We are experiencing an economical crisis which is – like the one in and after 1929  – created by the biggest sharks of the Wall Streets It seems that no one can or will stop the crisis – as though it is to be allowed to crash the world economy completely – in order to give a larger proportion of our money to those behind the crisis as well as more political control of the world. Let us see how they are managing to do so.

Council_on_Foreign_Relations_Logo
Demanding the end of national currencies
, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR´s) “Foreign Affairs” May/June 2007 wrote: Globalization and monetary nationalism are a dangerous combination, a cause of financial crises and geopolitical tension. The world needs to abandon unwanted currencies, replacing them with dollars, euros, and multinational currencies as yet unborn


I.
 Reuters March 17, 2009: The day before he returned to the U.S. Treasury for six weeks to help the understaffed Obama administration, Edwin Truman published a proposal to give the International Monetary Fund more firepower to fight the financial crisis: a one-off $250 billion allocation of
Special-drawing-rightsSpecial Drawing Rights (SDRs) to IMF member states. It could be sort of a global central bank printing money which could lead to inflation.

Think of the Special Drawing Rights as you like. Some see them and by and by the dollar, too, in this way.

The CFR supports the IMF solution cautuiously . In 2007, CFT Alan Greenspan  suggested the euro to take the role of international reserve valuta instead of the dollar

March 26, 2009 Paul Watson, Prison planet: One day the US Secretary of the Treasury telles Congress that he opposed to a new World reserve currency, the next day he tells the elitist CFR  that he is open to it!

But what is behind this?

Pres. Sarkozy and Prime Minister Gordon Brown as of Oct. 2008 called for the IMF to be the international money control organ demanding it to be reinforced by another 250bn dollars so as to have 500bn dollars at its Zhou-xiaochuandisposal. In the meantime , Mr. Brown demands an 450bn instead – and US Secr. of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, an 750bn dollars more for the IMF.  Now the Chinese Central Bank chief has joined the demand: The Telegraph 27 March 2009: 
The Chinese proposal, outlined this week by central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan, calls for a "super-sovereign reserve currency" under IMF management, turning the Fund into a sort of world central bank. The idea is that the IMF should activate its Special Drawing Rights. These SDRs would expand their role over time, becoming a "widely-accepted means of payments".

Now in The Times on March 27, China´s Vice-Prime Minister, Mr. Wang Qishan, confirmed Chinas readiness to support such an upgraded IMF financially.
Wall Street Journal 25 March confirms Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan´s proposal. “the proposal is unlikely to change the dollar's role in the short term.” Like China, Russia recommended that the International Monetary Fund might issue the currency – and emphasized the need of a new super reserve currency
. But Russia now demands gold in the currency basket of the IMF - a titbit for Rothschild in particular.

 
"The dollar reserve system is part of the problem," Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize winner, the Columbia University economist, said in a speech in Shanghai last week, because it meant so much of the world's cash was funneled into the U.S. (which spemt it irresponsibly). "We need a global reserve system," he said in the speech.

 
On March 27 the AFP reported a UN panel to support the idea of the IMF becoming the world´s central Bank. 
This is strongly supported by José Barroso demanding more world governance.
G-20
The G-20 Wall Street Journal 30 March, 2009: By the time the much-heralded Group of 20 meeting of heads of government ends Thursday, it may be difficult to spot a new world order. Mr. Brown, who will host the summit here, called for "a new Bretton Woods. It is already clear that the summit will mostly fall short of Mr. Brown's original lofty goals.
The oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia, along with new powers such as China, stands to get a bigger say in the IMF and in the regulation of global finance. The G-20 has no permanent bureaucracy or staff to manage its activities. Its business is conducted behind the scenes by top advisers, or "sherpas," who consult with each other to reach agreements that can be endorsed during the meeting. The G-20 was suggested as the
world government by influential globalists.

Comment:
IMF-afmagring
The IMF is a close Partner of Rothschilds BIS.
The fact that the Chinese now propose the IMF as a solution is hardly incidental. Rather it looks like a covert agreement as proposed by the New World Order Council on Foreign Relations – and the New World order preachers Gordon Brown and Nicolas Sarkozy (see videos on right margin of this blog). I guess we shall know more about this after the April G-20 meeting – which is schemed to be the future world government junta .
I think that the IMF could be yet another inflationary factor – printing SDRs out of thin air.
The conditions for borrowing with the IMF have been so harsh that worldwide riots have taken place at its and its twin´s, the World Bank´s global meetings.    

