Geert Wilders´ film ”Fitna” was in itself not exciting. It showed just two things: 1. That Islam - as we see it on a daily basis - is a violent ideology aiming at world dominance - like the other ideologies. 2. That its violence is Koran-based. We also knew this beforehand.

No, the outrageous thing about the film is the confirmation of something we also knew beforehand: That there is something totally wrong about our politicians and media.

1.Politicians headed by the Chairman of the EU Parliament Hans-Gert Pöttering vigorously disavowed the film. And Pöttering took the liberty of  dishonestly taking exception to the film on behalf of the entire European Parliament - which has rightly aroused  deep anger with Danish MEP Mogens Camre.

To this came an ambitious Danish Prime Minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a scared Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende, UN Secretary General Moon, NATO  Secretary General de Hoop Scheffer etc. : All of them were full of anger that Geert Wilders dared show the truth about Islam.

2. Furthermore, the populations of Europe do not rise in protest against the islamization of Europe on this occasion either – although a recent poll showed 59% of the Dutch to think of free immigration as the greatest mistake in the history of their country. But they are scared and full of indoctrinated sense of guilt.

3.The Muslims once more utilize the opportunity to hug themselves as innocent victims. 

What is behind these 3 patterns of behaviour?
These symptoms are well-known from the concept of neurosis. Expressed to the surroundings they can bring sympathy to secure the neurotic advantages in the form of consideration from his surroundings, nay they bestow dictatorial power over the surroundings who have been inculcated to pity and to indulge and comply with the behaviour of the neurotic.

But if the "victim" becomes aggressive in his striving for "secondary gain" and blames an entire civilization together for his role of victim, although he is the real offender, it becomes absurd. And if the "victim" is even strong, ruthless and ideologically brainwashed it becomes very dangerous.

Comfort comes from Austria, where 10.000 people demonstrated  for a referendum on the Constitutional Reform Treaty, which is a precondition for the coming "Union for the Mediterranean"- as reported on April 1, 2008, on Gates of Vienna

We have seen this before: National minorities. The " stab-in the-back legend". The proletariat as victims - and now  imperialistic Muslims in a self-declared role of victim - in spite of an enormous but squandered economic aid from us to them.

The sense of guilt
has become a very efficient weapon in the hands of Muslims They blame us for
1. Crusade Crimes
2. Colonial domination
3. Contempt for their religious ideology
4. Racism
5. We have humiliated the proud Muslims.
Concerning 1: Nine crusades took place between 1096 and 1291.  Their main purpose was to reconquer the Holy Land - besides all the other Christian lands which the Muslims had brought under Muslim sway during their Crescent Campaigns. Furthermore, it was a main purpose to stop the continuous incursion of Muslim hordes who had already occupied North Africa, most of Asia Minor, Southern Italy and Spain. In 732 they had been stopped at Poitiers in France by Charles Martell - but from ”Golden Andalusia" they sent annual predatory expeditions into France and to the Mediterranean coasts. In 793-94 they were defeated in France by king Louis I, the Pious.

In 1529 and 1683 the Muslims were defeated at Vienna. Otherwise,  Europe would have been Muslim today.

The crusaders were a mixed crowd of idealists and adventurers. They were not soft with the Muslims - just as the Muslims were absolutely not soft with defeated Christians. The Muslims were paid back in their own currency, so to speak.
I am sorry, but I can by no means feel guilty of what happened 800-900 years ago due to enforced military necessity.

Concerning 2:  France and the UK have had Muslim colonies and People´s League mandates. They have behaved like a master race - exactly as the Muslims are doing today in their conquered countries.
An aspect is that Muslims today would probably have been even more backward without contact with Europeans. On the world market today there is not one competitive product made in a Muslim country - except western-produced oil!  An interesting study shows that Indonesia´s dependence on Dutch capital was great before its Independence - while Dutch dependence on income from East India in the first half of the 20. century was insignificant. After the independence The Netherlands flourished - and Indonesia fell economically back.
The Berbers, e.g., helped conquer Spain in 711 - but were always looked down upon by the Arab rulers (Bat Ye´or, Eurabia 2005).

Concerning 3: Muslims are currently doing all they can to create  aversion against themselves and their religious ideology. It would be unnatural for us not to feel dislike - even fear of an ideology taking a strong line with violence, rapes murder and calling us whores, apes and swines (Koransura 2:65, among others Grand Mufti Tantawi)  . Muslims cost our society 3 times more than Danes from cradle to grave. In spite of the assurances of our media and politicians Muslims have all but enriched our culture - and they show us their contempt  and disgust to being integrated - which is forbidden by the Koran (sure 3:28, 4:89, 4:144, 5:51) and the ISESCO Charter art. 4 - isolating themselves in no-go-for whites-ghetto-zones. Nevertheless, our politicians squander enormous sums of tax money  on futile integration at the cost of our welfare!! In reality they are now paying jishya for our "protection" as dhimmis!

