Tue 14 Jul 2009
We just passed the 4. anniversary of the 7/7 London bombs. However, the memory is still alive – and inconsistencies in the official report on this event have aroused the suspicion of the public of an inside job like the suspicion about the 9/11 murders – in order for the government to take big brother control of the Britons.
London 7 July, 2005 Wikipedia: At 08:50, three bombs exploded within fifty seconds of each other on three London Underground trains. A fourth bomb exploded on a bus nearly an hour later at 09:47 in Tavistock Square. The bombings killed 56 people, including the four bombers, injured 700, and caused disruption of the city's transport system (severely for the first day) and the country's mobile telecommunications infrastructure.
It is not clear why the bombers carried identifying items, which led to the discovery of the bomb factory in Leeds. The bomb factory appears to have been intended for future use and a number of other explosive devices are said to have been found in the bombers' car at Luton station. In addition, the bombers bought return tickets to London from Luton. The first three bombs exploded within 50 seconds of each other, suggesting that a timing device or remote activation was used
The government has refused to hold a public inquiry, stating that… "it would be a drain on resources and tie up key officials and police officers". Former Prime Minister Tony Blair said an independent inquiry would undermine support for the security service.
A group of survivors and relatives of those killed are now pursuing legal action in the High Court and European Courts for a full Public Inquiry to clear up conflicting accounts of this day. The Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis said "It is becoming more and more clear that the story presented to the public and Parliament is at odds with the facts."
The Mail 3 July 2009 On the afternoon of 7 July , Tony Blair returned to Downing Street to pronounce that the attack was an act in the 'name of Islam'. Later, at a meeting of the Government's national emergency committee COBRA, London's anti-terror police chief Andy Hayman told senior ministers that he suspected suicide bombers.
And so the story of 7/7 that we have come to accept was pieced together: four British Muslims - Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Jermaine Lindsay, 19, and Hasib Hussain, 18 - blew themselves up using home-made explosives, killing 56 and injuring 700 on three Tube trains and a double-decker bus. They had travelled on a mainline train from Luton into King's Cross Thameslink Station in London, each carrying a heavy rucksack of explosives.
It is a version of events that has been endorsed by a high-level Parliamentary inquiry and a government report, both published in May 2006 ten months after the event, based on 12,500 statements, a police examination of 142 computers and 6,000 hours of CCTV footage. The report insisted that the bombers acted on their own, constructing explosives from chapatti flour and hair bleach mixed in the bath at a flat in Leeds, Yorkshire, where all four had family and friends.
But families of the dead victims and an increasing number of 7/7 survivors claim there are inconsistencies and basic mistakes in the official accounts that need explanation.
The survivors are so intent on an independent inquiry that they are now taking legal action in the High Court to try to force the Home Secretary Alan Johnson to authorise it. And they are demanding a full public inquiry to answer key questions about what the Intelligence Services and the police did and did not know before the bombings.
Meanwhile, the Government's determined refusal to meet their demands is having a very dangerous side-effect - fuelling myriad conspiracy theories about 7/7. Books, blogs and several video documentaries point to oddities in the official accounts.
Alarmingly, some of the conspiracy videos are being hawked around mosques throughout the country to whip up anti-British sentiment.
The chairman of Birmingham´s central mosque has since said that the identities of the bombers were discovered by the police suspiciously quickly. 'When a body is blown up, it is destroyed. How is it that the identification papers found at the bomb scenes of these men were still intact? Were they planted?'
The impact of the video is swaying Muslim feeling. One elderly man states: 'There can be little doubt that the Government did this themselves to these four young men.'
For the most outlandish and offensive of them suggest that the attacks were not the work of Muslim terrorists at all, but were carried out by the Government to boost support for the Iraq war – or big brother control of the Britons . Here is a revealing video on 7/7, Ludicrous Diversions .
The timetables Central to the puzzle is which train the four Muslims caught from Luton to London on the morning of the bomb blasts - bearing in mind that the three separate Tube explosions at Edgware Road, Aldgate and King's Cross occurred together at exactly 8.50am, followed by the red bus an hour later near Tavistock Square.
The official reports said the bombers got on the 7.40 am train from Luton which would have arrived at King's Cross in good time for them to board the Tube trains. However, the 7.40am train never ran that morning. It was cancelled.
The Government has since corrected this information - but only after the error was raised by survivors - saying the bombers actually caught an earlier train, the 7.25am from Luton, for the 35-minute journey to King's Cross. It was due to arrive in the capital at 8am. Yet this throws up more questions than it answers. For this train ran 23 minutes late It arrived in London at 8.23am, say station officials.
