Search Results for “slaves and horses”.

Summary: This is an excerpt of Andrew Gavin Marshall´s shocking essay. There is a paradoxe in the New World Order ideology: Officially it is working for the slogan of the French Revolution, its first big one, but in reality it it is a deeply racist movement considering itself to be the master race and the populations of the world to be inferior beings. Being Luciferians, the elitists consider themselves gods, entitled to shape mankind´s genes and minds according to their sick needs. They think the world ends up in chaos without their leadership - order out of chaos, as they say. But first they create chaos, since they own the world due to their incredible wealth. Their modern gurus are the brothers Aldous and Julian Huxley as well as Betrand Russell who introduced the idea of global scientific dictatorship by means of eugenics and by making mankind slaves through mass psychology. But more than that: they are making us love our slavery (welfare state, which they are now dismantling). Once completely established, their dictatorship will be impossible to abolish - for it is so interwoven and thought through, as an illuminist said already in 1781. It is funded by  Rockefeller Foundations, Ford, Carnegie, Mellon, Harriman, and Morgan. It really took in California in the 1920es - and Hitler imitated and further developed the ideas and the system in the Holocaust. After the war, eugenics had to split up into  population control, genetics, environmentalism - and mental hygiene. The UNESCO is deeply involved. The eugenecists are using tools like genetic manipulations, technology (chipping). Their aim is global mind control over a reduced humanity consisting of upgraded individuals - as in cattle breeding.     


The following is an extract of part 1 of an essay by Andrew Gavin Marshall. It is well documented – also by many references. The most bizarre aspect, perhaps, is that all the while the global elite and their bought minions are preaching the slogan of their first big revolution, The French Revolution, they are in fact working hard  to promote exactly the opposite: Servitude, inequality and extinction of the weak. They now call this their New World order (see videos on right margin of this blog). It all started with Mayer Amschel Rothschild of Frankfurt asking the “apostate” Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt, to make an organisation with which Mayer could rule the world by means of money. On May 1, 1776, this secret order for the New World was presented  to Rothschild. Weishaupt called the order the Illuminati, which after the Wilhelmsbad freemason conference in 1781 infiltrated freemasonry – surviving there and outside till this day. On that occasion, Comte de Virieu, a Mason, upon his return home said: "I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out, that it will be impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape it." This illuminati movement – today called illuminism by the EU (explanatory statement) has its roots in the “master race” concept of the Pharisaic Talmud, as Mayer Rothschild was a “pious” Talmud Jew.

Andrew Gavin Marshall, Global Research 5 July 2010
Award-winning author and researcher, Edwin Black, wrote an authoritative history of eugenics in his book, “War Against the Weak,” in which he explained that, “the incremental effort to transform eugenics into human genetics forged an entire worldwide infrastructure,” with the founding of the Institute for Human Genetics in Copenhagen in 1938, led by a Rockefeller Foundation eugenicistIt was financed with money from the Rockefeller Foundation. While not abandoning the eugenics goals, the new re-branded eugenics movement “claimed to be eradicating poverty and saving the environment.” 
The story of humanity has been the struggle between the free-thinking individual and structures of power controlled by elites that seekKissinger-order-chaos to dominate land, resources and people. The greatest threat to elites at any time – historically and presently – is an awakened, critically thinking and politically stimulated populace.
The tools and systems of social control are vast and evasive; they penetrate the very psychology and biology of the individual. The elite feel that they are entrusted – due to their supposed ‘innate’ superior intelligence and specialization – to control society and reshape it as they see fit, to actively mold and construct public opinion and ideas. They have a belief that people are essentially irrational emotional beings, and that they must be controlled by an elite or else the world would be in chaos. This is what underpins the ideas of ‘stability’ and ‘order’.

The Technological Revolution, especially the internet, has fostered an Information Revolution which has fed a global political awakening.
Simultaneously, the Technological Revolution has led to free humanity being faced with the dominating threat of a truly global elite, who have at their hands the technology to impose a truly global system of control: a global scientific dictatorship increasingly having the ability to control the very biology and psychology of the individual . 

