Search Results for “European Systemic Risk Board + de larosiere”.


Zusammenfassung: Bundeskanzlerin Merkel und Präs. van Rompuy haben gesagt, wenn der Euro falle, falle Europa. Viele glauben, dass der Euro fallen werde - aber dies sollte sicherlich nicht begrüßt werden: Wie Brzezinski sagte, sei Regionalisierung eine Voraussetzung für die Schaffung einer Weltregierung. Um deren Weltwährung, den Bancor nach Keynes, einzuführen, ist es notwendig, dass der Dollar und der Euro zusammenbrechen.
Aber die EU macht weiter mit der Maskerade: Mit Wirkung ab dem 1. Januar 2011 hat Barrosos lieber Freund, der Rothschild-Scherge und Trilaterale Kommissionist, Jacques de Larosière, uns  ein Wirtschaftsregulierungssystem beschert, bestehend aus den gleichen Kräften, die so bequem die vielen Gefahrenzeichen,  die zur für die Londoner und Wall-Street-Banker so einbringenden Finanzkrise führten,  ignorierten. Diese Krise brachte den Tätern große Mengen an Geld von Hausbesitzern, die ihre Heime verlassen mussten, sowie von den  Steuerzahlern durch Rettungsaktionen als Dank für die rücksichtslosen Spekulationen der Banker. Ein Europäischer Systemischer Risiko-Vorstand (ESRB) ist voll von Rothschilds EZB und  nationalen Zentralbankchefs. Darüber hinaus gibt es die ESA, die Europäische Überwachungsbehörde der Märkte, Die Europäische Bankaufsichtsbehörde (EBA),  eine Europäische Behörde für Versicherungswesen und die Betriebliche Altersversorgung (EIOPA) sowie eine Europäische Wertpapieraufsichtsbehörde (ESMA).

Nachdem  sie drastische Sparmaßnahmen in PIIGS- und anderen EU-Ländern eingeführt haben, sagt die EU-Spitze jetzt, die Maßnahmen seien gar nicht tiefgehend genug, um zu beissen - trotz heftiger Proteste dagegen. Viel mehr Strenge sei erforderlich, vor allem die Wohlfahrtstaaten seien stark abgebaut zu werden, u.a. seien das Rentenalter sowie Steuern und die Bemessungsgrundlagen anzuheben. Die EU fordert das Recht, uns zu besteuern. Die Kommission glaubt, das werde die Beschäftigung steigern - obwohl die Menschen weniger Geld haben, um die Nachfrage anzukurbeln.  Dies, zusammen mit ETS-Gebühren und Entgelte für den nutzlosen CO2-Umsatz auf den Klimabörsen der Banker ist ein Rezept für Unruhe in der EU. Es sieht ganz so aus, als ob die EU dies anstrebt. Um es noch schlimmer zu machen, gewährt die EU-Kommission mit Unterstützung des EU Gerichtshofes 50.000 EU-Beamten - einschließlich der Richter - eine Gehaltserhöhung von 3,7%, um so brav Millionen von Europäern in die Arbeitslosigkeit  geschickt zu haben. Die Gewerkschaften sind empört.

Die EU fordert von protestierenden, verschuldeten Ländern, dass sie ein EU-Rettungspaket annehmen müssen, wobei diese Länder jegliche Souveränität an Brüssel verlieren. Als nächstes Land auf der Liste ist nun Portugal, obwohl seine Regierung sagt, es brauche kein Rettungspaket. Experten meinen,  diese Rettungsaktionen seien völlig wertlos: 1. Sie verhindern  nicht die Ansteckung durch das todkranke  EU-Konzept des Euro. 2. Der Rettungsmechanismus sei ein Durcheinander. 3. Es gebe keinen Plan für Länder, um heraus aus dem Rettungs-Mechanismus zu kommen. 4. Schließlich machen all die Fehler, die mit dem Rettungsmechanismus verbunden seien, den Zusammenbruch des Euro eher wahrscheinlicher. Anleger können ganz klar sehen, dass die EU- und IWF-Medizin nicht  funktioniere.

Ich persönlich glaube nicht, dass der Euro fehlschlagen wird, bis diese finanziellen Genies uns den letzten Cent aus der Tasche gezogen haben. Die Überwachung gilt für die Volkswirtschaften aller EU-Mitgliedstaaten. Mit dem bevorstehenden Diktat, die EU solle alle nationalen Etats vor der nationalen Parlamentsvorlage gutheissen, hat die EU nun Europas Staaten zu Vasallen gemacht.

Angela Merkel sagte – wie auch der EU-Präs. van Rompuy: “Wenn der Euro fällt, fällt Europa” - als ob das eine Tragödie wäre. Welches es in der Tat ist, denn nach dem Euro folgt der Bancor, die Weltwährung (siehe die  “Reserve Accumulation and International Monetary Stability” des IMF. Die bereits bestehende Weltregierung, die gem. EU-Präs. van Rompuy im Jahr 2009 durch die G20 ins leben gerufen worden sei, wird die Welt offen regieren, die offensichtlich nicht einmal von den regionalen Regierungen wie der EU geregelt werden kann. Zbigniew Brzezinski hat darauf hingewiesen, dass die Weltregierung nur durch Regionalisierung möglich sei. Also, mal sehen, wie dieser Plan voranschreitet.

EU-Staats-Rettungsmedizin ist nutzlos - scheint eine Intrige  zu sein, um die EU-Länder unter Brüsseler Kontrolle zu zwingen
Jan. 18 Bloomberg Business Week: Diesmal ist es Portugal. Dennoch scheint das Skript sehr ähnlich dem, das bereits in Griechenland und Irland gespielt wurde. Die Anleiherenditen schiessen empor. Die Regierung bestreitet wütend jegliche Notwendigkeit einer Rettungsaktion. Französische und Deutsche Führer wiederholen einige ihrer Linien über die Bedeutung der europäischen Solidarität. Die Jungs des Internationalen Währungsfonds sowie der Europäischen Union packen ihre Koffer und überprüfen die Flugpläne. Ehe man sich´s versieht, sind die trotzigen Worte verschwunden, und die Rettungsaktion  hat begonnen.
Es macht keinen Sinn: 1. Die Ansteckung wird nicht aufhören. 2. Der Rettungs-Mechanismus ist ein Durcheinander. 3. Es gibt keinen Plan, um die Länder aus dem Rettungs-Mechanismus Larosiere+barrosoherauszunehmen. 4. Schließlich machen all die Fehler im Rettungs-Mechanismus ein Auseinanderbrechen des Euro wahrscheinlich. Anleger können ganz klar sehen, dass die EU- und IWFmedizin nicht funktioniert.

EU Presse-Mitteilung d. 17 Nov. 2010 (Dok. 39/10, 40/10, 41/10, 42/10, 43/10 und 13694/10).
Der Rat verabschiedete Verordnungen über 1. Den Europäischen Systemischen Risiko- Vorstand (ESRB), der für die Makroaufsicht des Finanzsystems zuständig ist, sowie drei neue Aufsichtsbehörden auf der Mikro-Finanz-Ebene (alles erbaut von der Rothschild-Marionette, Jacques de Larosière – rechts mit seinem “lieben Freund”, José  Barroso). De Larosière ist auch ein alter Trilateraler Kommissionist, der die  Marionetten, die es vor der ersten Finanzkrise im Jahr 2008 unterliessen, gegen den grundlegenden finanziellen Wahnsinn einzugreifen, mit ihrer  ”Aufsicht” weiter machen lässt. 2. Eine Europäische Bankaufsichtsbehörde (EBA), 3. eine Europäische Aufsichtsbehörde für Versicherungswesen und für Europäische Renten–  und Betriebliche Altersversorgung (EIOPA) sowie 4. eine Europäische Wertpapier– und Märkteaufsichtsbehörde (ESMA). Diese 3 werden ESA benannt: Die Europäische Aufsichtsratsbehörde.

Die vier neuen Körperschaften werden Teil eines europäischen Systems der Finanzaufsicht, die die Aufsichtsbehörden der Mitgliedstaaten umfassen wird. Der ESRB und  die EIOPA werden in Frankfurt, die EBA in London und die ESMA in Paris angesiedelt werden. Das neue System wird ab 1. Januar 2011 betriebsbereit sein.

Der ESRB hat die Aufgabe, potenzielle Bedrohungen für die Stabilität des Finanzsystems zu überwachen und zu beurteilen. Wo notwendig, wird er Risikowarnungen und Empfehlungen für Maßnahmen erstellen sowie ihre Umsetzung überwachen.
Risiko-Warnungen und Empfehlungen werden entweder allgemeiner Natur sein oder einzelne Mitgliedstaaten oder Gruppen von Mitgliedstaaten betreffen. Sie werden an den Rat gerichtet werden und gegebenenfalls an die drei neuen Aufsichtsbehörden.
Die Empfehlungen des ESRB werden voraussichtlich einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die Adressaten ausüben, durch eine hohe Qualität der Analyse, während die Adressaten verpflichtet sind, eine angemessene Begründung zu liefern (”Handeln oder Erklären“). Wenn die ESRB-Richter die Reaktion als unzureichend schätzen, werden sie den Rat gegebenenfalls informieren. Von Fall zu Fall, könnte der ESRB entscheiden, nach Anhörung des Rates, die Empfehlungen zu veröffentlichen .
Der Präsident der EZB hat den Vorsitz für eine erste Amtszeit von fünf Jahren.

Trichet-bangtAlle Macht den Zentralbanken Rothschilds: Ein kleiner Lenkungsausschuss wird die Arbeits-Tagesordnung des ESRB setzen und Entscheidungen vorbereiten. Das Programm umfasst den Vorstands-Präsidenten und den Vize-Präsidenten, fünf weitere Mitglieder des Verwaltungsrats, die auch Mitglieder des Erweiterten Rates der EZB sind (drei aus Mitgliedstaaten des Euroraums und zwei aus Nicht-Euro-Mitgliedstaaten), die Präsidenten der drei ESAs, ein Mitglied der Kommission und den Vorsitzenden des Wirtschafts-und Finanzausschusses (ECF).

Der Generalrat des ESRB-Vorstandes wird aus seinem Präsidenten und Vize-Präsidenten, Gouverneuren der Zentralbanken der Mitgliedstaaten (Rothschild-regiert - mit Ausnahme derjenigen von 5 Ländern), dem Präsidenten der EZB - der CFR- und Rothschild-Marionette, Jean- Claude Trichet - (oder dessen Vize-Präsidenten, wenn ihr Präsident auch den Vorsitz des ESRB führt), den Präsidenten der drei ESA, einem Mitglied der Kommission, und (als nicht stimmberechtigten Mitgliedern) dem Präsidenten des EFC und den Vertretern der nationalen Aufsichtsbehörden.

Die ESA ist für die Gewährleistung, dass ein einziger Satz von harmonisierten Vorschriften und einheitlicher Aufsichtspraxis durch die Aufsichtsbehörden der Mitgliedstaaten angewandt werde. Doch aufgrund der finanziellen Verbindlichkeiten, die für die Mitgliedstaaten beteiligt sein können, dürfen die Entscheidungen der ESA in keiner Weise auf die haushaltspolitischen Zuständigkeiten der Mitgliedstaaten eingreifen. Jede verbindliche Entscheidung durch die ESA sind auf die Übereinstimmung mit den EU-Gerichten zu überprüfen. Die ESA wird hochrangige Vertreter der Aufsichtsbehörden aller Mitgliedstaaten unter ständigen Vorsitzen umfassen. Die nationalen Behörden bleiben für die Tag-zu-Tag Beaufsichtigung einzelner Unternehmen zuständig, und ein Lenkungsausschuss wird eingerichtet werden, um die Zusammenarbeit zu gewährleisten und den Austausch von Informationen zwischen der ESA und dem ESRB zu koordinieren.

