Summary: “Climate Science” lies become more and more incredible, like Baron von Münchhausen´s mendacious tales. Now, the globalist Carnegie Institution claims Genghis Khan (1162-1227) to have killed 40 million people, that their fields then grew into forest, and that the many new trees engulfed so much CO2 that atmospheric CO2 dropped, and a global cooling ensued: This is the way forward, says the leading researcher of the study. We must learn from history! Only, while a minor cold spell did follow after Genghis, firstly it was less deep than the cold period from the birth of Christ until Genghis Khan’s time and, secondly, far less profound than the little ice age starting about 1500 AD, when the population was up again - and the new forests cleared. At a time when there were far fewer people than in the Medieval ages - before Christ - it was 2.5 degrees C warmer than now - and many more forests than after Genghis Khan. Antarctic ice core and plant stomata investigations show that there was no atmospheric CO2 decrease from the time of Genghis´birth and the next 400 years!
The Black Death killed twice as many as Genghis Khan is alleged to have on his lacking conscience. Carnegie´s postulate is pure fiction.
What Dr. Pongratz no doubt is making propaganda for is the “necessity” of implementing the Agenda 21
, huddling mankind together in cities – leaving, say 90% of the world uninhabited without access for people. But besides, the Illuminists have a well-known depopulation philosophy.

The Daily Mail brought an article by former longtime BBC journalist Peter Sissons. He  tells how the BBC uncritically swallowed all the incorrect IPCC reports and did not want to hear the opinions of climate sceptics about them, even cut climate skeptics airtime altogether. As Sissons suggested to hear climate skeptics he was considered insane. BBC managers celebrated Al Gore as the world´s savior in luxurious style. Even as an English High Court identified at least 9 scientific errors in Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” and thereby changed it into an inconvenient lie, not allowed to be screened in English schools without corrections, the climate lies were not subjected to critical journalistic scrutiny.  Completely uncritically the opinion of the Soros / Al Gore bribed climate fraudster, James Hansen, was aired that Obama only had 4 years to save the world from climate disaster.
Sissons interviewed the leader of Britain’s Green Party, Caroline Lucas, who was so offended by Sissons asking how it could be that the winter was very cold, even though atmospheric CO2 sped up, that she sent him a package with stools wrapped in toilet paper!

Now, in order to counter the elite’s imaginary CO2 warming that even Climategate-swindler, Prof. Phil Jones, admits has not occurred since 1995, warmists are working in earnest to transform our diets. Mealworms, grasshoppers and similar insects emit per unit of weight only 1 / 100 of the imaginary dangerous CO2 emitted by pigs and cattle. So our future foods could be redirected to these insect delicacies.
Indeed, it’s a dangerous time we live in because of ideologues who are so sick in their heads as ever. Unfortunately, they have power because they are intelligent and have brainwashed us into a coma-like indifference.

The Daily Mail 10 Febr. 2011: HRH Prince Charles in the EU Parliament: “This (sustainability) process has not exactly been helped by the corrosive effect on public opinion of those climate change sceptics who deny the vast body of scientific evidence that shows beyond any reasonable doubt that global warming has been exacerbated by human industrialised activity.” Charles´ own lifestyle creates a carbon footprint which is 100 times that of any other person in the UK. Here follow HRH´s vast body of scientific evidence – and on this basis Pres. Barroso will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 95% by the year 2050 – but deplores that “fighting climate change” has fallen down the agenda due to weak national budgets and unemployment!
Left: Genghis Khan the Destroyer (1162–1227) and his green hordes (right)Djenghis-Khans-horder
“Research” by the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology.
The Daily Mail 25 Nov. 2011: The Mongol leader, who established the world’s largest contiguous empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, according to new research.
The deaths of 40million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
And, although his methods may be difficult for environmentalists to stomach, ecologists believe it may be the first ever case of successful manmade global cooling.
The Carnegie study measured the carbon impact of a number of historical events that involved a large number of deaths.
Time periods also looked at included the Black Death in Europe, the fall of China’s Ming Dynasty and the conquest of the Americas?? All of these events share a widespread return of forests after a period of massive depopulation.
But the bloody Mongol invasion, which lasted a century and a half and led to an empire that spanned 22 per cent of the Earth’s surface, immediately stood out for its longevity.
We found that during the short events such as the Black Death and the Ming Dynasty collapse, the forest re-growth wasn’t enough to overcome the emissions fromFig2-20 decaying material in the soil,’ explained Dr. Julia Pongratz.
Though the Khan will remain known as Genghis the Destroyer and not Genghis the Green, Dr Pongratz hopes that based on the knowledge we have gained from the past, we are now in a position to make land-use decisions that will diminish our impact on climate and the carbon cycle,’ she said. We cannot ignore the knowledge we have gained.’
IPCC-1990-7c first report
Left: IPCC´s global temperatures in its 1. Assessment Report 1990.
Right (p.134): Corrected IPCC global temp.  in its 3. Assessment Report – leaving out the medieval warm period – due to Briffa´s forged science on 12 Jamal tree rings.
The graph below right shows that at a time from the beginning of our era until the time og Genghis Khan, it was considerably cooler than at the time of and after Genghis Khan. By the way: In spite of “global warming” the  arctic ice seems to have thickened from Jan. 2009 to Jan 2011 by 70 trillion cubic feet over the past 2 years

