Summary:In Iran– and Russia-backed Syria, another refugee avalanche is seen that will eventually swap over on endlessly hospitable Europe - just like from Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan, where NATO drove out people because of chaos. This has been declared to be desired, in order to create radical multi-cultural social change, i.e. the final eradication of nation states and Christianity - as demanded by Adam Weishaupt. There are still only 230 000 Syrians on the run - most within Syria. However, with more civil war and possibly Western-Arab intervention, their number will iincrease much more. To avoid this, Turkey is said to consider setting up buffer zones along the borders on Syrian soil, which would be tantamount to an invasion. However, in private, Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu, so says a source, said, “Turkey will do nothing to harm the territorial integrity of Syria.”
However, the war in Syria is already a Western war against a sovereign country - in part by CIA, MI5 and MI6 consultants and trainers, mostly by special forces from Qatar, from Great Britain, the USA and France on the ground.
But above all, Western NWO nations are using their Middle East client states for a multi-pronged attack on Syria by the media, the Arab League, the United Nations and now through proxy forces. The U.S. and its ally, Saudi Arabia (a Sunni extremist Islamic dictatorship - but seems to have a Rothschild central bank) are using extremist proxy forces throughout the Middle East as pawns on their geopolitical chessboard.
It is no coincidence that the Syrian Free Army (FSA) is strongest on the borders of Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, North Lebanon - areas with strong U.S. alliances. The Turkey, a NATO country, offers the FSAaccomodation and weapons. From Iraq. many of the 80,000 “unemployed” U.S. / Saudi hirelings of the “Awakening Council” are said to have trickled into Syria to serve their masters there.
From Libya, 300-400 warriors from the Islamic group, an “Al Qaeda” branch, to fight against Assad.
“[Sunni] Prominent radical Salafi cleric in Tripoli, Lebanon, called on Syrian Sunnis to join the uprising against the Syrian regime.” Syria receives weapon deliveries from Russia and Iran.
Assad’s country must be destroyed by the UK-trained militia, so that it can be developed along approved Euro-American lines. These guidelines mean first opening the country to the depredations of the multinational banks and companies as required by Soros. Furthermore, the establishment of a Rothschild central bank, as it happened right after the NATO invasion of Libya.
On 21 March, the UN Security Council approved in a presidential statement that Syria has to implement a peace plan by the envoy of the UN-Arab League, Kofi Annan, ”immediately”, and it contained a veiled warning against international action. Such a declaration is not binding - and Russia still will not hear about a regime change in Syria, although it now says that Syria makes very many mistakes. Just now, according to the ABC, Russian marines have come to Syria to fight the NATO special forces. Russia denies that. The danger is i.a. the fact that Assad and his cousin, Makhlouf, have threatened to attack Israel if their regime is in danger.
The Beirut-based newspaper Alakhbar writes: Today, the withdrawal of the armed groups in the neighborhood of Homs means one thing: the strategy of militarization of the conflict from the inside is no more a plausible option. Group A is for a face-saving exit from the promised escalation in Syria. It consists of the United States, the EU and Turkey. Group B, on the other side is strongly for regime change at any price, and includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar and some elements of French, American, British and Libyan establishments. The struggle in Syria is vital for group B. According to the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, the opposition is catastrophically split - and is getting more and more islamized.
It would be good if the Western-Arab countries would pay attention to the words of “Foreign Affairs” March / April 2012, the U.S. CFR: Nine years after U.S. forces overthrew Saddam Hussein, and only a few months after the last U.S. soldier left Iraq, the country has become something like a failed state. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, presides over a system full of corruption and brutality, political leaders in the security forces and militias are used to suppress enemies and to intimidate the general population. The law exists as a weapon against rivals, and to cover up the crimes of the Allies. The dream of an Iraq that is governed by elected politicians responsible to the people faded rapidly.”
The Iraqi government cannot ensure basic services, including regular power supply in summer, clean water and adequate medical care. Meanwhile, unemployment hovers by almost 30% among young men, making them easy to recruit for criminal gangs and militant groups.
In Libya, it looks likewise - and so will Syria look, too, after a “liberation” – and may even be lucky if the country avoids tribal and religious feuds, as in Libya and Iraq. These countries can work only under a strong dictatorship like the Sharia - as in Iran. This is what 95% of Egyptians understand by democracy.
Further south in the Middle East a proxy war is going on between Israel and Iran. The Iranian representatives in the Gaza Strip are Hamas and Jihad Islami, the latter has just been firing a round of rockets on Israel with many missiles. This feature has, however, now been taken over by a Sunni Dschhadist group, according to Debkafile. These groups have their quarters and weapons plants in the Sinai Peninsula, where they are outside the reach of the Israeli Air Force. Egypt refuses to talk directly or indirectly with the Iranian-backed Jihad Islami, Tehran’s Palestinian representative. As Egypt will enter into no truce negotiations unless these groups stop their activities in Sinai, this conflict is likely to escalate. It is actually the beginning of a war between Israel and Iran. In the north, waiting for Iranian support, Hezbollah might also bombard Israel with rockets.
“Al Qaeda has evolved into a media mythology, used as a tool of media disinformation and war propaganda. Reference to Al Qaeda has become a dogma.
The routine use of Al Qaeda to generate blanket explanations of complex political events is meant to create confusion. It prevents people from thinking. The Al Qaeda Legend sustains the “Big Lie”.
Acknowledged by the CIA, the Islamic jihad “was” a US sponsored “intelligence asset” going back to the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war (1979-1989).
Acting on behalf of the CIA, the ISI was involved in the recruitment and training of the jihadist fighters described by President Ronald Reagan as “Freedom Fighters”.
The notion of Al Qaeda –”the outside enemy” which threatens Western civilization– is predicated on “an inquisitorial doctrine”. The Homeland Security State personifies what might be described as the “American Inquisition” (Prof. Chussodovsky Global Res. 24 March 2012).
Now the US and NATO are doing the same subversive trick in Syria – once more on behalf of the money masters of the NWO – to make sure that Syria gets a Rothschild-loyal Central bank– as a jumping board for an attack on Iran, which also has no Rothschild central bank.
1. The Free Syrian Army of defectors and other militants The Telegraph 20 March 2012: Human Rights Watch: Syrian rebels have kidnapped, tortured and sometimes executed those they suspect of being supporters of the Assad regime and members of its militias, according to the fullest study yet of abuses by the opposition.
2. Russians in Syria ABC News 19 March 2012: A Russian military unit has arrived in Syria, according to Russian news reports, a development that a United Nations Security Council source told ABC News was “a bomb” certain to have serious repercussions. DEBKAfile 17 March 2012: Russian technicians man the Pantsyr-1 air and missile defense batteriesshielding Syria from foreign intervention. Car bombings in Damascus on 17 March were the work of foreign hands, possibly set up by Saudi Arabia or Qatar to revive the anti-Assad revolt, after the regime smashed the armed rebellion in its last stronghold in Idlib. Others maintain they were false flag operations. Global Research 30 Jan. 2012: Russia has freely admitted to recently sending $550 million worth of fighter jets to Syria, while also sending Russian battle ships as a deterrent to a foreign invasion. As the proxy war lumbers on, further foreign intervention — money and arms — on both sides will increase
3. Iran involved in Syria DEBKAfile 17 March 2012: OC US Central Command Gen. James Mattis explained March 3 to the Senate Armed Services Committee: They (Iranians) are working earnestly to keep Assad in power. They have flown in experts. They are flying in weapons. It is a full-throated effort by Iran to keep Assad there and oppressing his own people.”
DEBKAfile 14 March 2012: Debkafile’s exclusive sources reported in the wake of a visit paid by high-ranking Iranian and Hizballah officials on March 14, to the Lebanese-Israeli border region opposite Metulah, Israel’s northernmost town: The Iranian visitor, Javanfekr, commented in the hearing of our sources: “The Zionists can build any wall they like, whether of concrete, iron or plastic, but we and Hizballah will knock it down, like Israel itself.” His words were taken by top Israeli commanders as a blunt threat of a missile offensive on similar lines to the Gaza confrontation – only this time instead of Jihad Islami in Gaza, Hizballah would be entrusted with shooting missiles from Lebanon.
Word of this threat spurred Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to declare, “We shall strike Iran even if our American friends object.”
