JordpakkeThe United States’ National Intelligence Council  (NIC) has released a report, entitled "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World". This declassified document is the fourth report of  the Global Trends 2025: The National Intelligence Council’s 2025 Project,
This report is brought in detail on the website of the Atlantic Council – which declares to educate US leaders . Besides the Atlantic Council states to be

  • identifying and shaping responses to major issues facing the Atlantic Alliance and transatlantic relations;
  • building consensus on U.S. policy towards Russia, China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan;
  • promoting balanced responses to growing energy needs and environmental protection;
  • drafting roadmaps for U.S. policy towards the Balkans, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, and Libya;
  • engaging students from across the Euro-Atlantic area in the processes of NATO transformation and enlargement
  • The Atlantic Council has narrow relations with the Rockefeller Brothers´Fund  as well as with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR – even  its director, Frederick Kempe being a member of Rockefeller´s CFR).

    After mentioning a long line of possible developmentsthe report comes to the point:
    Climate disasters, ethnic and social and ideological/religious riots, possibly nuclear war, the war against terrorism, financial crisis scarcity of food and energy sources, pandemics (avian flu, SARS) with billions of buffeted and killed persons, the emerging new powers (Brazil, Russia, India, China) will not take the burden of command and responsibility but leave world governance/government to the Western elite, and existing institutions (UN, IMF, World Bank, i.e. the Rockefeller institutions) have finally convinced the citizens of the world that they need a world government, because national states cannot cope with all these (illuminist-planned) disasters. This bears a definite resemblance to “Albert Pike´s letter to Mazzini”.

    Here is an alarmist New World Order scenario in the worst Al Gore style – based on the lies of Nasa´s  James Hansen, who is the only source the Nobel Prize winning IPCC counts on although he has  even been caught red-handed in  faking his temperature measurements - and although half of his temperature measurement sensors were shown to be placed near artificial heat spenders.

    Presidential Diary Entry October 1, 2020

    I guess we had it coming, but it was a rude shock. Some of the scenes were like the stuff from the World War II newsreels, only this time it was not Europe but Manhattan. Those images of the US aircraft carriers and transport ships evacuating thousands in the wake of the flooding still stick in my mind. I guess the problem was that we counted on this not happening, at least not yet. Most scientists assumed the worst effects of climate change would occur later in the century. Still, enough warned there was always a chance of an extreme weather event coming sooner and, if it hit just right, one of our big urban centers could be knocked out. As I remember, most of my advisors thought the chances were pretty low after the last briefing we got on climate change. But we were warned that we needed to decentralize our energy generation and improve the robustness of our infrastructure to withstand extreme weather events. Tragically, we did not heed this advice.
    Comment: Tropical hurricanes  have always been a threat to New Orleans and southern USA. They are not due to man-made climate change.

    NIC mentions 4 scenarios – seems to prefer the last of them.
     

    Scenario IV
    In this fictionalized scenario, a new  world emerges in which nation-states are not in charge of setting the international agenda. Growing public concerns about environmental degradation and government in action come together in this example to “empower” a network of political activists to wrest control of the issue out of country-level officials in capitals.
    Global communications
    technology enables individuals to affiliate directly with identity-driven groups and networks that transcend geographic boundaries. Environmentalism is an issue for which there is a widespread confluence of  interests and desires.

     

     Preconditions for this scenario include:

    1. National governments’ relevance and power lessens in an increasingly decentralized world.

    2. Diasporas, labor unions, NGOs, ethnic groups, religious organizations, and others acquire significant power and establish formal and informal relationships with states.

    Communications technology permits ubiquitous and constant integration into identity networks.

     

    “Fictive FT editorial 2024: “In a sense, we have reached the Promised Land in which global cooperation is more than a “conspiracy” among elites but bubbles up from the grassroots across historic national and cultural divides. We had hoped for this with the European Union but never achieved it. Everyone maintained his narrow parochial viewpoint, speaking first as a Frenchman, or Pole, not as a European.

     Davos meeting , here (New World Order arrangement) and supporter of  the United Religions Initiative  was transformed several years ago. It brought in a host of activists from these networks and has since established virtual meetings where thousands more could participate.
    The pressure became too much for member-states to ignore. The United Nations General Assembly
    set aside 20 seats for NGOs  who yearly competed among themselves to take up a seat for a year and have the same voting rights as nation-states.