Infowars 18 Jan 2011NASA´s James Hansen thinks America needs to adapt Chinese authoritarianism in order to force climate change down the throats of the American people.“ China has the capacity to implement policy decisions rapidly. The leaders seem to seek the best technical information and do not brand as a hoax that which is inconvenient.”
James Hansen is bribed by Al Gore and Rothschils agent George Soros. His master Maurice Strong, who promoted Hansen and Rothschild´s anthropogenic  CO2–lie, lives in China on the run from a theft of 1 mio dollars from the UN and is advisor to the Communist Chinese government.

The media made this frenzy possible.
The Daily Mail 25 Jan. 2011 by former BBC journalist, Peter Sissons: The BBC became a propaganda machine for climate change zealots, says Peter Sissons… and I was treated as a lunatic for daring to dissent

For me, though, the most worrying aspect of political correctness was over the story that recurred with increasing frequency during my last ten years at the BBC — global warming (or ‘climate change’, as it became known when temperatures appeared to level off or fall slightly after 1998).
The over-simplified two-minute reports, without exception, accepted the UN’s assurance that ‘the science is settled’ and that human emissions of carbon dioxide threatened the world with catastrophic climate change.

Peter-sisson Environmental pressure groups could be guaranteed that their press releases, usually beginning with the words ‘scientists say?.?.?.?’ would get on air unchallenged.
On one occasion, an MP used BBC airtime to link climate change ­doubters with perverts and holocaust deniers, and his famous interviewer didn’t bat an eyelid.
On one occasion, after the inauguration of Barack Obama as president in 2009, the science correspondent of Newsnight actually informed viewers ‘scientists calculate that he has just four years to save the world’. What she didn’t tell viewers was that only one alarmist scientist, NASA’s James Hansen, had said that.

The BBC’s editorial policy on ­climate change, however, was spelled out in a report by the BBC Trust — whose job is to oversee the workings of the BBC in the interests of the public — in 2007.Caroline-lucas This disclosed that the BBC had held ‘a high-level seminar with some of the best scientific experts and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus’. The error here, of course, was that  ‘appropriate space’ given to minority views on climate change was practically zero.

I was on duty on News 24 and it had been arranged for me to ­interview the leader of the Green Party, Caroline Lucas (right) – green or brown?). She clearly expected, as do most environmental activists, what I call a ‘free hit’ — to be allowed to say her piece without challenge.
I began, good naturedly, by observing that the climate didn’t seem to be playing ball at the moment, and that we were having a particularly cold winter while carbon
emissions were powering ahead.

Miss Lucas reacted as if I’d ­physically molested her. She was outraged. It was no job of the BBC — the BBC! — to ask questions like that. Didn’t I realise that there could be no argument over the science? Lucas finished with a veiled warning. A week after this interview, I went into work and picked up my mail from my pigeon hole. Among the envelopes was a small Jiffy Bag, which I opened. It contained a substantial amount of faeces wrapped in several sheets of toilet paper.

Meanwhile, Al Gore, the former U.S. Vice-President and climate change campaigner, entertained the BBC’s editorial elite in his suite at the Dorchester and was given a free run to make his case to an admiring internal audience at Television Centre.
His views were never subjected to journalistic scrutiny, even when a British High Court judge ruled that his film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, ­contained at least nine scientific errors, and that ministers must send new guidance to teachers before it was screened in schools. From the BBC’s standpoint, the judgment was the real Brisbane-floods-2011inconvenience, and its ­environment correspondents downplayed its significance.

At the end of November 2007 I was on duty on News 24 when the UN panel on climate change produced a report which later turned out to contain ­significant inaccuracies, many stemming from its reliance on non-peer reviewed sources and best-guesses by environmental activists.
But the way the BBC’s reporter treated the story was as if it was beyond a vestige of doubt, the last word on the catastrophe awaiting mankind. Back in the studio I suggested that we line up one or two sceptics to react to the report, but received a totally negative response, as if I was some kind of lunatic.

