Summary: In the middle of the New World Order madness Ron Paul addressed the U.S. Senate and gave a surprisingly accurate description of this order, which changes sanity to the madness and good to evil. Perhaps surprising, given that he is also making illumist hand signs - but illumnism in accordance with the  Hegelian approach provides both thesis - antithesis - synthesis.
There is no doubt that the global "elite" is getting more and more desperate as people realize the truth about their big lies about global warming, the war on terror, 9/11
, the conspiracy between the UN's WHO and vaccine manufacturers on the swine flu fraud, the real masterminds behind the ongoing economical crisis, the conspiracy surrounding the Lisbon Treaty, etc. That´s why Obama's new regulatory czsar, Sunstein, proposed banning or taxing "conspiracy theories" - especially climate change denial - precisely because they have
often seen "conspiracy theories"  revealed as true. He will reintroduce the "fairness doctrine" which bans all TV and radio stations that have a single vision of "conspiracy theories". He would infiltrate "conspiracists" on the Internet and in real space to cast doubt on their arguments - and put the government's official positions there. Closing orders against  non-compiant media will be threatening. The German family minister and the Chancellor's Office are are game for this idea and want "traffic rules" on the net - child porno being the excuse, as usual. The EU has an equal treatment legislation in the making that would allow every one feeling offended by others' attitudes to take legal action against the "insulter", typically Muslims and homosexuals against churches with Christian attitudes.
The International Alliance of Journalists is immensely for facilitating the "good" bootlicking and regimentation of the New World Order.
Former KGB infiltration agent, Yuri Bezmenov,tells about his experiences in introducing New World Order standards, enabled after bribing the top of America's political system, which then swept skeptical colleagues aside. Actual brainwashing of Americans with huge effect for generations to come was done in 4 steps: 1. Demoralisation 2.  Destabilization 3. Crisis 4. "Normalization". Thus religious, political and moral values were removed.


Ron paul-satanistFinally, in the lunacy of the New World Order, one man has seen its real nature. Senator Ron Paul in front of the US Senate :"It's surreal; it's just not believable. A grand absurdity; a great deception, a delusion of momentous proportions; based on preposterous notions; and on ideas whose time should never have come; simplicity grossly distorted and complicated; insanity passed off as logic; grandiose schemes built on falsehoods with the morality of Ponzi and Madoff; evil described as virtue; ignorance pawned off as wisdom; destruction and impoverishment in the name of humanitarianism; violence, the tool of change; preventive wars used as the road to peace; tolerance delivered by government guns; reactionary views in the guise of progress; an empire replacing the Republic;slavery sold as liberty; excellence and virtue traded for mediocracy; socialism to save capitalism; a government out of control, unrestrained by the Constitution, the rule of law, or morality; bickering over petty politics as we collapse into chaos; the philosophy that destroys us is not even defined….we ought to prepare ourselves for revolutionary changes in the not-too-distant future.” More here. Strange, considering the fact, that Paul is also making the Illuminist hand sign of Satan.  But illuminism according to Hegelian strategy provides both Thesis-Antithesis - Synthesis.

The CRU e-mail scandal, where the purveyors of climate doomsday prognoses to its privy, the IPCC, were revealed to “do tricks to hide the decline in global temperature” was aggravated by the Russian Institute of Economic Analyses maintaining that the CRU had cooked Russian remperatures – even omitted temperatures from the very cold Siberia and rural districts. NASA GISS under James Hansen, has repeatedly been caught redhanded tampering its temperatures towards “global warming”.More and more people doubt the official 9/11 and war on terror explanation, Even Obama has blamed Wall Street for making the economic crise - and rewarded Wall Street with Tax payer money. Even Pres.  Obama holds Wall Street responsible for the creation of the running  economic crisis. That he is thereby blatantly lying is unknown to most people: Through the  Clinton administration, the biggest buyers of mortgages in the country were forced to lower the qualifications of  credit applicants in order to increase the percentage of  the poor to be given mortgages - even if they were insolvent.Then the Fed unleished the hell of mortgage granting by lowering the interest rate to zero. More and more people have seen the conspiration between the WHO and the vaccine and /Tamiflu-Relenza producers! And so on.