Die Überwachung gilt für alle EU-Staaten – und EU Gutheissung nationaler Etats vor der nationalen Parlamentsvorlage reduziert alle  europäischen EU-Mitgliedstaaten zu Vasallen
The Telegraph 18 Jan. 2011: Die EU sucht neue “Haushaltsüberwachungs-Befugnisse”, um gegen den britischen  Haushalt (und den aller anderen EU Mitgliedstaaten) Veto einzulegen, bevor es dem Parlament vorgelegt wird, laut Regierungsbeamten. Ein Beamter der Europäischen Kommission, sagte, dass die Richtlinie für alle EU-Länder notwendig geworden sei, um die “Einhaltung der Schwellen des Schuldenstandes und des Defizits sicherzustellen. Die Mitgliedstaaten müssen gewährleisten, dass diese Regeln für alle politischen Institutionen und staatlichen Teilsektoren, die für sie arbeiten, gelten”, sagte er.

The Financial Times Deutschland 20. Jan. 2011: Übervertretung von (Rothschilds) EZB und den Nationalen Notenbanken im ESRB. Die nationalen Aufsichtsbehörden haben kein Stimmrecht!
Einige Wirtschafter  befürchten, die Notenbank könnte durch die Hintertür ein Doppelmandat erhalten. Es drohen auf mittlere Sicht Interessenkonflikte zwischen Preis- und Finanzstabilität. Die Geldpolitik der EZB und der Nationalen Notenbanken bleibt ohne Überwachung (Vgl. Alan Greenspans katastrophale Niedrigzinspolitik!)

Bloomberg 20. Jan. 2011: “Das Problem ist, dass diese Einrichtungen aufgebaut sind, um die Probleme von gestern zu lösen”, sagte Peter Hahn, ein ehemaliger Banker der Citigroup Inc., der Finanz-Vorlesungen an der Cass Business School in London gibt. “Sie können nie mehr tun, als irgendein Problem zu signalisieren, und ob sie eine Krise stoppen können, ist fraglich.”  ”Wenn man nach einer Institution sucht, die uns vor der nächsten Krise retten wird, diese ist es sicherlich nicht”, sagte Carsten Brzeski, Volkswirt bei der ING Group in Brüssel.

Budget-nedskæringerEU Pressemitteilung 12. Jan. 2011:  Olli Rehn, EU-Kommissar für Wirtschaft und Währung: “Ohne verstärkte Haushaltskonsolidierung sind wir auf Gedeih und Verderb auf die Marktkräfte, wie wir gesehen haben, angewiesen. Ohne wesentliche Änderungen in der Art und Weise, in der die europäische Wirtschaft funktioniert, wird Europa stagnieren und wird zum Teufelskreis von hoher Arbeitslosigkeit, hoher Staatsverschuldung und niedrigem Wirtschaftswachstum verurteilt werden. Wir können es durch  entschlossene Haushaltskonsolidierung und intensivierte Strukturreformen  verhindern. Alle Mitgliedstaaten sollten in erster Linie Olli-rehnihre Ausgaben bei gleichzeitigem Schutz der für Wachstum ausgerichteten Ausgaben, insbesondere für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation anpassen. Wenn Steuererhöhungen notwendig sind – und in vielen Fällen sind sie notwendig - sollten wirtschaftliche Verzerrungen minimiert werden. Indirekte Steuern sind wachstumsfreundlicher als die direkten Steuern, und die Verbreiterung der Bemessungsgrundlage ist in der Regel besser als Anhebung der Steuern. Wir müssen auch makrowirtschaftliche Ungleichgewichte für die Mitgliedstaaten mit großen Leistungsbilanzdefiziten bekämpfen. Die Reformen der Lohnsysteme und Dienstmärkte sind von größter Bedeutung, um die gesamte wirtschaftliche Wettbewerbsfähigkeit zu stärken. Ebenso müssen die Mitgliedstaaten mit hohen Leistungsbilanzüberschüssen die Quellen der schwachen Inlandsnachfrage erkennen und bekämpfen. Dieses Jahr wird ohne Zweifel wieder ein sehr Anspruchsvolles für Europa, aber es kann auch das Jahr werden, in dem Europa seine Staatsschuldenkrise überwindet,  sein Wachstumspotenzial sowie seine Reformen der Ordnungspolitik steigert. Dies erfordert mutige steuerliche Maßnahmen und strukturelle Reformen in jedem Mitgliedstaat.

EUOBSERVER 12 Jan. 2011: - Trotz Hunderten von Milliarden, die bereits von den EU-Staatshaushalten im Zuge der Wirtschaftskrise gekürzt worden sind, sagte die Europäische Kommission am Mittwoch, die Schnitte seien nicht tief oder radikal genug und verlangte noch mehr Strenge von den europäischen Regierungen. Die EU-Exekutive skizzierte eine Reihe von strengen Empfehlungen, die “Jährliche Wachstumsübersicht” benannt, die die nationalen Hauptstädte zu befolgen haben.

In einer Vorführung der quer-ideologischen Einheit skizzierte ein Trio der Spitzenbeamten Europas, der Mitte-Rechts-Präsident, Jose Manuel Barroso, der liberale Kommissar für Wirtschafts-und Währungsfragen, Olli Rehn, und der linke Beschäftigungskommissar, László Andor, die Pläne in der europäischen Hauptstadt. Brüssel will weitere Einschnitte für Haushalte im Bereich Sozialstaat im Jahr 2012 sehen - darunter mehr Bedingungen für Leistungen und eine Anhebung des “verfrühten” Rentenalters.

France-pension-demonstrationsDie Rentenreformen haben sich jedoch als höchst umstritten herausgestellt, wobei Massenstreiks in Frankreich über die Rentenalter-Veränderungen im vergangenen Jahr das Land lahm legten.

Die Drei riefen auch zu einer Steigerung der effektiven Kredit-Kapazität des EU-Rettungs-Mechanismus unter wachsenden Befürchtungen auf, dass der Rettungsfonds der Eurozone möglicherweise nicht ausreiche, sollte Spanien oder Belgien auf seine Türen klopfen. Allerdings erklärten Frankreich und Deutschland den aktuellen Fonds für groß genug. Ein Machtkampf darüber ist zwischen Merkel und Barroso ausgebrochen. Die EU-Regierungen werden im Frühjahr die Vorschläge prüfen. Die Vorschläge der Kommission haben sofort Schock und Empörung bei den Gewerkschaften provoziert.

EUbusiness 10 Jan. 2010: Deutschland und Frankreich wollen Portugal drücken, um ein Rettungspaket zu beantragen, um zu verhindern, dass Spanien und Belgien die nächsten Euro-Krisenopfer werden. Paris und Berlin wollen auch, dass die Mitglieder der 17 Länder der Eurozone erklären, sie seien bereit, alles zu tun, um die Währungsunion zu retten, einschließlich des Ausbaus eines 750-Milliarden-Euro-schweren Rettungsfonds. Deutsche und französische Experten machen sich Sorgen wegen der hohen Zinsen, die Portugal zu zahlen hat, um Geld von Investoren, die durch die öffentlichen Finanzen in Lissabon besorgt sind, zu borgen. Spanien ist eine  viel größere Sorge für Paris und Berlin, indem seine Wirtschaft doppelt so gross wie Portugals, Griechenlands und Irlands zusammengenommen ist, sein Bankensektor kämpft mit schlechten Schulden, und die Arbeitslosigkeit ist fast 20 Prozent. Investoren sind auch wegen Belgiens, das seit fast sieben Monaten ohne eine Regierung ist, zunehmend besorgt.

The Express 16 Dec. 2010: Der EU-Haushalt fürs kommende Jahr  wurde gestern vereinbart - eine umstrittene 2,9 prozentige Steigerung der Ausgaben mitten in einem europaweiten Programm der drastischen Sparmaßnahmen in den Mitgliedsländern. EU-Abgeordnete hatten früher in diesem Jahr für eine sechsprozentige Steigerung gedrängt, ließen sich aber mit einem Kompromiss begnügen, der den jährlichen EU-Haushalt auf 126.500.000.000 € wachsen sieht - ein Schritt, der die britischen Steuerzahler zusätzliche 450 Mio EUR pro Jahr kosten wird, wobei Großbritanniens gesamter jährlicher Beitrag auf £ 8.5 Mrd. steigt.
EurActiv 22 Nov. 2010: Der Europäische Gerichtshof (EuGH) hat entschieden, dass eine 1,85% Lohnerhöhung für EU-Beamte von den Mitgliedstaaten nicht im Einklang mit EU-Vorschriften sei und bestätigte damit einen 3,7% Gehaltserhöhung wie ursprünglich von der Europäischen Kommission angenommen. Die Lohnerhöhung wird Auswirkungen auf rund 50.000 EU-Beamte haben, einschließlich der Richter des Europäischen Gerichtshofs.
Kommentar: Dies ist eine direkte Missachtung der Millionen von europäischen Arbeitnehmern, die  durch die Sparmaßnahmen, die von diesen EU-Beamten erfunden wurden, in die Arbeitslosigkeit geschickt worden sind.

EU Pressemitteilung 24. Nov. 2010:  EU-Kommisssions-Präs., José Barroso, über die EU-Wirtschaftsregierung: Die Staats-und Regierungschefs haben einstimmig entschieden, dass Vertragsänderung erforderlich sei, um den Mechanismus zu etablieren. Wir sollten eine Revision des Vertrags, die die Stimmrechte der Mitgliedstaaten in Frage stellt, nicht akzeptieren. Ich bin froh, dass dieses Argument akzeptiert wurde.

Griechenland und möglicherweise auch andere der am stärksten verschuldeten Euro-Länder müssen die Zahlungen aussetzen und die Rückzahlung ihrer Schulden aufgeben.
Business.dk 17 jan. 2011: Der Vorschlag wird heute von verschiedenen Parteien gestellt, darunter Goldman Sachs, Barclays und der britischen Wochenzeitschrift, The Economist.
Mehrere Menschen denken, wir sollten Inspiration aus dem Brady-Plan holen, der im Jahr 1980 verwendet wurde, um eine Vielzahl von Entwicklungsländern durch eine kontrollierte Konkursverwaltung zu steuern. Die großen Banken, die Geld an Länder wie Ecuador und Costa Rica geliehen hatten, tauschten ihre Forderungen gegen neue Anleihen ein, die einen niedrigeren Zinssatz oder eine niedrigere nominale Kapitalsumme als das ursprüngliche Darlehen hatte. Zur gleichen Zeit stellten die Schuldnerländer in unterschiedlicher Weise sicher, dass die Kosten der neuen Anleihen zu zahlen wären.
Im Jahr 2015 werden Griechenlands Schulden 165 Prozent des BIP erreicht haben, und das Land muss somit  8-9 Prozent seines BIP auf Zahlung von Zinsen aufwenden. “Es ist für ein kleines Land mit einer schwachen Wirtschaft unerträglich. Griechenland scheint, in den Konkurs zu gehen“, schreibt The Economist.
Im Jahr 2015 würde Irlands Schulden 125 Prozent des BIP erreicht haben, während Portugals Schulden 100 Prozent des BIP entsprechen würden. Diese Verschuldung kann, wenn nur rund vier Prozent Zinsen zu zahlen sind,  bewältigt werden. Belgien kann es heute. Letzte Woche verkauften Portugal und Spanien beide Staatsanleihen, 1,25 und € 3 Mrd., bzw., aber zu hohen Zinsen. Portugal hatte 6,7 Prozent Zinsen, was mehr als für Notkredite von der EU und dem IWF ist, zu zahlen - einen Zinssatz, den sich die Länder auf längere Sicht nicht leisten können. Der marktübliche Zinssatz für zehnjährige irische Staatsanleihen ist jetzt bei 8,5 Prozent.

