LATEST: EUObserver 2 Nov. 2011 Meanwhile, in a development that has stoked fears of a potential military coup in the country, Papandreou on Tuesday also fired the entire high command of the armed forces along with some dozen other senior officers and replaced them with figures believed to be more supportive of the current political leadership. EU leaders are horrified at the Greek leader’s plans to put the rescue plan and its accompanying austerity measures before the people, fearing a No vote could sink the euro and plunge the European Union into political crisis. The army’s 71st airborne brigade. practiced “feuding parties control … conflict deterrence …[and] crowd evacuation”, according to the newswire, which quoted military sources.

Summary: In 2001, the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) was established. The Carr Center for Human Rights was co-founder, and Carr´s director-in-chief at the time was Samantha Power, who is married to Obama’s Regulator Czar, Cass Sunstein - and now is Obama’s adviser in his National Security Council. She exercised a decisive influence on Obama’s decision to bomb Libya. The ICISS founded the “Respnsibility to Protect”, named R2P. Other Carr members were / are the former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson, and the South African activist, Desmond Tutu.
Another founder of the ICISS was Gareth Evans, who was also president of the International Crisis Group, where George Soros is on the board, and the arch globalist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wants to isolate the Russian Federation (The Great Chessboard), is advisor.
“True sovereignty belongs to citizens who in turn delegate it to their government. If the government abuses the authority entrusted to it, and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote in  2004.
A nation-state thus has no  sovereignty any more -  only positive obligations that can be enforced by the United Nations. As with any globalist initiative that corrupt national leaders accept R2P is also undoubtedly heralding the beginning of a new and controversial era of “activism” by the United Nations. It will not be more righteous but is closer to bringing the world a one-world order.” 2005 the R2P was adopted as a UN policy.
The UN Secretary General in January 2009 published a report entitled “Implementing the Responsibility to Protect”. In a General Assembly debate in July 2009, UN member states overwhelmingly confirmed the commitment of the year 2005 and adopted a consensus resolution that took note of the report of the Secretary. In 2011, the Security Council called on the R2P in a series of resolutions: 1970 and 1973 on the situation in Libya, 1975 on the situation in the Ivory Coast, and 2014 about the situation in Yemen.
Behind the “Arab Spring”, the Serbian revolution movement, OTPOR, the Georgian war and “Occupy Wall Street” was / is Rothschild agent George Soros as a champion of Rothschild´s  central banks and the dollar as the world´s reserve currency.
According to the Soros Dossier p. 71, his “Open Society”´s world looks like this: If a nation wants to control its own natural resources, it is a closed society. When a nation develops its economy and work through tariffs and regulations  it is a closed society. Any nation that refuses globalization, is a closed society and falling prey to the attacks of Soros and his shadow government of national representatives.
This is exactly the purpose of the ‘Responsibility to Protect “, which is being used by the NATO military complex as a ram against states which oppose Rothschild´s central banking system and the dollar as world reserve currency. Such nations are called “rogue” states, although they are only ruled as dictatorially, as the NWO intends to rule the whole world. Libya had, just as Iran and North Korea, no Rothschild central bank - and as well as Saddam Hussein they want(ed) to settle oil trading in dollars.
The United Nations was founded to end wars, but is now expanding them. They do this because it is intended by those who founded it. The bait presented by The Rockefellers and Franklin D. Roosevelt to entrap the Nations: the beautiful words about the family of man and the preservation of peace under the leadership of the armed (dictatorial) one-world government in a world of disarmed nation states – as advocated by  John F. Kennedy. In this pattern the R2P fits well - of course under the false pretext of humanitarian missions. The hollowness of this claim is obvious through the many Libyans killed - also by NATO. Furthermore, by the fact that NATO and the CIA are working with “Al Qaeda”, the (wrongly) alleged cause of the “War on Terror”, in Libya - not to create democracy, but a new dictatorship of the Shariah.
Obama is, according to his chief of staff at the White House, “frustrated”  and does all he can to bypass Congress, which is about to confer on him alone - without the consent of Congress - dictatorial power to wage war. The R2P is for Obama to understand rather as the right to act. Now the armed rebels in Syria - seeing Libya as a model - invoke the protection of the international community. Obama, who is just a puppet, will no doubt follow  the war cry of the Bilderbergers for a big, bloody war in the Middle East.


