Tue 15 Jan 2013
Daily Mail´s Obituary for the Global Warming Hoax While NWO Witch-hunting Inquisitor Demands Death Penalty for Heretic Warming Deniers
Abstract: The Daily Mail has just written an obituary for the CO2 “man-made global warming.” It documents how the warmists of the UK Met Office have fudged the numbers in order to spread their ideological propaganda in conflict with scientific facts. The hoax is driven by a lot of money from globalist organizations, including changing British governments who - supported by Parliament - granted as much as £ 734 billion per year over the next 40 years as additional spending for the “decarbonisation” of the economy.
The Met has based its figures on computer models, which have as a prerequisite the false claim that increasing CO2 in micro quantities in the atmosphere necessarily lead to global warming. Now, the Met has to confess that its numbers are wrong. In fact, the Met, the leader of the global warming scam, admits that has been s no global warming for now 15 years. It could not even predict the mega-floods in England last November. Despite its failing ability to even deliver other tenable multiple short-time forecasts as well, this incompetent Met even comes up with the prediction that there would be no global warming by 2017. To cover up its shame, the Met issued its revised figures on Christmas Eve! To save face, the Met claims that the CO2 emissions have led to “extreme rainfall” instead . However, The Daily Mail can prove by the Met´s own numbers that there has been even rainier years much earlier.
Australia has now introduced a CO2 tax. It negatively affects more than 80% of Australian small business which employ more that 47% of Australians Moreover, increasing CO2 fees at climate exchanges are raising worldwide energy and food prices, which together with social benefit cuts for mass immigration, war and the euro - even in London - brings about starvation.
However no one mentions the real human factors behind global and local climate change: chemtrails and geo-engineering as well as HAARP - stated by the U.S. Navy, Air Force and the EU.
In this situation, an obscure professor of psychology of music at the University of Graz calls for death penalty for climate change deniers, because they will kill hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people due to future climate disasters. Also, he will kill the heads of the Catholic Church for forbidding condoms - which has led to the death of millions. One might have the impression that the real reason is that by so doing, the Catholic Church does not contribute to Western population reduction. As a member of the Amnesty International, which is opposed to death penalty, he will, of course, not let the mass murderer Anders Breiwik, put to death, who killed only 77 people!
Now you might laugh and think he belongs in a department of psychiatry instead of psychology. However, it looks as if he could speak for desperate NWO forces whose mendacious climate and resource-postulates are now being painfully revealed. Parncutt is a member of the little-known Union of Concerned Scientists. This union seems to belong to Coleman’s committee of 300 - the Inner Circle of the NWO. By the Heartland Institute this group is described as the very active Grand Inquisitor of the NWO-environmental movement, which generally adapts science to their policies.
Furthermore, Parncutt is committed to the “Establishing Crimes Against Future Generations”. You can read there about its purpose: “To build the Future Justice on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UNESCO Constitution, the Earth Charter. The latter is the Leninist NWO program of Steven Rockefeller, Mikhail Gorbachev and the Rothschild / Rockefeller agent, Maurice Strong , now adviser to the Chinese government - after he stole from the UN.
What Parncutt writes is as taken out of the program of the the Illuminati Club of Rome. No wonder - he points out as his inspirer The World Future Council, which includes powerful Club of Rome members such as the Club of Rome’s vice-chairman, Anders Wijkman, and Ulrich von Weizsäcker. In addition, this Council includes members of The Dalai Lama´s, Al Gore´s and Mikhail Gorbachev’s World Commission for Global Consciousness and Spirituality. A further member of the WFC is Olivier Giscard d’Estaing, former governor of the globalist Atlantic Institute. He is the brother of Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, who wrote the infamous EU Constitution - which was “fraudulently changed into the Lisbon Treaty. In 1987, a U.S. senator said in the Senate that the Atlantic Institute worked for the NWO on a level with the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers.
So there is every reason to take Parncutt´s statement as an expression of NWO desperation.
The US National Climate Assessment has released in draft form on Friday the 1,000-page report, the work of more than 300 government scientists and outside experts. It was unequivocal on the human causes of climate change, and on the links between climate change and extreme weather. Sea level is rising, oceans are becoming more acidic, and glaciers and Arctic sea ice are melting.” 2012 was by far the hottest year on record.The draft assessment offers a perfect opportunity for President Obama at the outset of his second term,” said Lou Leonard, director of the climate change programme for the World Wildlife Fund. However, the White House was exceedingly cautious on the draft release (The Guardian 11 Jan 2013).
Documentation of Abstract
After another Climate conference failure in Doha in Dec. 2012, it is so clear that the entire climate discussion/combating is a gigantic fraud – and one of the biggest lies in human history.