Kommentar
Mit mehr Sparmaßnahmen-Forderungen von der EU sind mehr Rebellionen/Streiks zu erwarten - und das unersättliche Bedürfnis der PIIGS-Länder sowie die entsprechende Geldgier der Grossbanken werden wahrscheinlich zum Fall des Euro führen, wenn dadurch die EU die Macht über alle EU-Länder vollends übernommen hat - und die EUSSR-Planwirtschaft vollendet hat. Jedoch, ich stelle mir vor, das wird erst passieren, wenn die Globalisten uns den letzten Cent aus der Tasche gezogen haben.

Oneeye

“Eine Krise darf nicht vergeudet werden”, so wird der US Finanzminister, Timothy Geithner, der ehemalige Direktor der New Yorker Abteilung der Federal Reserve, zitiert.

Wer sind die EU-Aufsichtsbehörden, die alle Gefahrenzeichen vor der ersten Finanzkrise ignorierten? Es sind die gleichen Leute, die die Wirtschaft der EU-Staaten heute überwachen - verstärkt durch Rothschild-Marionetten der Europäischen und nationalen Zentralbanken, deren Vorsitzender auch den Vorsitz der European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) führt. Der ESRB und die ESA sind ein enormer Verlust der nationalen Souveränität an die übernationale EU.

Dies ist für die ambitionierten EU-Bürokraten fein: EUbusiness 24 Jan. 2010: “Europa” greift nach den Geldbeutel-Schnüren der Mitgliedstaaten, die es finanzieren. “Europas Antworten werden die (Haushalts-) Koordination der kommenden Jahrzehnte prägen.” Das Problem, wie immer, ist eine  “Übergabe der Souveränität” von den nationalen Hauptstädten an Brüssel, sagte Belgiens Finanzminister, Didier Reynders.
Die EU ist damit beschäftigt, die Wohlfahrtstaaten wegzuschneiden - trotz aller Unruhen aus diesem Grund in Frankreich, Griechenland, Portugal, Irland - und trotz der verdutzten Gewerkschaftsführer.
Diese Arbeitslosigkeitskrise, die Plünderung der Europäer von rücksichtslosen NWO-Eurokraten und Politikern durch ihr völlig unprofessionelles Euro-Projekt sowie ihre hausgemachte Finanz/ Wirtschaftskrise dienen als Futter für die Bankier-Haie: All dies ist die Neue Weltordnung, die die EU und hier geschaffen hat - und denen die EU nun verhilft, auf unsere Kosten fertigzustellen, indem die EU alle Wirtschaftsgewalt übernimmt und die Nationalstaaten entmündigt.

Summary: Chancellor Merkel and Pres. van Rompuy have said that if the euro fails, so does Europe. Many believe that the euro is failing - but it should probably not be welcomed: As Brzezinski said, regionalization is a precondition for the creation of world government. For a world currency, the bancor after Keynes, to be introduced, it is necessary that the dollar and the euro collapse.
But the EU continues the masquerade: Coming into force as of 1 Jan 2011, Barroso’s dear friend, the Rothschild minion and Trilateral commissionist, Jacques De Larosiere, has created a regulatory regime consisting of the same forces that so conveniently ignored the many danger signals of the financial crisis so favorable to the London and Wall Street bankers.  This crisis brought the perpetrators huge amounts of money from homeowners who had to leave their homes, as well as from taxpayers through bail-outs as thanks for their reckless speculations. A European System Risk Management Board (ESRB) is full of Rothschild´s ECB and national bank leaders. Furthermore,  there is the ESA, The European Markets Surveillance Authority: The European Banking Authority (EBA);  a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA); and a European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).

After having introduced very harsh austerity measures in PIIGS and other EU countries, the EU top now says that the measures do not hit deeply enough - despite severe protests against them. Much more austerity is needed, especially the welfare states are to be severely cut, including the pensionable age - and taxes and tax base are to be broadened. The EU demands the right to tax us. The Commission believes, this  will increase employment - although people do not have money to stimulate demand. This, together with ETS fees and charges for useless CO2 sales at the bankers´ climate exchanges is a recipe for unrest in the EU. It looks as if the EU is up to this. To add insult to injury, the EU Commission with the Court’s assistance granted to 50,000  EU officials - including the Judges - a salary increase of 3.7% for so bravely having sent millions of Europeans into unemployment. The unions are furious.

The EU demands of protesting indebted countries that they must take an EU rescue package, whereby these countries lose all sovereignty to Brussels. Next on the list is now Portugal, although it says it does not need any rescue package. Specialists believe that these bailouts are completely useless: 1 They do not prevent contagion from the EU´s mortally ill euro concept 2. The rescue mechanism is a mess. 3. There is no plan to get countries out of the rescue mechanism. 4. Finally, all the errors associated the with the rescue mechanism have made a failure of the euro more likely. Investors can see quite clearly that the EU and IMF medicine does not work.

Personally I do not think that the euro will fail until these financial geniuses have pulled the last cent out of our pockets. The surveillance applies to the national budgets of all EU member states. With the upcoming diktat that the EU is to approve of all national budgets before they are laid before national parliaments, the EU is now reducing European states to mere vassals – and putting an end to “welfare”.

Angela Merkel said – as did EU Pres. van Rompuy: “If the Euro falls, Europe falls” – as though that were a tragedy. Which it is, in fact, for after the euro follows the  Bancor, the World currency (see the IMF´s “Reserve Accumulation and International Monetary Stability. And the already existing world government, that acc. to EU Pres. van Rompuy was introduced in 2009 as the G20, will openly govern the world which obviously cannot be governed even by regional governments like the EU. Zbigniew Brzezinski pointed out that world government was only possible through regionalization. So, let´s see how this plan is progressing.

EU´s state bail-out medicine is useless – seems a plot to force EU countries under Brussel´s control
Jan. 18 Bloomberg Business Week: This time around, it’s Portugal. And yet the script seems very similar to the one played out already in Greece and Ireland. Bond yields surge. The government denies furiously there is any need for a bailout. French and German leaders rehash some of their lines about the importance of European solidarity. And the guys at the International Monetary Fund and the European Union pack their bags and check flight schedules. Before you know it, the defiant words have vanished, and the bailout has begun.
It makes no sense: 1.It won’t stop the contagion. 2. The rescue mechanism is a mess. 3.There’s no plan for getting countries out of the rescue mechanism. 4. Finally, all the flaws in the rescue mechanism make a breakup of the euro more likely. Investors can see quite clearly that the EU and IMF medicine isn’t working.

EU Press Release 17 Nov. 2010 (docs 39/10, 40/10, 41/10, 42/10, 43/10 and 13694/10).
Larosiere+barrosoThe Council adopted regulations establishing a 1. European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), which will provide macro-prudential oversight of the financial system, and three new supervisory authorities at the micro-financial level, namely (constructed by the Rothschild puppet, De Larosière right with his “dear friend” José Barroso). De Larosière is also an old Trilateral Commissioner to let the previous puppets who failed to intervene against the fundamental financial insanity before the first financial crisis in 2008 carry on with their “supervision”):
2. A European Banking Authority (EBA); 3. a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA); and 4. a European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). These 3 are called ESA: the European Supervisory Authorities.

The four new bodies will be part of a European system of financial supervisors, which will include the supervisory authorities of the member states. The ESRB and the EIOPA will be sited in Frankfurt, the EBA in London and the ESMA in Paris. The new system will be operational as from 1 January 2011.

The ESRB’s role will be to monitor and assess potential threats to the stability of the financial system. Where necessary, it will issue risk warnings and recommendations for action and will monitor their implementation.
Risks warnings and recommendations will either be of a general nature or concern individual member states or groups of member states. They will be addressed to the Council and, as appropriate, to the three new supervisory authorities.
The ESRB’s recommendations are expected to exert a major influence on addressees, with a high quality of analysis, while addressees will be required to provide adequate justification (”act or explain”). If the ESRB judges the reaction to be inadequate, it will inform the Council as appropriate. On a case-by-case basis, it could decide to make the recommendations public after consulting the Council.
The ESRB will be chaired by the President of the ECB for an initial term of five years.

Trichet-bangtAll power to Rothschild´s central banks: A small steering committee will set the ESRB’s work agenda and prepare decisions. It will comprise the board’s president and vice-president, five other members of the general board who are also members of the general council of the ECB (three from euro area member states and two from non-euro member states), the presidents of the three ESAs, a member of the Commission and the chairman of the economic and financial committee (EFC).

The ESRB board’s general council will comprise its president and vice-president, governors of the central banks of the member states (Rothschild-governed – except for those of 5 countries), the President of the ECBthe CFR and Rothschild puppet, Jean-Claude Trichet – (or its vice-president, if its president also presides the ESRB), the presidents of the three ESAs, a member of the Commission, and (as non-voting members) the president of the EFC and representatives of the national supervisory authorities.

The ESAs will be responsible for ensuring that a single set of harmonised rules and consistent supervisory practices are applied by supervisory authorities of the member states. However, on account of the financial liabilities that may be involved for the member states, decisions taken by the ESAs must not impinge in any way on the fiscal responsibilities of the member states. Any binding decision taken by the ESAs will be subject to review by the EU courts. The ESAs will comprise high-level representatives of all of the member states’ supervisory authorities under permanent chairmanships. National authorities will remain responsible for the day-to-day supervision of individual firms, and a steering committee will be set up to ensure cooperation and to coordinate the sharing of information between the ESAs and the ESRB.

This surveillance applies to all EU member states – and EU approval of national budgets before they are laid before national parliaments reduces all  European EU member states to vassals
The Telegraph 18 Jan. 2011: The EU is seeking new “budgetary surveillance” powers to vet the British (and all other EU memberstates´) budget before it is presented to parliament, according to government officials. A European Commission official said that the directive was needed for all EU countries to ensure “compliance with debt and deficit thresholds”. “Member states must ensure these rules apply to all political institutions and government sub-sectors for it to work,” he said.