4. NATO involved in Syria Global Res. 14 March 2012: Michel Chossudovsky: ”There’s ample evidence from official statements from the Arab League observer mission, from the Israeli media, that there are terrorist organizations involved in killing civilians and this, in a very cynical mode, provides the justification for the so-called international community to blame Bashar al-Assad when in fact these civilian casualties were ordered by foreign forces.” I am not suggesting that the Syrian government doesn’t bear any responsibility in this matter, but we must understand what are the underlying causes of this so-called protest movement.
We have Special Forces from Qatar; from Britain; from the US;from France on the ground. And I quote from British military sources. The MI6, CIA, SAS and what are they doing? They’re training members of the Free Syrian Army. This war has been prepared for years and years and years. What they want is to intervene in Syria in the form of a so-called “Right/Responsibility to Protecthumanitarian mandate.
Secretary Clinton just a couple of weeks ago acknowledged that al-Qaeda and other organizations on our terror list, that of the US, are supporting the opposition. If you start examining what is actually happening on the ground, this is already a war against a sovereign state where the representatives of NATO are on the ground.
5. Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council involved in Syria Global Research 30 Jan. 2012: In an effort to undermine Iranby overthrowing its strategic ally, Syria, western nations are using their Middle East client states to conduct a multi-pronged attack against Syria through the media, the Arab League, the United Nations and now through military proxy forces. It is no coincidence that the Syrian Free Army is strongest on the borders of Turkey, Iraq, Northern Lebanon, and Jordan — areas with strong U.S. alliances.
6. Turkish interference in Syria Global research 30 Jan. 2012: The Asian Times reports: “In spite of Turkish denials of support, FSA [Free Syrian Army] fighters are exploiting the relative safety they enjoy in southern Turkey to mount attacks against Syrian forces. The FSA is also alleged to have established bases in northern Lebanon and northern Jordan, regions that have similarly witnessed an influx in Syrian refugees.” In fact, Turkey hosted the initial meetings of The Syrian National Council, which enjoys tremendous support by the United States but very little inside of Syria. ANSAmed 16 March 2012 Turkey has taken another small step towards creating a buffer zone on its borders with Syria, for halting the inflow of refugees from that country, which is being seen as a doorway for international armed intervention. Without at least implicit consent to such a move on the part of the Syrian government, such a plan amounts to an invasion. Confirmed by The Guardian.
7. Libyan warriors and Al Qaeda involved against Assad in Syria Global Research 30 Jan. 2012: The London Telegraph: “There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There is a military intervention on the way. This is confirmed by the Wall Street Journal: “… [It is] estimated that 300 to 400 Libyans have based themselves in southern Turkey and crossed the border to join Syrians in skirmishes against government forces…”. It is widely rumored that the Libyan fighters are the same Islamic extremists that NATO admits it used to attack the Libyan government.
“Liberated” Libya the model of Syria after the assad Regime?
8. Other Muslim Jihadists fighting against Assad Global Research 30 Jan. 2012: U.S. allies are enlistingSunni extremists in this fight because the Syrian government relies on Shia Muslim support domestically and also externally, since Iran’s regime is largely Shia Muslim and is a key Syrian Ally. Dating back before the U.S.’ support of Islamic extremists later known as the Taliban against the USSR in Afghanistan, the U.S. and its ally, Saudi Arabia (a Sunni Islam extremist dictatorship), have used extremist proxy forces all over the Middle East as pawns in their geo-political chessboard.
One recent example of U.S. backed Sunni extremism is in Iraq, where the United States armed and funded the now-powerful Sunni extremist “Awakening Council” in order to hunt down any Iraqi opposition to the U.S.’ military presence. Now the Awakening Council is being discarded by the Shia majority in Iraq, but of the 80,000 plus armed members, many are rumored to have gone into Syria to further serve their Saudi and U.S. masters. The Asian Times article also commented on the Sunni extremist trend mounting against the Syrian government from northern Lebanon, a country which contains some key U.S. allies
9. Lebanon involved against Syria Global research 30 Jan. 2012 “Prominent radical Salafist [Sunni] clerics in Tripoli [Lebanon], including Dai al-Islam al-Shahhal, have called on Syrian Sunnis to join the uprising against the Ba’athist [Syrian] regime... Lebanon’s US- and Saudi-aligned “March 14 Alliance” (which includes former Lebanese Prime Minster Saad Hariri’s Sunni-dominated Future Movement) is in the forefront of organizing anti-Syrian [government] activities in Lebanon.” Infowars 22 March 2012: House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King told that Hezbollah is a threat to the United States. Hezbollah is “one of international terrorism’s most violent murder gangs,” he said. “The director of intelligence analysis for the New York Police Department and former officials of the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Treasury Department agreed that the militant Shiite group now posed a greater threat to Americans at home than Al Qaeda“.
10. Britain´s interests in Syria Axis of Logic 8 Febr. 2012: The UK has been instrumental in consolidating relations between the disparate and isolationist opposition groups in Syria—not because the British elite want genuine democracy, of course, but because Syria’s President Assad would not acquiesce to the neo-liberal economic policies of the Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative (BMENAI). Assad’s country must be destroyed via UK-trained militias so that it can be rebuilt along Euro-American-approved lines.
11. Israel – Palestinians-Egypt
Israel -Gaza DEBKAfile 12 March 2012: Debkafile’s intelligence sources report a Cairo demand for any truce deal to embody a Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami commitment to withdraw their forces from Sinai and stop using the peninsula for terrorist operations against Israel. The Gaza confrontation is therefore evolving into a military clash between Israel and Iran.
Hamas has even transferred all its weapons manufacturing, including missiles, from the Gaza Strip to safe locations in northern Sinai, along with its training facilities – out of reach of Israeli Air Force bombings.
Left: Israeli attack on Gaza strip. Right: Rocket from Gaza hits Israel
Another obstacle on the road to a ceasefire is Egypt’s refusal to hold direct, or even indirect, talks with Iran-supported Jihad Islami, Tehran’s Palestinian surrogate, which has been shooting the missiles. The conflict looks like escalating.
Shortly afterwards a short ceasefire was declared – but
Israel under attack from Sinai and soon from Hisballah in Lebanon? DEBKAfile 16 March 2012: The attacks have now been taken over from Jihad Islami by a small group of Salafi Palestinians calling itself Haraka Muhaheddin, which belongs to Jalalat, the al Qaeda roof organization in the Gaza Strip.
Comment On 21 March the UN Security Council in a presidential statement demanded that Syria “immediately” implement a peace plan proposed by UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and gave a veiled warning of international action.
The proxy war has got dangerous perspectives: The Russian leaders know the corporate US NWO tactics: WWIII by conquering one nation at a time. They know the US declares to be engaged in WWIII – using Al Qaeda as a pretext – although the US bothfounded Al Qaeda in 1979 and use them to conquer Libya and Syria and here and here and here.
And in Russian eyes the motto for such “humanitarian” operations – called the “Right to Protect” – must be a provocation, a call to intervene in any country the masters of the US NWO do not like. The Russians know that the West is waging a proxy war against Syria and has now sent a military unit to Syria to fight NATO and other terrorists. This is a very dangerous development. However, the Russians refuse this.
But the West is losing the Syrian conflict: Alakhbar 21 March 2012: Today, the retreat of armed groups from the Homs neighborhood means one thing: the strategy of militarizing the conflict from within is no longer a plausible option on which to hang this geopolitical battle. And so the external players are shifting gears – the more outspoken ones, quietly seeking alternative options. Two de facto groups have formed. Group A is looking for a face-saving exit from the promised escalation in Syria. It consists of the United States, European Union and Turkey. Group B, on the other hand, is heavily invested in regime-change at any cost, and includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and some elements of the French, US, British, and Libyan establishments.The battle in Syria has become an existential one for Group B. Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu, says my source, insisted in private that “Turkey will not do anything to harm Syria’s territorial integrity and unity because that will transfer the conflict into Turkish territory.” The West and its regional allies will happily draw out a low-boil War of Attrition in Syria to keep the Syrian regime busy, weakened and defensive, while further seeking to cement their hold on the direction of the “Arab Spring.