The Daily Mail 8 Jan 2013: The Met Office has admitted that global warming has stalled.
In fact, some people think we are heading for another little ice age.
Now a press release, published yesterday, has confirmed that over the next five years temperatures will be 0.43 degrees above the 1971-2000 average, instead of the previously forecast 0.54 degrees – a 20 per cent reduction.
This rise would be only slightly higher than the 0.4-degree rise recorded in 1998, an increase which is itself attributed by forecasters to an exceptional weather phenomenon.
With all but 0.03 degrees of the increase having occurred by 1998, the revision means that no further significant increases to the planet’s temperature are expected over the next few years. Officials say that by 2017, temperatures will not have risen significantly for nearly 20 years. They concede that previous forecasts were inaccurate – and have come under fire for attempting to ‘bury bad news’ by publishing the revised data on Christmas Eve.
The figures have been seized on by sceptics of man-made climate change, who claim that global warming has flatlined despite a large rise in greenhouse emissions in recent decades. Such a period of no increase will pose fundamental problems for climate models.
James Delingpole, The Daily Mail 10 Jan. 2013 held this global warming obituary
Until Christmas Eve, The Met had been confidently predicting temperature rises of at least 0.2 degrees per decade, with a succession of years exceeding even the record-breaking high of 1998. Its latest tells a very different story: no more global warming is expected till at least 2017.
According to Dr David Whitehouse of the independent think-tank the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the climbdown couldn’t be more dramatic or more devastating for the Met Office’s credibility. ‘They’re panicking. All the predictions they’ve been making about man-made global warming these past 20 years have started to come crashing about their ears.’
The Daily Mail 13 Oct. 2012 shows the Met Offices own figures (left).
Here (graph right), are the natural temperatures through the latest 2000 years. Since 1880 global temperature has risen just 0. 75 centigrades – on our way out of the little ice age from 1500–1860 AD. Eleven of the 12 hottest years on record have occurred since 2001, according to data from the World Meteorological Organisation. Prof. Phil Jones of Hadley, the arch fraudster of the Climategate scandal, states there has been no global warming since 1995.
‘The Climate Change Act was passed by an overwhelming majority as the most expensive legislation in history, costing £734?billion (£18.3 billion a year for the next 40 years) in extra spending to ‘decarbonise’ the economy.
According to the Met, Britain is apparently experiencing more rain by volume and intensity. But these claims appeared to be at best a dangerous fudge, at worst a complete nonsense.
As is clear from the Met Office’s own data — the England and Wales precipitation records dating back to 1766 — there has been nothing particularly abnormal about the recent rain.
Not only were there two years, 1872 and 1768, wetter than the supposed record-breaking year of 2012; but also, the Met Office appeared to have overlooked two very dry years (2003 and 2011) to prove its narrative that the past ten years have been the ‘wettest decade ever’.
The Global Warming Policy Foundation’s Dr David Whitehouse believes the very notion of ‘extreme’ weather is an unscientific nonsense. ‘Somewhere in the world, a weather record is being broken almost every day. This is normal. What’s not normal is when people try to impose on it some kind of invented trend.’
Right: Met Office chairman Robert Napier pushed climate change to the fore when he ran the World Wildlife Fund (The Daily Mail 3 Jan 2010).
Left: Hadley CGU founder, John Houghton, is a co-chair and lead author of the IPCC and director of the Met fice
In 1990 the Met became politicised under its then director John Houghton — the fanatical believer in the great global warming religion.
That infamous ‘barbecue summer’ and its inability to foresee last November’s floods were the result of the same major flaw in its system: its computer models are all programmed on the (false) assumption that as global CO2 levels increase, so will global warming. This means because of their green ideology, they’re continually predicting warmer weather, in contradiction of all the real world evidence.
Never mind the mere £200 million we pay a year to fund the Met Office’s dodgy, Mystic Meg prognostications: the real bill for its incompetence runs into the billions.
Globalist Report: Since its introduction on 1 July 2012, the Australian carbon tax negatively affects more than 80% of Australian small business. Australian small businesses employ more that 47% of Australians. 58 percent of Australians now disapprove of the carbon tax, up from 54 per cent in February 2012.
In a survey of more than 215 Australian small businesses conducted by the Australian Retailers Association, 60% report consumers have spent less since carbon pricing was introduced.
* It has added a total cost of approx $4000 per year in operating expenses. * Utility bills have increased, especially electricity (power costs up 40% since July). * Higher delivery costs for stock and those that used to deliver for free now charge a freight fee. * Increased cost of products and Increased expenses. * Supplier and input costs have risen exponentially.
