Latest: A reader has sent me the Report of the Bureau for Technology-Consequence Assessment of the German Parliament, TheTAB. The report includes i.a. current and intended operational concepts and scenarios in the context of threat scenarios. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs - Drones) have been established beyond the function of surveillance as weapons platforms in so-called hunter-killer missions. Only the military is entitled to use drones to kill - not the police or intelligence services, which, however, may use drones for surveillance purposes. Worrisome, however, is the use of fully automated killer drones, “acting on their own own”, which may also kill civilians “by chance”. The use of particular armed drones is not precluded by the principles of international humanitarian law per se. The U.S. experience shows, however,that drones kill not only on the battlefields.
In Portugal tens of thousands of demonstraters against austerity gathered (Deutsche Welle 29. Sept. 2012).
In Paris, on 30. Sept., more than 50.000 participated in a big demonstration against the fiscal pact and austerity - and it is said to be just the beginning.
Global Res. 29 Sept. 2012 The French, Spanish and Greek governments all announced multibillion-euro austerity plans yesterday in the face of massive popular opposition. On Wednesday, millions of workers throughout Greece walked off the job and hundreds of thousands protested in a one-day national strike.These events demonstrate the impossibility of fighting social austerity in Europe by supporting the bourgeois “left” parties, the European Union (EU), or European capitalism. In a matter of months, the promises made by the official parties have proven worthless.
When shall we see the EU´s EUROGENDFOR in action to bully the demonstrators?
Summary:The big German chemical corporations, the BASF, Bayer and Hoechst, merged in 1925 to form the IG Farben - a powerful financial empire with the participation of U.S. corporations such as Rothschild´s FED and Rockefellers Exxon / Standard Oil. Carl Duisberg of Bayer is said to have demanded - and to have - WWI, to have a market for the German chemical Industry under German legislation from Bordeaux to Sofia. According to Dr. Matthias Rath, WWII was an attempt by the German pharmaceutical industry to conquer the European market under German domination. Already during the end phase of the 3rd Reich, the 4th Reich was being planned: A German financial empire in the framework of a supranational organisation. To this end, Professor Walter Hallstein and 4 other former IG Farben affiliated experts, including Nazi lawyer affiliated to the IG Farben and stood for “blood and honor”. As their model for the EEC Commission, these undemocratic architects used the IG Farben, the operator of Auschwitz, the largest financier of Hitler and manufacturer of synthetic gasoline and synthetic rubbers on license from Rockefeller’s Standard Oil – without which Germany 2 could not have waged WWII.
Now the old Maoist Communist, José Barroso, wants to complete the dictatorial model for world governance and world state, the EU, by constructing an EU finance ministry at the expense of the reluctant German taxpayers, to send the southern EU member states into deeper dependence on Germany, the paymaster of the NWO EU Ltd. - ie Brussels. Germany is fit for this purpose, being a pacified wealthy non-state without a democratic Constitution – only the basic law dictated by the victors of WWII. Already during WWII and in particular thereafter, its corporations (and postwar politicians) were/are amazingly loyal to the NWO.
Barroso says. “We’ve integrated more than before. All previous steps taken to combat the crisis have led to more, not less European integration.” However, this does not at all mean advantage to the Germans or other North European countries like Denmark outside the euro zone because of the solidarity principle (the ESM). We have to pay directly or through our EU contributions to the ESM. The ESM will now be raised to a staggering 2 trillion euro to save Italy and Spain - and soon, France and Belgium, too, so that they can pay the big banks their interest. To expedite this poverty process, the ECB now wants to let its printing presses run uncontrollably - to create hyperinflation.The wealthy EU states are more and more endebted, and it is to be anticipated that through their ESM waste of money, the lender states will also sink into unlimited dependence of the big banks. This brings us total, boundless Fascism (Mussolini) with Communist regime over the increasingly large destitute proletariat, which is now being ripped of their previous bribery, their welfare states, in order to uphold the hopeless common currency and an endless unqualified Muslim immigration.
Social safety nets across the continent are clearly under pressure and collapsing, so much so that unemployed Spaniards begin to loot supermarkets in order to put food on their tables. Last month, the people of Cadiz and Seville, which have a reported an unemployment rate of 32%, joined forces to rob local grocery stores of three tons of food - some of which was distributed to local food banks.
46.7 million Americans - a new record - are dependent upon receiving food aid from the government.
Apparently, the EU now expects increasing social unrest and therefore plans – like the US (which will fly 30,000 drones in the US) – using spy / killer drones.
And people do not understand this brilliant looting.
“Germany is disappering more and more every day, and I simply find that excellent!” Former Federal Minister Jürgen Trittin, Bündnis90/Die Grünen
SuleymanDemirel,Turkey,to HelmutSchmidt(Soc.dem.),Germany: “You see,Mr.Schmidt,till the end ofthis century, we must exportevenfifteen millionTurksto Germany.…… We produce the kids,andyou‘ll take them!” Source:HelmutSchmidt ZEIT-PunkteNo.1/1993p29, published byDIEZEIT,Germany.
‘Two-faced’ politicians have opened the door to an EU superstate by giving up on democracy”. (The Telegraph 22 Sept. 2012, Czech President Václav Klaus.
Documentation of Summary
The German pharmaceutical corporation, IG Farben, was the ringleader behind what was named the 4th Reich in 1944 by SS officer Scheidt and by others the USSR (and the aim is world Communism for the masses, run by a capitalist fascist corporate/Nomenklatura, the World Community Ltd.): the EU as a German financial empire under a supranational shield. Behind this is the absolute top of the NWO pyramid of power and their hirelings who lead its global corporations, including the media and “our” politicians. Ultimately, the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations and the U.S. security services, the OSS and the CIA, were behind the founding of the European Community and the euro. Germany, bullied into submission through WWII, with no legal democratic Constitution – only with the Basic Law dictated by the victors of WWII – and a people famous for its intelligence, skills, austerity and financial solidity, was to be the cover-up and pay-masyer for the NWO take over of Europe as the model for its World governance/state through Zbigniew Brzezinski´s regionalisation.
Walter Hallstein became the first EC president (1958–1967) and is seen as one of the EU´s founding fathers. But who was that man? He was a Bilderberger, of course. Hallstein said: “We are building the United States of Europe.” But what kind of a United Europe?
Right: The EU is a corporate Ltd. – having the notorius Nazi IG Farben for its model. On April 24, 1964, the key architects of the “Brussels EU” – all of them active members of the IG Farben/Nazi coalition during WWII – met at the “Brussels EU” headquarters to stake their claims on the future of the European continent. 1. EU Commission President Walter Hallstein
2. German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard 3. Ludger Westrick, Head of the German Chancellery
4. Karl Carstens, German Secretary of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
5. Karl-Günther von Hase, Head of the Press and Information Service of the German government.
Wikipedia: During Nazism, Walter Hallstein was a member of the National Socialist People’s Welfare and national socialist professional associations for lawyers and judges. In 1941 he was appointed professor of civil law at the University of Frankfurt (Frankfurt am Main). He was also, at the same time, director of the university’s Institute for Comparative Law and Commercial Law. More about the Corporate Fathers of the EU.
EU Facts: Hallstein writes legal expertises for IG Farben. On January 23, 1939, only months before the launch of WWII by the Nazi/IG Farben coalition, Hallstein gives a speech on the topic of common European law under German leadership. Therein he states: “One of the most important laws (in occupied European countries) is the Protection Law for German Blood and Honour.”
Left: Carl Duisbergof Bayer Pharma was the father of chemical warfare and forced Labour during WWI. Acc. to Dr. Matthias Rath (Video above – I disagree with his medicinal views) he demanded WWI to obtain europewide markets. Already in 1904, he demanded supremacy of German chemistry over the entire world. He won Emperor Wilhelm II for this purpose. His chancellor, Hollweg, then on 31 July 1914 declared the purpose of WWI was an economic union with France, central European countries and Denmark in the interest of German chemistry. In 1931 Duisberg demanded an economic union from Bordeaux to Sofia in the interest of German chemistry. Duisberg was the driving force behind the creation of IG Farben 1925 through a merger with BASF and Hoechst – and IG Farben was the biggest financer of Hitler and ran Auschwitz – strongly supported by the American wing of its board –comprising Rothschild´s FED and Rockefeller´s Exxon/Standard Oil. Dr. Rath sees WWII as the 2. attempt by the German pharma industry to conquer Europe. Whereas the German board members were condemned as war criminals at the Nuremberg Processes the equally guilty US board members like the FED and Rockefeller were not even accused. Dr. Rath sees the EU as the 3. attempt of the corporate chemoindustry to conquer Europe.
The principally undemocratic construction of today´s “Brussel EU is no coincidence. Hallstein– expert of the IG-Farben concern – was chosen by these corporate interests to become the first EC Commission president with a specific assignment: to model the ‘Brussels EU’ after the original plans of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition to rule Europe through a ‘Central Cartel Office’ [i.e. the ‘Brussels EU’] with a junta of unelected cartel bureaucrats [i.e. the ‘EU Commission’] ruling the people of Europe on behalf of global corporate interests, namely (Rothschild´s) Chemical, Oil and Drug Cartels (and Rothschild-owned big banks).