The Financial Times Deutschland 20. Jan. 2011: The ESRB has  an overrepresentation of (Rothschild´s) ECB and National Central Bank bosses. National Surveillance Authorities have no votes!
Some economists fear the ECB could have a double mandat, conflicts of interest between price and financial stability threatening. The money policy of the ECB and Central Banks is left without surveillance (cf. Alan Greenspan´s disastrous low interest policy!)
Bloomberg 20 Jan. 2011: “The problem is that these bodies are set up to solve yesterday’s problems,” said Peter Hahn, a former Citigroup Inc. banker who lectures on finance at Cass Business School in London. “They can never do more than flagging any issues,” and whether they can stop a crisis “is questionable”. Even so, “if you’re looking for an institution that will save us from the next crisis, this is certainly not it,” said Carsten Brzeski, an economist at ING Group in Brussels.
Budget-nedskæringerEU Press Release 12 Jan. 2011Olli Rehn European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs: Without intensified fiscal consolidation, we are at the mercy of the market forces as we have seen. Without substantial changes in the way European economy functions, Europe will stagnate and will be condemned to the vicious circle of high unemployment, high public debt, and low economic growth. We can avoid that by determined fiscal Olli-rehnconsolidation and intensified structural reforms. All member States should primarily adjust their expenditure while protecting growth-friendly expenditure, especially education, research and innovation. When tax increases are necessary and in many cases they are necessary, economic distortions should be minimized. Indirect taxes are more growth friendly than direct taxes, and broadening the tax base is normally better than raising the rates. We also have to tackle macro-economic imbalances for the Member States with large current account deficits. The reforms of wage-setting systems and services markets are of paramount importance to enhance their overall economic competitiveness. Likewise, Member States with large current account surpluses need to identify and tackle the sources of weak domestic demand. This year will be without doubt a very challenging one for Europe again, but it can also be made the year when Europe overcomes its sovereign debt crisis, lifts its growth potential and reforms its economic governance. This calls for bold fiscal measures and structural reforms in each and every Member State.

EUOBSERVER 12 Jan. 2011: - Despite hundreds of billions having already been slashed from EU member-state budgets in the wake of the economic crisis, the European Commission on Wednesday said the cuts have not been deep or radical enough and demanded still more austerity from European governments. The EU executive outlined a series of stringent recommendations, dubbed the ‘Annual Growth Survey’, that it wants national capitals to adhere to.

In a show of cross-ideological unity, a trio of Europe’s top civil servants, the centre-right President Jose Manuel Barroso, liberal economic and monetary affairs commissioner Olli Rehn and left-wing employment chief Laszlo Andor outlined the plans in the European capital. Brussels wants to see further cuts to budgets in 2012 on welfare reform - including more conditionality attached to benefits, and a raising of the “premature” retirement ages.  France-pension-demonstrations
Pension reforms however have proved highly controversial, with mass strikes in France over retirement age changes last year paralysing the country.

The three also called for a hike in the effective lending capacity of the EU’s bail-out mechanism, amid growing fears that the eurozone’s rescue fund might be insufficient should Spain or Belgium knock on its doors. However, reacting to the suggestion, both France and Germany declared the current fund was big enough. A power struggle over this has erupted between Merkel and Barroso.  EU governments will in the spring consider the proposals. The commission’s proposals instantly provoked shock and outrage from trade unions.

EUbusiness 10 Jan. 2010: Germany and France want to press Portugal to seek a bailout in order to stop Spain and Belgium becoming the next euro crisis casualties. Paris and Berlin also want members of the 17-country eurozone to state that they are ready to do whatever it takes to save the currency union, including expanding a 750-billion-euro (970-billion-dollar) rescue fund. German and French experts are worried by the high interest rates Portugal is being forced to pay in order to borrow money from investors concerned by Lisbon’s public finances. Spain is of much greater concern to Paris and Berlin, with its economy twice that of Portugal, Greece and Ireland combined, a banking sector struggling with bad debts and unemployment at almost 20 percent. Investors are also becoming concerned by Belgium, which has been without a government for nearly seven months.

The Express 16 Dec. 2010: Next year’s EU budget was agreed yesterday – a controversial 2.9 per cent spending increase in the midst of a Europe-wide programme of drastic austerity measures in member countries. Euro-MPs were pressing for a six per cent rise earlier this year but settled on a compromise which sees the annual EU budget grow to 126.5 billion euros (£106billion) – a move that will cost British taxpayers an extra £450million a year, taking the UK’s total annual ­contribution to £8.5billion.
EurActiv 22 Nov. 2010: The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that a 1.85% pay rise for EU officials awarded by member states is not in line with EU rules, confirming a 3.7% salary increase initially adopted by the European Commission. The pay increase will have an impact on around 50,000 EU civil servants, including judges at the European Court.
Comment: This is direct contempt for the millions of European employees sent into unemployment by the austerity measures invented by these EU officials.

EU Press Release 24 nov. 2010: EU Commisssion Pres. José Barroso on EU economic governance: The Heads of State and Government decided unanimously that treaty change is required to establish the mechanism. We should not accept a revision of the treaty that calls into question the voting rights of Member States. I’m happy that this argument was accepted.

Greece and possibly other of the most severely indebted euro countries have to suspend payments and give up repaying their debts.
Business.dk 17 jan. 2011: The proposal is being put forward by various parties today, including Goldman Sachs, Barclay’s and the British weekly magazine the Economist.
Several people think we should take inspiration from the Brady plan, which in 1980 was used to control a variety of developing countries through a controlled receivership. The big banks that had lent money to countries such as Ecuador and Costa Rica exchanged their claims for new bonds, which had either a lower interest rate or a lower nominal principal amount than the original loan. At the same time the debtor countries in different ways assured that the benefits of the new bonds would be paid.
In 2015, Greece’s debts will have reached 165 percent of her GDP and the country will thus have to spend 8–9 per cent of her GDP on paying interest. “It is unbearable for a small country with a fragile economy. Greece looks set to go bankrupt,” writes the Economist.
In 2015, Ireland’s debt would have reached 125 percent of her GDP, while Portugal’s debt would equal 100 percent of her GDP. These debt levels can be coped with if you are  just to pay around four percent interest. Belgium can today. Last week, Portugal and Spain both sold government bonds, 1.25 and three billion euros, respectively, but at high interest rates. Portugal had to pay 6.7 percent interest, which is more than emergency loans from the EU and the IMF – an interest rate which the countries cannot afford in the longer term. And the market rate for ten-year Irish government bonds are now at 8.5 percent.

Comment
With more austerity measures to come from the EU,  more rebellion/strikes can be expected - and PIIGS countries’ insatiable need for rescuing combined with the big banks´ corresponding greed will probably lead to the fall of the euro when the EU has taken over the EU countries completely, thus completing their EUSSR planned economy - ie. when the Union has pulled the last cent out of Northern Europeans´ pockets!

Oneeye

“A crisis should never go to waste”, US Secratary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, former Director of the New York division of the Federal Reserve, is quoted as having said.
Who are the EU supervisors who ignored all signals of danger before the first financial crisis? The same people that survey the economy of the EU states today – reinforced by Rothschild puppets of the European and national Central Banks, the ECB chairman also chairing the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). The ESRB and the ESAs represent a tremendous loss of national souvereignty to the supranational EU.

And it is fine for the ambitious EU Bureaucrats: EUbusiness 24 Jan. 2010: ‘Europe’ is making a power-grab for the purse-strings of the member states that fund it. “Europe’s responses will shape (budgetary) coordination for decades to come”. The problem, as ever, is one of “the transfer of sovereignty” from national capitals to Brussels, Belgium’s Finance Minister Didier Reynders said on Friday.
The EU is busy cutting the welfare states away – in spite of all the riots this has already brought about in France, Greece, Portugal, Ireland  – and in spite of baffled trade union leaders.
This unemployment crisis, the plundering of Europeans via ruthless NWO eurocrats and politicians through their totally unprofessional euro project, their homegrown finansial/ øeconomic crisis  serving as feed for the banker sharks: All this is the New World Order which created the EU and here – and which the EU is now helping to complete at our cost  with its dictatorial approval and surveillance of all national budgets. This costs our “welfare”.

Summary: Before the votes on the EU Constitution and its successor, the Lisbon Treaty, there was no end to the assurances that national sovereignty would be intact under these treaties. Only the French, the Dutch and Irish were allowed to vote, because, as Sarkozy put it, Europeans are too dangerous to be allowed  votes on elitist´s Europe. They will invariably vote no! But now there is no end to all the state symbols, the EU is vigorously working to launch. Illuminist bankers created the Financial/euro crisis which is now being used by the Illuminist EU to demand economic governance over all EU countries, the EU  even requiring to critically examine governmental budgets before they are sent for readings in the national parliaments. The EU has established its own Financial Supervisors to coordinate the economy in EU countries in crisis, consisting of the same people that allowed the financial crisis to arise, Rothschild's people. Strangely enough, 75% of Europeans feel that it is a good idea, although less than half of them support the EU. EU will also introduce both direct taxation of Europeans, CO2 taxation and EU bonds to get a bigger budget for bureaucrats and more state-like clout. Furthermore, the EU has signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights to obtain the same status as nation states. Justice Commissioner, Viviane Reding, is proud that  since 1st July the European Union has de facto both a a Department of Home Affairs and of Justice to work intimately together to ensure the EU´s grip on - what? The European Court is the Commission´s tool to ensure maximum power over the nation states. Moreover, Reding is now implementing citizenship in nearly all everyday occurrences - with priority over nation state citizenship. As a nation, the EU spent our tax money to guarantee that irresponsible PIIGS countries like Greece do not go bankrupt - but may stay in the euro, which there is no reasonable basis for. Indeed, Trichet of the European Central Bank would rather run the risk of civil war due to EU austerity in Greece than let the country out of his claws. Nevertheless, the Greek rescue umbrella is illegal - in terms of both German and EU law. Furthermore, the EU has been allowed to speak at the UN General Assembly, a right that only nation states have - and which is an empty gesture, as long as the EU has no seat in the Security Council which it probably will have. The EU accounts for 72% of the UK's Regulation expenses - and 50% of its laws. The EU is now a self-declared super-state over powerless nation states - despite all promises to the contrary before the treaty referenda, and despite the fact that Europeans have not voted yes to it. 

The EU hates referenda, but could not avoid some over its Constitution. The Danish Prime Minister cheated the Danes of a promised referendum – and was received with standing applause in the European Council!!! The Constitution was then rejected by the French and the Dutch – who like all other Europeans except the Irish, were denied a referendum on its successor,  the Constitution once again – in a more refined and disguised form, the Lisbon Treaty. This was the Constitution (according to its author, Valéry Giscard d´Estaing) cleared of unacceptable paragraphs, which had been smartly taken out and transferred to other treaties, which had previously been accepted in referenda. This, of course was a blatant deception. The EU lured us before these referenda into believing that there were no danger to our national states under the new Treaty, even treated opponents like “enemies of the state” and used lies, bribery, concealment and breaches of national  constitutions to force the scared Irish to vote yes in their 2. vote. Note: The EU goes on having referenda until a nation says yes – and that was then its last vote, since the Europeans are considered too, dangerous for the Europe of the elite - they will invariably vote no!!! The following shows what the Lisbon Treaty really means.

I: EU´s overall economic governance
EurosEUObserver 3 Sept. 2010: The European Commission, the European Parliament and the EU member states reached a political deal to set up a European Systemic Risk Board - with the same people who allowed the finacial cisis to take place, Rothschilds people - and three separate agencies to monitor securities, banks and insurance companies. In the end, a compromise has delivered to member states the ability to appeal the decisions of the new bodies, something fiercely resisted by MEPs. The deal reached on Thursday will indeed make the current ECB chief, Jean-Claude Trichet the boss at the new board, but only for five years, after which a new head would be negotiated once more. The member states are to be the ones to declare that there is an emergency on the cards, not the European Commission or the parliament.
Additionally, direct oversight of companies will be left with national supervisors. The new agencies are to only co-ordinate actions. The European Parliament "is expected" to ratify these bodies. They will then become "operational as planned" from 1 Januar 2011.
Instead of all these bodies being based in Frankfurt, they will now be located in London, Paris and the home of the ECB.  EU Commissioner for Internal Market Michel Barnier : "No actor, no product, no sector, no territory should no longer be able to escape sensible and intelligent regulation and supervision". Open Europe's Director Mats Persson: "Once established, the EU supervisors are likely to extend their powers incrementally, since the proposal is designed to allow for more and more laws to come under their authority".

