Search Results for “global revolution + alexander king”.


“Auf der Suche nach einem gemeinsamen Feind, gegen den wir uns vereinen können, kamen wir auf die Idee, dass die Verschmutzung, die Bedrohung globaler Erwärmung, Wasserknappheit, Hungersnöte und dergleichen dem Zweck entsprechen würde. Man kann sie nur durch veränderte Einstellungen und Verhaltensweisen überwinden. Der wirkliche Feind ist dann die Menschheit selbst.” (First Global Revolution, p. 75, Alexander King, Gründer von Rockefellers Club of Rome.

*

The New American 19 Nov. 2013 (Warschau): “Während Theorien der Vereinten Nationen über angebliche menschen-verursachte globale Erwärmung auf der Weltbühne einbrechen, fordern Führer der Dritten Welt-Regimes, dass die Steuerzahler in den reicheren Ländern sofort beginnen, ihnen Billionen von Dollar  auszuhändigen,  um den “Klimawandel” zu behandeln. Vor massiven öffentlichen Protesten gegen die Erpressung auf dem jüngsten UN-”Klima”-Gipfel, hoffen die Regierungen, schnell und leise die Grundlagen für ein neues globales Abkommen zu erlangen, das Kohlendioxid rationieren wird.” (Agenda 21, CO2-Weltwährung).

The New American 19 Nov. 2013 (Warsaw): “With United Nations theories about alleged man-made global warming imploding on the world stage, LDC regimes are demanding that taxpayers in wealthier countries start promptly handing over trillions of dollars — supposedly to deal with “climate change.” At the latest UN “climate” summit, and facing massive public protests against the extortion effort, governments are hoping to quickly and quietly lay the foundations for a new global treaty rationing carbon dioxide.”

Die Postulate der globalen Erwärmung begannen mit Edmund de Rothschilds Behauptung (nach der 28:40 Minuten Marke) von CO2-Erderwärmung,  sowie dass man CO2 abfangen und zu auf die Pole und in die Sahara transportieren sollte, um diese Orte zu kühlen. Denn das würde ein großes Geschäft werden.

Club of Romes “Die 1. Globale Revolution” gab der globalen Erwärmung ihre politische Perspektive
(Weltregierung) . Schon die erste Veröffentlichung des Klubs, “Grenzen des Wachstums” hat die mangelnde Wahrhaftigkeit ihrer These  bewiesen,  dass die Menschheit vor 2000 AD aus Mangel an Ressourcen  - Öl-Wasser- untergegangen sein würde ( entschuldigen Sie mich, in diesen Kreisen verwenden sie c.e.  - common era, um  Christus nicht anzuerkennen). Die Grundlage dafür waren schlechte Computermodelle. Und genau dies ist heute noch das Problem

Denn schlechte Computer-Modelle werden immer noch verwendet, um zukünftiges Klima vorherzusagen, fast die Meteorologen Schwierigkeiten haben, vorauszusagen, wie das Wetter morgen wird.
Professor Ole Humlum, Oslo,  gibt regelmäßig seine Climate4You heraus. Die folgenden Grafiken sind aus der aktuellen November 2013 Ausgabe. Die Satellitenbilder am Ende sind von Cryosphere Today.

Die erste Grafik stellt den gigantischen Unterschied zwischen den tatsächlich gemessenen und aus Computer-Modellen vorhergesagten Temperaturen seit 1979 um den Äquator dar.
**************************



Measured_global_temp_compared_with_model_-_temp.

Global_surface_air_temp._+_atm._CO2

September-global-temp.sept.2013_

Temp.increase_since_1850

Zonal_lower_tropospheric_global_temp.

Global_oceanic_heath_content

Global_sea-level-surface-temp.

Global_sea_level

Global_sea_temp._16_nov.

Weighted_antarcticsurface_air_temp

Arcticair_temp

Arctic_and_antarctic_sea_ice

Northern_hemisphere_snow_cover

Arcticair_temp

Arctic_and_antarctic_sea_ice

Arctic_lower_tropspheric_temp.

North_atlantic_ocean_heath_content

Arctic_sea_ice_thickness

Arctic_ice-nov.2003

****************************************************************************************************************

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortage, famine and the like would fit the bill. It is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.” (First Global Revolution, p. 75, Alexander King, Founder of Rockefeller´s Club of Rome.

*
The New American 19 Nov. 2013 (Warsaw): “With United Nations theories about alleged man-made global warming imploding on the world stage, LDC regimes are demanding that taxpayers in wealthier countries start promptly handing over trillions of dollars — supposedly to deal with “climate change.” At the latest UN “climate” summit, and facing massive public protests against the extortion effort, governments are hoping to quickly and quietly lay the foundations for a new global treaty rationing carbon dioxide (Agenda 21 - Co2world currency.”

The postulations of global warming began with Edmund de Rothschild postulating (after 28:40 min. mark) CO2-warming and that CO2 should be caught and transported to the poles and into Sahara to cool those places. For that would be big business.

Club of Rome´s “The 1. Global Revolution” gave global warming its political perspective (world government). Already that club´s first publication, “Limits to Growth” had proved its lack of veracity by claiming, mankind would perish by 2000 AD for lack of resources - oil, water (excuse me, in those circles they use c.e. - common era - in order not to acknowlege Christ). The basis for that was and still is bad computer models.
For bad computer models are still used to forecast future climate

Professor Humlum, Oslo, regularly issues his Climate4You. The following graphs are from the November 2013 issue.
The satellite photos of the arctic ice expansion at the end of the graphs are from Cryosphere Today.

The first graph represents the enormous difference between actually measured temperatures and  temperatures prognosticated  on the basis of computer models since 1979 in the equatorial region.

*

Measured_global_temp_compared_with_model_-_temp.

Global_surface_air_temp._+_atm._CO2

September-global-temp.sept.2013_

Temp.increase_since_1850

Zonal_lower_tropospheric_global_temp.

Global_oceanic_heath_content

Global_sea-level-surface-temp.

Global_sea_level

Global_sea_temp._16_nov.

Weighted_antarcticsurface_air_temp

Arcticair_temp

Arctic_and_antarctic_sea_ice

Northern_hemisphere_snow_cover

Arcticair_temp

Arctic_and_antarctic_sea_ice

Arctic_lower_tropspheric_temp.

North_atlantic_ocean_heath_content

Arctic_sea_ice_thickness

Arctic_ice-nov.2003

****************************************************************************************************************

Kurzfassung: Mit dem Daily Mail Artikel vom 8. Sept. 2013 über die schon längst bekannte 60%ige Zunahme des arktischen Eises im letzten Jahr – wobei uns “die Wissenschaft” in diesem Jahr eisfreie Nordpol-Schiffspassage versprochen hatte – haben die Warmisten ein ernstes problem bekommen: Das IPCC muss seinen AR-Report neu schreiben und unter kräftigem Druck der Regierungen der Welt eine Menge Punkte umschreiben, weil sie schlichthin falsch sind.