So, no doubt, the warmists who have a world government agenda instead of the health of global climate on their minds are growing desperate. So what to do?
1) One option is this: The Register 15 Jan 2010: Norfolk police investigating the "Climategate" hack have called in colleagues from the National Domestic Extremism Team (NDET), it has emerged.  Now follows another option

2) Cass R. Sunstein 2008The Man who writes the following is not just Mr. Anybody: He is President Obama's regulatory czar,  arguing the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."

In a 2008 lengthy Harvard academic law paper "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?" Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud. 
"We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."

Continued Sunstein: "We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: (3) cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents either openly or anonymously will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity." Sunstein said government agents "might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups ."

Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as "an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role." 

Apollo11Some "conspiracy theories" recommended for ban by Sunstein include: (1) "The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud."  (2) "The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."  (3) "The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy." (4)"That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents."  (5) "The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred." Sunstein allowed that "some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true."!!  He continued: "The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of 'mind control.”

In a recently released book, "On Rumors," Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove "false rumors" while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such "rumors."

'New Deal Fairness Doctrine' and here
WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a "First Amendment New Deal" – a new "Fairness Doctrine" that would include the establishment of a panel of "nonpartisan experts" to ensure "diversity of view" on the airwaves. Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation. Sunstein's radical proposal, …promotes the "Fairness Doctrine," the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present Sheeple_deescontroversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed "equitable and balanced."  Sunstein introduces what he terms his "First Amendment New Deal" to regulate broadcasting in the U.S. Sunstein wrote it is "worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well."

Prison Planet 14 Jan. 2010:  What does Sunstein define as “conspiracy theories” that should potentially be taxed or outlawed by the government? Opinions held by the majority of Americans, no less. He’s talking about widely accepted beliefs shared by the majority of Americans but ones viewed as distasteful by the government. He is advocating Internet censorship .

The government has made it clear that growing suspicion towards authority is a direct threat to their political agenda and indeed Sunstein admits this on page 3 of his paper. That is why they are now engaging in full on information warfare in an effort to undermine, disrupt and eventually outlaw organized peaceful resistance to their growing tyranny.


How to Brainwash a Nation
Dick Eastman, 4 Oct. 2009: “In the early 1990's I was part of the fight in Washington State to defeat "G-Surf", the imposition of outcomes based education that Carla Nuxoll had brought. This was the destruction of education of a child to realize his potential under the Free-speechunregulated guidance of teacher, principal and school board — and replacement with simple indoctrination and simple training of human imputs for the needs of corporations.
The system, I discovered, had been bought from the Soviet Union in exchange for computer software by the Carnegie Foundation. Only the titles of the positions were changed — the political observer became the teacher's and the principal's "mentor" etc. Cookie cutter political correctness and social engineering — deconstructing our religious, moral and political values. It was foreign conquest without the bombs and tanks — all done by treason, infiltration and sabotage.
They won by buying off the leadership of the opposition at the top. The leadership  they couldn't buy off were blackballed by those they could. One friend of mine, a fellow a home schooler, who joined the fight — was so frightened and intimidated that he took up states and moved his family of 9 to Wyoming. I have seen a line of criminals and child crushers become school superintendents in this area, and I have seen grades — which we were told would be the best in the nation by 2000, near the bottom of the nation nationally — even though each other state has had similar programs imposed and similar loss of their childrens' freedoms and futures.”

Free-speech2This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov, who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It's shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.  Watch and listen very carefully… He states that only 4 steps are needed for the New World Order/communism to take over: 1. Demoralization 2. Destabilization 3. Crisis 4. “Normalization”.
Helpers are lined against the wall and shot.

