Video-joke: Climategate and Himalaya glaciers: Hitler´s last lies

Summary: The UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen was not a "failure", as widely agreed upon: a world government redistribution of wealth from enterprising to the absolutely not enterprising countries, a tenet of the communist New World Order - although nobody knows where the money is to come from. My bid: from us taxpayers. Now China and India will join the Copenhagen accord. After the scandals with IPCC supplier Keith Briffas tree rings from only 12 trees in Siberia, where the annual ring-thicknesses were alleged to be proxies for global temperature, even though his own figures showed that they were not, his theory collapsed completely, as it was revealed that Briffa had omitted the results from 34 neighboring trees  showing completely opposite trends. Thereby, Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph of correlation between CO2 rise and global warming, the basis for the Copenhagen summit, hopelessly fell to the ground, as well. Then followed the Climategate scandal, which includes the Head of the CRU, one of the UN IPCC's main suppliers of climate doomsday prophecies, stating in an e-mail that he was doing tricks with the figures to hide the real temperature decline. Now the IPCC was groggy. Wherupon came perhaps the worst uppercut: The IPCC got the Nobel Peace Prize together with large-scale liar Al Gore ( "An Inconvenient Truth") for its alarmist 2007 Report. That report published besides rigged temperatures that  Himalayan glaciers would have melted away by 2035. India protested, but  IPCC chief, corrupt Pachauri, haughtily called the critics "voodoo" science. Now  Pachauri had to apologize for the lie: It was based on an 8 year old claim in the popular science magazine, The New Scientist, which had its information from an unknown Indian scientist, who has acknowledged that the allegation was merely his presumption — that there was no research behind it. Moreover, it turns out that the IPCC's 2007 report stating relationship between global warming and natural disasters was called off as false by its authors - without the IPCC telling that. Furthermore,  Pachauris company, the TERI was granted money in the million pound class from European taxpayers on this account and Teris Europe Division has been revealed as a tax fraudster. Furthermore, it has long been known that NASA GISS' boss, James Hansen, by his former course leader at NASA called "an activist and an embarrassment", has in several cases manipulated the temperatures he sent to the IPCC. Hansen has praised a book that advocates the abolition of industrialization by closing all CO2-yielding machines, blowing up dams, razing all cities, reducing humanity and abolishing all domesticated animals. NOAA - a further temperature supplier to the IPCC - has just been unveiled in making tendentious exclusion of surface temperature measurement stations in the cold northern areas and in the heights! Sea temperatures are uncertain. Fully in line with Russian data on the CRU temperature measurements having been omitted from cold Russian rural areas - and throughout cold Siberia!The BBC is so unhappy with its CRU-partner´s, the Met Office´s, ineptitude that it will put the contract to tender. In the IPCC's 2007 report, there is contradictory information about the risk of species extinction. But the IPCC will be allowed to continue as the highest political and Media authority as long as it tells what designed to promote the New World Order´s World Government.

Now the UN Conference of Climate Change in Copenhagen is over. It was not a failure as widely proclaimed – for in fact it succeeded in establishing a New communist World Order  to distribute our wealth to the never-developing countries – although it was not agreed where the money is to come from. Besides, China as the leader of the developing countries, pushed the EU aside as the most important co-actor on the world stage. China and India are now said to be willing to join the Copenhagen accord. The credibility of the climate hoax is rapidly waning in the public, as will be seen from the following - not least due to a hard winter.

I: First there was Keith Briffa´s (Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia) cooked Siberian Jamal tree ring temperature proxies based on just 12 trees, while disregarding Hockeystick-dismantledopposite temperature trends in 34  neighbouring trees. According to Briffa´s own graphs, the rings showed no broadening, but narrowing with postulated increasing temperature, the opposite of what he claimed, thus nullifying his own claims that that the 1990es were the warmest period ever seen. Besides, he he just had his material from 2 Russians, had not secured its origin for himself! This – and forged statistics – also nullified Michael Mann´s “Hockey stick” graph (left)  which was the basis of the UN conference in Copenhagen.
Then followed the Climategate scandal, where ia. the leader of the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia , Phil Jones, told his colleagues, that he did “tricks with the temperatures to hide the decline in global temperature”.

II: Scandal about UN´s IPCC´s  warning that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035
The Times 19 Jan. 2009:  A central claim in the IPCC´s 2007 report was that the world's glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could ian high likelihood vanish by 2035. In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC's 2007 report. It has also emerged that the New Scientist report was itself based on a short telephone interview with Syed Hasnain. Hasnain has since admitted that the claim was "speculation" and was not supported by any formal research.
If confirmed it would be one of the most serious failures yet seen in climate research. The IPCC was set up precisely to ensure that world leaders had the best possible scientific advice on climate change. When finally published, the IPCC report did give its source as the WWF study. However, glaciologists find it  ludicrous, pointing out that most Himalayan glaciers are hundreds of feet thick and could not melt fast enough to vanish by 2035 unless there was a huge global temperature rise. The maximum rate of decline in thickness seen in glaciers at the moment is 2-3 feet a year and most are far lower.

