Before the NATO attack on Libya, the Brookings Institute’s “Libya’s Test of the New International Order,” February 2011 read: “It is a test that the international community has to pass. Failure would shake further the faith of the people’s region in the emerging international order and the primacy of international law“.

My latest post about the Iranians ridiculing Pres. Obama, declaring that he has totally fabricated his transcript of the negotiated agreement to stop Iran´s nuclear program and that Iran will carry on enriching as heretofore, may seem harmless considering Obama´s sensible will to avoid a military confrontation.

But have the Iranians gone into a long planned trap?

BrookingsWhichPathtoPersia2010CoverThe Brookings Institution is a very influential US think tank that has been building US policies over the past 70 years. In Brookings´paper “Which Path to Persia?“, 2009, Brookings writes on p. 39:

“…any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal.” (Thanks to Tony Cartalucci, The Land Destroyer 26 Nov. 2013).

Indeed, Iran may come under attack according to plan. Brookings writes:  Goading Provocations for an Air Strike, p. 97-98): “…it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.”

Now, Brookings is not just Mr. anybody. This Think tank is shaping USA´s policies.
Educate Yourself
: Brookings Institution Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s program, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, the Kennedy Administration’s “New Frontiers” program (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson’s “Great Society.” Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so.

And just look who commands them to write such tings

Dempsey at brookings

Right The US Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey at Brookings.

Wikipedia Brookings traces its history back to 1916 and has contributed to the creation of the United Nations, the Marshall Plan, and the Congressional Budget Office, as well as influenced policies of deregulation, broad-based tax reform, welfare reform, and foreign aid. It is ranked the number one think tank in the U.S. in the annual think tank index published by Foreign Policy, and number one in the world in the Global Go To Think Tank Index;

BrookingsSponsors_2
Left:  Land Destroyer shows some funders of the Brookings Institution. The Rockefellers are also among them (e.g. Chevron and Exxon) - like Rothschild´s VISA and  Rothschild´s Royal Dutch Shell and Goldman Sachs
Wikipedia: But Its largest contributors/funders include the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband Richard C. Blum, Bank of America, Exxon, Mobil, Pew Charitable Trusts, the MacArthur Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the governments of the United States, Japan, Qatar, the Republic of China, the District of Columbia, and the United Kingdom.

Obama-brookings

Brookings: “Brookings has achieved a special measure of respect in Washington because it has risen abovepartisanship, and that is not an easy thing to do in this town which is sort of built on partisanship.”—Hon. Michael Bloomberg, Mayor, City of New York, August 28, 2007
“Brookings has been at the center of every important policy debate in this country for 90 years.”—Sen. Chuck Hagel, July 28, 2006 - now Secretary of Defence.
“When important debates occur in Washington—whether over Middle East peace, global finance, or urban strategy—it’s a fair bet that Brookings is driving the conversation. ..Brookings has a breadth of experience that allows it to offer innovative fixes for nearly every critical issue facing the United States today.”  (The Foreign Policy Magazine’s Think Tank Index, January 2009).

Comment
Iran is not so much a question of nuclear bombs. It is a matter of subjection to the NWO elite and the establishment of a Rothschild central bank to rob Iran like nearly all other countries.

Former supreme NATO general Wesly Clark in 2001 said he had been told that 7 governments would be taken out - Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Iran as the last. Only Syria, Iran, Sudan and Somalia have escaped so far. So maybe it will still last some time before Iran is taken out. But Iran is in Brookings´trap now.