According to the July Seventh Truth Campaign - another group calling for a public inquiry - this again places the official version of the bombers' travelling times in doubt.
A still CCTV photo of the four bombers arriving at the station in Luton is the only one of the four men together on July 7. Controversially, no CCTV images, either still or moving, of them in London have ever been released. The Luton image is also contentious: the quality is poor and the faces of three of the bombers are unidentifiable. This photo is timed at four seconds before 7.22am. But if this were the case, the men would have had just three minutes to walk up the stairs at Luton, buy their £22 day return tickets and get to the platform, which was packed with commuters because of the earlier travel disruptions.
The Truth Campaign group is equally sceptical about the bombers' supposed arrival time at King's Cross. They say it takes seven minutes to walk from the Thameslink line station to the main King's Cross station, where there is an entrance to the Tube network. Police say the four men were seen on the main King's Cross concourse at 8.26am, although no CCTV footage has ever been made public. But is this possible? How had the men got there in three short minutes after getting off the Luton train at 8.23am
The mock drill Wiseup journal: On the morning of 7/7 Visor Consultants’ managing director, Peter Power, said on ITV and BBC that his crisis management firm ran a mock terror drill at the same time on the same targets (as the real terror attacks). You can hear his media interview here or see it here. His company ran the four drills “precisely at the railway stations” [direct quote] and one drill of an above ground explosion that also actually happened at the same time on the same day.
And it is such inconsistencies that are fuelling the deepening concerns.
This week, a television documentary on BBC2 called Conspiracy Files 7/7 revealed the existence of a conspiracy theorist's 56-minute video called Ripple Effects. It accuses Tony Blair, the Government, the police, and the British and Israeli Secret Services of murdering the innocent people who died that day to stir up anti-Islamic fervour and create public support for the 'war on terror'. It alleges that the four British Muslims were tricked by the authorities into taking part in what they were told would be a mock anti-terror training exercise. What they weren't told, the video alleges, was that the Government was going to blow them up, along with other passengers, then pretend the four were suicide bombers.
The author of "Ripple Effects" is 60-year-old Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill who lives in Kells, County Meath, Ireland. He is currently under arrest there and fighting extradition to Britain. Police here want to interview him on a charge of perverting the course of justice after he sent a copy of his video to a jury member in a terrorist case. The internet film asks why did so many survivors of the Tube bombings say that the explosions came upwards through the floor of the trains, not down, as would be the case if a backpack blew up inside? According to Infokrieg 2. July, a BBC broadcast on 30 June, 2009, confirmed that metal at the bottom of the trains was bent upwards - Paul Watson.
And why do no passengers on the London-bound Luton train clearly remember the four bombers with their huge rucksacks on that fateful morning?
Was it suicide
The Mirror: Why did they buy return train tickets to Luton? Why did they buy pay & display tickets for cars? The London bombers may have been duped into killing themselves”
New York Times : “Each of the four men who died in the July 7 attacks purchased round-trip railway tickets from Luton to London. Germaine Lindsay’s rented car left in Luton had a seven-day parking sticker on the dashboard. Some police officials are increasingly considering the possibility that the men did not plan to commit suicide and were duped into dying.”
How do suicide bombers who allegedly died on 3 trains and 1 bus get shot by police on the street?
The New Zealand Herald: “ A New Zealander working for Reuters in London says two colleagues witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf in London. Canada’s Globe and Mail newspaper reported an unconfirmed incident of police shooting a bomber outside the HSBC tower. ”
It is interesting to note Verint Systems, the security firm that was responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras in the London Underground rail network, had approximately 1,000 employees. No CCTV footage of the four Muslims boarding the tube-trains has been released by Verint who claim that their cameras were not working. Why?
PROBABILITY OF DRILL AND TERROR ATTACK COINCIDING BY CHANCE (10yr mean): One chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Could these 7/7 London bombing events be another 9/11, insider jobs committed by unscrupulous New World Order criminals in order to promote their control of us – and their conquest of the world? If so, what is next? And as for Al Qaida: Forget it. According to the Council on Foreign Relations it is just a cock-and-bull tale!
It is very suspicious that the British government will not allow an independent investigation. And the circumstances about the events are indeed very suspicious.
But what do you think, dear reader? I should like to see your comment on this blog.
By the way, note how "The Mail" prudently and antidemocratically designates those sceptical of the official declaration as “conspiracy theorists". That makes it odioos to seek the truth. In the present state of affairs the people behind the untenable official statements seem to be the "conspiring theorists"!
This word “conspiracy theory has been concealing an ocean of dictatorial dirty tricks!
8 Responses to “ Increasing Anger over London´s 7/7 bombs. Another 9/11? ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.