Nun tritt sogar die Erz-Warmistin, Die EU Klimakommissarin, Connie Hedegaard, hervor und gesteht ihre langjährige Lüge: Die Klimawissenschaft war gar nicht unerschütterlich ein für alle Male festgelegt, wie sie und ihresgkleichen sonst behaupteten. Historisch gesteht sie in The Telegraph “ Die Wissenschaft war falsch, aber unsere Politik ist richtig“. Was für eine Lüge: Die „Wissenschaft” gesteht, dass es seit 1995 keine Erderwärmung gebe – und somit besteht keine Grundlage für ihre Klima-Panikmache. Trotzdem meint sie und die EU, ihre rabiate Politik der Ausplünderung der Europäer sei richtig: und zwar durch Klimabörsen-Gebühren und CO2-Emissionsgenehmigungen, grüne Steuern überall , unnötige, sehr teure Umstellung auf grüne Energie-Quellen. Dabei nimmt man gar nicht die Billigen in Betracht. Des Weiteren die Erschaffung von „grünen Jobs“, um die Arbeitslosigkeit abzuwickeln, obwohl spanische Forscher festgestellt haben, dass jeder neue grüne Job den Verlust von mehr als 2.2 traditionellen Jobs bedeutet. Diese Jobs bedürften vor Jahren Steuerzahler-Zuschüsse in Höhe von 0.5 bis 1.0 Mio. pro Job.

 

 

Da nun die Klimalüge bei den meisten Menschen nicht mehr eingeht, holt die EU sofort eine neue Lüge aus dem Arsenal des Club of Rome (First Global Revolution) hervor, um „die nötige Disziplin“ in der Bevölkerung der Diktatur aufrecht zu erhalten: Appell an unser Gewissen hinsichtlich der grünen Energieversorgung für die steigenden Menschenmassen – obwohl die Welt über genug fossile Energie für die nächsten 54 ++ Jahre verfügt. Der eigentliche Zweck der EU erzählt sie uns aber nicht: Die seit 2009 existente Eine-Welt-Regierung Rothschilds muss sich weiter entwickeln – und zwar in die kommunistische Agenda 21-Nachhaltigkeitshölle und Menschen-Ballung, wie in diesem Jahr von der UNEA – und vor 10 Jahren von der NWO-besessenen dänischen Regierung – verabschiedet. Dafür ist eine enorme Kapital-Umverteilung nötig – vom Westen in das aus u.a. unabänderlichen religiösen Gründen bodenlose Loch der dritten Welt. Obwohl die Wissenschaft also feststellt, dass es keine Erwärmung gebe – einige sehen nun eine kühle Periode die nächsten vielen Jahre - geht der politiker-Irrsinn weiter: Sie wollen sogar niedrig-furzende Kühe – und wohl später auch Menschen – entwickeln. Monsanto steht mit GMO bereit!

*

Das Folgende ist eine historische Offenlegung der Lüge über “menschen-verursachte Erderwärmung”: Die EU-Klima-Kommissarin gesteht, uns damit belogen zu haben,

1. dass “die Wissenschaft “unstreitig und erledigt” sei.

2. dass der Zweck ihrer Politik nicht ist, den Planeten vor dem Braten zu retten.

3. dass sie unser Geld im Namen der “Klima-Bekämpfung” weiterhin ganz unnötig klauen will, obwohl sie zugibt, es gibt keine wissenschaftliche Basis dafür.

4. dass sie uns den wirklichen Grund, weshalb sie uns betrügt, verschweigt: die kommunistische Agenda 21-Eine-Welt-Regierung wie von der UNEA in diesem Jahr und dem dänischen Parlament vor 10 Jahren verabschiedet.

5. Die EU ist lügt weiterhin in Bezug auf die Schaffung von neuen grünen Jobs: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos March 2009, S.1 hat festgestellt, für jeden neuen grünen Job gehen 2,2 traditionelle Arbeitsplätze zzgl. derjenigen, die ohne die grüne Ideologie hätten erstellt werden können, verloren. Der staatliche Zuschuss pro Job in 3 Kategorien war von 0.5 – 2.0 Mio Euro (s. 25). Dies ist das Gesicht der Neuen Weltordnung.

The Telegraph 16 Sept. 2013: EU-Klima-Kommissarin Connie Hedegaard sagt, die derzeitige Politik sei richtig, obwohl die Wissenschaft falsch sei, weil eine wachsende Weltbevölkerung die Energieversorgung unter Druck setzen werde – unabhängig von der Geschwindigkeit globaler Erwärmung. “Vielleicht denkt die Wissenschaft in 30 Jahren anders!!” Die dänische Kommissarin wies auch öffentliche Beschwerden über Anstieg der Strompreise, um erneuerbare Energien zu subventionieren, zurück.

CONNIE_2673422b

Links: EU-Kommissarin Connie Hedegaard. Vielleicht denkt sie: “Verdammt, Daily Mail! und dein Artikel vom 8. Sept. 2013 auf die arktische Rekord-Eisdecke! Wegen unserer Versprechen von eisfreier Passage und kein Nordpol-Eis in diesem Jahr hat dein Artikel unseren Vorwand für unsere NWO und das Melken des Geldes der Völker des Westens zuschanden gemacht: Niemand glaubt uns mehr”.

Hedegaards Kommentare kommen, wie man erwartet, das (betrügerische) regierungs-gemeinsame Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) werde zugeben, die bisherigen wissenschaftlichen Prognosen für die globale Erwärmung und die Auswirkungen der Kohlendioxid-Emissionen haben sich als falsch erwiesen.

Gesickerte IPCC-Berichte, die Prognosen aus dem Jahr 2007 überprüfen, haben in Frage gestellt, wie viel Klimawandel stattgefunden habe, und zwar durch die Folgerung, die globale Temperatur sei nur wenig oder langsamer als in den letzten 10-20 Jahre vorhergesagt gestiegen. In Jyllands-Posten, DK, 16.Sept. 2013 erzählt Björn Lomborg, das IPCC habe in den letzten 15 Jahren den globalen Temperaturanstieg um 300% übertrieben. Nicht so merkwürdig in Anbetracht der Tatsache, dass IPCC-Vorsitzender Pachauri vor The Times of India feststellt, dass “Klimawissenschaft” politische Auftragsarbeit sei!

Im Prozess der Verteidigung der umstrittenen Politik hat die EU oft extreme Wetterereignisse mit globaler Erwärmung verbunden, nachdem das IPCC vor sechs Jahren besagte, es sei mehr als 50 Prozent sicher, dass Wirbelstürme, Überschwemmungen und Dürren durch von Menschen verursachte globale Erwärmung verursacht seien. Diese Zahl wird voraussichtlich auf weniger als einen 21 Prozent revidiert werden!!