Elitist Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary-General of the UN and former Chancellor of the UN University for Peace in Costa Rica:  “A hellish fate awaits all who resist political and spiritual globalization, ..those who criticize the UN are anti-evolutionary, blind, self-serving people. Their souls will be parked in a special corral of the universe for having been retarding forces, true aberrations in the evolution and ascent of humanity.” (False Dawn, Lee Penn, p. 133)

Human Rights Investigations Global research 28 Oct. 2011:  It is clear that the ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) doctrine has been hi-jacked by NATO and its supporters as a justification for its military campaigns and has lost its humanitarian content, becoming little more than a weapon in the propaganda war to draw ill-informed citizens into consent for military action.

Gaddaffi-brokenI have previously written about the 4 conditions under which the UN allows the “Right to Protect”. What is this concept actually? This article will try to illuminate it by means of i.a. Illuminati thoughts about it. For the concept is an NWO strategy to conquer the world  of the unwilling by means of coalitions of the willing Illuminati-led states – against their own praised “Human rights” and “international law”. R2P doctrine is referred to when the NWO wants to make its next step in the conquest of an unwilling people.

Gaddafi-misshandeltLeft above: Moammar Gaddafi – a broken man who shortly after this photo was illegally (contrary to UN Resolution 1970) was killed maltreated and killed (right – Yahoo News 20 Oct. 2011:  “Obama joined U.S. politicians and ordinary Americans in welcoming the demise of Gaddafi, who was for decades regarded as a nemesis of American presidents, and also claimed some of the credit for the Libyan strongman’s downfall.

Politico 28 Oct. 2011 Bill Daley, the White House chief of staff, twice in the course of an interview referred to the first three years of Barack Obama’s administration as “ungodly” and once as “brutal.”
“On the foreign policy-military side, you can act pretty quickly,” Daley says. “That is why the president, based upon frustration, is doing this ‘we can’t wait.’ He is going to every agency, every department, and saying, ‘What can you do on your own? What can we not have to wait for legislation to do?’ ”Congress? He don’t need no stinkin’ Congress! The White House is going to turn its back on it when it can.
In this situation Congress is transferring the right to declare war on the president alone - allowing him to attack any “rascal state”

NATO killed Gaddafi?
Debkafile’s (21 Oct. 2011) military sources report mounting indications that a NATO special forces unit – although of which nation is unknown – located and captured Muammar Qaddafi in the Sirte area. They apparently shot him in both legs to prevent his escape and informed a Misrata militia of his whereabouts, knowing they would kill him in view of the town’s long reckoning with the former Libyan ruler.
LankaNewspapers 24 oct. 2011:  Obama: “…we achieved our objectives, and our NATO mission will soon come to an end.” This   is therefore tantamount to his endorsement of Gaddafi`s violent end among other things. Even Obama`s political rivals have granted him the credit for killing Gaddafi. Associated Press quoted on Friday Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney as having said in answer to a question whether Obama deserved the credit for killing Gaddafi, `Yes, absolutely!

The Responsibility to Protect is simply a license to kill enemies of the NWO.