Auschwitz was 100% owned by IG Farben with Rockefeller and Rothschild investments - and WWII would not have been possible without IG Farben – according to the Nuremberg chief prosecutor, Taylor. Helmut Kohl, who signed the EU treaties, worked for IG Farben´s subsidiary, the BASF. The Express 12 Sept. 2012: The nations of the EU must come together in a federal state, if the euro is to be saved, the President of the European Commission declared today. He said the crisis, which had hit Greece, Portugal and Spain had ‘fuelled populism and extremism’ in Europe.”Old ideas” will not work any more and greater political union is needed in order to save the euro currency, he said. Barroso said the EU needs to “move toward a federation of nation states” that involves shared sovereignty.
“Pooled sovereignty means more power (to the EU Commission), not less,” he argued. The EC chief even claimed that the EU should have its own military force which would be able to intervene in conflicts ‘when needed.’
Der Spiegel 10 Sept. 2012: The German chancellor now wants to stop Athens from leaving the euro zone at all costs - even if it means massaging the figures in the upcoming troika report. For the German leader, it is essential to avoid the consequences of a Grexit before national elections next year.
The Spiegel 10 Sept. 2012: The ECB is politically independent, but it is not above the law. It is only independent within its mandate, which is clearly defined by the European treaties: The central bank is tasked with safeguarding price stability in the euro zone — no more and no less. Draghi wants more, though; he wants to save the European common currency at all costs. The euro, he says, is “irreversible.”Draghi has no democratic legitimization.
So far, the ECB has already spent over €200 billion ($256 billion) buying sovereign bonds from crisis-stricken euro-zone countries. If the exception now becomes the rule, additional bonds worth hundreds of billions could quickly follow. German taxpayers are also ultimately liable for this amount - without the German parliament, the Bundestag, having a say. Merkel is secretly pleased with Draghi’s initiative because the chancellor would probably not be able to gain majority support in the Bundestag for additional euro rescue programs. In such a situation, Mario Draghi is the most powerful man in Europe, undeterred by courts or parliaments. Comment: Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court has just decided that the European Stability Mechanism, the permanent successor to the current rescue fund, the ESM to be constitutional. The ECB apparently stands above the Bundestag and above the Federal Constitutional Court.
SHTFplan 5 Sept. 2012: Social safety nets across the continent are visibly under stress and breaking down, so much so that unemployed Spaniards have begun raiding supermarkets in order to put food on the table. As recently as last month the people of Cadiz and Sevilla, which have a reported unemployment rate of 32%, joined together to loot local grocery stores of three tons of food - some of which was distributed to local food banks.
This morning we learned that 46.7 million Americans – a new record – are receiving government nutritional food assistance benefits, so the troubles we’re seeing in Spain, Greece and other European countries are not just limited to the other side of the ocean. They are happening right here at home.
José Barroso, EU Press Release 30 Aug. 2012: We are already more integrated than before. All the steps so far taken to combat the crisis have resulted in more European integration, not less. Of course the logic of integration cannot be purely economic. Banking union requires a single European supervisor; further economic union too requires joint European supervision of the Member States economic policies. It is therefore logical, but it is also right and just, that there is further political integration as well. This is needed to ensure democratic oversight.
The European Commission will, on the 12th of September, table proposals to create a European banking union. The European Commission is now producing yearly country specific recommendations as part of theEuropean Semesteron economic governance. These cover the full range of economic policy from tax regimes to education. Our aim to give informed, impartial, independent and dispassionate guidance.
Across the European Union more than one out of every five youngsters seeking a job cannot find one. In some member states the figure is one in two. Even when they have found jobs 42.5 % of young employees are on temporary contracts.
The current crisis is not just economic. It has a social dimension which could drive a deeper disconnect between politicians and their electorate, and indirectly also between the EU and its citizens.
The EU budget is very small - just over 1% of EU GDP. If our Member States want to be serious about investing in growth and jobs, then an ambitious, targeted and realistic EU budget with added value should be supported. I have sketched the path which we need to follow, not simply to overcome the crisis, but to exit it as a stronger, more united and more competitive Europe; a Europe of sustainable long-term growth.
EUBusiness 31 Aug. 2012: Jobless numbers across the 17-nation eurozone hit a record 18 million in July. An additional 88,000 people joined the ranks of the unemployed throughout July, Eurostat said. The 18,002,000 headline jobless figure was the highest since records began in 1995, it added. With an estimated 25.254 million unemployed across the full European Union, the figures add to concerns over a plunge back into recession for the eurozone and its nearest neighbours.
The Los Angeles Times 6 Sept. 2012: The European Central Bank unveiled its most ambitious plan yet to halt Europe’s financial crisis on Thursday with a pledge to buy unlimited amounts of the government bonds of countries struggling to manage their debts.
But the ECB’s pledge of support came with a caveat: countries that want the central bank to help with their debts must first seek emergency aid from the bailout funds managed by the 17 countries that use the euro and submit their economic policies to the scrutiny of the International Monetary Fund. That puts enormous pressure on heavily indebted countries such as Spain and Italy.
In theory, the central bank has unlimited funds at its disposal. As the issuer of the euro currency, the ECB can simply create new money to buy the bonds from banks.
It also agreed to ward off any increase in the supply of money in the economy, a side effect of making purchases with newly created money. The bank said it would withdraw an equivalent amount from the financial system, which it can do by taking deposits or selling notes. The head of Germany’s Bundesbank (national central bank), Jens Weidmann, has opposed the bond purchases. He says they are too close to outright financing of governments – which is forbidden.
Global Res. 7 Sept. 2012In an obscure working document, the European Commission has announced it is working on plans to open European civil airspace to unmanned drones by 2016. This follows the signing by President Obama earlier this year of the FAA Appropriations bill which mandated that US airspace must be opened to drones by 2015 (30.000 of them). The European Commission (EC) plan was revealed in a Staff Working Paper published on September 4th 2012 entitled “Towards a European strategy for the development of civil applications of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems”.
The planning grpoup is co-chaired by the EC’s Directorate-General Enterprise & Industry and Directorate-General Mobility & Transport. Included are industry bodies including UVS International, the main European drone lobby group.
That the ECB will buy unlimited quantities of euro-bonds from defaulting states and at the same time leave the quantity of money unchanged means just one thing: dismantling the social states. To this comes that the ESM is now to be raised from 500 billion euros to a staggering 2 trillion euros- in order to save Italy, Spain , France and Belgium, so they can pay their interest rates to the NWO giant banks.
Merkels U-turn is probably ordered by her Bilderberg masters – or perhaps she sees the implementation of the 4. Reich, as planned long ago and declared by José Barroso (video below): Neuordnung Europa with Germany as a financial empire unter Rothschild´s NWO umbrella.
Right: Spaniards will also not put up with the EU austerity policy. Reuters 26 Sept. 2012: Flights and trains were suspended, shops pulled down their shutters and tens of thousands took to the streets on Wednesday .
In Athens, more than 50,000 people chanted: “We won’t submit to the troika (of lenders)” and “EU, IMF Out!”.About 3,000 police - twice the number usually deployed - stood guard in the centre of Athens as authorities braced for the kind of unrest that has marked past rallies.
Therefore, the EU is now following the example of the US: Filling the airspace over the Union wirh spy drones to crack down on rebellions against the holy NWO agenda of regionalisation and world governance. At least, I see no other explanation for this drone business – apart, of course, from the corporate interest in pulling taxpayer money into their pockets by selling these otherwise unnecessary spy machines. In case of Rebellion/civil war, the Lisbon Treaty allows death penalty/shooting of demonstrators in theory.
The Communist NWO (see videos on right margin of this blog) has many morally twisted sides: It lies about or conceals its dictatorial, misanthropic character. Here is just a small selection of what was formerly called crimes or high treason – today noble attempts to save mankind from fictitious enemies, but in reality abandoning mankind to the unscrupulous rulers of the one world government. The Banksters behind it control the world, because they own the media and here and here and here and our politiciansand here. I have previously portraited the character of a typical globalist as anything our parents warned us against. The NWO is characterizing what we learned as good to be bad and vice versa. Now judge for yourself.
9/11has jeopardized the freedomof the formerly freeworld - theU.S.in particular- and strongly reducedandbrutalized our political system.Governments in Europeandthe United States launch wars of conquestforthe NWOunder falsepretences-and have noscruplestoignoretheirown humanrights - torturingtheir captives. Criticismis unwelcome - so the media have been imposed “self-censorship“-andgreat politicaleffortsaremadeto control/prohibitthe freeinternet.
1. False flag operations Ten years have elapsed since the WTC was blown up and the Pentagon attacked. In the meantime more and more doubt is cast upon the 9/11 Commission´s official explanation. In fact, everything indicates an inside job as a pretext for the “War on Terror”.
The following 2 videos were lent from the Centurean 2 Blog. A classified CNN video (above) shows that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile– not a Boeing aircraft as officially stated!!! Former Minnesotan governor Jesse Ventura´s video (below) confirms this.