BBC 19 Jan. 2010   India has criticised the UN panel on climate change saying its grim warning about melting Himalayan glaciers was not based on “scientific evidence”. Indian environment Minister Jairam Ramesh called for an explanation. He said that the IPCC must account for how it reached the 2035 figure
Noaawat2 Rajendra Pachauri: World News London, January 9 (ANI): Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has described the critical Indian government report as "voodoo science"!

Christopher Booker and Richard North in The Telegraph 17 Jan. 2010  describe Pachauri´s TERI Europe firm as being characterised by forged accounts

The Times 21 Jan. 2009: Dr. Pachauri : “We slipped up on one number, I don’t think it takes anything away from the overwhelming scientific evidence of what’s happening with the climate of this Earth.”
This cliché was also used, when it was revealed that the entire foundation of the IPCC´s climate doomsday prophecies and the Copenhagen Conference  were based on fraud (Climategate). There simply is no “overwhelming evidence”. On the contrary. Will he say the same when it now becomes evident that his other purveyors, the NOAA and NASA GISS have also tampered with their figures? Or will this arrogant crook show a glimpse of mendacious inventiveness? He is making huge sums on his climate fraud.
The chair, vice-chair and co-chairs of the IPCC regret the poor application of IPCC procedures in this instance.”
The 2007 report won the panel the Nobel Peace Prize. The error is now being exploited by climate sceptics, many of whom are convinced that stolen e-mail exchanges last year revealed a conspiracy to exaggerate the evidence supporting global warming.


Left: Human King-Kong. Please, Note who made that poster: The UNEP - the United Nations´ Environmental Programme. Here a human is depicted as a monster threatening the poor animals with extinction. If so - who are the super monsters that change humanity into monsters by Mental Hygiene, the 68-revolution, Communism, Nazism, lies etc?

III: But now it is becoming so grotesque that only NWO politicians can take it seriously
The Times 23 Jan. 2010: Pachauri admits that there may be even more errors in the Nobel Prize winning 2007 IPCC report. The Times 24 Jan. 2010: A separate section (of the 2007 IPCC report) warned that the world had “suffered rapidly rising costs due to extreme weather-related events since the 1970s”.This was based on an unpublished paper. When this was finally published, it concluded that there is no relationship between global temperature and natural catastrophes. The IPCC did not correct . The Times 24 Jan. 2010: The chairman of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has used bogus claims that Himalayan glaciers were melting. Rajendra Pachauri’s Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), based in New Delhi, was awarded up to £310,000 by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the lion’s share of a £2.5m EU grant funded by European taxpayers.

IV: Mr. James Hansen´s NASA GISS has been caught redhanded several times cooking global temperatures in favour of global warming. His lies are being extremely well paid – i.a. by George Soros´Open Society and Al Gore.

WorldNetDaily 16 Jan. 2010: Stephen McIntyre corroborated the Himalayan scandal further and has forced NASA's James Hansento make temperature corrections. To this this corrupt governmental researcher reacted by  labelling McIntyre as a “pest” "and suggested that those who disagree with global warming should “be ready to crawl under a rock now”.
Comment: This is in accordance with the threats of Obama´s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein.

Mr. James Hansen has recently expressed the disastrous agenda behind the Gaia Climate religion: The Telegraph 22 Jan 2010.. Last year,  James Hansen was described by his former course supervisor at NASA, Dr John Theon, as an “activist” and an embarrassment. Dr. Hansen Back in 1988 started the whole climate scam in a senate hearing staged by Al Gore. He has lent his support to an eco-fascist book advising on ways to destroy western industrialisation through propaganda, guile and outright sabotage. Author Keith Farnish claims:  The only way to prevent global ecological collapse and thus ensure the survival of humanity is to rid the world of Industrial Civilization. Farnish blames the coming ecological doomsday on overpopulation. His solution: for instance, removing grazing domesticated animals, razing cities to the ground, blowing up dams and switching off the greenhouse gas emissions machine.

To this James Hansen has commented of his own accord: "Keith Farnish has it right: time has practically run out, and the 'system' is the problem. Governments are under the thumb of fossil fuel special interests - they will not look after our and the planet's well-being until we force them to do so, and that is going to require enormous effort". –Professor James Hansen, GISS, NASA. Compare Alexander King, Club of Rome, First Global Revolution: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. . . . The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” I.e.the Climate lie is sheer New World Order ideology.