Aldous huxleyIn 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote his “Brave New World,” in which he looked at the emergence of the scientific dictatorships of the future. In his 1958 essay, “Brave New World Revisited,” Huxley examined how far the world had come in that short period since his book was published, and where the world was heading. Huxley wrote that: In economics, the equivalent of a beautifully composed work of art is the smoothly running factory in which the workers are perfectly adjusted to the machines. Huxley explained that, The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”

In a 1962 speech at UC Berkeley, Huxley spoke primarily of the ‘Ultimate Revolution’ that focuses on ‘behavioural controls’ of people:  If you are going to control any population for any length of time, you must bring in an element of of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. We are in process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy – who have always existed and will presumably always exist to get people to love their servitude
I think there are going to be scientific dictatorships in many parts of the world. If you can get people to consent to the state of servitude – then you are likely to have a much more stable, a much more lasting society; much more easily controllable society than you would if you were relying wholly on clubs, and firing squads and concentration camps.

Bertrand-russellIn 1952, Bertrand Russell wrote the book, The Impact of Science on Society. Russell explained that: I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology.  Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio
What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion.  I see no reason why a scientific dictatorship’  should be unstable. After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history have had a large class of play an increasing part. slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.

Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished... Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. Russell later proclaimed in his book that, “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government and here (established 2009 according to EU Pres. van Rompuy).

In 1961, President Eisenhower
warned of the dangers to democracy posed by the military-industrial complex: the interconnected web of industry, the military, and politics creating the conditions for constant war. He also warned that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

Zbigniew-brzezinskiIn 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote about “the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society,” in the “technetronic revolution”; explaining: Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.

Many sciences and large social movements are directed by the same foundations and money that financed the eugenics movement in the early 20th century. The Rockefeller Foundations, Ford, Carnegie, Mellon, Harriman, and Morgan money that flowed into eugenics led directly to ‘scientific racism,’ and ultimately the Holocaust in World War II. Following the Holocaust, Hitler had discredited the eugenics movement he admired so much in America. So the movement branched off into forming several other social engineering projects: population control, genetics, and environmentalism, and here and here and here - as well as mental hygiene

Major environmental and conservation organizations were founded with Rockefeller and Ford Foundation money which then continued to be central sources of funding to this day; while the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was founded in 1961 by Sir Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley’s brother, who was also the President of the British Eugenics Society. Sir Julian Huxley also happened to be the first Director-General of the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). In 1946, Huxley wrote a paper titled, “UNESCO: It’s Purpose and its Philosophy.” In it, he wrote that the general focus of UNESCO is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for UNESCO_flagworld unification have become available….It is essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for, as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics. Thus low-grade mental defectives cannot be offered equality of educational opportunity, nor are the insane equal with the sane before the law or in respect of most freedoms. Many of these “genetic inequalities” revolve around the idea of intellectual superiority.” It just so happens that elites who propagate this ideology, also happen to view the masses as intellectually inferior; thus, there can be no social equality in a world with a technological intellectual elite.  Eugenics is about the social organization and control of humanity. Ultimately, eugenics is about the engineering of inequality. In genetics, elites found a way to take discrimination down to the DNA.

Rockefellerjohnbio3In a 2001 issue of Science Magazine, Garland Allen, a scientific historian, wrote about genetics as a modern form of eugenics. The term eugenics was coined in 1883 by the Victorian polymath Francis Galton, geographer, statistician, and first cousin of Charles Darwin. It meant to him "truly- or well-born," and referred to a plan to encourage the "best people" in society to have more children (positive eugenics) and to discourage or prevent the "worst elements" of society from having many, if any, children (negative eugenics). 

For the wealthy benefactors that supported eugenics, such as the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Harriman, and Kellogg philanthropies, eugenics provided a means of social control in a period of unprecedented upheaval and violence.