Right:UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon (2007–?) is a puppet, a tool in the hands of the NWO elite. His predecessor, Kofi Annan, accepted the warlike R2P in 2005 – making the UN a warlord, a conqueror, in stead of a keeper of peace.

tony blair.fjong Tony Blair to UN General Assembly 15 Sept. 2005: For the first time at this Summit we are agreed that states do not have the right to do what they will within their own borders, but that we, in the name of humanity, have a common duty to protect people where their own governments will not.
Brookings Institute’s “Libya’s Test of the New International Order,” February 2011: “It is a test that the international community has to pass. Failure would shake further the faith of the people’s region in the emerging international order and the primacy of international law“.
Pres. Richard Haas: US president Barack Obama may need to reconsider his assertion that there would not be any American boots on the ground (in Libya).

Chapter VII of the UN Charter, Article 42: “Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Here is a follow-up report by the UN secretary general: United Nations A/65/877–S/2011/393 General Assembly Security Council Distr.: General 28 June 2011 The role of regional and subregional arrangements in implementing the responsibility to protect:
R2P - The Responsibility to Protect populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing has emerged as an important global principle since the adoption of the UN World Summit Outcome Document in 2005. In recent years the international commmunity has accepted R2P both conceptually and in practice, including by invoking the principle in UN Security Council resolutions. Nato-bombs-civilians-in-libya

NATO has not felt Responsibility to Protect civilians in Libya

This international norm stipulates that: * The primary responsibility to protect populations from mass atrocities lies with the state itself. * When a state proves either unable or unwilling to protect peoples, that responsibility shifts to the international community. * This obligation must be exercised preventively; states can not delay action until mass crimes have already occurred. * The tools of action include diplomatic, legal, and other peaceful measures; coercive measures such as sanctions; and, as a last resort, military force.
These principles originated in a 2001 report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (see below)..

UN-logoThe UN Secretary-General released a report in January 2009 entitled Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. In a July 2009 General Assembly Debate, UN Member States overwhelmingly reaffirmed the 2005 Commitment and passed a consensus resolution taking note of the Secretary-General’s report. In 2011 the Security Council invoked the Responsibility to Protect in a number of Resolutions: 1970 and 1973 on the situation in Libya, 1975 on the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, and 2014 on the situation in Yemen.

The Daily Bell R2P (Responsibilty to protect) has been cleverly framed by the Anglo-American elite (which likely stands behind all such globalist measures) as a standard rather than a law. Various NGOs and numerous international agencies can help with the R2P framework. But the hammer – military intervention – can only be mandated by the United Nations Security Council and the General Assembly. In fact, when one examines what is evolving around the world it is clear that the powers-that-be are using the UN as a kind of globalist battering ram, knocking down the walls between nation-states and generating increasingly aggressive internationalist interferences.  A sovereign state was one that had control of its borders and provided a legal framework for its citizens.

With the advent of R2P, the nation-state has an affirmative obligation to provide safety to its citizens. This means that if it does not other states must, according to the R2P standard, interfere. A nation-state thus has no sovereignty anymore, only affirmative obligations that can be enforced by the United Nations. As with every globalist initiative that corrupt national leaders endorse, R2P, too, shall no doubt usher in a new and more controversial era of United Nations’ activism. It will not be a fairer one, or more just, but George-soros-2it will bring the globe closer to a one world order.

Behind the “Arab Spring”, the Serbian and Georgian wars stands/stood George Soros, the Rothschild agent as the champion of Rothschild´s central banks and the dollar as world reserve currency
His “Open Society” has this website. Acc. to the Soros Dossier p. 71: If a nation wishes to control its own natural resources, it’s a closed society. If a nation wants to develop its economy and power of labor through tariffs and regulations, it’s a closed society. Any nation that rejects globalization (i.e., British imperialism), is a closed society and subject to attacks from Soros and his shadow government of national agents. As will be seen, this is exactly the purpose of the Right to Protect doctrine, which is applied to bully countries denying to submit to Adam Weishaupt´s NWO and here and here – and in particular refuse to accept a (Rothschild) central bank – which Libya did not have until the NATO attack – but probably got immediately after. Besides, Gaddafi would give up the dollar in oil trading in favour of a gold dinar Other states that do not have a Rothschild National Bank are Iran (which even quitted to bargain oil in dollars), North Korea and Cuba. So, they are “rascal states”. Saddam Hussein´s sin was that he was giving up the dollar as reserve currency in oil trading.