On May 16, 2006, the Department of Defense released footage from two cameras that captured portions of the attack at 9:37. Pentagon´s own footage and here show the moment of explosion - with absolutely no aircraft present. Ventura thinks it was an inside job.
Governor Ventura´s video contains a video clip where Secretary of Defence, Ronald Rumsfeld, on the day before the attack , declares that 2.3 trillion dollars could not be accounted for, not be traced. What had happened to that incredible amount of money was hidden in exactly the section of the Pentagon which was hit in the attack on the following day. Ventura thinks Rumsfeld and his accomplices stole the money. This reminds of the demolition of WTC block 7, where the SEC was storing files related to numerous Wall Street investigations. Block 7 was not hit by any plane - and fell 7 hours after the Twin Towers. Leading US Architects declare building 7 to have been demolished by insiders. Also the Twin Towers imploded - almost certainly due to an inside job. Nanothermite explosive was found all around the rubbles.
Übrigens: Wer steuerte die Flugzeuge am 11. Sept. Bestimmt keine Amateur-Luftpiraten. Die Flugzeuge wurden in Radar Lücken hinein gesteuert - drehten dort vom ursprünglichen Kurs bis zu 36o Grad ab - und nahmen dann alle innerhalb von 10 Minuten Kurs auf ihre Ziele. Sieh Video unten.
By the way, whosteeredtheaircrafton 9/11?.Certainly notamateurhijackers.The immediately announced hijackers were by the big English media described as alive and well in the following days . And The FBI boss has admitted that he had no idea of who the hijackers might be! The planeswere steeredintoradargaps - military secrets of which Muslim amateur hijackers could not have any idea - turnedfromthere up to 360 degrees from their original courses -and then tooktheir courseswithin 10 minuteson their goals.Seevideo below. This could only be done from a central control noard - as previously drilled by the US AF.
Other postulated False Flag operations (violent deeds perpetrated by insiders accusing their enemies of them to obtain power, money and/or war)
False flag operations are difficult to expose – as they will always be considered impossible by the public. Here are some postulated ones: 1. The Lusitania 2.The Reichstaggebäude in Berlin 3. Pearl Harbour 4. The 2. Tonkin Bay incident on. While these false flag operations are disputable the 9/11 event stands as the most evident example of a false flag operation. 5. The 7/7 London bombs in 2005also bore all hallmarks of an inside job.
2. “War on Terror”.
I have previously described the nature of the “War on Terror”, the ongoing WWIII. Prof. James Petras, Global Research 10.July 2011The US government (White House and Congress) spends $120 billion a year, to fight an estimated “50 -75 ‘Al Qaeda types’ in Afghanistan ”,according to the CIA. (The estimate of the Council on Foreign Relations is a few hundred). During Obama’s Presidency, Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustment has been frozen, resulting in a net decrease of over 8 percent, which is exactly the amount spent chasing just 5 dozen ‘Al Qaeda terrorists’ in the mountains bordering Pakistan. This is absurd. The war seems really to be against the Taliban with tens of thousands of activists. The Taliban, however, have never engaged in any terrorist act against the territorial United States or its overseas presence. The US war in Afghanistan doe not seem not about defeating terrorism.
One possible explanation is described as what is known as Brzezinski´s plan of the ”Grand Chessboard” which is dooming Russia and the US to remain eternal enemies.
Left: JP Morgan
Global Research 3 July 2010: Perhaps the most famous hysterical response to “sea level rise” was this recent photo of the Maldivian president and ministers donning SCUBA gear to hold the world’s first underwater cabinet meeting as a “symbolic cry for help (money) over rising sea levels that threaten the tropical archipelago’s existence.” Pure baloney says paleogeophysicist Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner. Acc. to a NASA update review by Climate Audit (McIntyre), the annual sea level increase is 2.6 mm.. Since the last ice age the SLR has been increasing – now much less than earlier.
8. Hitler learned eugenics from Californian eugeneticists. The Rockefeller Foundation funded Hitler´s chief Eugenecist, Ernst Rüdin. Hitler was no Aryan –recent DNA studies on his living family members show that the family has genes that are rare among indigenous Europeans – but frequent among Ashkenazy Jews and Africans! A high-ranking SS-officer, Hansjürgen Köhler, described in 1941 how he was to get papers back from Austrian Chancellor Schuschnigg – papers that had been retrieved by the murdered former Chancellor, Dollfuss, and which his boss, Heydrich, thought could be correct. They stated that Hitler´s grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, became pregnant with Hitler´s father while serving in Salomon Rothschild´s House in Viennna.
10. Agenda 21 captivity The NWO has a plan for your future: The Agenda 21. I have also described this nightmare extensively here and here and here to promote Communist “sustainability” and enrich Rothschild with money and power over the world through his Global Environmental Facilityand here while locking you up in concentration camp-like megacities and depriving you of access to nature.
There is much more in store for you. If this reminds you of the works of the Devil it is no coincidence. For the Illuminati are pursuing their diabolical 6 point programme (“The Illuminati Grows”): Abolition of the Monarchy and all ordered government. 2) Abolition of private property. 3) Abolition of inheritance. 4) Abolition of patriotism. 5) Abolition of the family, through the abolition of marriage, all morality, and the institution of communal education for children. 6) Abolition of all religion (except their own Luciferian one). The illuminati want to control your mind, steal your soul – even using technology for that purpose.
Summary The globalist Business Insider 27 July 2011: “A Euro-Mediterranean community has now become an urgent necessity. Europe has technology and provides a secure framework for investment, but it is the southern Mediterranean that increasingly can point to strong economic growth. Europe is aging and will lose 20 million people by 2030, while the southern Mediterranean has a dynamic young population that desperately needs job opportunities.A Euro-Mediterranean monetary system is one goal in a Euro-Mediterranean Union leading to a Euro-African Union. By 2050, Europe and Africa together will have 2.5 billion people (Africans making out the vast majority), a quarter of the global population. With so much human potential, it will be possible to build on shared economic, social, and ecological strengths. Europe must strengthen its economic and political integration, and Africa must improve its governance by fighting corruption and establishing the rule of law more firmly. It may be that a Euro-Mediterranean and Euro-African Union is the only political project that is able to prevent World Government through a G-2 of the United States and China.” This is crazy: they want -just as with the Euro – to jump directly to the globalist goal – although all preconditions are impossible.
The globalists ignore the fact that the EU has now for more than 16 years unsuccessfully attempted to forge the Euro-Mediterranean / Euro-African Union.
It turns out that there existed intimate ties between the Rothschilds, their minions and Gaddafi´s son, Saif. This is embarassing, because prominent British leaders incl. Tony Blair are stated to have been advisers to the Gaddafis - especially on the release of the Lockerbie-bomber in return for oil!
The EU is in an awkward situation: Having built the Union for the Mediterranean on dictators it has now ousted, the EU sees the Union on its deathbed. But it hopes to revive it. Nevertheless, EU Commissioner Stefan Füle forwards such demands in the direction of human rights and democracy to be fulfilled by the partners that they make the Union impossible. For the demands are in contrast with the Koran/Islam. The new secretary general of the Union for the Mediterranean knows better and states that nobody can dictate western democracy to the Muslim countries who want the dictatorial Sharia to govern the entire world.
Today´s Euromediterranean zone is in chaos after the ongoing “Arab Spring” which is rather becoming an icy winter. The US wages war in the whole world against “terrorists” under the generic name of “Al Qaeda” - founded by the CIA as its faithful partner in the role of scapegoat for USA´s false flag operations. NATO and Pres. Obama now recognize the al Qaeda branch, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, as the new Libya´s government - and EU leaders hail the group as well!
Greece is regularly aflame - and after the declaration in western media of the “victory” of the “democratic” (95% want the Sharia) demonstraters in Egypt - the latter have found out that they were deceived, only losing a dying Mubarak, while his henchmen continue to rule. The rebels´victory and liberation in Libya is nothing but corporate New World Order occupation in order to rob this land, too, of resources. Furthermore, it is the beginning of a long bloody guerilla war by Gaddafi´s forces.
The biggest problem of the Union for the Mediterranean is the indiscriminate mass immigration to the EU, legally and in particular illegally. However, the EU keeps nearly everyone streaming into it - even making illegals legal citzens of the Union with a right to employment, if they beget a child, who is atomatically a union citizen (Zembrano Verdict). Danish and British politicians have admitted that the mass immigration has the purpose of tearing our historical roots away in order to change our societies radically, to clear the way for their NWO.
So, the Spiegel 26 Aug. 2011 has the following message on :”Germany´s Unhealty Obsession with Islam”: Not Islam is the problem, but our attitudes towards Islam. It is not the dispute over the phantasm of “Islam” that is productive, but the impartial analysis of the goals of the religio-political parties that are at odds in our country. This would relieve the Muslims and let them feel just like any other religious minority cultivating any other religion. (That they terrorize increasing districts of our cities, declaring them Sharia zones, making them no-go-zones for whites is ignored)Thus, problems relating to education, integration and equality could then be addressed as such, in a nuanced and appropriate manner, without being immediately framed within the context of a culture war. German Muslims would be relieved of the need to justify themselves every time an Islamist suicide bomber commits an attack somewhere in the world! This politically correct attitude is totally blind to the demands of the Koran to conquer the world by the sword (now by means of high birth rates), killing of infidels (sura 9:5 e.g.) , terror (sura 8:60). But does it work!