John D Rockefeller III founded the Population Council in 1952 – funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. It is rooted in the eugenics movement – and works for “reproductive health”, which means contraception. But the Rockefeller family has a long story of support for eugenics – funding Hitler´s Chief Eugenecist, Ernst Rüdin, extensively. Thus, in 1934 (February) a Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"

Free humanity faces the most monumental decision we have ever been presented with: do we feed and fuel the global political awakening into a true human psycho-social revolution of the mind, creating a new global political economy which empowers and liberates all of humanity; or… do we fall silently into a ‘brave new world’ of a global scientific oppression, the likes of which have never before been experienced, and whose dominance would never be more difficult to challenge and overcome?
We are not powerless before this great ideational beast. We have, at our very fingertips the ability to use technology to re-shape the world so that it benefits the peoples and not simply the powerful.

This is even more sinister. The ruling elite is about to steal our very souls, making us posthuman robots – by mean of devilish, weird technology and genetics.  Also see this shocking post and in particular its video. Avoid future vaccinations. 40  US billionaires incl. the depopulation champions Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Bill Gates and Ted Turner will now give half their fortunes away for for "charity". Rockefeller works through his  (De)Popuplaion CouncilBill Gates declares that he will use vaccines to reduce world population  - and is investing heavily in vaccines.

 The forces trying to change mankind according to its own Luciferian needs are hating mankind. In fact their number does not exceed 7.000 – but they are in control of nearly everything due to their incredible wealth: They have simply bought the world and made its inhabitants their slaves. Even more incredible that mankind puts up with it. But since the elite own the the media the masses have no idea about what is going on – nor where they are being pushed – towards the slaughterhouse. It even seems that Aldous Huxley was right: mankind has come to love its servitude – so far called the welfare state – which is now rapidly being taken away. But of course  people will put up with that, too. And if they don´t, it will be a bloody affair, first gendarmerie forces (Eurogendfor)– then military forces having the permission to shoot demonstraters – in the EU as a consequence of the Lisbon Treaty which was dictatorially passed in spite of its rejection by the populations.
All this being said, there is a problem with an explosive population increase in the LDCs – in particular the Muslim ones. And this problen is being actively increased by the elite encouraging the LDC birth surplus to lap into the developed countries to destroy them utterly. The paradoxical thing is that the European intelligence that developed the world is due to be extinguished in LDC populations demographically bound to take over and change the developed world into LDCs. Maybe because these uneducated people are easier to govern. The elite is also making our educational system mere junk. So, why do the elitist want good genes? The answer is: They don´t. The want racial hygiene. They want no genes but their own kind to survive – as shown in a subsequent post

Summary: The Danish foreign minister is working for the one-world government: He wants to use the EU's military globally - ie. against countries which oppose the New World Order dictatorship. He will make the EU the world's 3rd superpower, and is supported by the Italian Foreign Ministry, which will extend The Union for the Mediterranean to include not only Saudi Arabia - but also Iraq!  Italy's foreign ministry has a "global strategy", ie. the "Mediterranean Union" is to continue to expand in order to create their one-world state. The means is reputable media speaking for Islam from and in Europe, and extended cooperation in the "Mediterranean Union", including joint civil defense.
For cultural reasons, too, the development of the Euromediterranean Process, which in 2010 is to launch one of the world's largest free trade areas, has not been successful. But the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Fini, has the solution: Adapt European standards to North African standards!The appropriate denationalisation and dechristianization of Europe now has been going on for over 36 years. The aim is primarily to create sluggish slave souls who uncritically accept what the banking elite imposes on them.
This is being manipulated according to a slave owner's prescription: Feminists have educated  effeminate boys to female roles - and vice versa, so that men are becoming weak losers. Because many women despise the womanish males they have raised at home and through the educational institutions, they prefer to promote their racial mixing with aggressive, colored immigrant men, which Pres Sarkozy has declared a duty. Many Women seem to show exactly the loyalty to the New World Order Communist system that the slave owner described. The slave owner notes that different skin tones among slaves make it easier to create mistrust between skin tone groups, as well as between young and old, men and women, families, etc.- so that the sklaves only trust their master: Divide and conquer. Fortunately European politicians´ crusading for the "European Values", which are in reality the defense of Islam, encounters the rejection of the "aggressive" Muslims.  
My latest post was about the purpose of the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen: Completion of the dictatorial framework for a world government whose "Agenda 21" describes the physical environment to make us slaves. The following describes the mental framework which is a prerequisite for this bondage through the Euro-Mediterranean Project.
But first the EU's intentions with the dictatorial framework in which we become their New World Order slaves (see videos on the right margin of this blog).


Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Möller: The EU must be the 3rd superpower 
Denmark´s Radio 30. Oct. 2009 08.35 External: The EU must become a more successful foreign policy player, which can give the U.S. and China an equal fight. Foreign Minister Per Stig Møller states this in relation to an EU summit in Brussels.
- We have the largest market. We are the largest aid donor in the world. We have a huge amount of military, if we also used it. So we could have the opportunity to be one of the really big players in the world, he says.
The Foreign Minister is in no doubt that the EU should have a much larger global role, so that the union becomes a player that is respected around the world.
- Why do people talk about the G2 - the U.S. and China? Why not talk about the G3 - the United States, China and Europe? Nobody does, but they really ought to because we have the great gravity, thats we have. But we do not use it, "he says. 
According to the Foreign Minister, EU countries have, inter alia, been too bad to stand together and fight for Guide-to-lisbon-treaty3European Values.
At the Brussels summit, EU leaders paved the way for the Lisbon Treaty, which creates new opportunities in the foreign policy area. Among other things, the appointment of a new EU foreign minister who will have overall responsibility for the Union's foreign and security policy with several thousand people under him.
- Of course, foreign policy is still sovereign, but when the Lisbon Treaty comes through,  we can be much better to have Europe placed in global negotiations than we have been, goes Per Stig Möller´s wishful dream.

From the EU Commission booklet “Your Guide to the Lisbon Treaty”: People  are the pieces of a jig-saw puzzle to be put together by the elite of the New World Order. Know your status under the Lisbon Treaty!

The future under the Lisbon Treaty: genetical multiculturalism according to the guidelines of Coudenhove Kalergi, the spiritual father of the EU and founder of the European Movement: "The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals." 


The following may be a hoax, known since 1970, but with a few words of the 20. century. Nevertheless, it does show something essential, which the EU seems to be using. The William Lynch Letter 1712: Here is the most disgusting literature I ever read: A West Indian slave is said to have written an instruction “Let´smake a Slave”. He gives us his experiences; First of all break the males, flog them before the eyes of their women, who will then lose respect for the males and have to rely on themselves, being pliable to their masters in every respect – or they too, will be flogged or killed. He compares training slaves and horses:  Train the female horse whereby she will eat out of your hand, and she will in turn train the infant horse to eat out of your hand also. Such women will teach their daughters to be independent, contempting the males. And they will educate their sons to be meek, to take over female behaviour in order not to be flogged or killed. This pattern will repeat itself indefinitely, unless such dangerous things as a historical Guide-to-lisbon-treatymemory of past different ways of behaviour appears. Therefore, history must be eradicated from the minds of the slaves. And the slaves must learn a new language in order not to be reminded of the past and in order not to know too well, what their master says, since the slave could otherwise become dangerous, plotting against his masters plans.
But most important is to make different groups suspicious of each other: Young against old, women against males, darkskinned against light-skinned, families against families etc – so that the slave only trusts his master, who can then sleep quietly and increase his profits.
It is necessary to supply the negroes with good drops of white blood and then to let them interbreed. Different skin  tones make good slaves!  

Why do I write this? Because this is the way dictators rule their underlings: Divide and rule. The EU makes severe legislation like the EU Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophopbia against anything reminding of racism – even extends the term to religion. No wonder considering the above: The EU New World  dictatorship wants good slaves  and knows that different skin colours will create suspicion among the slaves as will different religions. Feminism has made perfect feminine male slaves, whom they hold in contempt, and very loyal female fellow travellers, who in many cases prefer to interbreed with aggressive immigrant men.  There has been systematic eradication of history in schools. A New language, English, worldwide  must be adopted to forget the national past. For these EU illuminists (explanatory statement) have declared that they want to tear the old societies totally down. I see this rationale behind the EU´s unlimited immigration of colured Muslims. In this sense, French President Sarkozy will even make “métissage”, genetical and cultural mixing, mandatory!!!

