Sun 16 Dec 2012
UN Climate Conference: Scare Wits out of Youths. Make Them Neurotic Transformative Climate Doomsday Agents. “Climate Change Process Is Complete Transformation of Structure of Economy and Mind”
Abstract: The series of the UN´s mendacious circus conferences on non-existent global warming continued from 26 Nov. - Dec. 9, 2012 in Doha, Qatar. UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres told a press conference on December 3, 2012: “It must be understood that what is occurring here, not just in Doha, but in the whole climate change process, is a complete transformation of the economic structure of the world. That does not happen overnight. It should happen much quicker than it is happening.”
This shows clearly that these conferences have nothing to do with climate - but with the structure of the one-world government of the communist NWO. All objective scientists proved long ago that there has been no global warming for 16-17 years now - even according to the testimony of the arch fraudster of the Climategate scandal, Prof. Phil Jones.
Now 125 independent climate scientists have written an open letter to UN Secr. General Ban Ki-Moon, in which they blame his wild lies about doomsday scenarios and extreme weather because of a non-existent man-made global warming. They tell Ban that neither the frequency nor the severity of storms deviate from the normal pattern, and they ask him to refrain from making such claims in the future, as there is no scientific evidence to support his allegations.
Stephanie Hodge, education program specialist for UNICEF, said: “Our current climate change education is “antiquated” and in dire need of renovation. We should be asking What is global citizenship? Climate change education is really about a process of change, about starting transformation through education.” Ie: it’s also about a restructuring of the children’s brains - brainwashing for the NWO.To help bring about this change and transformation, UNICEF, with help from its sister agency, UNESCO, has come up with a new curriculum guide, entitled, Climate Change and transformation, Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction in the Education Sector: Resource Manual.
The UNICEF Resource Manual opens with this paragraph: “I am the present and the future. A victim of climate change, I live in a region that is constantly affected by disasters. Hurricanes and floods are my reality.” — Walter, a 12-year-old boy from Belize.
A bigger purpose of the Resource Manual, we are told on page 11, is “to help children to become agents of change.” While preaching sustainability for Marx, their green climate worship is anything but sustainable: Infinite flight arrivals and departures, spacious dinners in luxury hotels, etc. All this is about enforcing the dictatorial NWO Agenda 21 globally, but already the Local Agenda 21 has progressed far.
Now psychologists, psychiatrists, teachers and parents report that the fear of an impending climate apocalypse is infesting apparently millions of children and youths around the world due to ongoing reports in the mass media about apocalyptic climate events: The youths refrain from education or to plan careers, everything coming to an end soon, anyway. They suffer from insomnia and depression.
Nevertheless, EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard and others in Doha and elsewhere unabashed continue with their alarmism about rising sea levels by 1 meter or more, extreme weather and hurricanes, almost total doom for the world.
The real purpose of the declared restructuring of the global economy and children´s minds: world government and plundering of the taxpayers of rich countries for the benefit of Rothschild´s GEF and World Bank as well as his investment banks and climate exchanges - and his dictator friends in developing countries who demand our money as climate mitigation – 100bn US dolars a year – for for our guilt of the non-existing global warming hoax.
In reality it is about communist redistribution - and I have the impression that the 1968 Marxist feminists play a very significant role here. Rockefeller´s UN looks perfect as the upcoming One World Government rooted in Alice Bailey’s Luci (fer´s) Trust. They are backed by UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, who would like to see himself as President of the world, and the de facto government of the United States and would-be government of the world, Rockefeller´s Council on Foreign Relations.
However, only the EU and a handful of other states have signed the Doha Declaration. In reality, these woman-moved Gaia-worship has come to a standstill - and that is because the rich countries are short of money.
The nature of this environmental movement was demonstrated by the fact that Lord Monckton, former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, sneaked into the room and told the truth. He was escorted out, forever robbed of his UN identification papers and also his residence permit in Qatar - the world’s largest per capita emitter of harmless CO2 .