The EU Commission wants to control national budgets before they are sent to reading in the national parliaments
The Telegraph 12 May 2010:  Commission president Jose Barroso unveiled plans for EU control over national budgets, including an incendiary demand that Brussels should vet budgets before their first reading in Westminster, the Bundestag, and other parliaments. Current account deficits and credit growth will be monitored. Brussels can impose sanctions on states that let booms run out of control. "We must get to the root of the problems," he said. Such a plan would greatly improve the working of the EMU system, but it would also entail a drastic erosion of sovereignty

EU Press Release 26 Aug. 2010: 75% of Europeans think that stronger coordination of economic and financial policies among EU Member States would be effective in fighting the economic crisis, according to the Spring 2010 Eurobarometer, the bi-annual opinion poll organised by the EU. Europeans’ main areas of concern in the crisis were the current economic situation (40%; unchanged compared to autumn 2009), unemployment (48%; -3 percentage points) and rising prices (20%; +1). The crisis also had an influence on citizens' perception of the EU: 40% of Europeans associate the EU with the euro (+3), 45% with the freedom to travel, study and work anywhere in the EU (-1), and 24% with peace (-4). The Express 27 Aug. 2010: Public support for the European Union has collapsed to a nine-year low in all of its 27 countries, a poll has revealed.The European Commission says fewer than half of voters across Europe are in favour of the union.

II: EU to impose its own direct taxation upon us
Earth Times 10 Aug. 2010: The EU is planning direct taxation of Europeans.  Le Monde on 13 July wrote: “I think there is a majority for it," said the French Socialist Stéphane Le Foll. The Parliament's Socialist Group is unanimous that the budget be through a percentage of taxes and fees collected at the national level The measure must be fiscally neutral and must not eu retfærdighedreturn to impose additional taxes on citizens, say MEPs. This would amount to a shortfall for states, which could be offset by a reduction in their contributions to the EU budget.Moreover,  Barroso wants EU-bonds to give the "Union" more state-like power on the market.

III: The European Convention on Human Rights
 
EUbusiness 7 July 2010: The European Union kicked off joint talks with the Council of Europe Wednesday for accession to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which would streamline rights protection in Europe. " But the EU's accession to the ECHR would place it on the same footing as its member states with regard to the system of fundamental rights protection supervised by the ECHR.

IV:  Intertwining of EU´s Ministry of Justice and the new Ministry of Home Affairs
Viviane Reding EU Press Release 1 July 2010: The DG Justice will be working hard under my  command (Viviane Reding´s) to make sure that our citizens will see concrete results of this institutional improvement.  It is a very normal situation in our Member States that there is both a Ministry of Home Affairs and a Ministry of JusticeIt is good news for our citizens that as of today, we will have a similar situation at EU level. In the future, when we will talk about sensitive civil liberties issues citizens can be assured that there is now a place for them to go in Brussels that will look after their interests. There will in future be a constructive dialogue between the new DG Justice and the new DG Home Affairs on the best way forward to defend civil liberties and to ensure that citizens are not forgotten when the EU tries to safeguard important public interests

V: EU Citizenship: The EU grabs the status of a single state – imposing a union citizenship, which Europeans have refused or were not asked about
Viviane Reding EU Press Release 1 July 2010:  After the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, EU Citizenship now needs to progress from a concept enshrined in the Treaties to a tangible reality in citizens’ daily lives. EU Citizenship is the essential link all Europeans have with the European Union. European-citizenship2Union citizens and their third country family members still face cumbersome and costly administrative procedures and unacceptable delays when moving to another Member State.  By creating my portfolio in the Commission, President Barroso entrusted me with concrete policy instruments which will allow me, over the next years, to fill the notion of Citizenship with concrete results. These policy instruments include the responsibility for the free movement within the European Union; civil justice and contract law; consumer legislation, starting from the Package Travel Directive and reaching to the proposal for a Consumer Rights Directive; data protection; the rights of the child; gender equality and anti-discrimination legislation; and also the responsibility for ensuring an effective application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Eu-ueber-allesVI: The EU´s bail-out of Greece is an illegal act of statehood 
Die Welt 5. Juli 2010A: The resolution of the European Union's Euro-rescue umbrella is a gross violation against the German constitution but also against EU law. This is the result of a study conducted by the Centre for European Policy (CEP).
B: The public was also misled about the design of the Euro-rescue umbrella in some points. In response to the crisis of confidence in the financial markets, the EU leaders on 11 May 2010 agreed on a 500 billion euro rescue fund. The EU Commission was authorized by the resolution to incur debts in order to provide loans to needy €-states. 1. "In the public it was propagated that the EU may maximally absorb up to 60 billion euros of bonds. However, there is no corresponding provision in the regulation". The same is true of of the three-years-term. 2. The euro-zone countries also provide 440 billion euros of guarantees available to support tumbling euro countries. The study lamented that the EU unfairly invokes "extraordinary events" concerning its assistance. For only then, according to EU law, a departure from the principle that each State must be liable for its own debt alone is allowed. Furthermore, a breach of EU legal order is also made because 3. the European Parliament would have had to agree, which has been omitted. "The regulation thus does not fulfill the the formal requirements of EU law. 4. The lawyer alleges the participation of the Bundestag und Bundesrat as demanded by the Constitutional Court was EU-UNinadequate. Although the national parliament and the chamber of the länder had sanctioned Germany´s taking over of her contribution, the part of the umbrella concerning the financial contribution over the EU Commission was not voted on. In the view of the Europe expert, this is in violation of the Constitution. The study carries the point of the euro-rescue umbrella sceptics. The Federal Constitutional Court has several lawsuits pending. However, the German Supreme Court had declined to stop the rescue plan immediately by injunction.
The money is being administered by the European Financial Stability Facility, headed by German Klaus Regling, who hopes the very existence of this EFSF will calm creditors, so that the EU money will not have to be spent.

VII: The EU has achieved representation in the UN General Assembly, the role of a state
Deutsche Welle 20 July 2010: There is opposition i.a. from the UK – but this is part of the Lisbon Treaty´s external service. Some EU states see this as a danger to national souvereignty in a superstate. However, the EU´s influence would be virtually zero as long as  it has no seat in the security Council.

Comment
The EU is in trouble: People expected the EU to manage the financial crisis – but do not like the EU. The EU distributes our money to e.c. Greece – but does so illegally! A famous German economist Hans-Werner Sinn, IFO Munich, now says that EU´s austerity measures cannot prevent Greek default, it will probably lead to civil war – and the least catastrophic solution is that Greece leaves the euro!!!  However, Mr. Trichet of the ECB sees this as the worst possible solution!! So chaos seems to be looming ahead.
The EU is constantly imposing costs on industry which passes the bill on to us – e.g. the ECX cap-and-trade scam – and now they are planning CO2– taxes to be paid. Such ridiculous regulations as the cucumber curvature regulation take a lot of time for the EU and the states – and for industries to implement. And for what purpose?   
Now the EU bureaucrats have fostered the brilliant idea of imposing direct taxation on us – at the cost of the national states, who will have to spend the less on e.g. welfare!! Who believes Greece_riotsthat the taxes will remain neutral? The outcome will be ever soaring direct taxes in addition to the indirect (CO2) taxes and fees.

The European Convention on Human Rights already has its instruments, the European Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia and the European Arrest Warrant  – turned against native Europeans who are automaticaly considered racists and xenophobics because they do not welcome the Muslim immgration and free mobility within the EU, which the Elite has stated is desirable and necessary in order to destroy our atavistic ancient Christian and national cultures, which our ancestors were so incredibly stupid to fight and die for!!!
We now see the EU which Jean Monnet declared to be the aim – by deceiving the Europeans, keeping them in ignorance. That the EU is a state is clearly told by Ms. Viviane Reding who is talking about a Ministry of Home Affaits and her Ministry of Justice. The European Court of Justice  is the real instrument to strengthen the EU Commission, by interpreting EU-legislation (vague due to political compromises) in the direction wanted by the Commission – i.e. more union. The ECJ has never rejected an EU directive.  The commission even wants to control our national budgets before they are sent to readings in our national parliaments! We are being imposed a totally unwanted EU-citizenship as a first move to dismantle national states totally. 
And our national souvereignty is nearly gone: Think Tank Open Europe 16 April 2009: The EU is without doubt the main driver of the cost of regulation in the UK - 72% of the cost of regulation over the last ten years is EU-derived from the EU. In terms of absolute proportion (of laws), we estimate the figure to be around 50%

Resumé: Før afstemningerne om EU-Forfatningen og dens aflægger, Lissabon Traktaten, var der ingen ende på forsikringerne om, at nationalstaternes suverænitet ville være intakt under disse traktater. Kun      franskmænd, hollændere og irere fik lov at stemme. For, som Sarkozy udtrykte det: Europæerne er alt for farlige til at man kan overlade dem afstemninger om elitens Europa.de stemmer uvægerligt nej! Men nu er der ingen ende på alle de statssymboler, EU energisk arbejder på at lancere. Den af illuministiske bankfolk skabte finans/eurokrise benytter det illuministiske EU nu til at kræve økonomisk regeringsmagt over alle EU-lande, forlanger endog kritisk at gennemgå statsbudgetterne, før de sendes til behandling i de nationale parlamenter. EU har oprettet sine egne finanstilsynsråd til at koordinere økonomien i kriseramte EU-lande, bestående af de samme folk, der tillod finanskrisen  at opstå,  Rothschilds folk. Forunderligt nok mener 75% af europæerne, at det er en god  ide, skønt mindre end halvdelen støtter EU. Kommissionen vil også indføre både direkte beskatning af europæerne og CO2-beskatning samt EU-obligationer, for at få et større budget til bureaukraterne og mere statslignende pondus. Endvidere har EU meldt sig til den Europæiske Menneskeretighedskonvention for at få samme status som nationalstaterne. Justitskommissær, Viviane Reding, er stolt af, at EU pr. 1. juli de facto har fået både et indenrigs- og et justitsministerium, der skal arbejde intimt sammen om at sikre EU grebet om - hvad mon? Den Europæiske domstol er Kommissionenes redskab til sikre den størst mulige magt over nationalstaterne. Endvidere vil Reding nu konkretisere unionsborgerskabet til at omfatte næsten alle dagligdags foreteelser - med fortinsret over nationalstaternes borgerrettigheder. Som en nationalstat brugte EU vore skattepenge til at garantere, at ansvarsløse PIIGS-lande som Grækenland  ikke går fallit - men kan blive i den euro, der ikke er fornuftig basis for. Ja, Trichet fra Den Europæiske Centralbank vil hellere risikere borgerkrig pga. EUs sparekrav til Grækenland end slippe landet ud af sine klør. Ikke desto mindre er Grækenlandsredningspakken ulovlig - både i henseende til tysk og EU-lov. EU har endv. fået lov til at tale på FNs generalforsamling, en ret, som kun nationalstater har - og som er en tom gestus, så længe EU ikke har plads i sikkerhedsrådet, hvad den nok skal få. EU står for 72% af Storbritanniens forordningsudgifter - og 50% af dets love. EU er nu en selverklæret superstat over magtesløse nationalstater - trods alle løfter om det modsatte før traktatafstemningerne, og trods det, at europæerne ikke har sagt ja dertil.

