In our search for a common enemy we came up with pollution, global warming, famine water shortages and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and interaction these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by every one together. However, these phenomena are only symptoms.
Our real enemy is humanity itself. (The First. Global Revolution, Club of Rome 1993)

The Telegraph Nov. 16, 2008: On Monday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), …. announced that last month was the hottest October on record.
This was startling. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month,
from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years. GISS’s computerised temperature maps seemed to show readings across a large part of Russia had been up to 10 degrees higher than normal

Global warming? October snow in London for the first time in 74 years

There are 4 institutes measuring global temperatures. UN´s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which last year along with Al Gore got the Nobel Peace Prize, count only one of them, viz. NASA´s GISS led by James Hansen - Al Gore’s chief climate adviser - and the man who started the whole climate ado in 1988. On the other hand, the 3 measuring institutes that use satellite method for monitoring global temperatures have been reporting decreasing temperatures since 1998 and Hansen’s GISS, on the other side, catastrophically rising temperatures. Why?

First, it appeared that more than half of James Hansen’s heat sensors were placed in the vicinity of artificial heat!

Now an article in by Christopher Booker The Telegraph amounts to taking the climate change for fraud. It has been yielding  leading globalists big income, and is being used by alarmist propaganda for claiming world-governance because “the climate problem” is being (made) so large that it obviously cannot be tackled by nation states in concerted action - but requires a world government!

So what explained the anomaly?
When expert readers of the two leading warming-sceptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit, began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing discovery.

The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all.
Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running

The error was so glaring that when it was reported on the two blogs - run by the US meteorologist Anthony Watts and Steve McIntyre, the Canadian computer analyst who won fame for his expert debunking of the notorious “hockey stick” graph - GISS began hastily revising its figures.

To compensate for the lowered temperatures in Russia, GISS claimed to have discovered a new “hotspot” in the Arctic - in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic sea-ice recovering so fast from its summer melt that three weeks ago it was 30 per cent more extensive than at the same time last year!!

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) relies on GISS to promote its case for global warming,  they are the most widely quoted, since they consistently show higher temperatures than the others.

Pachauri receives the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the IPCC - on totally false premises. The IPCC review a research report, often change the results!! and then submit it to the policy makers. Only after the latter have approved it it becomes official - but certainly not objective science!!!

EU-countries rebelling against  EU’s intention to reduce CO2-emission by 30% as compared to the 1990-level: Italiy, Poland, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria and Slovakia – threaten to veto EU-legislation  on just a 20% reduction.

What can I say? Readers of this blog will not be surprised : here, here, here. We know what the Green and the EU would say about us: Something like: “Climate hooligans with  antediluvian views !!”

The climate lies now exposed as a regular manipulation of a financially profitable business is an embarrassment - and can make life more cumbersome for the greedy New World Order forces, who have invented it.
But “worse” still is the political side of things: Climate lies are the most certain way of the globalists to intimidate people into a world federation and world government, because they claim that we can not survive these fictitious (climate) or by themselves triggered (financial) crises without a global government.

Look what José Barroso, currently President of the European Union, said in the EU Parliament on 18 November. 2008: “The summit in Washington has laid the foundations for a new (financial) world government.” In addition, he said, inter alia, that Europe puts much of its international credibility in the climate debate, where it is leading.”

The climate is the EU’s claim on its share of world government. But even if the lies are now exposed, they will continue to flourish - because the whole of globalization is through corrupt, hypocritical and greedy for power - and because CO2 charges / taxes are needed to finance the explosive immigration.

Just listen to this paid flunkey Eberhard Rhein Blogactiv (EU´s blog) Nov 20, 2008: “Humanity can rejoice. Finally, we have a real chance for seriously tackling global climate change.

The USA is about to make volte-face in energy and climate policy.

President-elect Obama has fully grasped the relevance for the USA and humanity that the USA has to cut its C02 emissions, for reasons of energy security and long-term threats to humanity. But he also sees climate change as an opportunity for creating millions of new jobs in renewable energies and energy efficiency.”

On Nov 21, 2008, José Barroso said to the Swedish Globalisation Council: “G20 leaders called for a new form of global governance.

Amid all this turmoil, we must not forget one of the most important challenges of the 21st century – the fight against climate change. Some are arguing that, given the very difficult economic situation, we can no longer afford our climate change and energy package.

They could not be more wrong. The consequences of ignoring the risks of climate change will be even greater than the consequences of ignoring risks from the financial sector.

The transformation of Europe into a low carbon economy is essential for future competitiveness. Recent falls in oil prices are only temporary and clearly reflect the downturn in the world economy. They are bound to rise again as soon as growth returns.

Without the climate change package, and as our own Strategic Energy Review clearly demonstrates, we will become more and more dependent on foreign energy. This would leave us vulnerable to energy shocks, with potentially disastrous effects for the economy.We recognise these concerns, and we have to agree on a clear methodology for identifying sectors and sub-sectors of energy-intensive industries at risk of carbon leakage and provide free allowances (to the smokestack industry!!).
The package will do a lot to increase Europe’s energy security.”

So,  are we coming to the core?  Do the Eurocrats know that  their  gaff about  climate change  is not tenable? Are they now speaking their  real motives: Jobs on a totally unnecessary CO2 Catch-and - Store industry, energy security, economy, profits on their ridiculous and ruinous ETS-trade,  increasing taxation, world governance?