Shortly before the conference began, green legend James Lovelock — the scientist and environmentalist who first came up with the whole “Gaia” concept — warned that the “green religion” was now “taking over from the Christian religion.” While it may sound absurd to most Americans, for many Rio+20 summit participants, the stunt with green lights shining on the statue of Christ no doubt had a special meaning (The New American 9 July 2012 - UN´s Rio de Janeiro Conf.)
Documentation of Abstract
The New World Order uses the climate hoax to bring the world under communist, one world government (Agenda 21). Brainwashed, blind feminists are taking command over the world through the UN´s green program: The New American 10 dec. 2012 UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres told a press conference on December 3, 2012: “It must be understood that what is occurring here, not just in Doha, but in the whole climate change process is a complete transformation of the economic structure of the world. That does not happen overnight. It should happen much quicker than it is happening.”
The UN´s Global warming scam has once again – as on Bali 2007, and Copenhagen 2009 (where Chancellor Merkel stated this was just the first step towards Climate New World Order), Durban 2011, and Rio 2012 being unfolded – in Doha, Qatar – to “make environmentalism compete with religion”, as UNEP´s Chairman, Achim Steiner said in 2009. As I have written repeatedly and here and here and here here and here and here and here and here and here, there is no proof whatsoever of CO2 being harmful to the climate, the CO2 being even a secondary phenomenon to global warming which with a latency of 100 years or more leads to release of CO2 from the oceans (see graph below, which also shows that 450 mio. years ago the CO2 i the Atmosphere was hundreds of times higher than now – and temperatures were likr today!) Only 1% of atmospheric CO2 is derived from human activity and CO2 has only increased from preindustrial 0.027% to now 0.039% of the atmosphere. Even a “little ice age” seems underway. Today global temperature is 2 degrees C lower than in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, mankind mostly believe in scaremongering like the following – although Europe is once again drowning in snow.
Deutsche Welle 26 Nov. 2012: Negotiators from 194 countries have gathered in one of the world’s top per-caput emitters, Qatar, for a two-week conference on climate change. The goal is the same as previous summits, and it appears just as forlorn.
Last week, a World Bank report, compiled by climate researchers in Germany, warned that unrestrained global fossil fuel usage would lift average temperatures by four degrees Celsius by the end of this century. Hundreds of millions of coastal inhabitants would be affected by sea-level rises of up to one meter (3.2 feet), the World Bank said. Emissions of carbon dioxide reached a record 34 billion tons last year. In 1990 - the Kyoto benchmark year - emissions amounted to 21 billion tons.
EurActiv 27 Nov. 2012: Last month, a report from Germany’s green Heinrich Böll Foundation argued that increased energy savings do increase productivity and result in income gains, but that these in turn also stimulate demand. Because this demand will be met by a still mostly-carbonised (bio fuel) grid, ‘Green Growth Unravelled’ contends that the “fatal fallacy” of this kind of green growth is that its ‘rebound effects’ will actually increase CO2 emissions.
The whole circus showed its dictatorial character, when it not only evicted Lord Monckton of Brenchley – but also, Qatar revoked Monckton’s visa to stay in Qatar. Authorities will do whatever is needed to maintain the “consensus.”
The Climate Depot 6 Dec. 2012 and The New American 9 Dec. 2012: Lord Monckton quietly slipped into the seat reserved for the delegation of Myanmar and clicked the button to speak. “In the 16 years we have been coming to these conferences, there has been no global warming and here (graph right),” Monckton said as confused murmurs filled the hall and then turned into a chorus of boos. The stunt infuriated negotiators and activists. Monckton was escorted from the hall and security officers stripped him of his U.N. credentials.