    International politics is forever changed even though I doubt these networks can be as effective on other issues. The environment was tailor-made because the widespread commonality of interest in avoiding Armageddon. At another time or on a different issue, my guess is national, religious, ethnic, and class differences will resurface. But the achievement stands and the precedent set will make it hard for governments to ignore NGOs. Maybe they can even begin to partner.”
    Comment:
    That world governance should also be managed by NGOs was favoured by the Bilderberg meeting 2005 (Daniel Estulin).

    In other words: “We are shocked into action–and a change in the way key players think about the issues”.

    Global Research Dec. 19, 2008
    “It is important, when reviewing the information provided by the report, to understand the perspective of the authors. The US intelligence community worked closely with businesses, prominent academic institutions and powerful think tanks, all of which play extremely significant roles in shaping our current world order. Thus, the perspectives outlined in the report come with an inherent bias, and so it is important to “read in between the lines.” The report does NOT state what the objectives of the US intelligence community, academic institutions, businesses or think tanks will be in this future 2025 scenario, but you can be assured that they will not play backseat roles and merely observe situations. These are among the most powerful players in the international arena, and this vision of 2025 is the world they are shaping.

    So when the report suggests the likely fractionalization of Pakistan, they do not say that it is a US objective to do so, but rather that it is a likely possibility that such a scenario will occur. Thus, it is important to comprehend this information with an understanding that those who wrote the report, have been, are currently, and they will in all likelihood, continue to be among the most powerful actors shaping the world order and the new international system. They have been behind the great “transnational issues” and are now proposing their “international solutions.”


    The report outlines the paths that current geopolitical and economic trends may reach by the year 2025, in order to guide strategic thinking over the next few decades. The National Intelligence Council describes itself as the US Intelligence Community’s “center for midterm and long-term strategic thinking,” with the tasks of supporting the Director of National Intelligence, reaching out to non-governmental experts in academia and the private sector and it leads in the effort of providing National Intelligence Estimates.”

     
    Comment
    Contributors to the report are i.a.: RAND; Council on Foreign Relations; Brookings, State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, The Atlantic Council, hundreds of experts inside and outside governments here in the United States and
    overseas.

    Here is what US Senator Jesse Helms said from the floor of  the Senate on Dec. 15, 1987  “This campaign against the American people - against traditional American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare. It is orchestrated by a vast array of interest comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left. Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.

    Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a new world order.

    Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles.

    …. The principal instrument of this control over the American economy and money is the Federal Reserve System, here, here. The policies of the industrial sectors, primarily the multinational corporations, are influenced by the money centers through debt financing and through the large blocks of stock controlled by the trust departments of the money center banks. Anyone familiar with American history, and particularly American economic history, cannot fail to notice the control over the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency which Wall Street seems to exercise…. . It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order.
    The viewpoint of the establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the "one-world" view by its critics.


    According to NIC itself, the ideas generated and insights gained during the preparation of the accompanying report have enriched the work of countless analysts and been incorporated

    into numerous analytic products published by the National Intelligence Council and other Intelligence Community agencies.

     
    This is the plan of the New World Order, I believe. It is extremely alarming – because they plan disasters. E.g., they meticulously describe the consequences of their fictive, propaganda-scaremiongering climate lie: The ice-free North Pole – open to navigation – and oil exploiting – and the tensions arising thereover!!!
    To this comes increasing fears that the US-economy will collapse within the next 2–5 years because of debt and inflation (and this comes from Willem Buiter Professor of European Political Economy, London School of Economics and Political Science; former chief economist of the EBRD, former external member of the MPC; adviser to international organisations, governments, central banks and private financial institutions– in an article in the Financial Times on Jan. 5, 2008 ) and a statement by a very much scared US Senator Ron Paul - video, who in particular fears the Gaza conflict and its influence on US economy – video 
    In the  London School of Economics he associates with  the illuminati David Rockefeller og George Soros. 

    My latest post dealt with a Global Research analysis of their military aims in the Middle East: Destabilisation and their probable olans of redrawing the borders of Middle Eastern and Central Asian countries – even through a world war. The above disasters do more and more remind one of what is stated in the postulated letter from Albert Pike  to Mafia-boss, Giuseppe Mazzini – a letter known from about 1949.
    Only, this time they are put forward by one of the most influential think tanks in the USA: The United States’ National Intelligence Council  (NIC).