Concerning 4: What is racism? Is it not allowed to defend one´s own culture, religion, nay one self without being a racist? Not according to the Council of Europe, the EU, the UNESCO etc. But if it be so, is it then not the  Muslims who are racist? The Koran states that on the Judgment Day Allah will gather the guilty, i.e. the blue-eyed (sura 20.102).It seems that the concept of racism has been vigorously redefined. What if we were saying likewise about the Muslims and their brown eyes?

Concerning 5:
It is maintained that we have humiliated the proud Muslims. How could that be?  I cannot see  any other way than we have denied them the triumph of defeating us by the sword as commanded by the Koran.

And now they can see that their swords do not achieve much against our weaponry. That´s why these proud warriors have been enforced to use their unmanly weapon, The B-bomb, the baby-boom bomb at our cost.

This offends their unshakable belief: 1. We infidels and blue-eyed criminal underlings are already condemned to Hell and are nevertheless standing as their superiors!  2. Can you no longer trust Muhammad? The Koran (sura 8:65) states: " O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence."
And in (sura 33:26-27) Allah states: "And He brought those of the People of the Scripture who supported them down from their strongholds, and cast panic into their hearts. Some ye slew, and ye made captive some. And He caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth, and land ye have not trodden. Allah is ever Able to do all things."
That is: So far Muslims have not been able to come up to Allah´s demands  against the blue-eyed criminals.This is really humiliating!!!
 
EU-Chairman, Slovenian Foreign Minister,  Dimitrij Rupel, also vigorously disavowed "Fitna", nay he  shouted and howled and spat furiously and crimsoning according to eye-witnesses in the EU Parliament - in order to prevent Dutch Foreign Minister  Maxine Verhagen from having a promised support for the Netherlands debated. In short, he behaved like Hitler!

 

 For the sake of these absurdities our politicians and media are now palming the sense of  guilt off on us, which pleases the Muslims so to see .
For the politicians have their own agenda. And that is not due to sympathy with the brown eyes of the Muslims  - but with the rich super-ideology of  brown red and black ideologists: The lucrative New World Order.
Some may say that like everybody else within the reach of the Jihad our politicians simply have the "grande peur" - horror (Bat Ye´or, Eurabia 2005). However, this is out of hold: Our politicians have voluntarily pumped, are pumping and will be pumping Muslim masses into Europe - although they always had the power to say stop.

But for the politicians, too, the day of truth will come
I think we are too decadent to resist in a civil war considering the fact that we cannot even mobilize mass demonstrations against the EU´s  Union for the Mediterranean with free Muslim immigration to Europe. But the costs of the immense immigration of a Muslim social clientele with much lower employment rates than that of the Europeans - even retiring on medical grounds at a much earlier age than Danes - will upset our economy.  The Danish Welfare Commission as of Dec. 2005  stated expenditure for immigrants from just the "heaviest" countries to be at least 50 billion kroner - some experts say even 100 billions - a year up to 2040, at which time according to demographers there will be a Muslim population majority in Denmark.  A master race which we with our ageing population have to provide for!  With persecution as self-inflicted thanks!
How can you expect more from the Muslims here than in North Africa and the Middle East? In Sweden expenditure for immigrants are said to account for 30 % of public budgets. 

And now the House of Lords in the UK has launched a report
showing immigration has not in any way fulfilled expectations about positive contributions to economy: ” We have found no evidence for the argument, made by the Government, business and many others, that net immigration—immigration minus emigration— generates significant economic benefits for the existing UK population…. We do not support the general claims that net immigration is indispensable to fill labour and skills shortages. Such claims are analytically weak and provide insufficient reason for promoting net immigration…. Arguments in favour of high immigration to defuse the “pensions time bomb” do not stand up to scrutiny as they are based on the unreasonable assumption of a static retirement age as people live longer and ignore the fact that, in time, immigrants too will grow old and draw pensions. Increasing the retirement age, as the Government has done, is the only viable approach to resolving this issue”.
So, a collapse will certainly come.

All politically produced arguments are invalid.
But why, then, do EU politicians insist on this useless and dangerous immigration and rage against those who criticize Muslim immigration and its undemocratic and inversely racist, dramatic consequences?