Björn Lomborg, Professor an der Copenhagen Business School und Autor von “Cool it”, einem Buch, das argumentiert, zu viel Klimapolitik basiere auf Panikmache, warf der Kommissarin vor, “gefühllos und auf dem Holzweg zu sein”.

DK-greengas_reduction

Rechts: Dänemarks Treibhausgas-Emissions-Reduktion

“EU- Klimapolitik hat direkte Energiekosten erhöht und verursacht mehr Energie-Armut - 300.000 Haushalte in Deutschland haben im letzten Jahr ihre Elektrizitätsversorgung verloren, weil sie ihre Rechnungen nicht bezahlen können, und Millionen sind in Grossbritannien energiearm. Klimapolitik kostet £ 174.000.000.000 jährlich bis zum Jahr 2020. Die EU-Kommissarin scheint anzudeuten, das Verschwenden von £ 174.000.000.000 sei kein Problem”, sagte er. “Soweit die EU Klimapolitik die Welt betroffen hat, hat sie Energie teurer gemacht, Wachstum gemindert und mehr Menschen in die Armut geschickt.”

Die eigene Schätzung der UK-Regierung zur Erfüllung der EU-Ziele ist eine Kostensteigerung von 33 (!) Prozent auf den durchschnittlichen Strompreis der Haushalte im Jahr 2020. Neue EU-Abgaben auf Kohlendioxid-Emissionen aus der Industrie werden schätzungsweise die britische Wirtschaft 700.000.000 £ kosten, eine Rechnung, die zum Verbraucher über höhere Preise weitergegeben wird.

Der Klimaplan der dänischen Regierung Aug. 2013 - jetzt eigentlich umsonst und als Luftschlösser leichtgläubiger oder böser Ideologen zu sehen:
“Menschen-verursachter Klimawandel ist real und ernst zu nehmen. Die Regierung will Dänemark aktiv dazu beitragen lassen, die Empfehlungen der Wissenschaft einer erheblichen Reduzierung der Treibhausgase zu erfüllen. Gleichzeitig wollen wir dem Rest der Welt Dänemark als Beispiel zeigen.

Wissenschaftler empfehlen, dass die Industrieländer ihre kollektiven Treibhausgasemissionen bis 2050 im Vergleich zu 1990 als Teil einer Gesamtstrategie zur Halbierung der globalen Emissionen um 80-95 % reduzieren. Die EU hat sich zu diesem Ziel verpflichtet. Dies bedeutet, dass wir unsere Wirtschaft deutlich anzupassen haben. Die Regierung wird eine Klima-Gesetzgebung darlegen.
Ko-metan-udslip
Methanemissionen von Kühen können durch Änderung der Fütterung von Rindern und die Entwicklung der so genannten Niedrig- Emissions-Rinder reduziert werden! (GMO , Monsanto Unternehmen?)

Kommentar
Dies ist ein historischer Moment: Man machte menschen-verursachte globale Erwärmung durch CO2 das Hauptargument für die NWO-faschistische / kommunistische Weltregierung Rothschilds. Nach einer langen Zeit des Konsenses in den Medien, stürzt plötzlich das Kartenhaus zusammen, denn die Wahrheit wird sich am Ende immer bewähren. Die Leute konnten die Abwesenheit der Erderwärmung einfach sehen und spüren.

Aber – die Globalisten haben viele Ideen vorrätig: In dem Bericht vom Iron Mountain 1967, brachten die Globalisten die Idee auf, dass die Angst vor Zerstörung irgendeiner Art Krieg ersetzen könnte, um die unverzichtbare Disziplin und die bürgerliche Zusammenarbeit in ihrem undemokratischen NWO-Staat aufrecht erhalten zu können.

In dem Bericht mit dem Titel “The First Global Revolution” (S. 75, 1991) durch den Club of Rome veröffentlicht, eine kommunistische, globalistische Rockefeller-Denkfabrik, finden wir die folgende Aussage des Mitgründers, Alexander King: “Auf der Suche nach einem neuen Feind, um uns zu vereinen, kamen wir auf die Idee, dass die Verschmutzung, die Bedrohung der globalen Erwärmung, Wasserknappheit, Hungersnöte und dergleichen in die Rechnung passen würde …. All diese Gefahren werden durch menschliche Eingriffe verursacht … der wirkliche Feind ist sonnt die Menschheit selbst”.

Nun ist diese CO2-Reduktion eine kostspielige Angelegenheit. Im August 2013 hat die dänische Regierung einen Klima -Plan dargelegt. – Demnach sollen dänische Treibhausgas-Emissionen um 8,5 Mio. Tonnen CO2 – Äquivalente jährlich reduziert werden. Gem. den Zahlen wird sich der Betrag auf 88 Mrd. Dänenkronen im Jahr belaufen – also 520 Mrd. D.Kr. bis 2020.

Diese und alle andere Einnahmequellen (”grüne” Steuern, Gebühren für Wall Streets / London Citys Klima-Börsen usw.) dürfen den Illuminaten-Räubern natürlich nicht verloren gehen. Also finden diese ideologischen Bankster sofort eine andere Ausrede für ihre Eine-Welt- Regierung – jetzt kehren sie wieder zur Öl-Ressourcen-Knappheit des Club of Rome zurück (ursprünglich vorhergesagt, das Ende der Welt bis zum Jahr 2000 zu bedeuten ) – obwohl es viel fossile Energie in bekannten Ressourcen für die nächsten 54 Jahre beim aktuellen Jahreesverbrauch gibt - und mehr wird im selben Takt gefunden, wie Öl aus der Erde gesaugt wird. (Forbes 27 March 2013).

Die Nutzung von Sonnenenergie-Konzentratoren, um durch Wasserspaltung Wasserstoff zu generieren, der extrem saubere und billige Treibstoff ist (The Independent 15 Apr. 2013 - Science 2 Aug. 2013), ist eine Möglichkeit der Energie-Erzeugung. Jedoch, dieser Gedanke sowie der Gedanke der Entwicklung von Nicola Teslas freier Energie (siehe Video oben) oder Energie aus Luftfeuchte – BlackLight Hydrinos und hier und hier – ist tabu: Es würde das große Öl-Geschäft ruinieren, das die Banken bereichern, die die NWO Politiker bestechen und hier.

http://euro-med.dk/?p=30910


Abstract:
The article in the Daily Mail on 8. Sept. 2013 showing a  long known 60 % increase of Arctic ice since  last year - although “science” had promised ice free shipping passage over the North Pole this year- got  the warmists into serious problems: The IPCC ’s AR-report has to be rewritten on a lot of issues after strong pressure from the governments of the world, because they simply are wrong.