Here, The Council on Foreign Relations 22 March explains why the Western puppet, the Syrian National Council, is a loser: The Free Syrian Army (FSA) needs weapons, money, logistical support, and the leadership of the SNC has refused to give it to them. This has caused a major controversy within the Syrian National Council, and it’s caused a number of very high-level defections within the SNC. The putative head of the Free Syrian Army, Colonel Riad al-Asaad, who is residing in Turkey, called the SNC a bunch of traitors because they would not give him money and arms.The SNC is worried that they’ll become too Islamic and too uncontrollable. The only available ideology to the insurgency in Syria is Islam. The Syrian national Council can’t do much for the revolution anymore. They’ve done the heavy lifting of getting sanctions and getting the world to condemn the Assad regime but the world is not going to invade, so in a sense they’ve hit a wall.
And here is what was achieved in Iraq – and in Libya – and what will be achieved after intervention in Syria: CFR´s “Foreign Affairs” March/April 2012: Nine years after U.S. troops toppled Saddam Hussein and just a few months after the last U.S. soldier left Iraq, the country has become something close to a failed state. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki presides over a system rife with corruption and brutality, in which political leaders use security forces and militias to repress enemies and intimidate the general population. The law exists as a weapon to be wielded against rivals and to hide the misdeeds of allies. The dream of an Iraq governed by elected leaders answerable to the people is rapidly fading away.
The Iraqi state cannot provide basic services, including regular electricity in summer, clean water, and decent health care; meanwhile, unemployment among young men hovers close to 30 percent, making them easy recruits for criminal gangs and militant factions.
LATEST: EUObserver 2 Nov. 2011 Meanwhile, in a development that has stoked fears of a potential military coup in the country, Papandreou on Tuesday also fired the entire high command of the armed forces along with some dozen other senior officers and replaced them with figures believed to be more supportive of the current political leadership. EU leaders are horrified at the Greek leader’s plans to put the rescue plan and its accompanying austerity measures before the people, fearing a No vote could sink the euro and plunge the European Union into political crisis. The army’s 71st airborne brigade. practiced “feuding parties control … conflict deterrence …[and] crowd evacuation”, according to the newswire, which quoted military sources.
Summary:In 2001, the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) was established. The Carr Center for Human Rights was co-founder, and Carr´s director-in-chief at the time was Samantha Power, who is married to Obama’s Regulator Czar, Cass Sunstein - and now is Obama’s adviser in his National Security Council. She exercised a decisive influence on Obama’s decision to bomb Libya. The ICISS founded the “Respnsibility to Protect”, named R2P. Other Carr members were / are the former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson, and the South African activist, Desmond Tutu.
Another founder of the ICISS was Gareth Evans, who was also president of the International Crisis Group, where George Soros is on the board, and the arch globalist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wants to isolate the Russian Federation (The Great Chessboard), is advisor.
“True sovereignty belongs to citizens who in turn delegate it to their government. If the government abuses the authority entrusted to it, and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote in 2004.
A nation-state thus has no sovereignty any more - only positive obligations that can be enforced by the United Nations. As with any globalist initiative that corrupt national leaders accept R2P is also undoubtedly heralding the beginning of a new and controversial era of “activism” by the United Nations. It will not be more righteous but is closer to bringing the world a one-world order.” 2005 the R2P was adopted as a UN policy.
The UN Secretary General in January 2009 published a report entitled “Implementing the Responsibility to Protect”. In a General Assembly debate in July 2009, UN member states overwhelmingly confirmed the commitment of the year 2005 and adopted a consensus resolution that took note of the report of the Secretary. In 2011, the Security Council called on the R2P in a series of resolutions: 1970 and 1973 on the situation in Libya, 1975 on the situation in the Ivory Coast, and 2014 about the situation in Yemen.
Behind the “Arab Spring”, the Serbian revolution movement, OTPOR, the Georgian war and “Occupy Wall Street” was / is Rothschild agent George Soros as a champion of Rothschild´s central banks and the dollar as the world´s reserve currency.
According to the Soros Dossier p. 71, his “Open Society”´s world looks like this: If a nation wants to control its own natural resources, it is a closed society. When a nation develops its economy and work through tariffs and regulations it is a closed society. Any nation that refuses globalization, is a closed society and falling prey to the attacks of Soros and his shadow government of national representatives.
This is exactly the purpose of the ‘Responsibility to Protect “, which is being used by the NATO military complex as a ram against states which oppose Rothschild´s central banking system and the dollar as world reserve currency. Such nations are called “rogue” states, although they are only ruled as dictatorially, as the NWO intends to rule the whole world. Libya had, just as Iran and North Korea, no Rothschild central bank - and as well as Saddam Hussein they want(ed) to settle oil trading in dollars.
The United Nations was founded to end wars, but is now expanding them. They do this because it is intended by those who founded it. The bait presented by The Rockefellers and Franklin D. Roosevelt to entrap the Nations: the beautiful words about the family of man and the preservation of peace under the leadership of the armed (dictatorial) one-world government in a world of disarmed nation states – as advocated by John F. Kennedy. In this pattern the R2P fits well - of course under the false pretext of humanitarian missions. The hollowness of this claim is obvious through the many Libyans killed - also by NATO. Furthermore, by the fact that NATO and the CIA are working with “Al Qaeda”, the (wrongly) alleged cause of the “War on Terror”, in Libya - not to create democracy, but a new dictatorship of the Shariah.
Obama is, according to his chief of staff at the White House, “frustrated” and does all he can to bypass Congress, which is about to confer on him alone - without the consent of Congress - dictatorial power to wage war. The R2P is for Obama to understand rather as the right to act. Now the armed rebels in Syria - seeing Libya as a model - invoke the protection of the international community. Obama, who is just a puppet, will no doubt follow the war cry of the Bilderbergers for a big, bloody war in the Middle East.
Elitist Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary-General of the UN and former Chancellor of the UN University for Peace in Costa Rica: “A hellish fate awaits all who resist political and spiritual globalization, ..those who criticize the UN are anti-evolutionary, blind, self-serving people. Their souls will be parked in a special corral of the universe for having been retarding forces, true aberrations in the evolution and ascent of humanity.” (False Dawn, Lee Penn, p. 133)
Human Rights Investigations Global research 28 Oct. 2011: It is clear that the ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) doctrine has been hi-jacked by NATO and its supporters as a justification for its military campaigns and has lost its humanitarian content, becoming little more than a weapon in the propaganda war to draw ill-informed citizens into consent for military action.
I have previously written about the 4 conditions under which the UN allows the “Right to Protect”. What is this concept actually? This article will try to illuminate it by means of i.a. Illuminati thoughts about it. For the concept is an NWO strategy to conquer the world of the unwilling by means of coalitions of the willing Illuminati-led states – against their own praised “Human rights” and “international law”. R2P doctrine is referred to when the NWO wants to make its next step in the conquest of an unwilling people.
Left above: Moammar Gaddafi – a broken man who shortly after this photo was illegally (contrary to UN Resolution 1970) was killed maltreated and killed (right – cf.here). Yahoo News 20 Oct. 2011: “Obama joined U.S. politicians and ordinary Americans in welcoming the demise of Gaddafi, who was for decades regarded as a nemesis of American presidents, and also claimed some of the credit for the Libyan strongman’s downfall.
Politico 28 Oct. 2011Bill Daley, the White House chief of staff, twice in the course of an interview referred to the first three years of Barack Obama’s administration as “ungodly” and once as “brutal.” “On the foreign policy-military side, you can act pretty quickly,” Daley says. “That is why the president, based upon frustration, is doing this ‘we can’t wait.’ He is going to every agency, every department, and saying, ‘What can you do on your own? What can we not have to wait for legislation to do?’ ”Congress? He don’t need no stinkin’ Congress! The White House is going to turn its back on it when it can. In this situation Congress is transferring the right to declare war on the president alone - allowing him to attack any “rascal state”
NATO killed Gaddafi? Debkafile’s (21 Oct. 2011) military sources report mounting indications that a NATO special forces unit – although of which nation is unknown – located and captured Muammar Qaddafi in the Sirte area. They apparently shot him in both legs to prevent his escape and informed a Misrata militia of his whereabouts, knowing they would kill him in view of the town’s long reckoning with the former Libyan ruler. “LankaNewspapers 24 oct. 2011: Obama: “…we achieved our objectives, and our NATO mission will soon come to an end.” This is therefore tantamount to his endorsement of Gaddafi`s violent end among other things. Even Obama`s political rivals have granted him the credit for killing Gaddafi. Associated Press quoted on Friday Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney as having said in answer to a question whether Obama deserved the credit for killing Gaddafi,`Yes, absolutely!”