EurActiv 10 Dec. 2012 and The Telegraph 9 dec. 2012: “At the UN Doha Climate Conference 26 Nov. – 8 Dec. 2012, not much more was achieved than a prolonagation of the Kyoto Protocol until 2012 signed by the EU and a handful of countries and the confirmation of the “willingness” stated in Copenhagen in 2009 of developed western countries having to pay 100bn dollars annually to developing countries from 2020 (The New York Times 5 Dec. 2012). Countries are split into two often-warring camps: the small number of wealthy nations that provide money to help deal with the effects of global warming, and the much larger group of poorer states that receive it. However, this money seems due to come from already granted LDC aid. The US opposed to pay this as “climate mitigation” – would only call it aid!
Comment: Aid is a more correct expression for the ongoing Communist equalisation of wealth from the West into the pockets of the “International bankers and LDC dictators – Rothschild´s GEF pocketing fat fees. “Climate mitigation”, “loss and damage” are expressions which are much valued by the LDC countries to make the West beg forgiveness on its knees for having emitted all this terrible CO2!
The western countries have more than enough to do with their own economic crises. The US will not limit its CO2–emissions. China, the world´s biggest emitter of CO2 has the status of a developing country, meaning the country is entitled to receive “climate mitigation” and it demands the West to go on paying “loss and damage” to the LDCs!!
The reactions were mixed. The EU’s climate commissioner, Connie Hedegaard, was upbeat about the results of the COP18 summit. “In Doha, we have crossed the bridge from the old climate regime to the new system,” she said in a statement. “We are now on our way to the 2015 global deal. It was not an easy and comfortable ride. Very intense negotiations lie ahead of us. What we need now is more ambition and more speed.”
“Harjeet Singh, the International Coordinator for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Adaptation at Action Aid International, said the deal was too weak to stop global warming or help the poor. “The only word to describe this deal is ‘unacceptable’ – the Doha outcome does not sufficiently reduce emissions nor provide resources for poor countries to deal with increasingly frequent and severe droughts, floods and storms. “
However, although lacking all arguments for its global warming hoax the UN uses all tricks to make the future world – youths – believe in its CO2 lies – the biggest in history – for the sake of money and one world government for its bankster masters.
The New American 6 Dec. 2012: Fear of an impending Climate Apocalypse apparently afflicts millions of children and adolescents worldwide, according to news stories in the mainstream media over the past few years (here, here, and here)).
Psychologists, psychiatrists, teachers, and parents report that many children are depressed and fearful, have difficulty sleeping, and believe it is pointless to study or plan a career, since there is little hope for a livable future. As a result, many are experiencing serious psychological and physical health issues. This should not surprise anyone, considering that hundreds of millions of students have been captive audiences for Al Gore’s “documentary,” An Inconvenient Truth (with 11 blatant lies acc. to a british court) - with many of them being subjected to multiple classroom showings - and other similar fare.
However, many children turn their global-warming angst into activism, becoming little climate warriors who will work tirelessly to convert their peers, their parents, and local and national political leaders into supporters of “sustainable development.” And this, clearly, is what the proponents of “climate change education” intend. Climate change education, they say, must be “transformative” and turn young children and adolescents into “climate change agents.”
Below is a video showing how a brainwashed 12–year-old-girl delivered an alarmist speech in Rio in 1992 at Rothschild/maurice Strong´s global climate conference. Then she is being interviewed 20 years later – and is pretty frustrated because the “incapable leaders of the world do not want what is good for people” on climate.
That is the message being delivered by officials of UNICEF, UNESCO, and other UN agencies and NGOs at the UN Climate Conference currently underway (November 26-December 7) in Doha, Qatar.
Stephanie Hodge, education program specialist for UNICEF, was interviewed at Doha by Climate Change TV, a UN-funded television network dedicated exclusively to propaganda about the global warming and the supposed solutions to this “crisis” that can only be attained through UN-directed global action. According to Hodge, our current climate change education is “antiquated” and in dire need of renovation. We should be asking, she said, “What is global citizenship? Climate change education, says UNICEF’s Hodge, is “really about a process of change, about starting transformation through education.”
To help bring about this change and transformation, UNICEF, with help from its sister agency, UNESCO, has come up with a new curriculum guide, entitled, Climate Change and Transformation, Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction in the Education Sector: Resource Manual.