Now even Arch-Warmist, EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, appears and confesses her long-standing lie: Climate science was not settled once and for all, as she and her ilk had been  claiming. Historically, she admits in The Telegraph that “The science was wrong, but our policy is correct.” What a lie : “The Science” admits that there has been no global warming since 1995 – and thus, there is no foundation for their climate scaremongering. Nevertheless, she and the EU say their rabid policy of plundering the Europeans is right: namely by climate exchange fees and CO2 emission licences, green taxes everywhere, unnecessary, very expensive conversion to green energy sources not taking the cheapest sources into consideration, as well as creation of “green jobs “to handle unemployment” . They ignore that Spanish researchers have found each new green job to cost more than 2.2 traditional jobs. Years ago, these jobs demanded taxpayer subsidies of between 0.5 and 1.0 million per job.

Since the climate lie no longer goes in with most people the EU immediately brings a new lie out of the arsenal of the Club of Rome (First Global Revolution) to maintain “discipline” in the population of the dictatorship: appealing to our conscience in terms of green energy supply for the growing crowds of the LDCs, although the world has enough fossil energy for the next 54 ++ years. However, she does not tell us the EU’s real purpose: Rothschild´s one-world government must develop further - into the Communist Agenda 21 ’s sustainable hell and human agglomeration, as passed this year by the UNEA - and more than 10 years ago by the NWO-possessed Danish government. An enormous amount of capital redistribution is necessary - from the West to the LDCs which are for  immutable religious reasons bottomless holes. Therefore, although science can show no warming - some now even see a cooling period for the next many years - the politicians´  madness continues: They even want to develop low-farting cows – by and by people, too, I guess. Monsanto is ready to provide the GMO.
*

The following is a historical disclosure of the lie of man made global warming: The EU Climate Commissioner admits to have been lying to us about 1. science being “indisputably settled”. 2. the real purpose of her policy not being to save the planet from frying to death. 3. that she wants to steal our money in the name of “climate combating” anyway although she admits there is no scientific basis for fighting warming. 4. by not telling she has concealed the real purpose of deceiving us: The Agenda 21 one world government as passed by the UNEA this year and the Danish Parliament 10 years ago. 5. The EU continues lying about the creation of new green jobs: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos March 2009, p.1 found that for each new green job 2.2 traditional jobs + those that could have been created without the green idelogy are lost. The average state subsidy per job in 3 cathegories was from 0.5 - 1 mio. euros (p. 25). This is the face of the New World Order.

The Telegraph 16 Sept. 2013 - In an interview with the Telegraph, EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard argued that the current policies are correct although the science was wrong, because a growing world population will put pressure on energy supplies, regardless of the rate of global warming.
Say that 30 years from now, science came back and said, ‘wow, we were mistaken then now we have some new information so we think it is something else’. The Danish commissioner also rejected public complaints over increases in electricity prices to subsidise renewable energies.”

CONNIE_2673422b

Left: EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard. Perhaps, she is thinking: “Damned, Daily Mail! and your article from 8 Sept. on the record Arctic ice cover!! Due to us promising free passage there and no North Pole ice this year, your article ruined our excuse for our NWO and milking the peoples of the West of their money: No one believes us any more.”

Hedegaard’s comments come as the United Nations (fraudulent) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is expected to admit that previous scientific predictions for global warming and the effects of carbon emissions have been proved to be wrong.
Leaked IPCC reports, reviewing forecasts made in 2007, have called into question how much climate change has taken place by concluding that, even with a doubling of carbon emissions from 1990 levels, the global temperature has risen little or more slowly than predicted over the last 10-20 years. In Jyllands-Posten 16 Sept. 2013, Björn Lomborg tells the IPCC has exaggerated global temperature increase by 300 percent!
Not so strange, considering that IPCC Chairman Pachauri to The Times of India tells  that  “climate science” is politically commissioned work!

The EU has often linked extreme weather events to global warming after the IPCC said six years ago that it was more than 50 per cent certain that hurricanes, flooding and droughts were being caused by man made global warming. That figure is expected to be revised down to less than a 21 per cent

Björn Lomborg, a professor at the Copenhagen business school and the author of “Cool it”, a book arguing that too much climate change policy is based on scaremongering, accused the commissioner of being “both callous and wrong”.

DK-greengas_reduction

Right: Denmark´s greenhouse reduction plans

EU climate policies have directly increased energy costs and caused more energy poverty - 300,000 households in Germany lost their power last year because they couldn’t pay their bills, and millions are energy poor in the UK. EU climate policies will cost £174 billion annually by 2020. The EU commissioner seems to suggest wasting £174 billion is no problem,” he said. “To the extent the EU climate policies have affected the world, it has made energy more costly, reduced growth and consigned more people to poverty.”

The Government’s own estimates of meeting the EU target are a cost increase of 33 per cent to the average electricity price paid by households in 2020. New EU levies on carbon emissions from industry are estimated to cost the British economy £700 million, a bill that is passed on to the consumer via higher prices.

The climate plan Aug. 2013 of the Danish government –  now actually all in vain and revealed as castles in the sky for gullible or evil ideologists:
“Man-made climate change is real and must be taken seriously. The government wants Denmark to contribute actively to meet the recommendations of science as for significant reductions in greenhouse gases. At the same time we want to show Denmark as an example for the rest of the world.

Scientists recommend that industrialized countries reduce their collective greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95 % by 2050 compared to 1990 as part of an overall halving of global emissions. The EU has committed itself to this target. This means that we must adapt our economy significantly. The Government will forward a climate bill.

Ko-metan-udslipMethane emissions from cows imay be reduced by changing the feeding of cattle and the development of so-called low-emission cattle!” (GMO, Monsanto business?)

Comment
This is a historical moment: Man made global warming by CO2 was the main argument of the NWO for Rothschild´s Fascist/Communist one world government. After a long time of consensus in the media, all of a sudden the card house tumbles, because truth will always prevail in the end. People could simply see and feel the absence of global warming.

But –  the globalist storehouse is full of ideas: In the Report from Iron Mountain 1967, the globalists  came up with the idea, that fear of destruction of some kind could replace war, which is otherwise indispensable for the discipline and civil coopertation  in their undemocratic NWO state.

In the report titled “The First Global Revolution ( p. 75, 1991) published by the Club of Rome, a Rockefeller-globalist think tank, we find the following astonishing statement by co-founder Alexander King:In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Now this CO2–reduction is a costly affair. In Aug. 2013, the Danish government issued a climate plan –  wanting to reduce Danish emissions by 8,5 mio. tons CO2-equivalents annually –  acc. to given figures 88 bn. Danish kroner annually –  i.e. 520bn D.Kr. by  2020.

This and all the other sources of income (“green” taxes, fees for the Wall Street/London City Climate exchanges etc.) must not be lost for the Illuminati robbers. So, these ideological banksters immediately find another excuse for their one world government –  now they might return the Club of Romes Oil Peak once again (originally said to mean the end of the world about 2000 AD)  –  although there is plenty of fossil energy in known resources for the next 54 years at the current rate years –  and more is found in the same tact as oil is sucked out (Forbes 27 March 2013).