According to illuminati George Soros and The Telegraph the upcoming G-20 meeting will solve no problems -meaning we are not yet ripe for the IMF-SRD as world reserve currncy. German Chancellor, Angela Merkel agrees – but adds: "We are talking about building a new global financial market architecture and we will not be able to finish this in London," she told the Financial Times.

II. But there is another step towards a global New World Order economy: UN taxation of us
DANIEL_ESTULIN
In 2005 the journalist, Daniel Estulin, sneaked into the meeting room of the Bilderberg Meeting at Rottach-Egern, Germany. He writes: 

“A much-discussed subject in 2005 at Rottach-Egern was the concept of imposing a direct UN tax on people worldwide through a direct tax on oil at the wellhead. This, in fact, sets a precedent. If enacted, it will be the first time, when a non-governmental agency, read the United Nations, directly benefits from a tax on citizens of free and enslaved nations.

Bilderberger proposal calls for a tiny UN levy at the outset which the consumer would hardly notice. Jim Tucker of the court-killed Spotlight magazine years ago wrote "establishing the principle that the UN can directly tax citizens of the world is important to Bilderberg. It is another giant step toward world government.

Fox News 27 March, 2009: A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.
Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord.
The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.

ObamaGoreChicago Climate Exchange now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”
Essentially Obama helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he is now seeking to steer through Congress. The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has direct ties to both Al Gore and Maurice Strong, two figures intimately involved with a long standing movement to use the theory of man made global warming as a mechanism for profit and social engineering.
Gore's investment company, Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offset opportunities, is the largest shareholder of CCX.
Strong, who was groomed by David Rockefeller to eventually serve as Director of the Rockefeller Foundation, is also a member of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome. Strong is the man behind the Earth Charter – alongside with Steven Rockefeller and Gorbachev.
Gore too comes from the Club of Rome clique.
At a Trilateral Commission meeting 2007, Echoing this sentiment was General Lord Guthrie, Director of NM Rothschild & Sons, member of the House of Lords and former chief of the Defense Staff in London, who urged the Trilateral power-brokers to "Address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide."

Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.
The paper makes no effort to calculate the magnitude of the costs and disruption involved, but despite the discreet presentation, makes clear that they will reverberate across the entire global economic system.

Among the tools that are considered are the cap-and-trade system for controlling carbon emissions that has been espoused by the Obama administration; "carbon taxes" on imported fuels and energy-intensive goods and industries, including airline transportation; and lower subsidies for those same goods, as well as new or higher subsidies for goods that are considered "environmentally sound."

Other tools are referred to only vaguely, including "energy policy reform," which the report indicates could affect "large-scale transportation infrastructure such as roads, rail and airports." 

The note informs negotiators without going into details that cap-and-trade schemes "may induce some industrial relocation" to "less regulated host countries." The note adds only that industrial relocation "would involve negative consequences for the implementing country, which loses employment and investment." But at the same time it "would involve indeterminate consequences for the countries that would host the relocated industries."

Run_deesThere are also entirely new kinds of tariffs and trade protectionist barriers such as those termed in the note as "border carbon adjustment"— which, the note says, can impose "a levy on imported goods equal to that which would have been imposed had they been produced domestically" under more strict environmental regimes.

In an influential but highly controversial paper called "Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change," British economist Nicholas Lord Stern, formerly a high British Treasury official, has declared that industrial economies would need to cut their per capita carbon dioxide emissions by "at least 80% by 2050," while the biggest economies, like the U.S.'s, would have to make cuts of 90 percent..

Comment
Fortunately, Pres. Obama has declared to be unable to do anything about CO2 until 2012  at the earliest. Why? According to the IPCC boss Pachauri it would trigger a revolution in the US. Probably, the EU has no money for this madness either due to the economical crisis. Now EU Climate Commissioner, Stavros Dimas, seems to be a little scared of his own courage – says he will see what the US will do. And  among the Environmental ministers of the European Council there seems to be widespread restraint as for more restrictive CO2–emission directives.
Prominent globalists have already given up the conference of Copenhagen.

I see the following scenario: The satanist, communist UN is making a redistribution of wealth – sending our money and industries to the poorest, i.e. Muslim countries, which are unable to contribute anything. Thus, we are being made the slaves of the Muslim world – and when Islam has obtained the majority here, the whole world will sink to the status of the Muslim world today.