The Guardian 10 Jan 2013: .
To this now comes meaningless CO2–taxes and climate exchange CO2 payments and fees to make foods more expensive. This means more hunger in LDC countries than already being brought about by Illuminati speculations and here.
Left: Thousands of children are starving on the streets of London due to poverty. CO2 taxes and climate exchange fees contribute to their number – as does mass immigration. Right: The Independent: Benefits cuts are threatening to make life harder still for Britain’s lowest paid. Charlie Cooper tries getting by on £175 a week – having just 31 pounds for food a week.
But the warmists do not give up lying and concealing the truth
The Daily Mail 8 Jan 2013: Labour MP Graham Stringer: ‘ They have got their climate change forecast wrong.
However, Dr Richard Allan of the University of Reading said: ‘Global warming is not “at a standstill”. ‘In fact, consistent with rising greenhouse gases, heat is continuing to build up beneath the ocean surface.’
Professor Myles Allen of the University of Oxford said: “It is foolish to extrapolate short-term climate trends.
Red: The accumulated atmospheric CO2 enrichment since 1750. Blue: The accumulated atmospheric CO2 enrichment through human activities (Siddons & D´Aleo since 1750.
The climateers´ lies know no end:
EurActiv 21 Dec. 2012: Next year is likely to be one of the warmest on record with global temperatures 0.57 degrees above the long-term average, Britain’s Met Office said in its annual year-ahead forecast. The forecast is based on Met Office research, as well as data from the University of East Anglia, the NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies (known for Soros/Al Gore paid corrupt James Hansen´s proven fraud) and the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Rising temperatures could be due to the natural variability of the climate and global warming from increasing greenhouse gas emissions, said Dave Britton, a Met Office forecaster. A warmer global average temperature does not necessarily mean every region of the world will get hotter, as regional climate variability produces different effects in different parts of the world, he added.
Climate Alarmism: Death penalty for global warming deniers
Talkbloke´s Talkshop 24 Dec. 2012: – Richard Parncutt, Professor in the psychology of music at the University of Graz, Austria. In this article (last updated 25 October 2012) he declares: I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW deniers.
Parncutt thinks the consequences of global warming mean that hundreds of millions of people may die from starvation or disease in future famines. Moreover, an unknown number may die from wars over diminishing resources. Even if that does not happen, thousands of plants and animals will become extinct. Islands, shorelines and coastal communities will disappear. “We are in a very real sense talking about something similar to the end of the world.”
Much more would have happened by now if not for the GW deniers. Of course, it is possible that scientists are just making it up for their own benefit – but it is unlikely, because they would risk their careers!!! It is possible someone is paying the scientists behind the scences to publish environmental doomsday stories, but: there is simply no money in environmental doomsday stories…. Even mass murderers should not be executed, in my opinion. Consider the politically motivated murder of 77 people in Norway in 2011. If the Norwegian government killed him, that would just increase the number of dead to 78. It would not bring the dead back to life. GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate. Prof. Parncutt even wants to kill the pope and other Catholic leaders for forbidding condomes – thereby killing millions of people by AIDS. Holocaust deniers are acquitted, however.
Richard Parncutt is an NWO global warming witch-hunting inquisitor?
Who is this Richard Parncutt really? He is a member of Concerned Scientists which is a fanatical adherent to the manmade global CO2 warming hoax. Founding councillor of the WFC, Francis Lappé, is also on the National Advisory Board of the Union of Concerned Scientists – which is said to be a group in the Committee of 300 around Rothschild.
See Coleman´s Committee of 300.
Heartland 2004: Environmentalists have their own holy day (Earth Day, April 22) and their own Grand Inquisitor–the Union of Concerned Scientists. Its job is to hunt down heretics who desert the true faith. One of those is a Danish academic named Björn Lomborg. The green witch-hunters have been after him for the past three years. The Union of Concerned Scientists helped mobilize some of Lomborg’s detractors.But Lomborg has had the last laugh. On December 17, the Danish Ministry of Science found the Committee’s judgment “completely void of argumentation.” The Union of Concerned Scientists, a strident political advocacy group conveniently based in the shade of Harvard at Cambridge, Massachusetts, typically interprets science to fit its politics.In 1992 the Union issued a “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity.” This petition is no different from the jeremiads of Paul Ehrlich, Lester Brown, and other members of the environmental clerisy
Parncutt is also a member of Amnesty International, which wants to abolish death penalty – Has Parncutt forgotten that? Moreover, Amnesty is fighting global warming. The University of Graz is also represented at Club of Rome meetings
Well, Lomborg later converted to orthodox climatism - and was sacked by the Danish government.