EU hader folkeafstemninger men kunne ikke undgå nogle omkring sin forfatning. Den danske statsminister snød danskerne for en lovet folkeafstemning - og blev modtaget med stående bifald i Det Europæiske Råd! Forfatningen blev derefter afvist af franske og hollandske vælgere - der ligesom alle andre europæere, undtagen irerne, blev nægtet en folkeafstemning om efterfølgeren, forfatningen igen - i en mere raffineret og tildækket form, Lissabon-traktaten. Den var forfatningen (ifølge  dens forfatter, Valéry Giscard d´Estaing) renset for uacceptable paragraffer, som smart  nok var blevet taget ud og overført til andre traktater, som tidligere var blevet godkendt i folkeafstemninger. Dette var selvfølgelig et åbenlyst bedrageri. EU lokkede os før disse folkeafstemninger til at tro, at der ikke var fare for vores nationale staters suverænitet under den nye traktat, selv om modstandere blev behandlet som "fjender af staten". Der brugtes løgne, bestikkelse, fortielse og overtrædelse af de nationale forfatninger for at tvinge bange irere til at stemme ja i deres 2. afstemning. Bemærk: EU fortsætter med at lave folkeafstemninger, indtil en nation siger ja - og det var så den sidste afstemning, da europæerne anses for at være for farlige for den europæiske elites planer - de vil ang. uvægerligt stemme nej! Følgende viser, hvad Lissabontraktaten egentlig betyder.

I: EU's samlede økonomiske styring
EurosEUObserver 3 sept. 2010: Europa-Kommissionen, Europa-Parlamentet og EUs medlemslande nåede en politisk aftale om at oprette et Europæisk Systemisk Risiko-Tilsynsråd - med de samme folk, der tillod finanskrisen, Rothschilds folk - og tre separate organer til at overvåge værdipapirer, banker og forsikringsselskaber. I sidste ende har et kompromis givet medlemsstaterne mulighed for at appellere afgørelser, der er truffet af de nye organer, noget MEPerne satte sig indædt imod. Aftalen vil faktisk gøre den nuværende ECB chef, Jean-Claude Trichet, til chef i det nye opsynsorgan, men kun i fem år, hvorefter en ny leder vil blive forhandlet en gang mere. Medlemsstaterne skal være dem, der erklærer, at der er en nødsituation, ikke Europa-Kommissionen eller Parlamentet.
Desuden vil direkte tilsyn af selskaber forblive under de nationale tilsynsmyndigheder. De nye agenturer skal kun koordinere aktioner.
Europa-Parlamentet "forventes" at ratificere disse organer. De vil så begynde at "fungere som planlagt" fra 1. januar 2011.
I stedet for, at alle disse organer er baseret i Frankfurt, vil de nu blive placeret i London, Paris og Frankfurt. EU-kommissær for det indre marked, Michel Barnier: "Ingen aktør, ingen vare, ingen sektor, intet område bør længere være i stand til at undslippe fornuftig og intelligent regulering og tilsyn". Open Europe's Director Mats Persson: "Når de først er etableret, vil EU's tilsynsmyndigheder sandsynligvis udvide deres beføjelser trinvist, idet forslaget har til formål at give mulighed for, at flere og flere love kommer under deres myndighed".

EU-Kommissionen ønsker at kontrollere de nationale budgetter, før de sendes til behandling i de nationale parlamenter
The Telegraph 12 maj 2010: Kommissionens formand, Jose Barroso, afslørede planer om EU-kontrol over de nationale budgetter, herunder et brandfarligt krav om, at Bruxelles bør granske budgetter før deres førstebehandling i Westminster, Forbundsdagen, og andre parlamenter. Budgettets løbende poster og vækst i kreditterne vil blive overvåget. Bruxelles kan pålægge sanktioner over for stater, hvis økonomier bliver overophedede og kommer ud af kontrol. "Vi må komme til roden af problemerne," sagde han. En sådan plan vil i høj grad forbedre arbejdsmiljøet i ØMU-systemet, men det ville også medføre en drastisk forringelse af suveræniteten.

EU Presse meddelelse 26. aug. 201075% af europæerne mener, at stærkere koordinering af de økonomiske og finansielle politikker blandt EUs medlemsstater vil være effektiv i bekæmpelsen af den økonomiske krise iflg. Forår 2010 Eurobarometer, den halvårlige meningsmåling arrangeret af EU. Europæernes vigtigste problemområder i krisen var den aktuelle økonomiske situation (40%, uændret i forhold til efteråret 2009), arbejdsløshed (48%; -3 procentpoint) og stigende priser (20% +1). Krisen havde også en indflydelse på borgernes opfattelse af EU: 40% af europæerne forbinder EU med euroen (+3), 45% med friheden til at rejse, studere og arbejde overalt i EU (-1), og 24% med fred (-4). The Express 27 Aug. 2010: Offentlig støtte til Den Europæiske Union er brudt sammen til et ni-årigt lavpunkt i alle 27 lande, har en meningsmåling afsløret. Europa-Kommissionen siger, at færre end halvdelen af vælgerne i hele Europa går ind for unionen.

II: EU vil indføre sin egen direkte beskatning af os
Earth Times 10 Aug. 2010:  EU planlægger direkte beskatning af europæerne.  Le Monde 13 juli 2010: "Jeg tror, at der er et flertal for det," sagde den franske socialist, Stéphane Le Foll. Parlamentets Eu retfærdighedSocialdemokratiske Gruppe går enstemmigt ind for, at budgettet skal financieres gennem en procentsats af skatter og gebyrer på nationalt plan. Foranstaltningen skal være skattemæssigt neutral og må ikke pålægge borgerne yderligere skatter, siger MEPer. Dette ville betyde et underskud for staterne, som kunne opvejes af en reduktion i deres bidrag til EUs budget. Endv. vil Barroso have EU-obligationer indført for at give "unionen" mere statsmagt på markedet.

III: Den Europæiske Konvention om Menneskerettigheder
EUbusiness 7 July 2010: Den Europæiske Union har skudt fælles drøftelser med Europarådet i gang for tiltrædelse til den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention, hvilket vil strømline menneskerettighedernes beskyttelse i Europa. "Men EUs tiltrædelse af den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention ville placere EU på lige fod med medlemsstaterne.

Eu-ueber-allesIV: Sammenfletning af EUs indenrigsministerium og justitsministerium
Viviane Reding, EU Pressemeddelelse 1. juli 2010
Generaldirektoratet for Retsvæsen vil arbejde hårdt under min kommando (Viviane Reding's) for at sikre, at vores borgere vil se konkrete resultater af disse institutionelle forbedringer.  Det er en meget normal situation i vores medlemsstater, at der både er et ministerium for indre anliggender og et justitsministerium. Det er gode nyheder for vores borgere, at fra i dag vil vi have en lignende situation på EU-plan. I fremtiden kan borgerne være sikre på, at der nu et sted for dem at gå til i Bruxelles, der vil passe deres interesser, når vi taler om følsomme borgerrettighedsspørgsmål. Der vil i fremtiden være en konstruktiv dialog mellem det nye Generaldirektorat for Retsvæsen og det nye Generaldirektorat for indre anliggender om den bedste vej frem til at forsvare borgerrettighederne og til at sikre, at borgerne ikke bliver glemt, hvor EU forsøger at beskytte vigtige offentlige interesser.

V: Unionsborgerskab: EU griber status som en enkelt stat - og indfører et unionsborgerskab, som europæerne har afvist eller ikke blev spurgt om
Viviane Reding EU Press Release 1 July 2010:  Efter ikrafttrædelsen af Lissabon-traktaten behøver EU-borgerskabet nu at udvikle sig fra et begreb, der er nedfældet i traktaterne til en håndgribelig realitet i borgernes dagligdag. Unionsborgerskab er det væsentlige link, som alle europæere har med Den Europæiske Union. European-citizenship2Unionsborgere og deres familiemedlemmer fra tredjelande står stadig med besværlige og dyre administrative procedurer og uacceptable forsinkelser, når de flytter til en anden medlemsstat.

Da han oprettede min portefølje i Kommissionen, betroede præsident Barroso mig konkrete politiske instrumenter, som vil muliggøre for mig at fylde begrebet medborgerskab med konkrete resultater i løbet af de næste år. Disse politiske instrumenter omfatter ansvaret for den frie bevægelighed inden for Den Europæiske Union; civilret og aftaleret, forbrugerbeskyttelse, lovgivning, fra pakkerejsedirektivet og til forslaget om et direktiv om forbrugerrettigheder, databeskyttelse, børns rettigheder; ligestilling og anti-diskriminationslovgivning og også ansvaret for at sikre en effektiv anvendelse af EUs charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.

VI: EUs redningspakke til Grækenland er en ulovlig stats-handling
Die Welt 5. Juli 2010A: Resolutionen om EUs Euro-rednings-pakke er en grov krænkelse mod den tyske forfatning, men også mod EU-lovgivningen. Dette er resultatet af en undersøgelse foretaget af Center for Europæisk Politik (CEP).
B: Offentligheden blev også vildledt om udformningen af Euro-redningspakken på nogle punkter. Som reaktion på tillidskrisen på de finansielle markeder enedes  EU-lederne d. 11. maj  2010 om en € 500 mia. redningsfond. EU-Kommissionen fik ved resolutionen mandat til at påtage sig gæld med henblik på at yde lån til trængende €-stater. 1. "I offentligheden blev det udspredt, at EU maksimalt kan absorbere op til 60 milliarder euro i obligationer. Der er imidlertid ingen tilsvarende bestemmelse i forordningen." Det samme gælder for treårsfristen. 2. Eurolandene stiller også 440 mia. € garantier til rådighed som støtte for euro-lande, der er ved at bryde sammen. Undersøgelsen beklagede, at EU uretmæssigt har påberåbt sig "ekstraordinære begivenheder" vedr. sin bistand. For først da er der i henhold til EU-retten tilladt en afvigelse fra det princip, at hver medlemsstat skal være ansvarlig for sin egen gæld alene. Desuden er det et brud på EU's retsorden også fordi 3. Europa-Parlamentet skulle have accepteret den, hvilket man undlod. "Forordningen opfylder således ikke de formelle krav i EU-lovgivningen. 4. Advokaten hævder, at  Forbundsdagens og Forbundsrådets deltagelse som krævet af forfatningsdomstolen var utilstrækkelig. Selv om det nationale parlament og delstatskammeret havde sanktioneret Tyskland« s overtagelse af sit bidrag, var den del af paraplyen, som omhandler finansielt tilskud over EU-Kommissionen ikke til afstemning. Iflg. EU-UNeuropaeksperten er dette i strid med forfatningen. Undersøgelsen giver skeptikerne mod redningspakken medhold. Den tyske forfatningsdomstol har flere verserende retssager desangående. Men  den tyske højesteret afviste at stoppe redningsplanen straks ved fogedforbud.
Pengene administreres af European Financial Stability Facility, der ledes af tyskeren, Klaus Regling, som håber, at selve eksistensen af EFSF vil berolige kreditorerne, så at EU pengene ikke behøver at bruges.