V: Climatologist Joseph D´Aleo, whose finds have several times been quoted on this blog in a TV broadcast made the following statement on the NOAA (The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), a key purveyor of temperatures to the IPCC: 
This whole project is SUCH A MESS. There has clearly been some cyclical warming in recent decades most notably 1979 to 1998. However the global surface station based data is seriously compromised by major station dropout. There has been a clear bias towards removing higher elevation, higher latitude and rural stations. The data suffers contamination by urbanization and other local factors such as land-use/land-cover changes, and improper siting. There is missing data and uncertainties in ocean temperatures. These factors all lead to overestimation of temperatures. Numerous peer-reviewed papers in the last several years have shown this overestimation is the order of 30 to 50% just from the contamination issues alone. The cherry picking of observing sites and the increase of interpolation to vacant data grids makes these estimates very conservative.  
“CRU’s Director at the time Phil Jones acknowledges that CRU mirrors the NOAA data. “Almost all the data we have in the CRU archive is exactly the same as in the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) archive used by the NOAA National Climatic Data Center.”

Uk-under-snowVI: The Independent 19 Jan. 2010: Rather than renewing its current weather forecasting contract with the Met Office automatically, when it expires in April, the BBC is putting it out to tender – for the first time since 1922. The Met Office's forecasting accuracy has come under unprecedented fire. The Met Office failed to predict this year's Big Freeze as a whole. The winter seasonal forecast for 2009-10, issued on September 29 last year, said that "winter temperatures are likely to be near or above average over much of Europe including the UK.  As it turned out, we are in the middle of the coldest winter for 30 years.  Last April, the Met Office issued its seasonal forecast for summer 2009, and said it was "odds-on for a barbecue summer". July turned out to be one of the wettest summer months on record.  That dealing with a chaotic system such as the earth's atmosphere means one can never make forecasts with complete accuracy, especially a season in advance. Comment: This last sentence is an admission worth noticing. For when they cannot make forecasts with complete accuracy for one season – how can they predict the climate of the future? The answer is: They cannot. Any attempt to do so is fraud.

VII: Yet another inaccuracy by the IPCC has been revealed by the The New York Times 19 jan. 2010.  In the  Summary for Policy Makers of the report on climate impacts IPCC 2007, there are different summations of extinction risk within a few pages.  On page 6, the summary states: 1) Approximately 20 to 30 percent of plant and animal species assessed so far are likely to be at increased risk of extinction if increases in global average temperature exceed 1.5 to 2.5°C.  In a chart on page 16, at a point marking a 2°C warming from the global average temperature through the 1980s and 1990s, a label reads: 2) Up to 30 percent of species at increasing risk of extinction.  In the Summary for Policy Makers of the final Synthesis Report drawing on the entire 2007 assessment, the extinction risk is summarized in yet another way: 3) There is medium confidence that approximately 20 to 30 percent of species assessed so far are likely to be at increased risk of extinction if increases in global average warming exceed 1.5 to 2.5°C (relative to 1980 to 1999). I asked a half dozen I.P.C.C. scientists.  Basically, they acknowledged there was inconsistency and flawed writing.

Deutsche Welle 24 Apr. 2009  Extinction rates are currently running at around 1,000 times their natural pace, with three species vanishing every hour, according to UN statistics. This would correspond to 26.280 species being extinguished annually. Now, according to the "Bible" of biodiversity, the IUCN, in 2009 just 875 species were extinguished - and 17,291 species were threatened. There is nothing unusual about the ongoing extinction rate.

The EU summoned a disaster meeting to discuss the extremely flawed UN figures from the mendacious UNEP. Copenhagen is the pretext of the New World Order to 1. create its fascist, dictatorial communist corporative world government. 2. to rob us for the benefit of a few international bankers – giving a trifle to the never-developing countries. The big loser seems to the UN which has proved unfit to seal the scam deal. But the New World order will not be stopped, since it is the “big idea” (Pres. Bush Sr.) of the Luciferian and here world elite -  World News 9 Jan. 2010 MADRID - The European Union said yesterday that it will pursue a new deal on global warming through the G20, since last month's United Bøvse-fårNations climate conference of nearly 200 nations led to unwieldy negotiations that did not accomplish much. Bilderberger Rompuy , the new EU president, said halting global warming remains a key target for the Europeans whose proposal for ambitious pollution cuts by 2020 found no takers at the Copenhagen Conference. So the hoax will simply go on against all scientific evidence, supported by blatant lies, as long as the blindfolded world public allows it.  

However, the New World Order politicians and its dependent scientists cannot be stopped by such simple obstacles as facts
The Daily Mail 18 Jan. 2010: Scientists in Australia are homing in on an unlikely weapon to tackle greenhouse gases  -  the burp-free sheep. Emissions from agriculture are the country's second largest source of greenhouse gases and environmentalists have begged farmers and scientists to find a way of reducing the problem.The target is to stop the main cause of the methane problem  -  burping sheep. In a world-first study, the Australian Sheep Co-operative Research Centre is conducting experiments with 700 sheep from 20 different genetic lines.