Summary: There is increasing clarity that the attack on Libya by some Western countries has no connection with the asserted humanitarian grounds for it, since many other African and other countries (eg. Sudan) have for years with impunity been committing genocide against their own populations - as the Bulgarian Prime Minister rightly points out. Also, U.S. Congressman Ed Markey says straight out that the U.S. war effort in Libya is due to oil - and Senator Dick Lugar declares: “We really have not found out who it is we are trying to support in Libya.” By extension, the U.S. war participation is illegal because only Congress can decide on war - and it was not asked! Instead of humanitarian goals, it all seems to be about Soros´ policy of opening up closed societies for their groups’ free looting of Libya’s oil reserves.
Tony Cartalucci is in no doubt that corporate owners are behind, and he writes that the third World War II has begun with the NWO taking over countries one by one - and that even Russia and China are helpless in this process. It is expressed clearly by the Council on Foreign Relations’ organ, The Foreign Affairs, on 21 March 2011: “Gaddafi must be ousted. There is another reason why selective containment is unwise: it would severely constrain the international community’s future options. The international community would need to help establish a Libyan version of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that brought political opponents in South Africa to some kind of understanding. Meanwhile, the international community would also have to steer the development of democracy and good governance.  Indeed, the threats that the LNC is already issuing should give the international community doubts about its readiness to lead in democratic government. Libya’s survival as a unified country will depend ….. on the careful planning of outside powers.” It cannot be expressed more clearly.

Libya is a tribal society. As “Die Zeit” writes Gaddafi is not killing his own people, the Gaddafi tribe,which he is now arming. He kills the rebellios tribes - which he should never have subdued. The rebels are made up of so-called Al-Qaida fighters and Islamists whom the British intelligence, the MI6, has protected, supported and paid for since 1996 - and the MI6 even prevented Osama bin Laden from being extradited for prosecution. The CIA trained the opposition party, the LNSF, since 1984. Western countries will not be able to contain them when Gaddafi is gone. They are armed with heavy artillery and tanks, rockets. In a haste, they were renamed “civil society”, the  paid  professional riot-mongers from outside, who are now setting North Africa and the Middle East ablaze.

UN Resolution 1973 provides only the right to enforce a no-fly zone and protect the civilian population - not to oust Gaddafi – which Obama and Cameron demand. Behind it all lies a UN General Assembly Recommendation on Responsibility to Protect (RtoP), where Tony Blair forced through to punish dictators or to intervene in failed states, who did not protect their people. This is inconsistent with the UN Charter, which states that “nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially covered by a State’s internal jurisdiction. States´ internal abuses - including the slaughter of civilians - cannot automatically be considered as “international” threats under the Charter. RtoP document excludes, for example, intervention in case of civil unrest and coups. NATO now seems bound to take command of the operation

Additionally, the war effort is directly lethal for us, as Americans are using depleted uranium  against hard targets. As micro particles it is whirled up into the higher strata of air and from there spread by the winds throughout Europe and Asia. Moreover, radioaktive winds from Japan have now first reached Sweden (DR Videotext 24. March). We know from Iraq that depleted uranium leads to many birth defects and cancers. One must consider the Illuminati’s stated wish to reduce world population drastically. Now Russia is warng NATO that it may face a full-scale war.


EUbusiness 21 March 2011Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov: “The military intervention in Libya is an “adventure” driven by petroleum interests. Petrol and who will exploit Libya’s oil fields are to a great extent the interests behind this operation. There are many African countries where hundreds of thousands were killed, where unrest is ongoing. But there are no operations conducted there”.
Professor Michel Chussodowsky, Global Research on Russia Today: “This is violation of international law, not a humanitarian war: The trophy is oil and gas.” Congressman Ed Markey: “We are in Libya because of oil” 20 March 2011. Many of the weapons used, especially those used against tanks (are mostly made up of Depleted Uranium.
All weapons that contain Depleted Uranium weapons are recognized as radioactive poison gas weapons
and thus violate the Geneva Convention under the 1925 Geneva Poison Gas Protocol. These weapons are described as a “highly mobile indiscriminate killer and permanent terrain contaminant,” witg a half life of 4.5 billion years and thus remain in the environment for ever. Right: How the winds circulate the depleted uranium desert sand. This comes in addition to what may come from the Fukushima meltdown. Many birth defects and accumulation of cancer diseases in Iraq were seen after  depleted uranium bombs.