The usage of  sun energy concentrators to generate extremely cheap and clean hydrogen fuel  from sea water  (The Independent 15 Apr. 2013Science 2 Aug. 2013) is an option for energy production. However, this thought as well as the thought of developing Nicola Tesla´s free energy (see video above) or energy from aerial vapour  - BlackLight Hydrinos and here and here - is taboo: It would ruin the big oil business which  enriches the bankers  bribing NWO politicians and here.

Se dokumentation for klimaløgnen her og her

Resumé: Artiklen i Daily Mail den 8. September 2013 viser en længe kendt 60% stigning i den arktiske isudbredning siden sidste år  - skønt “videnskaben” havde lovet fri skibsfart over en isfri Nordpol i år - og skaffede varmisterne alvorlige problemer: IPCC ’s AR-rapport skal skrives om på en masse punter efter stærkt pres fra regeringerne i verden, fordi de simpelthen er forkerte.

Nu træder oven i købet ærke-varmisten, EUs klimakommissær, Connie Hedegaard, frem og bekender sin mangeårige løgn: Klimavidenskaben var slet ikke én gang for alle slået fast, som hun og hendes ligesindede havde hævdet. Historisk indrømmer hun i The Telegraph, at “videnskaben var forkert, men vores politik er rigtig.” Hvilken løgn: “Videnskaben” indrømmer, at der ikke har været nogen global opvarmning siden 1995 - hvorfor der ikke er grundlag for deres klima skrækkampagner. Alligevel siger hun og EU, at deres politiske plyndring af europæerne er rigtig: gennem klimabørs-gebyrer, salg af CO2-licenser, grønne afgifter overalt, rabiat unødvendig og meget dyr omlægning til grønne energikilder. De tager end ikke de billigste kilder i betragtning. Endv. oprettelse af “grønne job” til at klare arbejdsløsheden. De ignorerer, at spanske forskere har fundet, at hvert nyt grønt job koster mere end 2,2 traditionelle jobs. For år tilbage krævede  disse job skatteydersubsidier på mellem 0,5 og 1,0 millioner per job.

Da klimaløgnen ikke længere går ind hos de fleste, bringer EU straks en ny løgn ud af Club of Romes arsenal (First Global Revolution ) for at opretholde “disciplin” i befolkningen under diktaturet: EU appellerer til vores samvittighed i form grøn energiforsyning til de voksende skarer i de mindst udviklede lande, selv om verden har nok fossil energi til den næste 54++ år. Men hun fortæller os ikke EUs virkelige formål:  Rothschilds en-verdens regering skal udvikle sig yderligere - til det kommunistiske bæredygtighedshelvede, Agenda 21s diktatur, med urbanisering og masseophobning af mennesker. Det er vedtaget af UNEA - og for mere end 10 år siden af ​​den NWO-besatte danske regering. En enorm mængde kapital-omfordeling er nødvendig - fra Vesten til de mindst udviklede lande, der af bl.a. uforanderlige religiøse grunde er bundløse huller, og det skønt videnskaben ikke kan vise opvarmning - nogle peger nu endda på en afkølingsperiode i de næste mange år. Og politikernes galskab fortsætter: De har endda ønsker om at udvikle lidet-pruttende køer -  do. mennesker også, tror jeg. Monsanto er klar med GMO.

*

Det følgende er en historisk afsløring af løgnen om menneskeskabt global opvarmning: EU Klimakommissær Connie Hedegård indrømmer at have løjet for os om 1. at “videnskaben “ligger ubestrideligt fast” . 2. At formålet med hendes politik slet ikke var at redde planeten fra at blive stegt til døde. 3. at hun ønsker at stjæle vores penge til “klima bekæmpelse” alligevel, selvom hun indrømmer, at der ikke er noget videnskabeligt grundlag for at bekæmpe opvarmning. 4. at hun har skjult det egentlige formål med at bedrage os: Agenda 21, en verdensregering, som er vedtaget af UNEA i dette år og af det danske Folketing for 10 år siden 5. EU fortsætter løgnen med nye arbejdspladser: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos March 2009, s.1 oplyser, at der for hver nyt grønt job mistes 2.2 traditionelle arbejdspladser + dem, der kunne have været skabt uden den grønne idelogi. Det gennemsnitlige statstilskud per job i 3 kategorier var fra 0.5 - 1 mio. euro (s. 25). Dette er den Nye Verdensordens ansigt.

The Telegraph 16 Sept. 2013 - I et interview argumenterede EU klimakommissær, Connie Hedegaard, at den nuværende politik er korrekt, selv om videnskaben var forkert, fordi en voksende verdensbefolkning vil lægge pres på energiforsyningen, uanset hastigheden hvormed global opvarmning udvikler sig.
“Tænk, hvis om 30 år fra nu af videnskaben kom tilbage og sagde, ‘wow , vi tog fejl, nu har vi nogle nye oplysninger, så vi synes, det forholder sig anderledes”. Den danske kommissær afviste klager fra offentligheden om, at stigninger i elpriserne skal subsidiere vedvarende energi.”

CONNIE_2673422b

Venstre: EU klimakommissær Connie Hedegaard. Måske tænker hun: “Pokker tage dig,  Daily Mail! og din artikel af 8. Sept. om rekordudbredelsen af den arktiske iskappe! Pga., at vi lovede fri sejlads dér og ingen Nordpolsis i år, har din artikel ødelagt vores undskyldning for vores Nye kommunistiske Verdensorden og vor malkning af befolkningerne i den vestlige verden for deres penge: Ingen tror os mere.”

Hedegaards kommentarer kommer,  mens FNs (bedrageriske) Internationale Panel om Klimaændringer (IPCC) forventes at indrømme, at tidligere videnskabelige forudsigelser om global opvarmning og konsekvenserne af kulstofudledninger har vist sig at være forkerte.
Lækkede IPCC-rapporter, der gennemgår forudsigelserne fra 2007, har sat spørgsmålstegn ved, hvor meget klimaforandringer, der har fundet sted, ved at konkludere, at selv med en fordobling af kulstofemissioner fra 1990-niveauet er den globale temperatur i de seneste 10-20 år kun steget lidt eller langsommere end forudset. I Jyllands-Posten d. 16 september 2013 fortæller Björn Lomborg, at IPCC har overdrevet den globale temperaturstigning med 300 %! Ikke så mærkeligt, når selve IPCC-formand Pachauri til Times of India erklærer, at “klimavidenskab” er politisk bestillingsarbejde!

EU har ofte knyttet ekstreme vejrforhold sammen med global opvarmning, efter at IPCC for seks år siden sagde, at den var mere end 50 procent sikker på, at orkaner, oversvømmelser og tørke blev forårsaget af menneskeskabt global opvarmning. Det tal forventes at blive justeret ned til mindre end 21 procent.

Bjørn Lomborg, professor ved Copenhagen Business School og forfatter til ” Cool it” , en bog, der  argumenterer for, at for megen klimapolitik bygger på skræmmekampagner, beskyldte kommissæren for at være “både afstumpet og galt afmarcheret”.