The Responsibility to Protect is simply a license to kill enemies of the NWO.
Right:UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon (2007–?) is a puppet, a tool in the hands of the NWO elite. His predecessor, Kofi Annan, accepted the warlike R2P in 2005 – making the UN a warlord, a conqueror, in stead of a keeper of peace.
Chapter VII of the UN Charter, Article 42: “Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Here is a follow-up report by the UN secretary general:United Nations A/65/877–S/2011/393 General Assembly Security Council Distr.: General 28 June 2011 The role of regional and subregional arrangements in implementing the responsibility to protect: R2P - The Responsibility to Protect populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing has emerged as an important global principle since the adoption of the UN World Summit Outcome Document in 2005. In recent years the international commmunity has accepted R2P both conceptually and in practice, including by invoking the principle in UN Security Council resolutions.
NATO has not felt Responsibility to Protect civilians in Libya
This international norm stipulates that: * The primary responsibility to protect populations from mass atrocities lies with the state itself. * When a state proves either unable or unwilling to protect peoples, that responsibility shifts to the international community. * This obligation must be exercised preventively; states can not delay action until mass crimes have already occurred. * The tools of action include diplomatic, legal, and other peaceful measures; coercive measures such as sanctions; and, as a last resort, military force.
These principles originated in a 2001 report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (see below)..
The UN Secretary-General released a report in January 2009 entitled Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. In a July 2009 General Assembly Debate, UN Member States overwhelmingly reaffirmed the 2005 Commitment and passed a consensus resolution taking note of the Secretary-General’s report. In 2011 the Security Council invoked the Responsibility to Protect in a number of Resolutions: 1970 and 1973 on the situation in Libya, 1975 on the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, and 2014 on the situation in Yemen.
The Daily BellR2P (Responsibilty to protect) has been cleverly framed by the Anglo-American elite (which likely stands behind all such globalist measures) as a standard rather than a law. Various NGOs and numerous international agencies can help with the R2P framework. But the hammer – military intervention – can only be mandated by the United Nations Security Council and the General Assembly. In fact, when one examines what is evolving around the world it is clear that the powers-that-be are using the UN as a kind of globalist battering ram, knocking down the walls between nation-states and generating increasingly aggressive internationalist interferences. A sovereign state was one that had control of its borders and provided a legal framework for its citizens.
With the advent of R2P, the nation-state has an affirmative obligation to provide safety to its citizens. This means that if it does not other states must, according to the R2P standard, interfere. A nation-state thus has no sovereignty anymore, only affirmative obligations that can be enforced by the United Nations. As with every globalist initiative that corrupt national leaders endorse, R2P, too, shall no doubt usher in a new and more controversial era of United Nations’ activism. It will not be a fairer one, or more just, but it will bring the globe closer to a one world order.
Behind the “Arab Spring”, the Serbian and Georgian wars stands/stood George Soros, the Rothschild agentas the champion of Rothschild´s central banks and the dollar as world reserve currency His “Open Society” has this website. Acc. to the Soros Dossier p. 71: If a nation wishes to control its own natural resources, it’s a closed society. If a nation wants to develop its economy and power of labor through tariffs and regulations, it’s a closed society. Any nation that rejects globalization (i.e., British imperialism), is a closed society andsubject to attacks from Soros and his shadow government of national agents. As will be seen, this is exactlythe purpose of the Right to Protect doctrine, which is applied to bully countries denying to submit to Adam Weishaupt´s NWO and here and here – and in particular refuse to accept a (Rothschild) central bank – which Libya did not have until the NATO attack – but probably got immediately after. Besides, Gaddafi would give up the dollar in oil trading in favour of a gold dinar Other states that do not have a Rothschild National Bank are Iran (which even quitted to bargain oil in dollars), North Korea and Cuba. So, they are “rascal states”. Saddam Hussein´s sin was that he was giving up the dollar as reserve currency in oil trading.
Klein Online 4 Oct. 2011: As for Aaron Klein: see here. In his address to the nation in April explaining the NATO campaign in Libya, Obama cited the doctrine as the main justification for U.S. and international airstrikes against Libya.
The Carr Center for Human Rights Policy has a seat on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded Responsibility to Protect. The commission iscalled the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. One of its founders was Gareth Evans, who was also the president of Soros´(on the board)International Crisis Group.The ICISS invented the term “responsibility to protect” and defined its guidelines. Samantha Power, the National Security Council special adviser to Obama on human rights, was Carr’s founding executive director and headed the Board members of the group including former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former Ireland President Mary Robinson and South African activist Desmond Tutu.
Soros himself outlined the fundamentals of Responsibility to Protect in a 2004 Foreign Policy magazine article entitled “The People’s Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World’s Most Vulnerable Populations.” In the article Soros said, “True sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their governments.If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote. “By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the international community can penetrate nation-states’ borders to protect the rights of citizens. The International Crisis Group has been petitioning for the U.S. to normalize ties with the Muslim Brotherhood. The group includes on its board Egyptian opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei, as well as other personalities who champion dialogue with Hamas, a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. The crisis group has petitioned for the Algerian government to cease “excessive” military activities against al-Qaida-linked groups and to allow organizations seeking to create an Islamic state to participate in the Algerian government.
As will be seen from the above, one person emerges again and again: George Soros, Rothschild´s stooge. There is no doubt whom the R2P really benefits, since it aims at the “rascals” who are rascals in the sense that they are dictators. But there are 2 kinds of them: the ones who accept the NWO, its central banks and the dollar as world reserve currency – and the others who do not. The latter are to be conquered. I.e. the states with nuclear weapons (like North Korea) can so far defy the Illuminati elitists – but how long? Russia (Communist Revolution, Freemasonry and here) and China (in the Trilateral Commission) are also involved in the NWO endgame - but as antitheses to the Western thesis.
The United Nations, created to end wars, now prolongs and enlarges them. It does so because it has to in the spirit of those who created it.The Rockefellers and Franklin D. Roosevelt did mean the bait with which they caught the Nations: The fine words about the family of man keeping peace under the guidance of the armed (dictatorial) one world government in a world of disarmed nation states as proposed by John F. Kennedy. And there has been long negotiations to achieve this disarmament, so that the corporate fascist NWO government can protect the interests of the Illuminati elite against rebellious rascals. However, they did not tell about their measures to bully and destroy those rascals who will not cooperate.
Now Pres. Obama will make a study of how to avoid mass atrocities through i.a. new “humanitarian wars” after probably thousands of civilians were killed in Libya – some of them by NATO. And the armed Syrian rebels are giving Obama an excuse to intervene, as they are calling for international protection. But the goal is the creation of a worldwide empire, that of the Illuminati´s corporate one world – the immortal idea of the power elite at all times – and they just want to govern 500 mio slaves acc. to their Georgia Guidestones. So what will they do about the remaining 6.5 billion of today´s 7 billion people?
LATEST:The long awaited 2. American Revoluton?“Occupy Wall Street is going viral. The demonstrations are spreading over America, and 700 protesters were arrested on Brooklyn Bridge. Marines are coming to protect the demonstraters from the police???? Army serviceman Ward Reilly : “I’m heading up there tonight in my dress blues. So far, 15 of my fellow marine buddies are meeting me there, also in Uniform.
New American 30 Sept.: The trend has some analysts very concerned — particularly after reports claimed union bosses tied to the Obama administration were plotting to bring about chaos. Supporters and critics alike say this may be only the beginning of something much bigger. A broad coalition of socialists and Marxists has jumped on the bandwagon, too. “One US journalist said: “ I saw they did include sessions on the Communist Manifesto and Spanish Revolution. The objectives of the purportedly “leaderless” anti-Wall Street movement remain somewhat murky — probably on purpose.”
Revelation 17: 3…and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls… 5 And upon her forehead [was] a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6.And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. 16 … and the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
Now the probable next U.S. President, Ron Paul, even admits to be in “Occupy Wall Street” - video below at the 8:00 min mark. This man also is making Illuminati hand signs - as the following video shows! Paul is a Freemason. He wrote the book: “The (Libertarian) Revolution: A Manifesto”. Ron Paul equates personal freedom with “economic freedom”, ie the “freedom” of the Jewish capitalists to steal our wealth. “There is nothing to fear about globalization, free trade and a global single currency.” Paul wants private gold banks, which will obviously be international and the private, entirely Jewish-controlled World Bank. Paul’s bosses are trying to establish a mechanism of world control. Therefore, Paul wants to get rid of the U.S. Federal Reserve.