A clique of bellicose countries have started bombarding Libya in Order to maintain a UN adopted No-fly zone. Acc. to James Lindsay, vicepresident of the Council on Foreign Relations 25 March 2011, “the mission was poorly conceived, because a no-fly zone was never sufficient to protect civilians. The administration has not said what we will do if we actually get a ceasefire.”  The noble – but no doubt mendacious – pretext is to protect civilians. Just odd, that this only happens now and not in all other African countries committing genocide for many years – and not after the Lockerbie bombing ordered by Gaddafi in 1988.

Russia’s NATO-ambassadør, Dmitry Rogzin, warned the alliance that it could be dragged into a full-scale war. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has taken a hard stance on the coalition mission in Libya, comparing the UN resolution to “medieval calls for crusades.”

Could it be that the Soros´ globalist commandment of opening all closed countries for free looting by their international corporations – as in Iraq – was the real reason?
In Denmark a united Parliament adopted the burning desire of the pime minister to go out and bomb Libyans. It was a real demonstration of the New World Order and its World government having done the Danish nation state in: Leading politicians never spoke about Denmark wanting to go to war (and why should we?). They kept talking about “the international community”, which they are sick to please, not least our Trilateral Comminissionist, Rockefeller/Brzezinskis “Danish” Foreign Minister, Lene Espersen. How much do they get in return?

Libya: the West and al-Qaeda on the same side
Who are these brave and noble rebels who are armed to their teeth with tanks and rockets? They are the freedom loving brandnew civil society recognizing the LNSF, which is probably funded by the CIA who has trained the LNSF (Libyan National Salvation Front – the Libyan opposition party), see under 1984.
The Telegraph 18 March 2011: Statements of support for Libya’s revolution by al-Qaeda and leading Islamists have led to fears that military action by the West might be playing into the hands of its ideological enemies (or rather partners). Supporters of Islamist causes among the opposition to Col. Gaddafi’s regime have been identified.
The Muslim Brotherhood-linked theologian issued a fatwa authorising Col Gaddafi’s military entourage to assassinate him. But they also agree that liberals, nationalists, those with personal experience of regime brutality and Islamists who subscribe to democratic principles have leading roles in the revolution .

The Guardian 10 Nov 2002: British intelligence paid large sums of money to an al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a doomed attempt to assassinate Colonel Gadaffi in 1996 and thwarted early attempts to bring Osama bin Laden to justice.

The Daily Mail 20 March 2011: A sombre David Cameron spoke on his return from a Paris war summit with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. It is legal because we have the backing of  the UN Security Council (Resolution 1973 of 17 March 2011) and also of the Arab League and many others. And it is right because I believe that we should not stand aside while this dictator murders his own people.  See Mr. Cameron on video.

President Sarkozy s, Hillary Clinton, President Obama agree ‘This will likely be a multi-phased military operation,” a Pentagon Spokesman said. ’Countries including Canada, Denmark, Spain and Norway were sending planes while Italy said it would permit the use of air bases such as Sigonella in Sicily and Aviano in the north to launch sorties
The official communique released after the summit was signed by a number of Arab nations. Italy said it would permit the use of air bases such as Sigonella in Sicily.

The Folly of Protection
Foreign Affairs (CFR) 20 March 2011: Resolution 1973 authorized UN member states to take all necessary measures   to protect civilians and civilian populated areas” in Libya by establishing a no-fly zone and enforcing an arms embargo. The resolution gave teeth to the much-heralded “responsibility to protect” (RtoP)– which, according to the 2005 UN World Summit Outcome, is the responsibility of the international community to “help protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.”
Western nations secured the Resolution 1973  with ten votes in favor, no vetoes, and five abstentions from Brazil, China, Germany, India, and Russia.

The true complexity of the UN action against Qaddafi’s regime can be understood only by investigating the UN Charter, which specifies that “nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.” The RtoP document precluded, for example, intervention in cases of civil disorder and coups. There is a tension between RtoP — in itself only a General Assembly recommendation — and the UN Charter itself. The Libyan resolution does not authorize the ouster of Qaddafi .