The UNICEF Resource Manual opens with this paragraph, which is sure to intensify any climatic stress already being felt by students: “I am the present and the future. A victim of climate change, I live in a region that is constantly affected by disasters. Hurricanes and floods are my reality.” — Walter, a 12-year-old boy from Belize.
On page 11 the UNICEF Manual Climate Change and Transformation, talks about “to help children become agents of change.” The term “agents of change” is used five times in the Manual. In addition, it twice refers to “adolescents as climate change agents,” and describes “the role of youth themselves as change agents in sustainable development. For quality education to be transformative, we need to see changes embedded in district, village and school development plans. “The scaling up and mainstreaming of climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction needs to be ensured throughout the education sector.”
The New York Times 3 Dec.: New York State voters overwhelmingly say they believe that Hurricane Sandy demonstrated the effects of climate change, according to a poll released Monday by Siena College. Comment: rather than global Sandy seems to be local man made geo-engineering
New American 4 December CFR´s top guru on climate change, Michale A Levi, must surely be aware that no evidence supports his contention that a government-forced reduction of emissions by the United States would have any impact whatsoever on global temperatures. However, the financial, social, and political costs would be horrendous. As critics point out, it is a prescription for “all pain and no gain” — except for the politically connected, who stand to gain immense wealth and power under the proposed UN global climate regime.
Levi ignores the steadily mounting evidence to promote the CFR’s ongoing globalist line. “International climate diplomacy provides the United States with opportunities to leverage domestic action for greater impact abroad,” says Levi. In a November 5 column, “Hurricane Sandy and Climate Change: Levi wrote Three Things to Know,” Levi hymned a predictable refrain. “Increased human emissions of greenhouse gases are leading to more risk of dangerous weather extreme.
“The fraudulent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports – whose chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, says climate “science” is politically commissioned work -are the ‘scientific’ source of claims for more severe and extreme weather,” observed Dr. Tim Ball, a climate scientist who has been one of the more prominent experts to challenge the UN’s dubious theories aside from former IPCC experts themselves. “In fact the incidence and severity of extreme weather — hurricanes, wind storms, tornadoes, heat waves, drought, floods, ice storms, etc. — have not generally increased recently and are well within long term natural variability.” “In Sandy’s aftermath,” says the CFR, we should work for “increasing global cooperation” on climate change.“ I.e. Exploit every possible tragedy and weather anomaly as an opportunity to establish, empower, and enrich the UN and related global institutions.
In a February 21, 2006 column entitled, “State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era,” CFR Pres. Richard Haas states: Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change. “All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalization,” Haass avers. According to Haass and the CFR, the only answer to this predicament is a progressive weakening of national sovereignty and a steady move to global government – or anarchy. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.”
“The goal,” says Haass “should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government – or anarchy.”
The Council’s many task forces, panels, and speaker programs have pumped the false alarms of melting polar caps and rising sea levels to influential opinion molders, policymakers, and legislators. On a global scale, the CFR influences an even wider audience of opinion molders, policymakers, and legislators through its Council of Councils. The Council of Councils is a formal association of 25 of the CFR’s “sister” organizations.
Following the UN secretary general’s comments bizarrely linking Hurricane Sandy to human-caused CO2 emissions, a coalition of more than 125 scientists and experts in the field published an open letter in the Financial Post urging him to come back to reality.
“Global warming that has not occurred cannot have caused the extreme weather of the past few years,” the concerned scientists explained, noting that aside from the now-obvious lack of warming over 16 years, the incidence and severity of extreme weather has not increased either.
Despite those facts, top UN officials continue to make blatantly false claims about climate, warning that if governments refuse to promptly force their populations to submit to the outlandish demands, certain disaster awaits. The tone is only getting more and more hysterical, too.
One sticker at the Doha-Conference is particularly scaring: 7 billion challenge – a covert hint to reduce the population of the Earth to the 500 mio. mentioned on the Georgia Guidestones – a goal for which the Rockefeller Foundation has long been working.