“Occupy Wall Street,” they chanted, “all day, all week.” The Guardian 25 Sept. 2011: The marchers carried signs spelling out their goals: “Tax the rich,” one placard said. “We Want Money for Healthcare not Corporate Welfare,” read another. The demonstrators were mostly college-age people carrying American flags and signs with anti-corporate slogans. Some beat drums, blew horns and chanted slogans as uniformed officers surrounded and videotaped them.
With metal barricades and swarms of police officers in front of the New York Stock Exchange, the closest protesters could get was Liberty Street, about three blocks away. The modest inception is swelling. The 1. video below is from 29 Sept. 2011
See this MSNBC explaining why the police makes illegal arrests: The US police is by nature violent
MSNBC Photo Blog: Over 700 hundred Continental and United pilots, joined by additional pilots from other Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) carriers, demonstrate in front of Wall Street on September 27, 2011 in New York City. The pilots want to draw attention to the lack of progress on negotiations of the pilots’ joint collective bargaining agreement ahead of the one-year anniversary of the corporate merger close date of United and Continental airlines.
Washington´s Post 29 Sept. 2011The Teamsters Union and New York Transit Workers Union have thrown their support behind the Wall Street protests. The whole left-versus-right thing is just a distraction trick. It’s really the American people versus the giant bankers, captains of the military-industrial complex, and handful of others who are benefiting by shafting the average American.
Remember that one of the founders of the Tea Party – Karl Denninger – has slammed the current Tea Party (which was quickly co-opted by the mainstream GOP) for serving the rich and the Republican party instead of fighting against the giant banks, and is calling for non-partisan, Gandhi-style nonviolent resistance to take on the banksters. The protests are spreading world-wide. There are now purportedly 80+ copycat protests planned world-wide, including London, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, Las Vegas and many other locations.
On day 12 Occupy Wall Street has grown much more peaceful – but clearly, this is a peaceful social revolution directed against Wall Street banksters – with a different globalist agenda.
This revolution reminds of the Communist Manifesto OCCUPY WALL STREET DIARY 30 Sept. 2011: “Occupy Wall Street” has recently come into the media spotlight, not because of our political message, but because certain high-ranking members of the NYPD punched, threw, and stepped on peaceful marchers. Abuse of power is abuse of power. Whether perpetrated by Wall Street bankers or members of the NYPD, it is the duty of all citizens to oppose injustice. We condemn the actions of unprofessional police who used excessive force in subduing a peaceful march. But we are foremost here to oppose the growing power of the ruling class. Let us also be clear that, when approached as individuals, members of the NYPD have expressed solidarity with our cause. It has been inspiring to receive this support. Over these thirteen days, we have learned that no one supports corporations’ disproportionate influence in the political sphere. We have learned that no one is in favor of evicting struggling families to the street while banks continue to profit. No one, that is, except the corporations and banks. We urge members of the NYPD to remain in solidarity with our cause. These men and women could lose their pensions and benefits during the next round of budget cuts. We ask that members of the NYPD treat all peaceful human beings with respect and care. This will be a great step towards reclaiming power for the working class. Those who profit off the suffering of others will held accountable. We are the 99%, and we are too big to fail.”
Comment Hegelian dialectics (problem – bloody/enslaving solution – synthesis thereof to bring their one world state closer) is at play, no doubt (“Order out of Chaos” – but first create chaos!). The Illuminati are not a homogeneous group. I have learned that there is rivalry among them. One group, the fascists (Mussolini: government by corporations and politicians), supports the corporative bankster group – another group is opposed and is leaning on Marx´ and Steven Rockefeller, Gorbachev and Strong´s Communist “Earth Charter” wing (the Communist group). Together these 2 groups constitute Illuminism. Both are certainly Antichristian, Luciferian and globalistic. For they are the products of Adam Weishaupt´s / Rothschild´s Illuminati New World Order (see right margin of this blog). Some like Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his descendants, who take the appearance of total contempt for mankind, while others like Adam Weishaupt´s 6 commandments and feign to be humanitarian – although they have proven the opposite (e.g. Soviet Union).
IMMINENT:DEBKAfile (Israeli Intelligence Service blog) 8 Aug. 2011: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Turkey’s foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu to press Syria to “return its military to the barracks,” during his visit to Syria Tuesday (9 Aug.). Behind the demand was an ultimatum that if Assad continued on his present bloody path, NATO member Turkey would intervene militarily in the crisis. This is the last warning from Ankara –and therefore NATO – that Turkey was about to intervene militarily in Syria. Assad spurned the ultimatum: He embarked on his Deir el-Zour operation Sunday in order to present Washington and Ankara with a fait accompli..
Debkafile’s Iranian sources report that in the last few days, Tehran has repeatedly warned Ankara that Iran will not stand aside for a military operation against Syria and would come to the aid of the Assad regime. It was indicated that Turkish attacks on Syrian military targets would bring forth Iranian attacks on the Turkish army and American bases in Turkey. Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan declared Saturday … Turkey could not remain a bystander to the violence… “but must do what is necessary.”
LATEST:DEBKAfile 5 Aug. 2011 Twelve hours after Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned Assad he faced a “sad fate” if he failed to introduce reforms, Moscow’s envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin accused the Western alliance of planning a military campaign against Syria to help overthrow the Assad regime “with the long-reaching goal of preparing a beachhead for an attack on Iran.“In an Izvestia interview Friday, Aug. 5, Rogozin added: “This statement means that the planning [of the military campaign] is well underway.”The noose around Iran is tightening,” he said. “Military planning against Iran is underway. And we are certainly concerned about an escalation of a large-scale war in this huge region.”
(See Isaiah 17).
Summary:“The Arab Spring” has slopped over on Israel. which is now seeing rapidly growing popular mass protests by an increasingly impoverished middle class, whose wages cannot pay for their accomodations, food etc. The wealth of Israel is in the hands of a small elite. The protesters have pitched tents along the Rothschild Avenue in Tel Aviv - and similar camps and demonstrations are now appearing in all bigger Israeli cities and towns - and general strikes have been announced. This is a disaster for the governing Likud party - and in particular for Prime Minister Netanyahu, whose head the demonstraters demand on a plate. The demonstraters plan to endure until the UN General Assembly vote on a Palestinian state in Sept., intending to reinforce the pressure, so that the government resigns on the eve of the UN vote. They hope this will make many countries vote for Palestinian statehood within the 1967 borders. They think this will bring peace and less military expenditures. But in vain. For the Palestinians want every inch of Israel - and all of the millions of Palestinian refugees back to Israel proper. This and alone conceding East Jerusalem or withdrawal behind the 1967 borders would trigger a civil war in Israel between secular and orthodox Jews.
So, one of the organizers of the tent demonstrations fears that Anti-Amelekite Netanyahu might trigger some war - with Lebanon, Syria and /or Iran – to draw attention to a common vital issue.
US observers with insight have stated (and suddenly denied) that, with a probability bordering on certainty, Netanyahu will attack Iran in September - knowing that he would immediately draw a swaying US , which through its threats without substance has lost any credibility in the Near East, into the war, which will be suicidal for Israel. The Israeli daily, the Haaretz, already sees an Iran war 2011 as a fait accompli, Netanyahu and Ehud Barak being “hell bent” on war!
Biblical and Masonic prophecies abound with predictions on exactly the wars that seem to be in the making now. These wars are predicted to involve the whole world. The Bilderbergers at their June 2011 meeting cried for a “big bloody war” in the middle east now. And very influential Doomsday sects are advisers to Netanyahu and the Pentagon. They use Biblical Doomsday prophecies as their working plan - thinking this will speed the coming of their Messiah, Ben David - for the masons even the pure light of the doctrine of Lucifer - ignoring that what they provoke are exactly the signs of the Second Coming of their worst enemy, Jesus Christ. More and more observers think that this scenario is inevitable sooner or later.
Zachariah 11:16 – “For, lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, [which] shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that standeth still: but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces.”