Here is the wishful utopia of the Corporate NWO - unabated in spite of more than 16 years of disproof of the thesis. Business Insider 27 July 2011: A Euro-Mediterranean community has now become an urgent necessity. Europe has technology and provides a secure framework for investment, but it is the southern Mediterranean that increasingly can point to strong economic growth. Europe is aging and will lose 20 million people by 2030, while the southernMediterranean has a dynamic young population that desperately needs job opportunities.
To boost investment in both directions, a zone of monetary stability should be created. A Euro-Mediterranean monetary system would avoid the discrepancy between euro- and dollar-denominated trade. Industrial re-deployment might also be the answer to outsourcing by European companies. At the same time, jobs mobility should replace unwanted migration. By 2050, Europe and Africa together will have 2.5 billion people (Africans making out the vast majority), a quarter of the global population. With so much human potential, it will be possible to build on shared economic, social, and ecological strengths. International trade must bring about a rise in social and environmental standards, which requires a multilateral Euro-Mediterranean system. A Euro-Mediterranean Union leading to a Euro-African Union could open the way to balanced mutual development. As Europe knows, constructing an economically and socially integrated zone offers the best opportunity to resolve conflicts and overcome political and cultural enmities. Europe must strengthen its economic and political integration, and Africa must improve its governance by fighting corruption and establishing the rule of law more firmly.
Building a joint future for Europe andAfrica, starting with the Mediterranean, will be difficult, but that is no reason to delay. In fact, it may be that a Euro-Mediterranean and Euro-African Union is the only political project that is able to prevent World Government through a G-2 of the United States and China. Comment: This is crazy: they want -just as with the Euro – to jump directly to the globalist goal – although all preconditions are impossible.
They ignore the fact that the EU has now for more than 16 years unsuccessfully attempted to forge the Euro-Mediterranean / Euro-African Union.
Gaddafi´s Rothschild connection The Daily Mail 23 oct. 2011: Gaddafi´s son, Saif, a former playboy who still owns a £10million house in London, last year described Mr Tony Blair as a ‘personal family friend’ who he said had visited Libya ‘many, many times’ since leaving Downing Street four years ago. He even claimed that Mr Blair had become an adviser to his family, an allegation which the former PM denied. Former EU Commissioner Lord Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Saif could also come under the spotlight. The pair met days before it emerged that Megrahi (Lockerbie bomber) was to be freed. They were both guests of billionaire financiers Jacob and Nat Rothschild at their Corfu villa in the summer of 2009. In a damning transcript of a conversation obtained by a Sunday newspaper between the pair, Saif told the freed bomber that his name had been ‘on the table in all commercial, oil and gas agreements we supervised during this period’. Weeks later Saif and Lord Mandelson attended a shooting party at the Rothschilds’ chateau-style mansion in Buckinghamshire.
Should Saif take the witness box in The Hague, he could even try to include Prince Andrewin his ‘web of friends’. The Duke of York was accused of holding secret ‘detailed discussions’ over the release of the Lockerbie bomber with Saif in 2009.
EU´s demands to the Arab Euromed. partners so unrealistic as to doom the project to its ultimate demise EU Press Release 14 June 2011 – EU Commissioner Stefan Füle: Providing greater support to partners engaged in building deep and sustainable democracy is one of the cornerstones of the new approach outlined in the ENP Communication adopted on 25 May.
The Communication identifies some elements that are common to building a democracy that is both deep and sustainable. These are: * free and fair elections; * freedom of association, expression and assembly and a free press and media; * the rule of law administered by an independent judiciary and right to a fair trial; * fight against corruption; * security and law enforcement sector reform and the establishment of democratic control over armed and security forces.
These elements are the central benchmarks against which the EU will assess progress and adapt levels of support to its partners: 1. Commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms 2. Full compliance with their provisions 3. partnership with the Council of Europe, to support some of the countries in the South, starting from Morocco and Tunisia. 4. gender equality,5. freedom of religion; 6. respect the rights of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection 7. and commitments in yet other areas.
In the next generation of Action Plans, we will suggest to partners that we focus our joint work on a limited number of short and medium-term priorities. The new approach to the ENP is based on mutual accountability and conditionality. Conditionality means that if a partner country wishes to obtain greater support from the EU then it will have to make progress towards significant political reforms, such as greater freedoms of expression and association; judicial reform; or fight against corruption. We will monitor the progress. Non-compliance implicates stop of funds. Comment:If these principles have to be observed – all “partner countries” will remain disqualified – because the principles are in conflict with Islam. Even EU`s pet, Morocco, gruesomely violates EU´s Fundamental Rights – on race, refugees and religion – for they are impossible for Islam to accept.
The Communication proposes two new instruments to channel EU support to civil society: a Civil Society Facility and a European Endowment for Democracy(A parallel to the US National Endowment for Democracy, a driving force behind the US instigated, now bloody revolts in the Arab world and here. The Civil Society Facility will help civil society organisations in our neighbourhood develop their ability to monitor reform and their role in implementing and evaluating EU programmes.
European Investment Bank 30 May 2011: Investment of over EUR 300 billion will be required by 2030 to modernise infrastructure and public services in the Mediterranean region.The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the European Union’s financial institution (and equally corrupt) and the leading financial investor in the Mediterranean via FEMIP, which was established in 2002. At end-2010, this commitment represented a total investment of more than EUR 12 billion. In 2010, FEMIP had already increased its business volume by 60% – to EUR 2.6 billion . Comment: Huge allocations largely disappeared in corruption by means of the incompetent or fraudulent European Investment Bank, which could not account for large sums, which ended with corrupt African “partners” and in taxfree havens.
ANSAmed 29 June 2011 - On the second day of the general strike and of violent demonstrations against the Parliament vote the new economic plan to save Greece from bankruptcy (78 billion euros), the entire centre of Athens has become an enormous battlefield, where smoke and flames are rising from burning rubbish containers amid clouds of teargas.
ANSAmed -29 June 2011 - Five months and one day after the first Friday protests which, on January 28, triggered the revolution that forced Hosni Mubarak to step down, Tahrir Square is once again the stage of clashes between protesters and police (below left) after the riots on April 9 in which two protesters were killed.
Moroccan diplomat Youssef Amrani, new secretary general of the Union for the Mediterranean: ”Neither the UfM nor any other international organization are in a position to give certificates of democracy,” he added.”The time when one could dictate from the West the criteria for a country’s acceptance has gone.” Egypt and France co-chair the union while Spain hosts its headquarters in Barcelona.
Comment An article in Der Spiegel 26 Aug. 2011:”Germany´s Unhealty Obsession with Islam” gives a pseudointellectual, politically correct explanation for the screwed-up view of the EU on Muslim immigrants. It states that not Islam is the problem, but our attitudes towards Islam. “It is not the dispute over the phantasm of “Islam” that is productive, but the impartial analysis of the goals of the religio-political parties that are at odds in our country,” the article states.
“This would remove an enormous burden from the everyday lives of Muslims. They could simply view themselves as a religious minority among others, like the Jews for example. A minority that seeks to practice its religion within the framework of what is legally permissible — nothing more and nothing less (se photos left and right). Problems relating to education, integration and equality could then be addressed as such, in a nuanced and appropriate manner, without being immediately framed within the context of a culture war. German Muslims would be relieved of the need to justify themselves every time an Islamist suicide bomber commits an attack somewhere in the world.
“Terrorism is a problem among culturally uprooted, politically radical angry young men, who are often educated and yet unsuccessful. They are men who rebel against a world in which they no longer feel at home” (so why not go back to where their ideals are being lived?). Therefore, the EU keeps nearly everyone streaming into it - even making illegals legal citzens of the Union with a right to employment, if they beget a child, who is atomatically a union citizen (Zembrano Verdict).
Thus the politically correct system confirms its own cataractous views: It makes Islam a religion just like any other - no more related to violence than other religions. Thereby, the author wilfully? overlooks a fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam: The teachings of Christ, the New Testament, are commands to love your neighbour. The teachings of Mohammed (Koran and Hadiths) are to love other Muslims -but to kill (Sure 9:5, 4:89) the infidels, use terror against them (sura 8:60), wage war on the infidels till they submit to Islam (8:39, 8:69, 9:29) and to conquer their lands and take their houses (33:27), even racistically calling the “blear-eyed” guilty (sura 20:102). While Christ gave people an offer to take up his teachings voluntarily - Islam is to kill or enslave those who refuse. And history shows that is Muslim practice today – as it was Christian practice in former days. “Christian” religion rose after the popes of Rome became politicians (after 250 A.D.) - thus by breaking with the teachings of Christ waging wars by proxies, while orthodox Muslims follow Muhammad by not fighting with sword or high birth rates for the whole world to become Islamic.