VII: EU har opnået repræsentation på FNs Generalforsamling, en rolle, som tilkommer en stat

Deutsche Welle 20 July 2010: Der er modstand bl.a. fra Storbritannien - men dette er en del af Lissabon-traktatens eksterne tjeneste. Nogle EU-lande ser dette som en fare for den nationale suverænitet i en superstat. Imidlertid vil EUs indflydelse være næsten lig nul, så længe den ikke har sæde i Sikkerhedsrådet.

Kommentar
EU er i knibe: Folk forventede, at EU kunne klare finanskrisen - men kan ikke lide EU. EU fordeler vores penge til f.eks. Grækenland - men gør det ulovligt! En berømt tysk økonom Hans-Werner Sinn, IFO München, siger nu, at EUs sparekrav ikke kan forhindre græsk statsbankerot, og at det sandsynligvis vil føre til borgerkrig - samt at den mindst katastrofale løsning er, at Grækenland forlader euroen! Men Trichet fra ECB  ser dette som det værst tænkelige løsning! Så kaos synes at true forude.
EU lægger konstant omkostninger på industrien, som sender regningen videre til os - f.eks ECX cap-and-trade fupnummeret - og nu planlægger EU CO2–skatter. Sådanne latterlige regler som agurkekrumnings-regulativet tager en masse tid for EU, landene og for brancherne at gennemføre. Og til hvilket formål?
Nu har EU bureaukraterne fået den geniale idé direkte at beskatte os - på bekostning af nationalstaterne, der bliver nødt til at bruge mindre på f.eks velfærd! Men hvem mener, at skatterne vil Greece_riotsforblive neutrale? Resultatet vil blive stadigt højere direkte skatter ud over de indirekte (CO2) skatter og afgifter.

Den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention har allerede sine instrumenter, Den Europæiske Rammeafgørelsen om Racisme og fremmedangst og den Europæiske Arrestordre vendt mod indfødte europæere, der automatisk anses som racister og fremmedangste, fordi de ikke er glade for den muslimske indvandring og frie bevægelighed i EU, som eliten har erklæret er ønskelig og nødvendig for at ødelægge vores atavistiske gamle kristne og nationale kulturer, som vores forfædre var så utroligt dumme at kæmpe og dø for!!
Vi ser nu det EU, som Jean Monnet erklærede som målet - ved at bedrage europæerne gennem at holde dem hen i uvidenhed. At EU er en stat klargøres af  Viviane Reding, som de facto taler om både et indenrigs- og et justitsministerium. Den Europæiske Domstol er det virkelige instrument til at gennemføre EU-kommissionens vilje, ved at fortolke EU-lovgivningen (vag på grund af politiske kompromisser) i den retning, som Kommissionen ønsker, dvs. mere union

ECJ har aldrig underkendt et EU direktiv.  Kommissionen ønsker endog at kontrollere vores nationale budgetter, før de sendes til behandlinger i vores nationale parlamenter! Vi bliver nu pålagt et helt uønsket EU-borgerskab som et første skridt til at afvikle nationalstaterne totalt. Og vores nationale suverænitet er næsten væk: Think Tank Open Europe 16 April 2009: EU er uden tvivl den vigtigste drivkraft for omkostningerne ved forordninger i Storbritannien - 72% af omkostningerne ved forordningerne i løbet af de sidste ti år stammer fra i EU. Vi vurderer antallet af nye love til omkring 50% fra EU.

The below Commission Proposal for financial regulation was adopted at the EU summit on 18/19 June, 2009 according to the Wall Street Journal 19 juni: However, the head of the Systemic Risk Council will not be the president of the European Central Bank - but elected by the members of the ECB's General Council, a group that includes the ECB president and vice president as well as the heads of all 27 EU countries' central banks (ie. sheer Rothschild-people!). The new bodies can not dictate how governments should spend their money. Germany and France wanted more centralized and stronger power. (Of course, Rothschild banks are sovereign to determine under what conditions they will lend states money!)

Those who created the banking crisis and here are also still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. US senator Dick Turbins about the US Senate: The bankers own the place!” more about it here.

The New York Times 31 May. 2009Representative Collin C. Peterson, is a Minnesota Democrat and the chairman of the House Agriculture Committee:“The banks run the place (the House of Representatives). I will tell you what the problem is — they give three times more money than the next biggest group. It’s huge, the amount of money they put into politics.” What makes this fight different, say Wall Street critics and legislative leaders, is that financiers are aggressively seeking to fend off regulation of the very products and practices that directly contributed to the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Special interests in the financial-services industry are beginning to advocate a return to business as usual and to argue against any need for serious reform.”
Through political action committees and their own employees, securities and investment firms gave $152 million in political contributions from 2007 to 2008, according to the most recent Federal Election Commission data. The top five companies — Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Credit Suisse (all Rothschild corporations)— gave $22.7 million and spent more than $25 million combined on lobbying activities in that period, according to election data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics. 

And how are “our” politician henchmen being rewarded?

Larosiere+barrosoI have previously  described how the President of the EU Commission, bilderberger (2003, 2005, 2007) José Barroso, asked his good friend, Trilateral Commissionist and bilderberger, former IMF boss Jacques de Larosière, to invent “new” financial regulation in the EU.

I recorded i.a.: ”Here is a thorough analysis of de Larosière´s “High Level Group.” It is hard to imagine a clearer example of privileged access to decision-makers by vested interests. Ottmar Issing is called the power house of Wall Street - advising Angela Merkel - and now the EU!

Four members are closely linked to giant financial corporations, such as Goldman Sachs (Rothschild) , BNP, Lehman Brothers (Rothschild) and the Citigroup ( Rothschild – a  Partner in Royal Dutch Shell).  A fifth one was the head of the UK Financial Services Authority that completely failed in its supervision of the Northern Rock. With the de Larosière Group, the Commission has repeated the mistakes of the past. It has set up a High Level Group dominated by the very kind of people that created the crisis in the first place. The Commission has again gone for a process ‘behind closed doors’… with strong connections to the financial industry.”

The President of the EU Commission praises his good friend, Jacques, former IMF director, for taking the task of suggesting that the institutes of the House of Rothschild continue supervising and regulating international finances, although it was the very same Rothschild institutes who stood for the international financial supervision – and ignored the basic financial insanity, which had for many years been evident even to laymen. Their neglect is so gigantic and blatant, that one cannot help concluding that it was deliberate and planned. How on Earth can we expect those fraudsters to do better now than before the crisis, which they allowed?

Who got the task of advising the Northern Rock, after the British Government saved it? N.M. Rothschild and Sons.- the House behind the crisis that broke Northern Rock. So, it is such a clique Barroso´s dear friend, Jacques, is pointing to. This might be called letting the fox guard the hen house. The EU calls for more regulation – leaving to the men of the financial indudustry and inveterate supporters of less regulation to manage their own financial institutes !!! You might also call it a gentleman agreement between New World Order colleagues on behalf of their masters, Rockefeller and Rothschild.David_rockefeller

The Grand Master of the Temple of Bilderberg: David Rockefeller, Rothschild´s right hand.

Now, here is an EU Press Release from 27 May, 2009 – where 3 EU Commissioners plead to the European Council to pass this proposal of Barroso´s dear friend M. de Larosière during its June-session.

José Barroso:As you know the Commission has signalled in February our broad acceptance of the Larosière Group's report and this was endorsed by the Spring European Council. I want once again to thank the Larosière group for this excellent report. Today we are asking the June European Council to endorse a more detailed approach, so we can bring forward the necessary legislation in the autumn.
Let me be very clear about this. The reason why I established the de Larosière group last November was very simple. We needed to make a break with the past!!  Now it is time for action. It will be now or never, if we cannot reform the financial sector, financial supervision, when we have a real crisis, when will we reform it? I am determined to reform financial supervision in Europe. I can only hope the member states will follow us. And today we are making very important and I believe achievable and realistic, but at the same time ambitious proposals.

This is, I insist, not a centralising of power. We are not taking away national supervisors' day to day role. It is a partnership between national supervisors and new European Supervisory Authorities. That is to give this a European approach. They are existing supervisors. The Commission wants Europe to be the first to implement its G-20 commitments on cross-border supervision. So I will be asking the European Council to endorse the new system and to commit to setting it up in 2010

Commissioner McCreevy (bilderberger 2008): he crisis has reinforced the tendency for supervisors to think nationally.
The new System would be composed of 3 new European Supervisory Authorities: the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities Authority (ESA).

These would replace the current EU Committees of Supervisors (CEBS, CEIOPS and CESR). The new Authorities would be working in a network with national supervisors. This network would develop common supervisory approaches to the supervision of all financial firms.
The new European Supervisory Authorities should draw up technical standards, help ensure the consistent application of Community law and resolve disputes between supervisors.
Going beyond what M De Larosiere had envisaged we are now proposing in this communication the creation of a coordinating or steering group among the three Authorities.

Joaquin-almunia-håndtegn 2EU Commissioner Joaqin Almunia (bilderberger 2008):  The reforms proposed today would for the first time equip the EU with a pan-European macro-prudential supervision system.

Concretely, for what concerns macro-prudential supervision, the Commission proposes the establishment of a new body, the European Systemic Risk Council that would be entrusted with the role of ensuring macro financial stability in the EU. Based on appropriate analysis, the Council would be able to detect potential threats to the stability of the entire financial system and, if needed, to issue early warnings about these threats and make recommendations to avoid that they materialise. In doing so, we will be able to ensure that we escape from the boom-bust dynamic that is at the origin of the systemic failures that have characterised the functioning of our financial systems recently. We are proposing that this Systemic Risk Council is chaired by the President of the European Central Bank (Jean-Claude Trichet, bilderberger 2000–2005, 2007, 2008, participant in Trilateral Commission meeting) and that the ECB plays a key role in its functioning. Its members would include all the central bank governors of the 27 Member States (Rothschild-people) , the Vice-President of the ECB (Trilateral Commissionist Papademos, former chief of the Fed., Boston), the chairpersons of the three new European Supervisory Authorities and a member of the European Commission. This composition reflects the links between micro- and macro supervision and the necessary consistency between those and the role of the Commission.

I will finish by saying that this new body would, obviously, liaise closely with the IMF (i.e. the probable coming UN world treasury), the Financial Stability Board and other international systemic-risk counterparts.” 

In the US there is a parallel trend.
 
Geithner1Global Res. 26. May: Bilderbergers (Volcker, US-Treasurer Timothy Geithner, Lawrence Summers) to  give the Federal Reserve more authority to supervise financial firms deemed too big to fail. Ownership is literally being granted  over the financial regulator to the banks being regulated.

The Bilderberg agenda of creating a global treasury has already been started prior to the Bilderberg meeting, with decisions made during the G20 financial summit in April. Although the G20 seemed to frame it more in context of being formed into a global central bank, although it is likely the IMF could fill both roles. This would mean Rothschild´s domination of world finances - and so of the world.

Following the G20 meeting at the beginning of April, 2009, it was reported that, “The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity,” as the Communiqué released by the G20 leaders stated that, “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn  into the world economy and increase global liquidity,” and that, “SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.” Essentially, “they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body.”

The bilderbergers were discussing the destruction of the dollar. The only way to bring about a major reduction in its role as a reserve currency is by international agreement.” This is where the SDRs come into play, as “One way to make the SDR the major reserve currency relatively soon would be to create and allocate a massive amount of new SDRs to the IMF’s members.” This is, interestingly, exactly what is happening with Africa and the IMF now.