The “Arab Spring” has slopped over on Israel – apparently also supported by circles in Washington – and now demonstrates that this UN constructed state is losing cohesion due to a too wide span between poor and rich. Throughout 2000 years of Christianity, it has been preached acc. to Biblical prophecies that the demise of a restored Israel would mean the demise of the whole world and the Second Coming of Christ. This has even been forgotten by most churches. Now Israel is restored as prophesied – but as an NWO state, which is founded on Communism for the poor – and capitalism for the few very rich, apparently. Today´s Israel is a reult of a cooperation between 3 factors: 1.Theodor Herzl´s (see year of 1897) Zionism and 2. the Rothschild dynasty´s money. 3. Without WWII there would hardly have been an Israel. Hitler was probably the grandson of Salomon Rothschild in Vienna and here.
Debkafile 27 July 2011: Two weeks ago, a motley group of youngish people set up a “tent city”in the high-end Tel Aviv Rothschild Boulevard to protest the unavailability of affordable housing in the city and other parts of the country. Since then, the movement, although never acquiring the same dimensions or fury, has assumed three attributes of the uprisings in Arab lands: It enjoys backstage foreign political support, some from certain circles in Washington; it is exploiting genuine popular grievances for political capital; and it wants regime change, namely, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s head on a platter. The protest movement grew out of the fragile underpinnings of that economy – an underpaid, overtaxed workforce; a professional 20-50 aged class that can’t make ends meet between overpriced food, housing (rents or mortgages) and schooling for their children; no prospects of change and the widest social gap in the Western world.
Today, they have shifted into parroting political watchwords borrowed from the lexicons of the Arab Revoltand left-wing extremism.
Netanyahu on July 27 promised new legislation before the Knesset’s summer recess to meet their demands. Bibi believed his initiative would take the wind out of the protesters’ sails. He was wrong. The tent-protesters plan to keep going through August towards a peak which makes the Netanyahu government doomed to fall on the eve of the UN vote. The political havoc in Israel will persuade many countries to give their votes to the Palestinians. A new Israeli government will recognize Palestinian independence within the 1967 boundaries, reversing the Netanyahu government’s firm rejection of this formula. Haaretz 31 July 2011: More than 150,000 protesters took to the streets in 12 Israeli cities, calling for a change in the division of wealth and the resignation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Ansamed 26 July 2011: The movement of social protest in Israel is rapidly gaining ground and attracting new followers. The protest has been marked by tents in Tel Aviv and springing up in Jerusalem, Haifa and Beer Sheva. The difficulties faced by tenants - the first to set up the protest camps to denounce accommodation costs, which have sky-rocketed in cities - comes amid outrage from personnel in the public health system, who themselves have staged industrial action, including hunger strikes, as a result of a loss of spending power deriving from wages. The protest has today arrived outside the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament. The growing range of initiatives involves increasingly different sections of the impoverished middle-class, a great threat to the Benyamin Netanyahu’s governing right-wing Likud party. Those camping out in Tel Aviv, meanwhile, are refusing to loosen their grip on the city’s elegant Rothschild Boulevardy. Protestors fromother sectors of society are also beginning to co-ordinate action.
In the Following video, an organizer of the tent protests in Israel fears, that Netanyahu is under so much pressure that he might start a war.
So, is war the answer? Reuters 22 June 2011: Israeli leaders holed up in a new underground nuclear bunker on Wednesday as part of annual nationwide maneuvers to prepare for a possible missile war with Iran, Syria and their Lebanese and Palestinian guerrilla allies.
I bring the following remarkable statements by former CIA officer, Robert Baer, although he now goes back on his predictions! And Jeffrey Goldberg is said to do, too: Jeffrey Goldberg: The Atlantic Sept. 2010 : “Based on months of interviews, I have come to believe that the administration knows it is a near-certainty that Israel will act against Iran soon if nothing or no one else stops the nuclear program.” Acc. to Business Insider 3 Aug. 2011, Goldberg wrote, there was a greater than 50% chance that such an attack would occur, if conditions that held last spring continued to hold this summer (2011). I cannot find that in Goldberg´s original article. So, it may have been deleted. Maybe the Stuxnet virus has made an attack on Iran unnecessary for now?
But most worrying: The Israeli NewspaperHaaretz 4 Aug. 2011 seems to see the 1. Iran war (in 2011) as a completed fact – and brings an article on how a commission will hold the war-bent Netanyahu and Ehud barak responsible afterwards!
The Huffington Post 15 July 2011 and repeated by Business Insider on 2 Aug. 2011 A longtime CIA officer who spent 21 years in the Middle East is predicting that “There is almost “near certainty” that Netanyahu is “planning an attack [on Iran] … and it will probably be in September before the vote on a Palestinian state. And he’s also hoping to draw the United States into the conflict,” Robert Baer explained. .”..it’s a nightmare scenario. We don’t have enough troops in the Middle East to fight a war like that. I think we are looking into the abyss.”
Baer didn’t name sources for his prediction of an Israeli attack, but the few he did cite are all Israeli security figures who have publically warned that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are hell-bent on war.
Baer is especially impressed by the unprecedented warning about Netanyahu’s plans by former Mossad chief, Meir Dagan. Dagan left the Israeli intelligence agency in September 2010 and two months ago predicted that Israel would attack and that doing so would be “the stupidest thing” he could imagine. According to Haaretz:
The Iranians have the capability to fire rockets at Israel for a period of months, and Hizbollah could fire tens of thousands of grad rockets and hundreds of long-range missiles, he said.
Baer said that the military is opposed, and so was the civilian head of the military, former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who used his influence to thwart an Israeli attack during the Bush and Obama administrations. But he’s gone now and “there is a warning order inside the Pentagon” to prepare for war.
It should be noted that Baer says, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard would welcome a war. They are “paranoid.” They are “worried about … what’s happening to their country economically, in terms of the oil embargo and other sanctions.” And they are worried about a population that increasingly despises the regime.
They need an external enemy. Because we are leaving Iraq, it’s Israel. But in order to make this threat believable, they would love an attack on their nuclear facilities, love to go to war in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Iraq and hit us where they could.
Baer: Israel is “truly out of control.” What happens when you see 100 F-16’s approaching Iraq and there is a call to the White House [from Netanyahu] that says “We’re going in, we’re at war with Iran”? What does the President of the United States do? He has little influence over Bibi Netanyahu. …We can’t stop him. And he knows it.
Actually, only one person matters: the president. If Israel bombed Iran tomorrow, Congress would forget all about partisan differences and run, not walk, to the House and Senate floors to endorse the attackand call for unstinting support for Israel. That is what Congress always does, and will always do so long as the lobby (and the donors it directs) are the key players in making our Middle East policies.
There is a drive for war in the Middle East. Netanyahu needs it to survive, the Iranian president,Ahmedinejad, sees war as a necessity for the coming of his 12. imam, the Mahdi. The Bilderbergers have just called for a major and bloody war in the Middle East – and Wolfgang Eggert´s Doomsday sects with great influence on Netanyahu and Pentagon are active to have this war follow the pattern described in Biblical prophecy.
The demise of Israel in Biblical prophecy As for Israel, the Doomsday prophecies are particularly sinister. Acc.to Esajas 17, the demise of Israel will follow upon the total destruction of Damascus – and the demise of Baylon (Iraq). Luke 21 describes the demise of Israel in war. Matth. 24 describes no less than a nuclear world war and and so do Habakuk 3, Jeremiah 25, Joel, Zephaniah 1 and Isaiah 33:1–4. Zachariah 12:1–9 even predicts that Jews will fight Jews in the final battle over Jerusalem.
Palestine 1939: Left Jewish immigrants. Right nomades with sheep
The New American Standard Bible, Ezekiel 38: “And the word of the LORD came to me saying, 2 Son of man, set your face toward Gog of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh (The King James Bible translates this to “chief prince”), Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him 3 and say, Thus says the Lord GOD, “Behold, I am against you, O Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal. 4 I will turn you about and put hooks into your jaws, and I will bring you out, and all your army, horses and horsemen, all of them splendidly attired, a great company with buckler and shield, all of them wielding swords; 5 Persia, Ethiopia and Put (Libya) with them, all of them with shield and helmet; 6 Gomer with all its troops; Beth-togarmah from the remote parts of the north with all its troops—many peoples with you. 8 After many days you will be summoned; in the latter years you will come into the land that is restored from the sword, whose inhabitants have been gathered from many nations to the mountains of Israel which had been a continual waste; but its people were brought out from the nations.” 19 “…I declare that on that day there will surely be a great earthquake in the land of Israel. 22 “With pestilence and with blood I will enter into judgment with him; and I will rain on him and on his troops, and on the many peoples who are with him, a torrential rain, with hailstones, fire and brimstone. 23 “I will magnify Myself, sanctify Myself, and make Myself known in the sight of many nations; and they will know that I am the LORD.” Ezekiel 39: 3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. 4 Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that [is] with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and [to] the beasts of the field to be devoured. 6 And I will send a fire on Magog, and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I [am] the LORD.”