The whole Mediterranean Project and the now dying Union for the Mediterranean are not built on ignorance of Islam. On the contrary! Danish and British politicians even actively staked on the incompatibility of the Western world and Islam to destroy its old culture and religious roots entirely. “Chaos out of Order” – but first create chaos – possibly “civil” wars. Depopulationists and see here – and here and here are deeply involved.
Summary:The North American Union is a globalist dream, conceived by the Trilateral Commission (TC) - and especially its two founders, David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski - the man behind “The Grand Chessboard” strategy to achieve U.S. world government through the containment of Russia. On its website, the Trilateral Commission makes no secret of its primacy to rule the world by fusing a North American, a European (Euro-Mediterranean) and an Asian-Pacific group – already with Japanese, Indian and Chinese participation. Rascal states unwilling to participate have to be defeated. On Danish side TC participants in this conspiracy against nation states are - mildly said – inappropriately Foreign Minister Lene Espersen and Climate-Energy Minister Lykke Friis. World government will be established through Brzezinski´s regionalisation model. The maybe-upcoming Danish Prime Minister, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, is engaged in the abolition of nation-states and world government through Bilderberg membership (2009) and the European Council on Foreign Relations (co-founder along with Rothschild agent George Soros), an
offshoot of USA’s “invisible Government, the “Council on Foreign Relations, who also will rule the world by David Rockefeller’s ideas. And as NATO secretary-general, former Prime Minister and Bilderberger (2000, 2003) Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is trying in vain to militarily overcome the rascal states on behalf of “Our International Community” – as Helle Thorning-Schmidt puts it. Denmark is totally dominated by the NWO.
As U.S. Senator, CFR-member Jesse Helms said from the floor of the Senate on Dec. 15, 1987: “Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a new world order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles….”And he continued: “The viewpoint of the establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the “one-world” view by its critics. Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy. …..All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits.”
A Wikileaks cable from Canada’s U.S. ambassador in 2005 shows how the strongly accelerating “North American Initiative” can translate into an EU-like North American Union, which most Americans fear. According to economists, no financial benefit can be foretold by the union - and they recommend focusing on the security aspect (makes an impression because of the “war on terror”) to entice people on board the NWO galley. In February, Pres Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Harper held a secret meeting on fusion of their countries with removal of the border. U.S. and Canadian parliaments have nothing to say about this utterly undemocratic fusion. Only U.S. President and Canadian Prime Minister stand for the process. And they have done everything to keep their secret arrangements unknown to parliaments and populations.
In addition, CETA discussions between Canada and the EU are going on in order to allow European corporations to lay their hands on Canada’s resources and have the right to sue the Canadian Government, as U.S. corporations already are allowed to, in case the government should be an obstacle to their profits. As the Canadians say it is about accelerating corporations´ takeover of Canada.
But the Trilateral Commission has more accidents on its inexistent conscience: The Trilateral Commission website: “The framework of the Trilateral European group is the European Union (formerly the European Community). Beyond their Trilateral commitment, European members are also committed to working for the European unification process. The idea that a united Europe must play a greater role on the global stage, has been a driving idea of the Trilateral Commission from the start.” The president of the European Convent, which wrote the European Constitution - now known as the “Lisbon Treaty” depriving the Europeans of their liberty - was the Trilateralist, Valéry Giscard d´Estaing. When the Trilateralists withdrew their credits for the Soviet Union it collapsed.
The North American Union will come, unless the very skeptical and knowing freedom forces in the U.S. can exercise a so strong pressure that the Illuminati do not dare go ahead with it. I guess that is why that union does not already exist. Nor would the EU have existed, had the Europeans not been so heavily brainwashed.
History of the Trilateral Commission (TC) in North America The Trilateral Commission: The 2. North American chairman was David Rockefeller (1977-91), who continues to be recognized as founder and honorary chairman. The North American deputy chairmen are the heads of the Canadian and Mexican groups. Funding comes from foundations, corporations, and individual members.
The Trilateral Commission: “The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system. The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” That interdependence also has ensured that the current financial crisis has been felt in every nation and region. It has fundamentally shaken confidence in the international system as a whole. The Commission sees in these unprecedented events a stronger need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) have been the primary anchors of the wider international system. Doubts about whether and how this primacy will change do not diminish, and, if anything, have intensified the need to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.
Our membership has widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, including in 2009 both Chinese and Indian members. Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.”
What is the purpose of the Trilateral Commission? Above, the Trilateral Commission declares to have developed the “global interdependence” into globalization. What globalization really is seems unclear to most people. Here is what US Senator, CFR-memberJesse Helmssaid from the floor of the Senate on Dec. 15, 1987: “Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a new world order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and theBilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles….”And he continued: “The viewpoint of the establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the “one-world” view by its critics. Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy. …..All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits.”
Left: The Amero is a hypothetical currency that some think could some day replace the Dollars and the Mexican Peso in a future North American Union – just like the Euro.
The National Post 2 June 2011: The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach.The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union. The cable said Canadian economists were split on whether a fixed exchange rate, or a move toadopt the U.S. greenback, would benefit this country. It goes on to say North America would be well served by implementing a single, continent wide, tariff or a customs union arrangement. “We cannot make the claims about how large the benefits might be on a national or continental scale.” (See Addendum below)
The bait is shared prosperity – as for the Euromediterranean Project. The truth is wealth redistribution Business Insider 11 Febr. 2011: Both of Perot’s opponents (George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton in 1992) argued that NAFTA would create jobs in the U.S. because of business expansion.
However, the goods balance of trade for the U.S. with Mexico has been negative and steadily growing over the years. In 2010 it amounted to $61.6 billion, which was 9.5% of the total goods trade deficit last year. And the US has lost 28.7 mio. jobs due to NAFTA.
New American 11 Febr. 2011: The move toward a North American Union received another big boost last week as President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper met in Washington, D.C. to hammer out a deal on creating a common “perimeter” around the two countries while diminishing the role of the nations’ shared border and developing a biometric system to track North Americans.
The two leaders, touting the plan as a move toward security and prosperity, signed a four-page declaration supposedly committing the two countries to working together on a wide range of issues– and to enhance our security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people, goods, and services between our two countries,” the declaration states. It also praises the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Bringing in third countries — Mexico, perhaps? — and international institutions is part of the plan, too.
And it appears that Congress and the Canadian Parliament will have little to no say in the matter. “Responsibility for ensuring inter-agency coordination will rest with the Prime Minister and the President and their respective officials,” according to the agreement.“ Both governments deliberately tried to avoid scrutiny of the matter in the press and in their legislatures, as a government public-relations document leaked by The Toronto Star this week revealed. The new agreement proves yet again that a Council on Foreign Relations-backed North American Union — modeled after the European Union — is silently being erected with no input from citizens or their legislatures.
But the fusion of the regions is also going on Global research 13 Jan. 2011: Canada and the EU have already held five rounds of negotiations towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) which will go beyond NAFTA. With the sixth round of talks scheduled to take place in Brussels, Belgium from January 17-21, Canadian and EU officials remain optimistic that a deal could be finalized by the end of 2011. As talks enter their final crucial stages, there are growing concerns over the threat CETA poses to Canadian sovereignty. Coupled with the financial turmoil sweeping Europe, deep economic integration with the EU could prove disastrous.
In a recent article Maude Barlow, national chair of the Council of Canadians, points out: “ At its heart, this deal is a bid for unprecedented and uncontrolled European corporations´access to Canadian resources.” She also added, “CETA will likely have a NAFTA-type investor-state enforcement mechanism, which means that European corporations will have the same right that U.S. companies now enjoy to sue the Canadian government if it introduces new rules to protect the environment.” CETA will further serve corporate interests. CETA is based on thefailed NAFTA trade model and will only serve to accelerate the corporate takeover of the country.
But David Rockefeller´s NAFTA idea is by no means dead WorldNet Daily 15 dec. 2010: Obama quietly erasing borders. Dem. administration advancing ‘North American Union’ agenda. Similarly, the U.S. State Department fact sheet calling for “A New Border Vision” with Mexico specified five areas of “joint border management.
CTV News reported that the draft declaration of “A New Border Vision” with Canada similarly also specified a cross-border policy agenda, including: *An integrated cargo security strategy; *Cross-border sharing of information between law enforcement agencies; i.a. *A closer working relationship between the two militaries in the event of emergencies; *A new level of collaboration on preventing and recovering from counter attacks.
Comment To begin from behind: There is only a marginal and very uncertain prospect of economic gain from carrying on with the “North American Initiative”/The North American Union. Nor is that the real motive. As usual, they use a crisis – the financial one, which they created themselves and here – to deepen the power of “the International Community” at the cost of the populations of the world – Hegelian dialectics. Thus, Iain Begg, a professorial research fellow and expert at the London School of , argues that the European sovereign debt crisis will spur the development of new governance mechanisms that will ultimately deepen EU integration (TheCouncil on Foreign Relations 14 June 2011).