Union-for-mediterranienWith the failure of the Barcelona process of 1995, which has seen few tangible results fourteen years after its launch, a re-awakening of the partnership between Europe and the Mediterranean countries will require the re-thinking of relations on the part of the players involved. So emerged from today's second and final day of the congress organised on the island of Capri by Confindustria's Young Entrepreneurs, focussing on the Mediterranean and its pivotal role in the future of Europe and the Gulf.  (by Benedetta Guerrera) (ANSAmed) - CAPRI (NAPLES) 

The President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Gianfranco Fini, outlined to the congress his guidelines for new Euro-Mediterraean policies, stressing how vital it is that Europe grow out of its attitude of superiority. ''If Europe,'' he said, ''continues in its attitude of supremacy over the Muslim religion, it risks fomenting fundamentalism''. On the other hand, Fini also stressed the need for ''common standards'' to help regulate ''the actions of governments as well as commercial and financial exchange'' in the area. In the view of Fini, this is one of the roads to go down in order to build an authentic dialogue: ''I think the time has come to reaffirm Sarkozy's insight, focussing on coordinating European norms with those of the countries of the southern shores of the Mediterranean''.
The President of Confindustria, Emma Marcegaglia. The immigration problem ''is to be managed competently and with intelligence; work has to be done to make the migratory routes safe, but we also have to work towards a better integration of the migratory flows, based on a respect for the rules'', she said.  But the basic objective for businesses is that of creating a society which is open to multi-ethnic integration''. However, apart from the issue of integration between the Northern and the Southern Shores, when one speaks of the Mediterranean it is impossible to leave the concept of regional integration out of consideration.

The General Secretary of Italy's Foreign Ministry, Giampiero Massolo, invited listeners to have a broader concept of the Mediterranean, also embracing ''the Gulf states  (Franco Frattini, Italian foreign minister, former EU-Commissioner) and - one day - Iraq as well, for an inter-regional approach that would combine the Mediterranean, North Africa, and the Gulf''. But Italy's Foreign Office, he added, is also working towards ''a global approach, which was the reason behind our inviting Egypt to participate at l'Aquila; an inter-regional and lastly a regional approach in which the Mediterranean Union has to play a decisive role and to which the Foreign Ministry would make its contribution through the deployment of its diplomatic-consular network''. (ANSAmed)

Euromed.-civilforsvarProject to create a Euromed Civil Defence Network  
(by Chiara Spegni)  ANSAmed The programme has a 5 million euros funding from the European Commission for the 2009-2011 period, as part of its neighbourhood policy. ''The Euro-Mediterranean global village is already a reality, whether we like it or not'' Miozzo said.

(by Carlo Gambalonga) (ANSAmed) - ROME 31 Oct. 2009  - One of the landmarks established by the historic Barcelona Conference of 1995, which marked the creation of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, was the progressive liberalisation of trade towards the establishing, in 2010, of a large free-trade area which would number, in terms of its weight and size, among the world's largest. The Mediterranean is thus re-gaining its central position on the international scene, but only in terms of trade.
Everything else is noticeable by its absence. Almost fifteen years after the Barcelona accords, which ratified Europe's awakening interest in the Mediterranean, a strange paradox has arisen: never before has there been as much talk about Mediterranean partnership as during the past decade, but never have we seemed to notice - as we do now - the loneliness and isolation of the peoples on the other shore of the Mediterranean.We Guide-to-lisbon-treaty2 are in front of countries which are completely shut inside themselves and fearful and mistrustful of a world of media which is all too often in the hands of huge Anglo-American publishing behemoths .

Hi, girls. We know what you think – “anything else than a white man” (quotation by French Arreva President, Anne Lauvergeon,  Oct. 2009). So your self hatred will secure Coudenhove Kalergis and the EU illuminists´dream of their New World Order  slaves comes true. And you will get the position you deserve – within the framework of the Muslim Sharia. I hope you will find an elegant burka. 
But be careful. But not all blacks like white women and blue eyed babies – according to Nelson Mandela and his people as well as to America´s black Hitler, Khalid Abdul Muhammad (Gates of Vienna 5. Oct., 2009).