I.a. The New American Standard Bible and my old Bible mention Gog as the prince of the nation of Rosh.
Many Bibles have dropped “Rosh” from their versions of the Gog prophecy – and some write that Rosh is not Russia – although Rosh is exactly the Russian word today for Russia. Some do think there is substance in identifying Rosh with Russia. This comprehensive study: “The Prophecy That Is Shaping History: New Research on Ezekiel’s Vision of the End” – Jon Mark Ruthven, PhD Ihab Griess, PhD does indentify Russia/Ukraine convincingly with a people of Rosh, which had migrated out of Northern Turkey, and the other peoples from the North, that Ezekiel mentions. See the map below.
I know that the Pharisees have rewritten the Old Testament in many details so as to fit into their Talmudic master race ideology. However, in Chapter 36, Ezekiel writes things so insulting to the Israelites that today he would be jailed for racism in Western Europe. This speaks in favour of the athenticity of this prophecy.
The demise of Israel in Freemason “prophecy”/plan This is what Albert Pike is said to have written (the imposter freemason Gabriel Jagond-Pager aka Leo Taxil, claimed in his book “Le diable au XIXe siècle (1894)” that it was from a letter of Pike to Mazzini written in 1871: “The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, …will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”
Is this what is going to happen now? However, the U.S. and Israel have several times threatened Iran with war and here and here and here and here, began doubting, then organized a really credible military deployment around Iran, and then retired - with the U.S. losing any military credibility in Middle East.
LATEST.The Washington Post 4 March 2011: The Obama administration is preparing for the prospect that Islamist governments will take hold in North Africa and the Middle East, acknowledging that the popular revolutions there … could give way to more religious forces. Some within the U.S. intelligence community, foreign diplomatic circles and the Republican Party say Obama’s readiness to accept Islamist movements… fails to take into consideration the methodical approach many such parties adopt toward gradually transforming secular nations into Islamic states at odds with U.S. policy goals.
Summary:A little known phenomenon is the “civil society”, composed of globalist paid hirelings in the form of non-government organizations (NGOs), institutions, etc. Their real job is to deliver desired responses to the UN, EU (“at the heart of EU enlargement”), individuals like George Soros - who has himself founded an NGO, “The Open Society” and is paying large sums to the henchmen of subservient civil society. Soros and his NGOs cooperate with the EU, especially The EU Economic and Social Council. The civil society answers are called the will of the people, although civil society is utterly undemocratic. Civil society is also being used to prepare the ground for revolutions, for example in North Africa and the Middle East. The CIA is widely using civil society in order to foment revolutions and influence public opinion in the desired direction in target countries. Perhaps the most dangerous (quasi-) NGO is the U.S. Federal Reserve / “National Bank”, which is currently in the process of destroying world economy (hyperinflation) again through rampant issuing of banknotes.
Soros is a Rothschild agent, and his Open Society works to ensure that there is free access for this illuminati gang to plunder all the resources of a country. If a country resists globalization / opening by wanting to retain its natural resources and keep and develop its own workforce by means of duties and rules of its own, or control its immigration, the Soros, EU, UN, CIA civil society police function comes into force and summons such a “closed country” before the globalists´ courts that they pay with our tax money and out of their own pockets. In “bad” cases of obstinacy, the UN, IMF, World Bank come up with sanctions. This is now happening to disobedient, closed Libya and Iran. NGOs are energetic lobbyists for dramatic changes in the UN mission and structure to achieve world government. They pretend they’re on the side of the masses. Most NGOs are also members of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In Egypt the Kmara Flag - a special fist - used first in the revolution against Milosevitch - as well as by the US State Department, and then in the Georgian Revolution in 2003 - has appeared in the Egyptian Revolutions, the leading “6 April” first being advised by the US State Department - and then sent to Belgrade´s Otpor/ now CANVAS to learn the state of the art of demonstrations.
Now the Rothschild publication, The Economist, calls Constitution supporters “mentally ill”. “Indeed, there is something infantile in constitutional worshipers believing that complex political arguments today can be solved by simple fidelity to a document that was written in the 18th century.” And the CIA supporter, The Foreign Policy, does not believe that the old Constitutions can handle such complicated issues as homosexual marriages!! Another player in this direction is America’s invisible government, the Council on Foreign Relations: The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States.
For this purpose, civil society is particularly suited - and it will acc. The CFR´s magazine, ”Foreign Affairs”, play a very important role in the future.
The U.S. and the CIA´s subversive efforts now extend to the EU Parliament, too, by means of the Colombian Intelligence Service (DAS) funded by the U.S. It is now being reconstructed by the CIA to be called The Columbian CIA! And the government of the people, for the people by the people? This phrase was already killed long ago.
“From the days of Spartacus (= Weiskopf), Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenburg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century. ” Winston Churchill 1920.
EU Commission Pres. Barroso 2 March 2011: “We can only contribute to open societies if we further encourage mobility. We should be ready to offer mobility partnerships to countries that meet certain conditions…so that mobility can be increased among those countries themselves and with Europe. We will support non-state actors such as NGOs, trade unions, women organizations and media.”
In the perverted universe of the New World order (NWO), the opinion of the stupid peoples does count. NWO democracy is based on “civil society” – built up of New World Order institututions and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) paid by whosoever may need their services – unknown to and not at all elected by the ordinary people. Such funders may be the UN, the EU, national governments, intelligence services – or private people like George Soros,who especially supports East European and Asian NGOs. The point is that when these NGOs are being asked to do what they are paid for, it is called the will of the people. These NGOs are per definition good guys fighting for justice – and when they take over, democracy and the “rule of (NWO) law” will prevail! It is very clever, take North Africa: The Egyptian and Tunisian peoples were declared to be victorious in their “revolutions”, which were no revolutions at all – but peaceful demonstrations to let the steam out and bringing no freedom at all – a few persons disappearing, but the old system continuing to rule. Now this is becoming clear to the peoples, who are again taking to the streets in Tunisia and Egypt. This is NWO control of the peoples – who are being betrayed by their “civil societies”: NGOs, the Arab League´s Amr. Moussa, ElBaradei of George Soros´and Brzezinski´s “Crisis Group”. On an EU level, the European Economic and Social Council (EESC – and here) is responsible for the contatct to the “civil society”, which is at the “heart of EU enlargement” (Olli Rehn, EU Commissioner). And Further, Mr. Olli Rehn said on 17 Apr. 2008: “In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Open Society Institute – whose founder George Soros will speak right after me – opened 12 centres around the country to support NGOs in their networking and communication activities. EU financed 8 of those centres.” Which means that the EU closely cooperates with George Soros and his NGOs. This civil society was confided with the Islamisation of Europe. But the world´s most dangerous NGO is the US Federal Reserve, which is destroying the world´s economy. I will not here enter upon the 2 safest NWO ways to create chaos: The economical crisis and here and the “war on terror”.
1. The CIAand civil society Philip Agee, former CIA agent: Since its founding in 1947, the CIA had been deeply involved in secretly funding and manipulating foreign non-governmental voluntary organisations. These vast operations circled the globe and targeted political parties, trade unions and business associations, youth and student organisations, women’s groups, civic organisations, religious communities, professional, intellectual and cultural societies, and the public information media. The network functioned at local, national, regional and global levels. Over the years, the CIA exerted phenomenal influence behind the scenes in country after country, using these powerful elements of civil society to penetrate, divide, weaken and destroy organisations on the left, and indeed to impose regime change by toppling governments.
The Soros Dossier 4 July 2008, p.71: Soros explains that the ideal open society would suppress particular national interests, while an international political and financial structure takes responsibility for the so-called common good. Accordingly, Soros arms his philanthropic organizations with cash, buying up key sectors within the population who are then let loose to overthrow a government that tries to maintain a “closed society.” If a nation wishes to control its own natural resources, it’s a closed society. If a nation wants to develop its economy and power of labor through tariffs and regulations, it’s a closed society. Any nation that rejects globalization (i.e., British imperialism), is a closed society and subject to attacks from Soros and his shadow government of national agents
The Open Society Institute (OSI), Human Rights Watch, the Soros Foundation, the Extractive Industries Transparency Institute, are all British-style intelligence outfits under the supervision of Soros. In 2002, Soros admitted to personally spending over $2.1 billion in five years on his philanthropic ventures. Of his organizations, he writes, “They work with the government when they can and independently of the government when they cannot; sometimes they are in outright opposition.