This is precisely what is aimed at by the forces behind regionalisation. Who are those forces? The prime movers were the arch-one-worlders, David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, perhaps the most dangerous man in the world. These two Illuminists started the Trilateral Commission, the task of which is to form corporate one world governance and government through regionalisation:North America, theEuromediterranean bloc and the Far East. Countries in the Middle East and North Korea barring the way of this movement are rascal states (and they are, in fact!) and have to be conquered. This is all part of Adam Weishaupt´s vision for a world government – and Brzezinski´s vision to obtain it by containment and weakening of Russia (The Grand Chessboard). In fact, TC was first to replace the “the New World Order”, a term, dating back to H.G.Wells and Satanist Alice Bailey – in order to have the masses put up with the concept without criticism.
The TC declares straightforward to be behind of the undemocratic EU – The Trilateral Commission Website:“The framework of the TrilateralEuropeangroupistheEuropeanUnion(formerlythe European Community). BeyondtheirTrilateral‘commitment, Europeanmembersarealsocommittedtoworkingfor theEuropeanunificationprocess.The ideathataunitedEuropemustplayagreater roleonthe globalstage,hasbeenadrivingideaofthe TrilateralCommissionfromthe start.”
TheNorthAmericanUnionwill come,unlesstheveryskepticaland knowingfreedomforcesin theU.S.canexercise a sostrongpressure thatthe Illuminatido notdarego aheadwith it.I guess that is why thatuniondoes notalreadyexist.
ADDENDUM “Viewing cable 05OTTAWA268, PLACING A NEW NORTH AMERICAN INITIATIVE.”
This is a serious situation concocted by the Canadian Paul CELLUCCI and American Ambassador, which seems to never have been observed by Congress.Extract.
Back in 2005, thecable released recently by WikiLeaksexplained how it would be done. And looking back, the document was right on the mark. 281556Z Jan 05 UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000268 SIPDIS etc.
¶1. THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OUTSIDE USG CHANNELS.
¶2. (SBU) An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers. Our research
leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both “security” and “prosperity” goals. This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration. While in principle many of them support more ambitious integration goals, like a customs union/single market and/or single currency, most believe the incremental approach is most appropriate at this time.
¶3. (SBU) The economic payoff of the prospective North American initiative - in terms of higher incomes and greater competitiveness - is available, but its size and timing are unpredictable, so it should not be oversold. We believe that, given growing Canadian concern about “border risk” and its effects on investment, a focus on the “security” side could also produce the most substantial economic/trade benefits.
CANADIAN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE
¶4. (SBU) Canadian economists in business, academia and government have given extensive thought to the possible options for further North American integration. Following is our summary of the professional consensus:
BORDER RISK: The risk that business will be obstructed at the border by discretionary U.S. actions, inhibiting investment in Canada. For small businesses, the complexities of navigating the border are apparently even more intimidating than the actual costs. Reducing this risk is Canada’s top motive for pursuing further integration.
LABOR MARKETS: Many Canadian economists point to labor markets - both within and among countries - as the factor market where more liberalization would deliver the greatest economic benefits for all three countries.
REGULATION: Canadian economists agree that Canadian regulations (if not their standards, then their complexity) are needlessly restricting foreign investment and impeding food, communications and other industries. An international initiative could help to catalyze change.
CUSTOMS UNION: A common external tariff, or a customs union which eliminated NAFTA’s rules of origin (ROO), is economically desirable. NAFTA’s ROO are so restrictive that importers often prefer to pay the tariff rather than try to prove North American origin.
However, one study estimated that a full customs union which eliminated ROO would only raise national income by about one percent. CURRENCY UNION: Canadian economists are split on whether a return to a fixed exchange rate, or adopting the U.S. dollar, would benefit Canada in current circumstances.
NORTH AMERICAN INTEGRATION: WHAT WE KNOW
¶5. (SBU) Past integration (not just NAFTA but also many bilateral and unilateral steps) has increased trade, economic growth, and productivity. Indeed, they may have been more important to our growing prosperity over the past decade than NAFTA’s tariff reductions.
¶6. (SBU) A stronger continental “security perimeter” can strengthen economic performance, mainly by improving efficiency at land borders and airports. It could also facilitate future steps toward trilateral economic integration, such as a common external tariff or a customs union, if and when our three countries chose to pursue them. Paradoxically, the security and
law enforcement aspects of the envisioned initiative could hold as much - or more - potential for broad economic benefits than the economic dimension.
WHERE’S THE UPSIDE?
¶7. (SBU) Some international economic initiatives (such as FTAs) produce across-the-board measures that generate broad benefits for a country’s industries and consumers on a known time-line. This was true of NAFTA but it is less likely to be true of the economic aspects of the NAI. This is a piecemeal process and the ratio of payoff to effort is likely to be lower than with across-
the-board measures. Governments naturally focus on resolving the problems which their firms or citizens bring to their attention. While this approach has merits, it tends to deliver the payoffs toward particular interests. If there are hidden costs, there might be little impact on national performance. ¶8. (SBU) In contrast, cooperative measures on the “security” side, a critical focus of current bilateral efforts, can deliver substantial, early, and widespread economic benefits.
A NOTE OF CAUTION
¶9. (SBU) There is little basis on which to estimate the size of the “upside” gains from an integration initiative concentrating on non-tariff barriers of the kind contained in NAI. For this reason, we cannot make claims about how large the benefits might be on a national or continental scale. CELLUCCI
Summary:Time and again, both the EU and other illuminists are highlighting the EU as a model for the one-world state. Other similar constructions, e.g. the ASEAN and NAFTA have been attempted with the EU as a model - but certainly not with the same degree of integration. Indeed, EU Commission President Jose Barroso said the EU has delivered its part of the agreement on world governance, and EU Council President Van Rompuy, has declared the year 2009 as the first year of world governance - after the G20 meeting in London. In the same breath he said that the “climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards global governance of our planet.” According to The Daily Mail this man is more dangerous than he looks: He is to stand for Europe´s “belgianisation”, ie. the dissolution of nation states. After the Lisbon Treaty, the Union developed megalomania with the desire to promote the “international community”, ie. the New World Order (which they are all talking about - videos) militarily. The EU has established a very expensive foreign service with embassies parallel to the now totally incapacitated nation states. Spearheading this travesty is the EU’s “High Representative”, small Catherine Ashton, who 2 months ago declared: “We have made a longstanding commitment to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at its center. Regional organizations are building blocks for global government”- after top Illuminatus, Zbigniew Brzezinski. The EU Parliament has been working for a World Parliament since 1994. So, the EU has great ambitions to count among the superpowers.
“Global Government” acc. to “EurActiv” is a very old question: cooperation between “sovereign” states on common challenges: first 1. peace and security 2. trade negotiations on tariff reductions, 3. Agriculture and 4. Intellectual Property Rights, 5. responses to the economic and financial crises, 6. environmental issues like climate change and 7. Biodiversity, 8. Terrorism, 9. nuclear proliferation, 10 migrations, 11 drug and human trafficking, and 12 health risks such as pandemics.
In practice, cooperation on these issues develops through formal institutions - such as the United Nations, The World Trade Organization and even the EU itself - and through more informal summits like the G8-G20 and intergovernmental conferences on climate change and biodiversity. A joint report by the U.S. National Intelligence Council and the EU Institute for Security Studies defines global governance more broadly as “all institutions, regimes, processes, partnerships and networks that contribute to collective action and problem solving at the international level. Institutions are planned built up since 1945 - and controlled by a tiny elite.
Looking now at what the EU has achieved in these fields, the result is pathetic - and the EU megalomania embarrassing:
Its Utopian Euromediterranean Project is now in shambles – like its climate ambitions based on lies – without consent of the US, Russia, China – and even its own populations. Its flagship, the Euro – thought by its “father”, Robert Mundell, to be an intermediary to the one world currency as now advocated by Rothschild/Soros – is an increasing catastrophe, more and more of its member states needing bail-outs, artificial respiration, yielded by all 27 members – thus also impoverishing the non-euro members. Which may very well be intended to achieve the one world currency! As for democracy, the final remnants disapperared with the Lisbon Treaty/Constitution, which ignored the rejection resulting from the few referenda given in countries which could not cheat their citizens of the opportunity to say “no” to giving up their souvereignty – and an Irish “Yes” was obtained through intimidation, corruption and lies. Now our politicians are stumbling over each other to give up our souvereignty to decide our own national budgets to Barroso & Co. As for controlling drug, human trafficking and migration the EU has had just the opposite effect: It has enormously increased these evils. Peace and security? The EU now has become a hawk in the service of Rothschild´s/George Soros´Open Society – threatening to attack all “closed” societies – provided they are not too big or have nuclar weapons!! Agricultural management has led to dismantling of well-functioning European agricultural units, increasing food prices and fraud. Nuclear proliferation control? Iran, Korea? Health? The biggest scandal in medical history after WWII, the mass vaccinations against the harmless “swine flu” in 2009/10 – WHO experts being in bed with the vaccine producers – was strongly recommended by the EU´s EMEA and national Health Services, even on children, although no one knew with what side effects. Now narcolepsy seems to be a side effect in children. This vaccine contained up to 1 mio. times the squalene that was strongly suspected to have made 125.000 soldiers sick in the first Gulf War, than the vaccine for those soldiers!