Parncutt writes: “The authors of different studies are generally working independently of each other in different countries, universities and disciplines. If so many unbiased people independently come to a similar conclusion, the probability that that conclusion is wrong is negligible.”
This is a blatant lie – as shown by the Climategate scandal.
I do think there is an influence on weather by those who claim to own the weather and openly state that they use weather to wage war on mankind – even cause disastrous earthquakes by their HAARP, the military in the US and Russia at least. Human activity is responsible for just 1% of the now 0.039% of the atmospheric harmless CO2. Prof. Parncutt should know about the Climategate scandal, the hockey stick fraud and that Chairman Pachauri of the IPCC has said that climate “science” is just politically committed work, i.e. hoax for money and power.
In other words: Not global warming deniers should be severely punished – but the global warming protagonists like Prof. Parncutt, whose irresponsible claims are making food much more expensive, leading to death by the millions in LDC – even in developed countries – and to poverty due to CO2–taxes and fees at the mugging bankster Climate Exchanges even in London.
What Parncutt writes is as taken out of the Program of the Illuminati Club of Rome: The Communist Club of Rome´s “Limits to Growth” and “The First Global Revoluion” claiming doomsday by the year 2000 due to lack of resources and declaring mankind to be the enemy of this planet. Their solution is Rockefeller´s Population reduction to 500 mio. at most (the Georgia Guidestones). All their talk about saving mankind is nothing but a blind for their population reduction philosophy.
Here is what can be read from Parncutt´s link to “Establishing Crimes against Future Generations”: “Thus, Future Justice builds on The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UNESCO Constitution, The Earth Charter, Convention on the Rights of the Child, UN Millennium Declaration.”
So, this is none less than the implementation of Steven Rockefeller´s, Mikhail Gorbachev´s and Maurice Strong´s Leninist “Earth Charter”. It is called “Future Justice“. “Changing policies and laws alone will not bring about Future Justice. Legislation is not considered enough: Those who act without concern for the planet, and the human and non-human life upon it, would be pursued and prosecuted.
The references to the inspiration for Parncutt´s page is interesting, since his World Future Council links directly to the strong originator of environmentalism, the Communist Club of Rome:
The World Future Council tells, that its co-chair, Prof Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker, is a member of the Club of Rome. From 1998 to 2005 he was a member of the German Parliament.
The WFC chairman is Michael Otto is the CEO of the worlds largest mail firm, Otto. He is Chairman of the Council of the Environmental Foundation WWF Deutschland. The WWF is a rabiat environmentalist foundation. It was created by Julian Huxley and i.a. Godfrey Rockefeller – and is still funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and here. Wikipedia: The World Wildlife Fund Living Plant Report of 2012 states that “economic growth should be abandoned, (and) citizens of the world’s wealthy nations should prepare for poverty.”
The Club of Rome members – Maurice Strong and Al Gore are affiliated to the Club of Rome through National Associations (e.g. USACOR, CACOR etc) The Rockefeller/Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, was vice president of the WWF until 1981 . Strong and the WWF were responsible for the contents of the Brundtland Report – launching the Communist concept of “sustainability” and Strong saw to it that the notorious Communist Agenda 21 was adopted by parliaments – i.a. in Denmark – today developing as the societal model of the 21. century. Here is Strong´s Local Agenda 21.
Left: Anders Wijkman is co-president of the Club of Rome with prominent members like Bill Gates, Al Gore, Michael Gorbachev, Jimmy Carter and the Tällberg Foundation and Concillor for the World Future Council. He is former president of GLOBE, a community of parliamentarians present in the legislatures of most countries of Europe and other regions of the world. GLOBE’s 1st World Summit of Legislatorsdiscussed for a 3-days the role of legislators to reinvigorate the application of the UN Rio Conventions.
A councillor is Riane Eisler, commissioner of the World Commission on Global Consciousness and Spirituality of the Dalai Lama alongside with Al Gore and Mikhail Gorbachev and many more. So is Jane Goodall, “a messenger of peace” distinguished by many globalist prizes.
Councillor Jan McAlpine is head of the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF), based at UN Headquarters in New York. She worked i.a. at the White House, first with the President’s Council on Sustainable Development and then in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Councillor Sulak Sivaraksa is co-founder of the International Network of Engaged Buddhists and is counted with such luminaries as the Dalai Lama. Another councillor is Olivier Giscard dÉstaing who has been governor of the globalist Atlantic Institute. He is the brother of Valéry Giscard d´Estaing who wrote the notorious EU Constitution – fraudulently “changed” into the Lisbon About the Atlantic Institute, US Senator Jesse Helms said from the floor of the Senate on 15.12, 1987: “Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles. …”