DK-greengas_reduction

“EU klimapolitikker har direkte øget energiomkostningerne og forårsaget mere energifattigdom - 300.000 husstande i Tyskland mistede deres elforsyning sidste år, fordi de ikke kunne betale deres regninger, og millioner er energi-fattige i Storbritannien. EU klimapolitikker vil koste £174.000.000.000  årligt i 2020. EU-kommissæren synes at antyde, at det at spilde £174.000.000.000 ikke er noget problem,” sagde han. “I det omfang EU klimapolitikker har påvirket verden, har det gjort energi dyrere, givet mindre vækst og sendt flere mennesker ud i fattigdom.”

Regeringens egne skøn mht. opfyldelse af EU-målet er en omkostningsstigning på 33 procent oven i den gennemsnitlige elpris, der skal betales af husholdningerne i 2020. Nye EU afgifter på kulstofemissioner fra industrien er anslået til at koste den britiske økonomi £ 700.000.000, en regning, der gives videre til forbrugerne via højere priser.

Den danske regerings Klimaplan Aug. 2013 - nu faktisk helt forgæves, og afsløret som luftkasteller for godtroende eller onde ideologer:
“Menneskeskabte klimaforandringer er reelle og skal tages alvorligt. Regeringen ønsker, at Danmark bidrager aktivt til at opfylde anbefalingerne fra videnskaben mht. betydelige reduktioner i drivhusgasudledningen. Samtidig ønsker vi at vise Danmark som et eksempel for resten af verden.

Forskere anbefaler, at de industrialiserede lande skal reducere deres kollektive udledning af drivhusgasser med 80-95 % i 2050 i forhold til 1990 som led i en samlet halvering af de globale udledninger. EU har forpligtet sig til dette mål. Det betyder, at vi skal tilpasse vores økonomi betydeligt. Regeringen vil barsle med et klimalovforslag.

Ko-metan-udslipMethan-udledninger fra køer kan reduceres ved at ændre fodringen af kvæg og udvikling af såkaldte lav-udledningskvæg!” (GMO, Monsanto? )

Kommentar
Dette er et historisk øjeblik : Menneskeskabt global CO2-opvarmning var det vigtigste argument for for Rothschilds Nye Verdensordens fascistiske / kommunistiske en verdensregering. Efter lang tids enighed i medierne tumler pludselig korthuset sammen, fordi sandheden altid vil sejre i sidste ende. Folk kunne simpelthen se og føle fraværet af den globale opvarmning.

Men - globalisternes lager er fuldt af ideer: I Rapport fra Iron Mountain 1967 kom globalisterne frem med den ide, at frygten for ødelæggelse af en eller anden slags kunne erstatte krig, som ellers er uundværlig for den disciplin og civile samarbejde, der er nødvendig i deres udemokratiske NWO stat.

I rapporten med titlen “The First Global Revolution” (s. 75, 1991) udgivet af Club of Rome, en Rockefeller - globalistisk tænketank, finder vi følgende forbløffende erklæring fra medstifter Alexander King: “Da vi søgte  efter en ny fjende til at forene os, kom vi på idéen om, at forurening, truslen om global opvarmning, vandmangel, hungersnød og lignende ville passe ind i billedet …. Alle disse farer er forårsaget af menneskelig indgriben den virkelige fjende er så menneskeheden selv .”

Nu er denne CO2-reduktion en bekostelig affære. I august 2013 udsendte den danske regering en klimaplan - idet den ønskede at reducere det danske udslip med 8,5 mio. tons CO2-ækvivalenter årligt. Iflg opgivne tal svarer dette til 88 mia.. DKr. om  året - dvs 520 mia. Kr. til 2020.

Denne og alle de andre indtægtskilder ( “grønne” afgifter, honorarer til Wall Street / London City klimabørser osv.) må ikke gå tabt for Illuminat- røverne. Så disse ideologiske bankstere finder straks en anden undskyldning for deres én-verdensregering. Nu kan de vende tilbage til Club of Romes Oliemangel igen (oprindeligt sagde de, at den betød verdens ende omkring 2000 e.Kr.) - selv om der er masser af fossil energi i kendte ressourcer til de næste 54 år med det nuværende årsforbrug - og der findes mere i samme takt som olien suges ud (Forbes 27 March 2013).

Brugen af ​​solenergi-koncentratorer til  at generere ekstremt billig og ren brint-brændstof fra havvand (The Independent 15 Apr. 2013Science 2 Aug. 2013), er en mulighed for energiproduktion. Men denne tanke samt tanken om at udvikle Nicola Tesla frie energi (se videoen ovenfor ), eller energi fra luftfugtighed  - BlackLight Hydrinos og her og her - er tabu: Det ville ruinere de store olie-koncerner, som beriger bankfolk med penge til at bestikke NWO politikere og her med.

Abstract: In the European Commission,  pessimism is prevalent because of the economic / Euro crisis and the austerity measures prescribed, leading to poverty and therefore hatred of the Commission, the EU and national politicians. Jean-Claude Juncker, former head of the euro group, is short of imagination - he repeated his absurd scaremongering from the month of January 2013: The year 2013 was so similar to the year of 1913 that one can fear a European war next year, in which Europeans would slaughter their best dairy cow, Germany, because the demons of war were only asleep! That would obviously be the end of the announced fourth  Empire of Rothschild and its reorganization of Europe. Barroso also speaks of the demons of war. Do they know something we do not know - or is it just desperate scaremongering to emphasize the “need” of their union?

In Germany a New Party, “Alternative for Germany” is under way - led by the top economists of the country. It wants Germany to enforce contractual changes, that Germany abandons the Euro and return to the D-Mark. This party, acc. to an Emnid survey, can expect 25% of the votes in the upcoming parliamentary election.
In Italy, in the general election, Beppo Grillo’s new Internet 5-Star Party has just won 26% of the votes, making him the kingmaker. He holds the Commission, which is said to cost 300 million euros a year, to be totally unnecessary.

Former European Commission President Romano Prodi told the EU Council, i.e. Van Rompuy, is now taking over the power of the Commission - and the Parliament will not adopt the budget of the Commission.
In Britain, Prime Minister Cameron has had to promise a referendum on the EU in 2015 because of strong pressure from his own MPs.

But not enough: Germany and Finland have prevented Bulgaria and Romania from joining the Schengen agreement - life blood to the Commission.  In particular, the cause thereof is a harsh slap in the face of the EU: These countries and their populations are deadly tired of Roma immigration with indescribable pollution of whole districts and enormous pressure on social budgets.
However, the much greater threat: the opening for the immigration of theoretically up to 1.2 billion Muslims in the name of the conquest of the West for Allah they dare not mention. Is Roma antipathy the tip of the iceberg, maybe a vanguard for provisions that could ultimately limit the massive Muslim immigration? This would mean loss of more life blood with the Euro-Mediterranean process and its practically free Muslim immigration finally coming to an end, which would be a further huge loss of prestige for the globalist world communist EU Commission.