But nevertheless, the EU is a loyal, servile creature of his crimson champions and their future communist dictatorship over a humanity that is ideologically aligned and locked up in urbanized cages: The Agenda 21 It was this future that Pres Bush sr. talked about in his speech on the State of the Union in 1991: “What is at stake is … a new world order … to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind … based on common principles and the rule of (illuminat)law, …. The illumination of the thousand points of light (top masons as governors )…. The winds of change are with us now.”
Revelation 13: “7 Power was given him (the beast from the sea of peoples) over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty [and] two months. 3– 4 … all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who [is] like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” Revelation 17:13 - “These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.”
Herman van Rompuy even declared 2009 to be the first year of world governance – introduced without our knowledge at the G20 meeting in London in Apr. 2009. EU Commission Pres., José Barroso: EU Press Release 24 March 2011confirmed that the EU plays a role in world governance:“We are in fact now doing what was a very important aim for all those who wanted a stronger Union to complete the monetary union with an economic union. And I would like to link this also to the commitments that we all, as a European Union, have taken to the outside world, namelyin the G20 process. We have promised ….. governance. AndEurope may say thatEurope has delivered its part of the bargain on global governance.”
The following is what the EU is all about – an Illuminist (p.29) construction to destroy the nation states and to be the model of Zbigniew Brzezinski´s regionalisation as a steppingstone to the NWO one world state Deutsche Welle 10 Nov. 2010: EU Council President Hermann van Rompuy: “Nationalism represents a threat to the continent, as it no longer creates “a positive feeling of pride of one’s own identity, but a negative feeling of apprehension of the others. In every member state, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalized world,” he said. “It is more than an illusion: It is a lie.” The Daily Mail 10 Nov. 2010: Van Rompuy more dangerous than he looks. He is the man to lead the Belgianization of Europe.
This is how it is done – with already failed methods: Economic integration with “partners” in South and East EurActiv 13 Apr. 2011 - EU Commissioner, Stefan Füle: “We are ready to embark on economic integration with those (Euromed) countries, in addition to strengthening civil society and here, supporting their democratic developments, strengthening the democratic institutions and supporting their inclusive and sustainable growth. All of that you could do much better if you engage our neighbours with the idea of gradually creating the kind of European economic area which is working so well in Europe,” Füle said. Füle said that similarly a clearer perspective was required for the Eastern partners while they engage in painful reforms.
Euractiv 4 April 2011: European Council President Herman Van Rompuy said that “[the] climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet“. In a speech to the United Nations in February, EU High Representative Catherine Ashton said “we have a long-standing commitment to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at the core. Regional organisations are building blocks for global governance“.
A growing plethora of international institutions and agreements are attempting to tackle the world’s major challenges: economic, environmental or security.
Milestones of this emerging world order (NWO) * 24 Oct. 1945: Entry into force of theCharter of the United Nations.
* Oct. 1947: Signature of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
* 15-17 Nov. 1975: First summit of the G6 heads of state and government in Rambouillet, France.
* 3-14 June 1992: First Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.
* 1 Jan. 1995: Establishment of theWorld Trade Organisation (WTO).
* 20-22 June 1997: Russia first joins the G7, forming the G8.
* 11 Dec. 1997: Adoption of the Kyoto Protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
* 15-15 Dec. 1999: First summit of the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors.
* 14-15 Nov. 2008: First summit of the heads of state and government of the G20 countries for a common response to the global economic andfinancial crisis (”new” G20). * 7-18 Dec. 2009: COP 15 United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen.
* 1 Dec. 2010: Launch of the European External Action Service, one year following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
* 29 Nov.-10 Dec. 2010: COP 16 United Nations climate change conference in Cancún, Mexico.
* 3-4 Nov. 2011: G20 summit in Cannes, France.
* 28 Nov.-9 Dec. 2011: COP 17 United Nations climate change conference in Durban, South Africa.
* 4-6 June 2012: ‘Rio+20′ United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (third ‘Earth Summit’). This means the UN´s dictatorial system to rule the world, the Agenda 21 andhere.
Left: EU poster: The Tower of Babel now to be finished in defiance of God (Genesis 11:1–8). Note the inverted Luciferian pentagrams. Notice the cubic humans = robots of the “International Community/NWO) in the Agenda 21.
What is the EU’s role in this emerging world order? ‘Global governance’ refers to a very old issue: cooperation between sovereign states on shared challenges: 1. peace and security 2. trade negotiations on tariff reductions, 3. agriculture and 4. intellectual property rights, 5. responses to economic and financial crises, 6. environmental issues such as climate change and 7. biodiversity, 8. counter-terrorism, 9. nuclear proliferation, 10. migration, 11. drug and human trafficking, and 12. health risks such as pandemics.
In practice, cooperation on these issues develops through formal institutions – such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization and even the EU itself – and through more informal summits, such as the G8-G20 and the intergovernmental conferences on climate change and biodiversity. A joint report by the US National Intelligence Council and the EU Institute for Security Studies defines global governance more broadly as “all the institutions, regimes, processes, partnerships, and networks that contribute to collective action and problem solving at the international level.” (They are all controlled by a very small elite). All this is occurring in a context where,since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU has set high ambitions for itself.
EEAS The EU’s foreign policy ambitions were boosted by the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009. Among its innovations are the creation of the post of EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, fully-fledged EU embassies, and the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS). Since then, however, the results have been somewhatdisappointing. Time and again the EU struggles to find a single voice and often seems to find itself marginalised by other countries. Last September the EU failed far to secure full representation in the UN General Assembly, and European countries have seen their representationreduced at the IMF and the World Bank to make room for emerging economies. EU member states are heavily overrepresented in
the United Nations Security Council.
Left: The Great seal of the US given to the US illuminati by Mayer Amschel Rothschild through his handpicked messenger, Haym Solomon. A symbol seen on every 1 dollar bill as a reminder to build the world state. The pyramid with the lifted capstone represents the unfinished New World Order, Novus Ordo Seclorum – as written below the pyramid in the sea of peoples. This task is being forcefully seen through now to the point where only a world war can complete it – whereupon the capstone is in place, Lucifer´s all-seeing Eye is gone – and his star, Venus, the Pharisaic/ i.e. Talmudic Illuminati Messiah is on the top, ruling the world – as Pres. Bush Sr. said in his State of the Union Speech 1991: “What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea — a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of (Illuminati) law…. The illumination of a thousand points of light (now hidden top Illuminati – see them in the sky right)…. The winds of change are with us now.” This pyramid tells the same Luciferian story as the Tower of Babel construction.
Environmental governance International efforts were largely developed following the June 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, following which major conventions on climate change and biodiversity were adopted. At global level the two main institutions currently involved are the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), established in 1972, and the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), created in 1992. Over the past decade, environmental conventions have multiplied and public agencies and departments have mushroomed at all levels, leading to a patchwork of agreements and regulations. Businesses have created their own environmental departments, and many new research and academic institutions have also been established.
InMay 2012 a new Rio+20 ‘Earth Summit’ will be held in the same city ( (see the EurActiv LinksDossier on the Rio +20 – the craziest thing I have seen for a long time)). The summit will try to impose taxes on activities that harm the environment. Countries will also explore the idea of creating a ‘World Environmental Organisation’. So far the EU has made limited progress in persuading other countries to reduce their carbon emissions.
CarbonPositive 11 Apr. 2011: A new UN-brokered global climate agreement appeared as far away as ever following latest round of talks in Bangkok last week. Japan and Russia, reject any extension of Kyoto unless the US and major developing world emitters like China and India commit to emissions pledges first. The European Union wants an interim extension of Kyoto targets beyond 2012. Japan and Russia are against this.
Europe leads by example on continental governance Regional integration efforts, sometimes explicitly modelled on the EU, are common across the world: ASEAN, NAFTA, Mercosur, the Gulf Cooperation Council. Pan-regional bodies generally have achieved very limited integration: the African Union, Unasur and the Arab League.
However, apart from being the model of the NWO, the EU has performed miserably in regard to its mission as a steppingstone to the one world state. Its Utopian Euromediterranean is now in shambles– like its climate ambitions based on lies – without consent of the US, Russia, China – and even its own populations. Its flagship, the Euro – thought by its “father”, Robert Mundell, to be an intermediary to the one world currency as now advocated by Rothschild/Soros – is an increasing catastrophe, more and more of its member states needing bail-outs, artificial respiration, yielded by all 27 members – thus also impoverishing the non-euro members. As for democracy, the final remnants disapperared with the Lisbon Treaty/Constitution, which ignored the rejection resulting from the few referenda given in countries which could not cheat their citizens of the opportunity to say “no” to giving up their souvereignty – and obtained an Irish “Yes” through intimidation, corruption and lies. Now our politicians are stumbling over each other to give up our souvereignty to decide our own national budgets to Barroso & Co. As for controlling drug, human trafficking and migration the EU has had just the opposite effect: It has enormously increased these evils. Peace and security? The EU now has become a hawk in the service of Rothschild/George Soros´Open Society – threatening to attack all “closed” societies – provided they are not too big or have nuclar weapons!! Agricultural management has led to dismantling of well-functioning European agricultural units, increasing food prices and fraud. Nuclear proliferation control? Iran, Korea? Health? The biggest scandal in medical history after WWII, the mass vaccinations against the harmless “swine flu” in 2009/10 –WHO experts being associated with the vaccine producers – was strongly recommended by the EU´s EMEA and national Health Services, even on children, although no one knew with what side effects. Now narcolepsy seems to be a side effect in children. This vaccine contained up to 1 mio. times the squalene that was strongly suspected to have made 125.000 soldiers sick in the first Gulf War, than the vaccine for those soldiers!