Watts Up With That 14 Jan 2011: Historically seen, inundations as seen in Australia are not unusual. They are due to La Nina.

Natural News 16 Jan. 2011: Researchers from Wageningen University in the Netherlands say that insects produce far less greenhouse gases than cattle and pigs do, and would thus be a viable alternative to eating meat. Published in the journal PLoS ONE, the study found that pigs, for instance, produce up to one hundred times more greenhouse gases than the equivalent weight of mealworms.
AntsResearchers compared the greenhouse gas emissions of mealworms, crickets, locusts and pigs. Particularly with methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).

Left: Karl Friedrich Hieronymus Baron von Münchhausen (flourished between 1720 and 1797) told enormously unlikely lies, one bigger than the other – just like the global warmists. Right: How would you like your Chicken McBuggets served up today?

Climatism is an ideological means of brainwashing people. Of course, the climate has been warmimg and cooling all through  the history of the Earth. On “Der Honigmann Sagt” blog, I found this example of how NASA can postulate a warming of 0.8 degree C of the Arctic sea per decade 1979 – 1997 – by extrapolations from a few land-based weather stations – disregarding the measurements by buoys placed in the sea itself. The latter only showed a Baronmuenchhausen-hansalberstemperature rise of 0.3 degrees annually – an none at all in 68% of the sea!  The mentioned small rise in temperature has nothing to do with global CO2–warming – but with the cyclical Pacific Decadal Oscillations and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillations (PDO und AMO).

The postulate by the Carnegie Institution that the Black death was too shortlived to cause the same cooling effect as the massacres of Genghis Khan is simply not true – but an example of NWO pseudo-science. Wikipedia: “The Black Death was one of the most devastating pandemics in human history, peaking in Europe between 1348 and 1350 (plague). It is thought to have started in China and  is estimated to have killed 30% – 60% of Europe’s population, reducing the world’s population from an estimated 450 million to between 350 and 375 million in 1400. It took 150 years for Europe’s population to recover.”

“We must learn from history!” says dr. Pongratz. Only, while a minor cold spell did follow after Genghis, firstly it was less deep than the cold period from the birth of Christ until Genghis Khan’s time (1162-1227) - and, secondly, far less profound than the little ice age starting about 1500 AD when the population was up again - and the new forests cleared. At a time when there were far fewer people than in the Medieval ages - before Christ - it was 2.5 degrees C warmer than now - and many more forests than after Genghis Khan’s time. The Black Death killed twice as many as Genghis Khan is alleged to have on his lacking conscience. Carnegie´s postulate is pure fiction.
Co2-1000-1500What Dr. Pongratz no doubt is making propaganda for is the “necessity” of implementing the Agenda 21, huddling mankind together in cities – leaving, say 90% of
the world uninhabited without access for people.

CO2-1000-2000Right:  Investigations by stomata/preserved plant remnants (right) of atmospheric CO2 correlate very well with Antarctic ice core finds (left), each vertical line here being the turn of a century – beginning with 1000 AD – and this graph published by Reuters. There is no significant decrease in atmospheric CO2 until about 1550 AD – well after the beginning of the “little ice age. Then atmospheric CO2 begins to rise after the end of the “little ice age” about 1860 (oceanic absorption/release). The Carnegie Institutions postulate about the green Genghis Khan is another Baron Münchhausen fairytale.

Here is a  BBC video on lying propaganda on anthropogenic global warming.
Former Minnesotan Governor, Jesse Ventura, thinks weather is being manipulated by the military HAARP as a weapon (Video). And something indicates he is right.
On the other hand, some scientists who think we are moving into am era og global cooling – which was predicted by John Holdren, Obama´s climate czar, back in the 1970es.
When I see the sky crisscroosed with chemtrails imposed upon us by the EU, The UN and various governments and coordinated by the Royal Society of London here in the middle of winter I know that they are not there to fight global warming. Rather, I think they are trying to create a new ice age – or to poison us as part of their depopulation programme and here and here and here. Here is a  video by Alex Jones, who accounts for the real aims of the ecologists: Massive population reduction: even down to just 300 mio. on the planet(Ted Turner). Their hatred of mankind is tremendous. I have previously written how the illuminists are enriching themselves and grasping global power through their climate exchanges, redistributing our wealth to LDC countries who will never produce wealth because they don´t work. I have written about the CO2–fraud on the side of the IPCC, and here, the East Anglia CRU, and here, The British Met Office, the EU.