Do you think matters are better in Europe? Look here
 The Telegraph 3 Aug. 2009 The Catholic Bishops of England, Wales and Scotland denounced the European Commission's planned Equal Treatment Directive as "wholly unacceptable" because, they said, it would force Christians to act against their consciences.The directive is aimed at harmonising and enforcing a ban across the 27-member bloc on discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, age, religious belief and disability outside the scope of employment law. But the bishops say the directive will simply have the result of sharply curtailing the rights of religious liberty and freedom of expression. He said: "At this point the EU would effectively be dictating to religious bodies what their faith does or does not require - a wholly unacceptable position."

The definition of harassment in the directive will also mean that any person who decided they were "offended" by an expression of Christianity could bring a case against the Churches. The EU council will now have to consider whether to adopt, amend or reject the directive. Sweden, which holds the EU presidency, has indicated that it wishes to introduce the directive in November.

MM-News 10 Aug (German)  reports on politicians and the Spiegel´s attacks on the internet freedom in Germany, Iraq and China.

German Federal Family Minister, Ursula von der Leyen, who has significantly promoted the initiatives on Web closing, warned that the Internet threatens to become a legal space of mess, and called for discussions about the right amount s freedom of expression, democracy and human dignity on the Internet. Now, the Chancellery, Thomas de Maizière, adds on, calling for "traffic rules on the Internet."

"Challenge for Europe" 
Eu-censur (hammer-segl-mundbind)Blogactiv 2 July 2009 “(Journalistic) quality information depends above all else on conditioning its production process. Some press companies are already taking ethical and responsible measures. We need to value them and encourage media organizations to help them multiply.
In the information world, certain media organizations are implementing policies and strategies that establish practices that are more responsible than others. The International Alliance of Journalists, in its work on the production process for “responsible” information, sheds light on the existence of these “good” practices. To remedy this situation, the alliance proposes that an online inventory of these practices be set up in order that they can be valued, shared, modeled, and spread. The alliance already initiated this work among a group of twenty media organizations in France, Italy, Spain, Brazil, Belgium, Switzerland, India and Central Asia. This site could eventually become a reference for all media organizations concerned about quality of information and for the reading public who are sensitive to ethical criteria.

The production of information favours the application of deontology defined by different codes and charters of the profession as well as ethics as defined by the declaration of human rights, the UN charter, the (communist) Earth Charter, the charter of human responsibilities (and in France, the new charter on the quality of information, too). Broaden the inventory of ethical and responsible measures taken by media organizations to include all news and general interest media in the European Union and make it accessible to its citizens via a multilingual website.”

Alliance of Journalists: “Our purpose is to invent, to share, and to practice new forms of collective action, from the local to the global scales, so that together we can exercise more control, together and with Nature, over the future of an increasingly complex and interdependent world.
The challenge of the Alliance is to favor unity within diversity by proclaiming our societies’ capacity to understand and assess the complexity of situations, the interdependence of the issues, and the legitimacy of all the different geocultural, thematic, social, and professional viewpoints, and to encourage them all to act accordingly.
This seems to be an offshoot of the terrible meeting in Vienna on May 22, 2006, where the EU Presidency, the European Commission and the EUMC ordered the media of the Euromediterranean Countries (i.e. the European countries) to submit to regular dictatorship censorship.”


The above explains why we are only being told lies by the media, which silences the truth – about themes like the Euomediterranean, Climategate, WHO´s swine flu-vaccination scam, immigration etc.
But the most appalling thing about it is that people (by some called sheeple) dont want their freedom. McClatchy: The survey found 51 percent of Americans agreeing that "it is necessary to give up some civil liberties in order to make the country safe from terrorism." At the same time, 36 percent agreed that "some of the government's proposals will go too far in restricting the public's civil liberties."  

Why was democracy so shortlived? Because it does not belong in the New World Order, which is really a return to the dictatorial status quo of the Old World Order, under which mankind always lived.