Bloomberg 6 June, 2009: The IMF’s so-called special drawing rights could be used as the basis for a new currency, First Deputy Managing Director John Lipsky said. “But this is not a quick, short or easy decision,” he said, adding that it would be “quite revolutionary.” As much as 70 percent of the world’s currency reserves are held in dollars, according to the IMF, leading to calls for nations to diversify their cashpiles to avoid excessive exposure to the U.S. economy as it quadruples its budget deficit in a bid to counter the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Former IMF Managing Director Jacques de Larosière recently stated that the current financial crisis, “given its scope, presents a unique opening to improve institutions, and there is already a danger that the chance might be missed if the different actors cannot agree to changes by the time economic growth resumes.”

The Obama administration was heavily represented at this years Bilderberg meeting.

Comment
Garten´s remarks are either prophetic – or they come from the forces governing the G-20. Exactly this idea  was reintroduced at the seminar held by the Chatham House and Brookings on 10. March 2009 – and passed at the G-20 meeting in i London on 2 April, 2009.

David RothschildThe Grand Master of the Mammon Temple, David Rothschild. He stands immediately  before taking over complete domination of the world - through his World Central Bank which is also the supreme financial regulator and the treasury of the UN world government. It took this dynasty 233 years and much bribery to get that far!

Rothschild´s agents deviced the current economical crisis – even celebrated it at the latest Bilderberg meeting in Greece.

Rothschild´s financial supervisors ”relied upon” by Western governments failed miserably – were no doubt told to do so. Now Rothschild´s friends want to make these same supervising institutions – as stated by Barroso above - which always were against regulations, regulate the financial markets – in a mandatory EU staging!!! The commissioners talk about early warning by Rothschilds´s agents the next time Rothschild´s agents start another crisis!!! If the European Council passes this – and it will – the conspiracy against our money for Rothschild´s enrichment´s sake will be complete.  .
The IMF and Rothschild´s Bank for International Settlements (BIS) are close partners. Also the FSF (since Apr. 2009 the FSB) is closely interwoven, the BIS President being FSB-chairman and the BIS being a member of the FSB, and all of them are being housed at the BIS in Basle. 

Barroso´s proposal could be connected to something much bigger coming up: The IMF as the worlds central bank and chief financial regulator on behalf of the New World Order UN´s world governance  and here – and the UN´s world treasury at the same time. In that case the dollar and the euro will have to be destroyed – which might need a very deep depression – as wanted by the bilderbergers. This may be what Gordon Brown meant, when at the G-20 summit he expressed his vision of an emerging New World Order – video.

However, the UK, Slovenia, Slovakia and Romania and  Finland criticised the Commission's proposal - and cannot accept it as it is. Teir palms will probably have to be more greased!!
Rothschild supervision to create another financial crisis?
Michael Gorbachev 10 June, 2009: "That (US) model is now cracking and will, sooner or later, be replaced (by perestrojka). That will be a complex and painful process for everyone." This is the New World Order goal.

Larosiere+barrosoEvery crisis has meant more union in the EU. As US Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner is quoted as having said: “No crisis should go to waste!!” This clearly seems to be the motto of the Bilderberger, José Barroso as well: He has ordered a report from the Trilateral Commissionist and Bilderberger (1982), Jacques de Larosière.
The following is furthermore a survey of the finance control authorities which totally neglected their duty to control – and so paved the road for the financial/economical crisis.


José Barroso, 25 Febr, 2009 – Rapid EU Press Release
: “Let me start by thanking Jacques de Larosière most sincerely for chairing this High Level Group on Financial Supervision whose report is published today. This report is comprehensive, of high quality and is intellectually rigorous. Now it is for the Commission to assess and act. I am committed to engage immediately in the preparation of our action. And this report provides a very good basis on which to build our proposals.

This is an area where decisive action is needed also at European level: it is a matter of fundamental ethics to avoid that losses are socialised and gains are privatised . Citizens expect us to change the rules of the game and the way the game operates. We must not let citizensdown.”

Here is a thorough analysis of de Larosière´s “High Level Group”

“It is hard to imagine a clearer example of privileged access to decision-makers by vested interests. Ottmar Issing is called the power house of Wall Street - advising Angela Merkel - and now the EU!

Four members are closely linked to giant financial corporations, such as Goldman Sachs (Rothschild) , BNP, Lehman Brothers (Rothschild)  and Citigroup (Rothschild Partner in Royal Dutch Shell). ). A fifth one was the head of the UK Financial Services Authority that completely failed in its supervision of Northern Rock  With the de Larosière Group, the Commission has repeated the mistakes of the past. It has set up a High Level Group dominated by the very kind of people that created the crisis in the first place. The Commission has again gone for a process ‘behind closed doors’… with strong connections to the financial industry.”


Larosière is a former chief of the IMF and the Banque de France.
The job was conferred on him and his group by José Barroso in Oct. 2008. “We must work with our partners to converge towards high global standards, through the IMF, FSF, the Basel committee and G20 processes. This is critical.
It will only be effective and lasting if the European Union, with the biggest capital
 markets in the world, has a strong and integrated European system of regulation and supervision.”

The de Larosiére –report for the EU Commission
The Group considers the new body should be set up under the auspices of the ECB, and chaired by the President of the ECB.

The main proposal are for the FSF  (Financial Stability Forum) to be put in charge of converging international financial regulation to the highest level. The FSF should link closely with the

IMF..

The FSF is a Forum housed at the Rothschild Bank for International Settlements (BIS)   in Basle  – comprising i.a. the BIS,  here  central banks, the FSA 
Comment:  Countries and banks not submitting to the FSF´s financial world dictatorship are to be severely punished.

The FSF's mandate is:  1. to assess vulnerabilities affecting the international financial system;  2. to identify and oversee action needed to address these; and  3. to improve co-ordination and information exchange among the various authorities responsible for financial stability. Strengthening financial systems and the stability of international financial markets. 

Hans_tietmeyer_03FSF History. Dr Hans Tietmeyer, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank presented his report   to G7 Ministers and Governors at the meeting in Bonn on 20 February 1999 and G7 Ministers and Central Bank Governors endorsed the creation of a Financial Stability Forum (FSF) bringing together:  1. national authorities responsible for inernational financial stability;  2. sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors; international financial institutions charged with surveillance  3. committees of central bank experts concerned with market infrastructure and functioning.
Mission: To promote stability in the international financial system.
Mr Andrew Crockett, General Manager of the (Rothschild) Bank for International Settlements, was appointed Chairman of the FSF.

One member is the  Committee on the Global Financial System,which  is a BIS daughter
It is chaired by Donald L Kohn, Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and monitors developments in global financial markets for the central bank Governors of the G10 countries.

Another of these Rothschild BIS-organisations is the  The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision   which   provides a forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision worldwide. At times, the Committee uses this common understanding to develop guidelines and supervisory standards.  In this regard, the Committee is best known for its international standards on capital adequacy; the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision; and the Concordat on cross-border banking supervision.  The Committee's members come from Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Countries are represented by their central bank .
BIS in BaselThe Committee encourages contacts and cooperation among its members and other banking supervisory authorities. It circulates to supervisors throughout the world both published and unpublished papers providing guidance on banking supervisory matters.
The Committee's Secretariat is located at the BIS.

The  BIS  Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) contributing to strengthening the financial market infrastructure through promoting sound and efficient payment and settlement systems. It serves as a forum for central banks to monitor and analyse developments in domestic payment, settlement and clearing systems as well as in cross-border and multicurrency settlement schemes.
Since June 2005 Timothy F Geithner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, now US secretary of the Treasury, has chaired the Committee.

Larosière  recommends all IMF states to commit to its FSAP programme (Chief: Bilderberger (2000) Strauss Kahn)   It seeks to identify the strengths and vulnerabilities of a country's financial system.
The report also emphasizes how important it is to organize coherent EU representatives in the new global economic and financial architecture.

Larosière group´s recommendations

Recommendation 25: The Group recommends that, based on clear objectives and
Time tables, the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), in conjunction with international standard setters like the Basel Committee of Banking Supervisors, is put in charge of promoting the convergence of international financial regulation to the highest levelbenchmarks. In view of the heightened role proposed in this report for the FSF, it is important that the FSF is enlarged to include all systemically important countries and the European Commission. It should receive more resources and its accountability and governance should be reformed by more closely linking it to the IMF. The FSF should regularly report to the IMFC. 

The IMFC should be transformed into a decision-making Council.
Recommendation 26: The FSF, working closely with other relevant international bodies, should ensure coherent global supervisory practice.
Recommendation 27: The Group recommends that the IMF, in close cooperation with other interested bodies, notably the FSF, the BIS, central banks and the European Systemic Risk Council (ESRC), is put in charge of developing and operating a financial stability early warning system, accompanied by an international risk map and credit register.
Recommendation 28: The Group recommends intensifying co-ordinated efforts to encourage currently poorly regulated or "uncooperative" jurisdictions to adhere to the highest level international standards and to exchange information among supervisors.

IMF-2-protestRecommendation 29: The Group recommends that EU Member States should show their support for strengthening the role of the IMF in macroeconomic surveillance and to contribute towards increasing the IMF's resources in order to strengthen its capacity to support member countries facing acute financial or balance of payment distress.

 Recommendation 16: A new body called the European Systemic Risk Council (ESRC), to be chaired by the ECB President, should be set up under the auspices and with the logistical support of the ECB – (the board of which consists of a bunch of Bilderbergers, Trilateral commisionists, board members of Rothschildd´s BIS and central bankers – the vice President even having a past in the US Fed.) 

 Recommendation 18: A European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS) should be set up. This ESFS should be a decentralised network: existing national supervisors would continue to carry-out day-to-day supervision;
Recommendation 19: In the first stage (2009-2010), national supervisory authorities should be strengthened with a view to upgrading the quality of supervision in the EU.

Recommendation 20: In the first stage, EU should also develop a more harmonised set of financial regulations, supervisory powers and sanctioning regimes.

 Recommendation 22: In the second stage (2011-2012), the EU should establish an integrated European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS).e.g. legally binding mediation between national supervisors; oversight and coordination of colleges of supervisors;

Comment

This is what the Rothschild dominated European Round Table of Industrialists  led by Rothschild agent Pehr Gyllenhammar has suggested.

If this were not so tragic it would be a laugh! The President of the EU Commission praises his good friend, Jacques, former IMF director, for taking the task of suggesting that the institutes of the House of Rothschild continue supervising and regulating international finances, although it was the very same Rothschild institutes who stood for the international financial supervision – and ignored the basic financial insanity, which had for many years been evident even to laymen. Their neglect is so gigantic and blatant, that one cannot help concluding that it was deliberate and planned. How on Earth can we expect those fraudsters to do better now than before the crisis, which they allowed?

Who got the task of  advising the Northern Rock, after the British Government saved it? N.M. Rothschild and sons.- the House behind the crisis that broke Northern Rock.

This crisis and the following fire-sale prices of banks and real estate is a repetition of what the CFRs Paul Warburg, John D. Rockefeller and JP Morgan did in 1929.

So, it is such a clique Barroso´s dear friend, Jacques, is pointing to. This might be called letting the fox guard the hen house. The EU calls for more regulation – leaving to the men of the financial indudustry and inveterate supporters of less regulation to manage this !!!  You might also call it a gentleman agreement between New World Order colleagues on behalf of their masters, Rockefeller and Rothschild.  
Besides, the FSF was founded by the G7 and their central banks!!! Why shall such an institution govern my money without asking my permission? 

 

 

 

 





Web Analytics