Trade, economic exchange, tourism, cultural and political relations themselves across the opposite sides of the Mediterranean need instead, as a pre-condition, a European-based media, which speaks with a creditable voice through established and recognised brands. And in order to promote this, Europe's institutions should rapidly summon the assistance of the South and the Mediterranean's best and most prestigious media voices and build opportunities for dialogue. Along with the construction of sea-ports, airports and roads, this area which is our neighbour only by merit of its position on the map, can be brought closer to us through a new approach to communicating with it.

As the writer Fatema Mernissi notes, only the right kind of communication can further our common hope that terrorism and neo-colonialism can be slowed by the advance of a humanistic Islam. And to support it we have to start exporting models of democratic news media, of the right to be critical, in a way that the other shore starts to dialogue with Italy and with Europe on the themes of social justice.

Comment: This is uncanny reading. The Danish foreign minister wants a big European Army in order to wage aggressive wars againt the blind fools who will not submit Per_Stig_Mller_171399dto the New World Order. What does this madman get in return for being a reborn viking to conquer the world on behalf of superrich bankers and at the cost – not of of his – but of fine young men´s lives? He will have the satisfaction of a missionary spreading “European Values” directed against the native Europeans in favour of coloured mass-immigrants with a foreign, non-integrable religion. He will be pleased to see the whites be mixed with coloured – for as “slave owner Lynch” tells – mixed races with diffrent tones make the better slaves. You see, just the “elite” is allowed to be racist, for this is “positive” racism, while racism of the underlings is “negative” in the sense that they want to remain whites – very much against Pres. Sarkozy´s widh..
Now come influential Italian politicians and a former EU Commissioner, Franco Frattini, and tell us that in their wisdom they have decided to expand the Union for the Mediterranean (which few Europeans have even heard of) to include Saudi Arabia and Iraq – and later on probably a tamed Iran as well. This implies free mobility of persons within the union in return for political and democratic progress. Morocco has achieved this status.
Fortunately, the Mediterranean process in spite of an enormous lot of money and mental hygienic endeavours, innumerable organisations and conferences to make people swallow the inedible mixture of Christian and Islamic cultures, has been in an impasse all along. For it is impossible to mix fire with water and have both to survive.

During the Muhammad crisis the former Anna Lindh Foundation Director, Traugott Schoefthaler, gave up: “Too often, dialogue events stressed collective identities (national, ethnic, religious) rather than identities of individuals or social groups. Dialogue fora composed of "representatives" of religious or ethnic groups are counter-productive and contribute to the clash of civilizations scenario rather than preventing it.It is always the same mechanism of drawing dividing lines between human beings through assuming and imposing collective identities rather than respecting the human rights principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Javier Pérez de Cuéllar and Amin Maalouf come to similar conclusions: Culturally sensitive lan-guage needs to avoid schematic concepts such as the popular distinction between "Us" and "Them". They even warn against further using the term of "The Other" which is standard in almost all intercultural education concepts, since it opens the gate for imposing collective identities on the individual

Anna-lindh-dialogue-night-draftCultural diversity between as well as within countries is as essential for humankind as biodi-versity is for nature.
  Deconstructing self-referential systems of belief (Italian crucifixes in schools) and knowledge is essential.” He also states: “Reference to "European values" is one of the most disastrous tools used in communication be-tween Europe and other regions.” So, maybe after all we should be thankful to the Danish foreign minister – in spite of his abominable attempts ti islamize the Danes through his  Danish Center for Culture and  Development!
After that, the dialogue could only go on between members of the “civil societies” – but they are mainly insufficient and expensive! Nevertheless, the sages will nerver learn. They just think the right media will do the trick and create the dialogue which the Koran forbids. But Mr. Fini knows the solution: Just adapt European norms (religion, culture etc) to the standards of North Africa! 

Web Analytics