When foundations can cooperate with the government, they can be more effective; when they cannot, their work is more needed. As a general rule, the worse the government, the better the foundation because it enjoys the commitment and support of civil society.”
Whatever they view as “closed society” behavior is brought before the tribunal of the paid-for demos; or, if the behavior seriously threatens imperial interests, the UN, World Bank, IMF, WTO, etc., can be mobilized to implement sanctions.This process of subjecting a sovereign nation to a fixed international standard of behavior is called, “transparency.” The fixed relationship among those subject nations is called Empire.
Soros ally, Tony Blair explicitly stated his vision for such international institutions in a speech before the UN World Summit in September 2005: “For the first time at this Summit we are agreed that states do not have the right to do what they will within their own borders, but that we, in the name of humanity, have a common duty to protect people where their own governments will not.”
3.The NGOs (non-government organizations) already unleashed in France, Germany, England and Greece will soon be taking to the streets in America, a state George Soros-described as “the biggest obstacle to One World Government” - Patriots for America 11 Nov. 2011.
NGOs, long fomenting for revolution, and on the payrolls of the One World Order deadly duo George Soros and Maurice Strong, are not the good guys. The political, strategic spawn of Soros and Strong, they are the paid agents of change, looking to Barack Obama to get the job done. It was Strong who long ago came up with the blueprint for coupling the money from “philanthropists” and business with the objectives of government.
No one describes the NGOs better than Phyllis Schlafly who has watched them for decades: “The NGOs are energetic lobbyists for dramatic changes in the mission and structure of the UN to achieve global governance. Most NGOs are also members of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which originated many of the global environmental polices set forth in the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on Climate Change, and Agenda 21. The most prominent NGOs are the radical environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and the feminist and population-control groups such as Planned Parenthood.”
But the NGO members, both cunning and conniving, make like they are on the side of the masses. They are the next door neighbour, the cantor singing at Sunday service, the babysitter who teaches your children that evil capitalism must be stomped out; that Mommy and Daddy are polluting the Planet.
Here is a list of Soros supported NGOs and institutions.
millions by the US National Endowment for Democracy. Its signature clenched fist logo adorned flags, signboards, and t-shirts carried by the US State Department-laid astro-turf until the ousting of Slobodan Milošević in 2000.The exact same logo would turn up 11 years later across the Mediterranean Sea in the streets of Cairo, illustrating further the foreign-backed nature of the Egyptian uprisings. After its success, Serbia’s Otpor would continue receiving funds from the West and become a “CIA-coup college” of sorts, under the name CANVAS, or “Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies.” It appears that after the Egyptian April 6 Youth Movement finished attending the US State Department funded confab in New York City in 2008, it would make a trip to visit Otpor/ now CANVAS in 2009. From there, it took CANVAS’s “curriculum” and apparently their logo, and began assembling a US-funded mob in Egypt. In fact, this fist is the flag of Kmara: Kmara (Georgian -”Enough!”) was founded by Sakashvili´s Liberty Institute and funded by the US and George Soros to oust Georgian President, Edward Shevardnadze, in 2003, because he opposed the US.
The Arab riots Prison Planet 27 Febr. 2011: As Washington plunges the Middle East and North Africa into chaos, and city by city collapses into the hands of globalist stooges, many have mistakenly interpreted this “change” as a positive transformation. On the contrary, the regimes that will replace the embattled nationalistic dictators in each nation the globalists despoil will interface not with the national governments in the service of their people, but will interface with the “civil society” underlay the Western backed NGOs have meticulously built up over decades. This “civil society” will in turn answer to corporate serving globalist institutions, like the IMF, WTO, World Bank and the UN, instituting crushing economic “liberalization.”
We have been given a prepackaged ideal of what “revolution” is supposed to look like. So when we see people in the streets battling security forces, waving flags, all within the backdrop of their burning society, we are satisfied that “revolution” is taking place. But the reality is, this is not a revolution by any stretch of the imagination. It is a high-tech, high-speed invasion and subjugation, a corruption of the sovereign state similar to what Tacitus described in Roman conquered Britannia. From HistoryWorld.net: ‘His object was to accustom them to a life of peace and quiet by the provision of amenities. He therefore gave official assistance to the building of temples, public squares and good houses. He educated the sons of the chiefs in the liberal arts, and expressed a preference for British ability as compared to the trained skills of the Gauls. The result was that instead of loathing the Latin language they became eager to speak it effectively. In the same way, our national dress came into favour and the toga was everywhere to be seen. And so the population was gradually led into the demoralizing temptation of arcades, baths and sumptuous banquets. The unsuspecting Britons spoke of such novelties as ‘civilization’, when in fact they were only a feature of their enslavement.” Tacitus Annals of Imperial Rome, translated Michael Grant, Penguin 1956, 1975, page 72
As we can see, “civil society” is not a new idea, nor is the concept of lulling a population into decadence and complacency while rolling them into a corrupt, exploitative domineering empire.
Some may be skeptical of whether or not boycotting and replacing the elitist system that currently domineers mankind is even possible, however it is already taking place. The alternative media is one such example, where people fed up with being lied to by obnoxious propagandists have decided to turn off the TV and report the news themselves. It has become a self-sustaining industry with exponential growth, where reputation and accuracy is replacing the slick graphics and 500 dollar suits that used to represent “legitimacy.”Foreign Affairs: ”The World Ahead,” a special issue of Foreign Affairs: non-state actors (NGOs) are playing a large role.
4. The editors of the Economist have declared constitutionalists mentally ill.“Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors wrote on September 23. “When history is turned into scripture and men into deities, truth is the victim.” – Infowars 25 Sept. 2010 : The Economist is owned by members of the Rothschild banking family of England. It is run by the Economist Group, a known CIA front. The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry? Soon after the Economist article appeared, the establishment publication Foreign Policy posted an article slamming the idea that we should follow the Constitution. Joshua Keating writes that he suspects “most Americans don’t realize quite how old the Constitution is by world standards,” that is to say globalist standards. In 2008, Foreign Policy was bought by the Washington Post Company. The Washington Post is the crown jewel of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird to subvert the free press in the United States.
The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States.
Comments Here is a list of the most important owners of The Feeral Reserveas quoted from Representative Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency for 12 years as quoted from the Congressional Record (He was murdered because of his outspokenness). See these names – and you will know who want to get rid of our constitutions, using other NGOs to undermine nation states.
Subversive activity is the NWO way of creating “chaos out of order”! Their best tool is their “civil society” – a well paid body of vampire-bitten blind idealists who think they can save the world on the basis of lies (CO2–lies, multiculturalism etc.). Of course, some of them deliver fine analyses. But they are paid to deliver ideological answers to be used in the sense: “The people thinks”. They replace both elections and independent opinion polls. And not only that: Vicious Rothschild agents call themselves “philanthropists”, using NGOs as watchdogs to report on countries that will not open up to the globalists´ looting. Then the Illuminati turn their economic, perhaps. military thumbscrews until the “closed country” complies and opens up. Libya’s and Iran’s rulers are such obstinate (and unsympathetic) rulers in closed countries. Therefore, they are to be removed - at any costs! Thus the Illuminist (explanatory statement, p. 29) world dictatorship is working - because we allow them to!
In North Africa the CIA is now using civil society to stage “revolutions” – with no real changes at all. Now the NGOs have the possibility to become the bedding of a new dictatorial rule. However, this will not be possible beyond the limit set by the Muslim fundamentalists, cf. the Muslim Brotherhood and the military. For it is true: The choice in Muslim countries is secular military – or Muslim Sharia rule – in both cases dictatorship. The NGOs will have to seek support with one side or the other – are just puppets in this situation, too, also to be won by ancient Roman decadence methods.
And why do they want to starve mankind into despair and rebellion? And why does the CIA spy on the EU, the US NWO partner? Maybe the answer lies in their declared contempt for the US (and others´) Constitution – the backbone of the USA. They want one world government – order out of chaos – but first chaos!