When foreigners liberators invade a country they often fall into one or more of three traps1. the replacing leadership cannot rule because it has not the necessary support, and, as in Iraq, civil strife follows the liberating invasion. 2. The country becomes a client state rather than a free nation. 3. The leadership learns that it can only govern as the previous dictator didby force.
Legitimate armed interventions must cost fewer lives than they save – and be likely to be successful.  The current intervention in Libya strains against the letter of the UN Charter law on intervention.

None the less, British Defence Secretary, Liam Fox declared: “Colonel Gaddafi himself could be targeted by air strikes if there is no risk to civilians,” the Defence Secretary said yesterday. But  The Independent 21 March 2011: Ministers today appeared to be at odds with senior military commanders over whether coalition forces in action over Libya can legitimately target Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, Video. By the way, only the US Congress can start a war – and it was not asked. So, the US participation is unconstitutional. The Arab League criticizes the extent of the allied bombardments.

Tony Cartalucci Prison Planet 19 March 2011: Nations like Russia and China, whose interests are being directly threatened and stripped away in this malicious melee, appear powerless and unpreparedThe globalists are infiltrating, corrupting, and turning the entire planet, taking over one nation at a time in a combined scientific-geopolitical NWO  dictatorship that will be effectively impossible to reverse once it is completed. Some nations succumb in silence behind the scenes, others are invaded, mercilessly brutalized, and assimilated into the globalist combine

The civil society and here overlay the globalists use to establish what amounts to a subversive shadow government is always creeping forward no matter how hard a target nation may try to ward it off. The corporate-financier oligarchs and their ever growing collection of globalist stooges and vassal states worldwide are fighting against the rest of free humanity for the purpose of one world government. They have created a perfect strategy of tension, where we wrestle with one battle after another, work to head-off one war after another all while their agenda moves ever forward.
The very fake “War on Terror” is another example. We lose sight within this puppet theater of the men pulling the strings above. We become blinded and cannot understand the necessity of climbing up above the stage and throttling the puppet masters themselves.

The Libyan rebels have heavy weapons and training in using them at their disposal. They are not just peaceful, idealistic civil society academics. Right they have downed a Libyan MIG fighter. Below rebel in tank and rebel missil launcher. See the Daily Mail 15 March 2011.

The source of torment is the same: the unwarranted power wielded by myopically obsessed megalomaniac corporative finance oligarchs, leveraging and squandering that power to enrich themselves at the cost of the rest of humanity.  The answer is to undermine this unwarranted power by no longer paying into their system through a full-spectrum boycott and find local solutions. World War III has already begun and is consuming the world one nation at a time.

Naming Names: Corporate-Financier Oligarchs to Boycott & Replace:  CFR Corporate Membership –  Chatham House Major Corporate Membership–  Chatham House Standard Corporate Membership – International Crisis Group Supporters – Supporters.

Within EU and NATO divides were seen. However on 24 March tough disagreements between France and Turkey seem to end with NATO taking the leadership of the operation. Unless ground troops are used, this war cannot be won by the bellicose servants of the oil hungry illuminati demanding “open societies” – meaning free access for their multinationals to steal Libya´s oil. Their humanity can be disregarded, when one sees their killing machines at play in Libya.

To justify this intervention, they have hastily established a civil society, which recognizes the CIA-supported opposition party, the LNSF.

Die Zeit 21. März 2011: “We want freedom” can mean anything. Gaddafi does not kill his own people. No, he even arms his people, his tribe, to make war on the rebellious tribes. Who is your leader? “Allah !!!”, cry the insurgents, who want to suppress the Gaddafi tribe. After all, U.S. Senator Dick Lugar said on the CBS: “We really have not found out who it is we are trying to support in Libya”.

Here is an amazingly honest article by the organ of the NWO´s (the “international community´s”) Council on Foreign Relations: Foreign Affairs 21 March 2011 (factual US government),  on the true intention of the NWO attack on Libya: Gaddafi must be ousted. Otherwise it would severely constrain the international community’s future options. The international community would have to steer the development of democracy and good governance.  Indeed, the threats that the LNC is already issuing should give the international community doubts about its readiness to lead in democratic government. Libya’s survival as a unified country will depend ….. on the careful planning by outside powers.
I think the NWO´s plan to take over Libya and oust Gaddafi in breach of Resolution 1973 for that purpose cannot be expressed more clearly.

Finally I cannot help thinking of the depopulationistic wing of the illuminati. Are they spreading depleted uranium to kill as many of the world´s population as possible – and here and here?