*

“In fact, Italy’s already out of the euro”. Beppe Grillo believes that the Nordic countries would keep Italy only so long, “until they have taken the pure investment banks in their Italian bonds again. Then they will drop us like a hot potato.”
Grillo sketched a popular decision on the euro. “Just as on the Lisbon Treaty. These are “all issues on which our Constitution was ignored”.
Grillo sees himself not as anti-European. “We are the French Revolution - without guillotine” .Europe needs a “Plan B,” says the Italian politicians.
“We must still ask: What happened to Europe? Why do we have no common information policy, no joint tax policy, no common policy of immigration? Why has only Germany been enriched?
(Beppe Grillo in an interview with the Handelsblatt)

*

Documentation of Abstract

The EU structure shows significant cracks, which is saddening  the unelected Commission bigwigs because they have no idea how to save their globalist brain figment, the EU as the 4. Reich aka Rothschild´s 4. Reich in the long run. It is good for just nothing - neither their political Euro-Utopia nor their ideas that the peoples of Europe will melt into a babylonian one world mass, easy to manipulate into slavery,  if they are made poorer and poorer - through the climate lie, through bailouts and endless immigration of violent, uneducated Muslims and Roma who despise us and live by massive welfare suck, while banks devour our last money. Gradually the populations are seeing a light: The EU itself  as well as our corrupt governments and here are even poisoning us by chemtrails. But if the populations knew that the Pharisees are the real force behind it all, there would probably very soon be a revolution? Hardly - because these forces have profoundly pacified us through brainwashing into total submission. Nevertheless, a colossus with feet of clay will not stand forever.

Juncker020708The Telegraph 11 March 2013 Jean Claude Juncker, prime minister of Luxembourg, (left showing the antichristian 666-sign) who chaired a group of Euro-zone finance ministers said that he had been appalled by protesters’ banners in Greece which showed Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, in Nazi uniform. Resentment over austerity measures advocated by Germany spilled over into public anger when Mrs Merkel visited Athens last October. Some Greeks protesters burned a swastika flag while others dressed in Nazi uniforms. Mr Juncker said in an interview with the magazine Der Spiegel: “Anyone who believes that the eternal question of war and peace in Europe is no longer there risks being deeply mistaken. The demons have not gone away — they’re only sleeping, as the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo showed. I am struck by how much conditions in Europe in 2013 are similar to those of 100 years ago.” Comment: This means the EU is a failure!

The way in which some political figures in Germany had been criticised in Greece has left “deep wounds” Mr Juncker said. He said the Italian election was also “excessively hostile to Germany and therefore anti-European”. Mr Juncker, who chaired the Euro Group from 2005 until he stepped down in January this year, said that he saw parallels with 1913. “In 1913 many believed that there would be no more war in Europe. The great powers of the continent were so closely intertwined economically that the view was widespread that they could no longer have military confrontations.”  However, his dramatic evocation of the past has also prompted some derision. Comment: This is desperate scaremongering. In 1913, Germany  had no Rothschild national bank. She has now  - whereby the banksters have no reason to instigate a European war against Germany - as they did then. How could Greece or Italy wage such a war? And why should France destroy its best dairy cow? Juncker had made his warnings to journalists already in January of this year. Why is he repeating that? Scaremongering? By the way: Barroso uses the same phrase with the demons.

Meanwhile, a poll published on Monday indicates growing German unease over the cost of the euro crisis. One in four Germans would vote in September’s federal election for a party that wants to quit the euro, according to an opinion poll conducted by TNS-Emnid for Focus magazine.

Logo_-_Alternative_fuer_Deutschland_rgb_kleiner_RandWahlalternative-2013_07Spiegel 8 March 2013 In Germany, a new party is forming this spring, intent on abandoning European efforts to prop up the common currency. And its founders are a collection of some of the country’s top economists and academics.
Named Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany), the group has a clear goal: “the dissolution of the euro in favor of national currencies or smaller currency unions.” The party also demands an end to aid payments and the dismantling of the European Stability Mechanism bailout fund.

Programm der Alternative für Deutschland

* We call for an orderly resolution of the euro zone. Germany does not need the euro. Other countries damage the euro.
* We call for the reintroduction of national currencies, or the  creation of smaller and more stable currency unions. The reintroduction of the German Mark should not be taboo.
* We call for a change in the European treaties to allow each state to leave the euro. Each nation must be allowed to decide democratically on  its currency.
* We demand Germany to enforce this right of withdrawal from the euro  by blocking further  ESM bail-outs with her veto.
* We demand that the cost of the so-called bailout policy not be borne by taxpayers. Banks, hedge funds and large private investors are the beneficiaries of this policy. They must be the first to be accountable.
More here.

In Geolitico 6. März 2013 an additional  program item can be read: “substantial transfers of sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Germany requires plebiscites”. Strange is an article by a signatory of the “Alternative for Germany”, supposedly ultra-conservative and clearly politically correct Konrad Adam, a retired writer of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Die Welt. For he has not a good word to say about the Alternative for Germany - although he actually can produce no serious arguments against its representatives - but for Hans-Olaf Henkel being an adviser to the Bank of America, and that the AfD only has the euro for a program.

As for prominent subscribers, see the Addendum below

Prodi-Barrose

What went wrong?
Interview with former EU Commission pres. Romano Prodi, EUObserver 18 Febr. 2013Europe´s progress will not be [led by] the commission but by the Council,” he noted.

The voice of the commission is very, very soft. There is interest only when Mrs Merkel and Mr Hollande … meet together. Van Rompuy is step by step becoming the centre of Europe.” And while the commission is becoming less political, national politicians are becoming more selfish, he warned.

“They (the Germans) had pushed for the stability Growth and Stability Pact and yet they were the first to disobey it and to put it in the dustbin. I can’t forget that night … I was shy. I said: ‘Look, but you can’t go beyond three percent.’ And I remember they told me: ‘Shut up. We are the lords of this.’ The euro was introduced in 2000 in a move which Prodi described as “a change in the concept of the state.”
Referring to the 17th century Peace of Westphalia, a treaty which defined the modern European notion of statehood, Prodi said: “The Westphalian state is basically dependent on its army and its currency. When you have a common currency, you have a different kind of state. I personally pushed for it [the euro], because it was a great step for the European Union and, even more, an absolutely necessary step in the context of globalisation.” The failure of the constitution broke the spell.