Population-at-riskThe American Thinker 23 March 2011The Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect is funded by  George Soros’s Open Society Institute. Soros has ties to Samantha Power-Obama’s influential foreign policy adviser. She is married to Obama´s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, and had a decisive influence on Obama´s decision to bomb Libya.

Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect: (The map left is from its website). The United Nations Security Council must strongly condemn the unrelenting attacks by the Syrian government on its own people and call for an immediate cessation to the violence. Dr Simon Adams is Executive Director of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect in New York.: In preventing the United Nations from upholding its Responsibility to Protect, China and Russia have placed themselves on the wrong side of history. Their veto was a challenge to the UN notion of the international community’s “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P).

Klein Online 4 Oct. 2011:  As for Aaron Klein: see here In his address to the nation in April explaining the NATO campaign in Libya, Obama cited the doctrine as the main justification for U.S. and international airstrikes against Libya.


The Carr Center for Human Rights Policy has a seat on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded Responsibility to Protect. The commission is called the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. One of its founders was Gareth Evans, who was also the president of Soros´(on the board) International Crisis Group. The ICISS invented the term “responsibility to protect” and defined its guidelines. Samantha Power, the National Security Council special adviser to Obama on human rights, was Carr’s founding executive director and headed the Board members of the group including former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former Ireland President Mary Robinson and South African activist Desmond Tutu.

Soros himself outlined the fundamentals of Responsibility to Protect in a 2004 Foreign Policy magazine article entitled “The People’s Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World’s Most Vulnerable Populations.” In the article Soros said, “True sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their governments. If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote. “By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the international community can penetrate nation-states’ borders to protect the rights of citizens.
The International Crisis Group has been petitioning for the U.S. to normalize ties with the Muslim Brotherhood. The group includes on its board Egyptian opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei, as well as other personalities who champion dialogue with Hamas, a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The crisis group has petitioned for the Algerian government to cease “excessive” military activities against al-Qaida-linked groups and to allow organizations seeking to create an Islamic state to participate in the Algerian government.

As will be seen from the above, one person emerges again and again: George Soros, Rothschild´s stooge. There is no doubt whom the R2P really benefits, since it aims at the “rascals” who are rascals in the sense that they are dictators. But there are 2 kinds of them: the ones who accept the NWO, its central banks and the dollar as world reserve currency – and the others who do not. The latter are to be conquered. I.e. the states with nuclear weapons (like North Korea) can so far defy the Illuminati elitists – but how long? Russia (Communist Revolution, Freemasonry and here) and China (in the Trilateral Commission)  are also involved in the NWO endgame - but as antitheses to the Western thesis.

The United Nations, created to end wars, now prolongs and enlarges them. It does so because it has to in the spirit of those who created it.The Rockefellers and Franklin D. Roosevelt did mean the bait with which they caught the Nations: The fine words about the family of man keeping peace under the guidance of the armed (dictatorial) one world government in a world of disarmed nation states as proposed by John F. Kennedy. And there has been long negotiations to achieve this disarmament, so that the corporate fascist NWO government can protect the interests of the Illuminati elite against rebellious rascals. However, they did not tell about their measures to bully and destroy those rascals who will not cooperate.
Now Pres. Obama will make a study of how to avoid mass atrocities through i.a. new “humanitarian wars” after probably thousands of civilians were killed in Libya – some of them by NATO. And the armed Syrian rebels are giving Obama an excuse to intervene, as they are calling for international protection. But the goal is the creation of a worldwide empire, that of the Illuminati´s corporate one world – the immortal idea of the power elite at all times  – and they just want to govern 500 mio slaves acc. to their Georgia Guidestones. So  what will they do about the remaining 6.5 billion of today´s 7  billion people?