Behind this whole scam is the Agenda 21 and here and here sustainability world communism driving mankind together in megacities like battery hens in the name of sustainability – in reality to promote Rothschild´s wilderness program to rob us through his Global Environmental Facility and here and take these wildernesses with their natual riches as forfeited securities from states growing poorer and poorer as they have their money printed and lent to them by Rothschild´s national banks and private banks. This Agenda 21 is being built pyramidally from the bottom – all Danish municipalities having been commanded by the Parliament to have Local Agenda 21 plan s to be renewed all 4 years.
The Council of Councils is new to me. It seems to have been founded this year and comprises globalist institutions from all over the world. For their one world governance program the climate fraud is indispensable.
Open letter from 125 Scientists to Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General, Financial Post 3 Dec. 2012 Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations
On November 9 this year you told the General Assembly: “Extreme weather due to climate change is the new normal … Our challenge remains, clear and urgent: to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to strengthen adaptation to … even larger climate shocks … and to reach a legally binding climate agreement by 2015 … This should be one of the main lessons of Hurricane Sandy.”
On November 13 you said at Yale: “The science is clear; we should waste no more time on that debate.”
The following day, in Al Gore’s “Dirty Weather” Webcast, you spoke of “more severe storms, harsher droughts, greater floods”, concluding: “Two weeks ago, Hurricane Sandy struck the eastern seaboard of the United States. A nation saw the reality of climate change. The recovery will cost tens of billions of dollars. The cost of inaction will be even higher. We must reduce our dependence on carbon emissions.”
We the undersigned, qualified in climate-related matters, wish to state that current scientific knowledge does not substantiate your assertions.
The U.K. Met Office recently released data showing that there has been no statistically significant global warming for almost 16 years. During this period, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations rose by nearly 9% to now constitute 0.039% of the atmosphere. Global warming that has not occurred cannot have caused the extreme weather of the past few years. Whether, when and how atmospheric warming will resume is unknown. The science is unclear. Some scientists point out that near-term natural cooling, linked to variations in solar output, is also a distinct possibility.
The “even larger climate shocks” you have mentioned would be worse if the world cooled than if it warmed. Climate changes naturally all the time, sometimes dramatically. The hypothesis that our emissions of CO2 have caused, or will cause, dangerous warming is not supported by the evidence.
The incidence and severity of extreme weather has not increased. There is little evidence that dangerous weather-related events will occur more often in the future. The U.N.’s own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says in its Special Report on Extreme Weather (2012) that there is “an absence of an attributable climate change signal” in trends in extreme weather losses to date. The funds currently dedicated to trying to stop extreme weather should therefore be diverted to strengthening our infrastructure so as to be able to withstand these inevitable, natural events, and to helping communities rebuild after natural catastrophes such as tropical storm Sandy.
There is no sound reason for the costly, restrictive public policy decisions proposed at the U.N. climate conference in Qatar. Rigorous analysis of unbiased observational data does not support the projections of future global warming predicted by computer models now proven to exaggerate warming and its effects.
The NOAA “State of the Climate in 2008” report asserted that 15 years or more without any statistically-significant warming would indicate a discrepancy between observation and prediction. Sixteen years without warming have therefore now proven that the models are wrong by their creators’ own criterion.
Based upon these considerations, we ask that you desist from exploiting the misery of the families of those who lost their lives or properties in tropical storm Sandy by making unsupportable claims that human influences caused that storm. They did not. We also ask that you acknowledge that policy actions by the U.N., or by the signatory nations to the UNFCCC, that aim to reduce CO2 emissions are unlikely to exercise any significant influence on future climate. Climate policies therefore need to focus on preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climatic events however caused.
2 Responses to “ UN Climate Conference: Scare Wits out of Youths. Make Them Neurotic Transformative Climate Doomsday Agents. “Climate Change Process Is Complete Transformation of Structure of Economy and Mind” ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.