“Europe changed and the optimism changed into pessimism and then came the break-up of the European Constitution. It was too early to do it. I understand now that if you want to change the concept of nationhood in a peaceful way, as we are obliged to do because of globalisation, then you need time.
EurActiv 25 Jan. 2013:  A caucus of eurosceptic British Conservative MPs has issued a manifesto today (16 January) stating that “the status quo is no longer an option” and demanding “a new and different relationship” with the European Union. In consequence Prime Minister Cameron has promised an EU referendum in 2015

With Europe in the throes of an economic crisis, resentment towards Brussels is higher than ever. Many Europeans have blamed the EU for causing the crisis, citing a failure of the euro currency. They also resent the EU for continued rounds of austerity measures, which have seen some communities lose vital services, and for its perceived lack of democratic legitimacy. The president of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso: “Of course [euroscepticism] worries me … There are old demons in Europe - extreme nationalism, populism, xenophobia. You see that in times in crisis that extremist forces, populist forces, have a better ground to oversimplify things and to manipulate feelings.”

Nik de Boer and Maarten Hillebrandt of the Amsterdam Centre for Law and Governance say the mistrust between citizens and the EU is understandable. “The European member states have never really sought to involve their citizens in the EU. The political debate about the goal of the EU and the way to reach it has largely taken place behind closed doors,” they wrote on BlogActiv.

EUObserver 13 March 2013Beppe Grillo’s extraordinary success in the recent Italian elections tapped into anti-establishment feeling that is ripe for the plucking in other member states too, say analysts.

The EU/NWO system calls this man a clown - for fighting for what the the European man in the street   wants . So what to call those who call that clown acts? The following video has German captions - but you can change it int English by clicking on texts/subtitle icon in the process line on this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7I9OwaPq7g , click translate(beta), choose e.g. English.

Grillo’s 5-Star Movement, established by blog in autumn 2009, scooped 26 percent of the vote during last week’s elections, effectively putting him in kingmaker position as government negotiations begin. The 5-Star Movement has a lean programme with five themes: public water, transportation, development, internet connection and the environment. There is nothing on foreign policy. And nothing about the EU.

Grillo, a former comedian who built a following through out the 1980s with his political satire, is given to expansive rhetoric.
“Apart from Barack Obama, I have never seen a politician with such an incredible following,” says Jamie Bartlett, director of the UK-based Centre for Analysis of Social Media.The key factor for Grillo doing so well says Bartlett was that “his supporters went out and voted.”

The 64-year old, who will not enter parliament himself because it would fall foul of his movement’s own rules on not having a criminal conviction (he has one for manslaughter following a car accident), managed to get his online followers out on to the street to canvas, knock on doors and finally go to the ballot box.
Grillo’s supporters are generally young, reasonably well-educated and about 20 percent of them are unemployed. Forty-six percent came from the left; 39 percent came from the right.

Their distinguishing feature is their deep mistrust of political parties and institutions, of mainstream media and the justice system. For supporters of the five-star movement, the economy and unemployment is their main concern.

With levels of trust in institutions falling across Europe, Bartlett reckons a Grillo-ist movement could be replicated in other member states. He points to similar levels of across-the-board mistrust in the UK, Greece and France. This is compounded by crisis economics, high joblessness and continued austerity measures. So, “We could see quite a (EU) parliament next year,” says Heather Grabbe of the Open Society Institute in Brussels.

This likelihood is increased by the fact that voters tend to see their EU parliament ballot as having little domestic consequence. Grillo himself has denounced all traditional parties in Italy and has refused to deal with Italian media.  A couple of years down the line, predicts Bartlett, Grillo will aim for a pan-European movement. He is already telling other similar movements, such as the Spanish protest movement Indignados, where they are going wrong.

Poverty

Contempt to citizens: Austerity to please the markets creates planned poverty
Deutsche Welle 13 March 2013
: Today, the International Red Cross distributes food aid in almost 20 EU member states as result of rising poverty levels. In Spain alone, some three million people now depend on help to survive.”Poverty is eating its way into the very heart of society,”

Comment

Roma-protest

Further cracks have arisen: 1. The Parliament will not pass the budget passed by the EU Council, 2. Germany and Finland have now barred Bulgaria and Romania from joining  the Schengen area - because they don´t like these welfare tourists. Approximately 200,000 Roma, or “gypsies,” call Germany home. In Bulgaria that number is 370,000, and in Romania, 550,000. Other estimates put the two countries’ combined total at 1.5 million. But no politicians  protest to prevent 1.2 bn uneducated Muslims from coming legally and illegally into the EU to receive welfare benefits although the latter are following a Koran-program to conquer the west for the Sharia. Is the banning of Romas a first sign that our national governments are clawing back their sovereign rights to decide their own demographic future - a foreboding that the disastrous immigration on the whole must be stopped - although destruction of the nation state by immigration is another crucial EU point? One may hope so - The final death of the Euromediterranean Process with its promises of visa easing for Muslim states with “advanced status, like the Christian persecuting state Morocco, would be a real backlash for the EU.
The EU Commission is right feeling threatened because of its Utopian adventurous, impoverishing, undemocratic secrecy policies. May it fall and never rise again!

Addendum

To the main subscribers of the “Alternative für Deutschland” count:

Dr. Konrad Adam, Journalist (FAZ, Die Welt) und Publizist.
Prof. Dr. Charles Blankart, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Berlin.
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Blum, Präsident des Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle a. D.
Prof. Dr. Ursula Braun-Moser, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments (CDU) 1984-1994.
Peter Christ, vormals Leiter der Wirtschaftsredaktion “Die Zeit” und Chefredakteur von Stuttgarter Zeitung, Manager Magazin, Sächsische Zeitung u. a., Luzern.
Dr. Ebenhöh, Orthopädie, Chefarzt MediClin Reha-Zentrum, Bad Orb.
Günter Ederer, Filmemacher und Wirtschaftsjournalist, Weiler bei Bingen am Rhein.
Dieter Farwick, Brigadegeneral a. D. und Publizist, Sigmaringen-Laiz.
Dr. Alexander Gauland, Staatssekretär a. D.
HenkelProf. Dr. Andrea Gubitz, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Frankfurt.
Christian Hanika, Mitglied im Bundesfachbereichsvorstand ver.di Ver- und Entsorgung, Bad Abbach.
Prof. Dr. Ing. E.h. Hans-Olaf Henkel, Praesident der IBM Europa, des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) und der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft a.D. (right)
Dr. Wolfgang Hönig, Generalbevollmächtigter a. D. der Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt.
Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Hannover.
SchachtschneiderDr. Klaus-Peter Last, freiberuflicher Softwarespezialist, 1991-1998 Landesschatzmeister von Bündnis90/Die Grünen Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
Prof. Dr. Bernd Lucke, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Hamburg.
Prof. Dr. Helga Luckenbach, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Gießen.
Prof. Dr. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider, Öffentliches Recht, Hamburg (left).
Dr. Dieter Spethmann, Vorstandsvorsitzender Thyssen AG a. D.
Prof. Dr. Joachim Starbatty, Volkswirtschaftslehre, Tübingen.
Beatrix von Storch, Zivile Koalition, Berlin.
Uwe Woltemath, Journalist, ehemaliger Landes- und Fraktionsvorsitzender der FDP Bremen





Web Analytics