But nevertheless, the EU is a faithful, cringing creature to its masters, and here. As for the background: See here.
"A sound of tumult on the mountains, Like that of many people! A sound of the uproar of kingdoms, Of nations gathered together! They are coming from a far country, from the farthest horizons .." (Isaiah 13:4-5).
Something strange is taking place in central Asia around Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India. It is a big game under the false name of “War on Terror” – a terror which started on 9/11 of 2001 with what many think was an insider jobHowever, the intention is to control all mankind – the real enemies of the New World Order. See this shocking video. This whole 9/11 business seems to be inspired by Pearl Harbour. The "Day of Deceit": “In White House meetings the strong feeling was that America needed a call to action. This is not what the public wanted, though. So, according to Stinnett, Roosevelt provoked Japan to attack us, without warning the fleet in Pearl Harbor, and thus galvanized the country to war.”
In chess, you cannot win the game, unless you control the centre. The same is true in the attempt to here introduce world government . The energy and geopolitical centre of the Earth today is Central Asia and the middle East.
The US-NATO-invasion of Afghanistan took place with full support by the EU – and here – although till this day the EU has sent just 193 policemen to Afghanistan! On Sept. 23, 2008 The UN submitted to NATO which has now become the New World Order´s tool to gain world domination.
Zbigniew Brzezinski´s, Obamas mentor´s, view on the world : Brzezinski sees Eurasia as the centre of the world – necessary for the USA to dominate, if the US want to rule the world, keeping any rival away. (As for his views on regionalisation as the way to the world state – see here) "Long-term, global policy must become more akin to a supremacy of power in the hands of a single state. Thus, America is not only the first, but also the only true global superpower, and it may probably be the very last" – very ominous!!! (s.209)
Brzezinski: "Between 2 Ages 1970:" 9. Society is controlled by the elite. Democracy and the humanitarian, social values are, unfortunately, mistakes that result in the uneducated´s regime." And, he also argues that the "One-World society" that is the crown and completion of work.
Beginning US-Russian Inconsistency over Central Asia Russia is reasserting its role in Central Asia . On Wednesday, Russia announced a financial rescue fund for a group of ex-Soviet allies and won their agreement to form a military rapid reaction force (10.000 men) in the region that it said would match North Atlantic Treaty Organization standards. That came a day after Kyrgyzstan announced, at Russian urging, that it planned to evict the U.S. from the Manas base it has used to ferry large numbers of American troops into Afghanistan. Russia said the base may house part of the planned new force instead. (The eviction within 6 months has been passed by the Kyrghysz Parliament).
The steps mark Russia's most aggressive push yet to counter a U.S. military presence in the regionthat it has long resented. They pose a challenge for the administration of President Barack Obama, which sees Afghanistan as its top foreign-policy priority and is preparing to double the size of the American military presence there.
Russia is signaling that it will be a tough defenderof its interests, especially in its traditional backyard of the former Soviet Union. “Karasin dismissed suggestions that Moscow's strategy was to provide bases for US Afghan operations in exchange for Washington abandoning its anti-ballistic missile shield.”
With Pakistan increasingly tenuous, U.S. officials have had to turn to Russia for help. The U.S. already ships large quantities of fuel through Russia.
The Putin-Medvedev doctrine consists of Russia defending the rights of its citizens wherever they are and by whatever means necessary, as in Abkhazia, is causing concern.
Why does this matter? The US National Intelligence Council predicts a total implosion of Pakistan - “a failed nuclear power with myriads of terrorist groups, displeased groups of rebels and a mighty army. This is expected to have serious consequences for global security.
Global Research Febr. 16, 2009 It is the people of South Asia who will pay a steep price as the Pentagon and their corporatist masters seek a "solution" to what Washington insiders have dubbed the "Af-Pak" problem.
A New York Times article also states that the US is continuing to carry out Special Forces operations on the ground inside Pakistan, in addition to its stepped-up missile attacks.
Obama, Gates and the military chiefs have already outlined a policy shift away from any pretense of democratic reform or “nation-building” in favour of a more concentrated focus on counter-insurgency operations aimed at wiping out popular resistance in both Afghanistan and Pakistan to US neo-colonial aims. There is a growing danger of a military conflagration throughout Central Asia and beyond. The Pentagon is attempting to persuade U.S. President Barack Obama to approve a vast nation-building plan for Afghanistan that would involve deploying 100,000 troops in that country for as long as a decade alongside with civilian measures. It would cost "around $2 billion per month beyond the roughly $20 billion we already spend.
I: U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, revealed that CIA Predator drones are flown from an airbase in Pakistan. Feinstein's remarks are certain to enflame tensions against Pakistan's civilian government. And that may be intended!! Comment: And it is true – according to the Times Online.
Global Research 23 Febr, 2009: 3 Pakistani military commanders are now joining forces against the government for this reason. This will destabilize President Asif Ali Zardari´s civilian government of Pakistan. The Zardari government is in full crisis mode. With a reputation as a grifter the Yankee overlords made it clear they had no confidence in Zadari´s administration and would prefer another compliant military "Big Man"to rule the roost.
II: Besides, Pakistan sees a home-grown Islamist insurgency. President Zardari: "We are aware of the fact (the Taliban are) trying to take over the state of Pakistan. So, we're fighting for the survival of Pakistan." However, the government has responded by capitulating to the Taleban´s demands in …the Swat Valley. Taliban have virtually cut NATO's supply lines into Afghanistan through the Khyber Pass and now threaten Peshawar, the NWFP's capital, a sprawling city of three million people.
It appears that the government's strategy for "winning" entails a complete capitulation to the Taleban´s demands, including the imposition of draconian Sharia to be "administered" by the Taliban themselves!
Pakistani critics believe that the organization …launches new operationsaimed at the centers of power. Many Pakistani Army and intelligence officers … oppose using force against fellow Muslims, and some have ties to militant groups.
III: Ab Ordine Chaos – Chaos out of Order: The masters of the New World Order at play with incalculable risks for the planet. The Americansplay double games, e.g. equipping select Taliban groups with sophisticated technologies that are effectively used against their attempts to restrain the activities of the Taliban. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Muhammad ElBaradei has said Pakistan's nuclear weapons can fall into the hands of terrorists due to the prevailing instability in the South Asian country. Instability, I might add, that the United States and their NATO partners seem hell-bent on spreading far and wide.
The US Defence Department is preparing to intervene, “if a nuclear state becomes instable and nuclear weapons could be used against rivalling groups – or the US) American officials may also be prompted by growing concern that the militant attacks are increasingly putting the civilian government of Pakistan, a nation with nuclear weapons, at risk.” But the USA already has remapped the countries of the Middle East and Central Asia on the desk.
If Pakistan were pushed by internal and external forces to fly-apart, it would set the stage for the military occupation of the country by the U.S. and their partners under the guise of "peacekeeping" and "stability operations." Government opposition is staging riots against Zardari´s government.The illuminist Atlantic Council: Pakistan faces dire economic and security threats that threaten both the existence of Pakistan as a democratic and stable state and the region as a whole. We are running out of time - ultimate failure threatens. Zardari to the Atlantic Council: “We – [the United States, Pakistan, NATO and the world at large] – are losing the battle” to keep Pakistan stable, at peace. A senior Pakistani military officer told us: “If Pakistan fails, the world fails.” Comment: NATO intervention seems imminent.
IV: New World Order out of chaos Now where is the direct voice from the New World Order? Here is a voice from Tavistock´s Brookings Institution , which is telling the US Government how to run its affairs and the Chatham House, the daughter of Cecil Rhodes´Rothschild Club, The Round Table and the sister of Rockefeller´s Council on Foreign Relations:“
Bruce Jones, Director, Center on International Cooperation, New York University : “Let’s look backwards on Afghanistan briefly. We would be in a significantly stronger shape here if over the past eight or more years we had invested serious effort in building up the capacity of the UN and NATO to do the statebuilding work of governments.
Spiegel: As it is now the troops are getting exhausted. Therefore 17.000 US troops extra have been deployed in Helmand – but the US expects much more troops from Europe – especially from Germany, Italy and France) Apparently the EU is not willing to play the game of the New World Order when it comes to blood shedding in a remote country better being left alone, in case we closed our borders to people from that part of the world.. A conflict between China and the USA is unlikely, China being the creditor of the US and the US China´s best market. . However it is not impossible
Obama and Saudi Arabia make a secret pact for the Persian Gulf while Moscow supports Teheran.