Freedom Goodbye II: EU´s Agency for Fundamental Rights Wants to Criminalise all Expressions of Displeasure with Immigrants as “Racist Hate Crimes”

Posted By Anders On December 4, 2012 @ 00:05 In English, Euromed | No Comments

Abstract: The EU supports a huge influx of unskilled and unintegrable Muslims into the EU - the purpose being declared to be undermining and destruction of the nation state and the teachings of Christ in order to complete their one-world government unhampered. In practice it means escalating immigrant violence and increasing poverty due to dismantling the welfare state, the money being spent on immigrants`and bombs intended for their home countries, as well as artificial respiration of the NWO-Euro. With the approval of the EU,  even EU-countries have contributed to creating these streams of refugees from Libya and Syria in NATO missions.

The European Union´s Agency for Fundamental Rights has been entrusted with the task of watch-dog to monitor the enforcement of the European Convention on the Human Rights (ECHR). These rights aim exclusively at minorities in Western societies - at the expense of the indigenous populations of Europe:
‘Under well-established ECHR case law, Article 14 of the ECHR is to be read as obliging EU Member States to render visible – or as the ECHR says to ‘unmask’ – bias motives leading to criminal offences by highlighting and punishing hate crimes more severely than others.

What is referred to as hate crime is intimately linked to Article 14 of the ECHR and to the corresponding concept of human dignity: “The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.”
Thus, the EU calls for morality to be replaced by “human dignity”, the contents of which appear to differ significantly from previous concepts of native Europeans of good and evil.

This is everyday life: E.g., Muslims call us non-Muslims apes and swine, because we are called so in the Qur’an (Sure 2:65, 5:60). Furthermore, fucking Danish whores, potato Danes, they harass non-Muslim children in schools and destroy education, cars etc. without consequences. But if the locals oppose it or protest – that is immediately called a hate crime and punished especially hard: up to 3 years in prison. Now, the Danish Institute for Human Rights is educating the police on Funen about “hate crimes”. Since these, according to the infamous paragraph 14, only refer to “crimes” against minorities, the Muslims can therefore unpunished´commit all “hate crimes” as much as they please.

Now, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights has published large studies with very few “hate crimes” against these minorities, who due to demography will constitute the majority in Denmark  in the last half of this century. Great, of course, is the disappointment of the Agency at these small numbers. It is believed that the “victims” have not reported the actual number of “hate crimes” - they do not trust the police (probably because they have so often been detained for severe crime of another kind), or even see the the occurrences as trifles.

Therefore, the Agency must issue a reminder to strengthen its dubious reason to exist: People throughout the EU are indeed the targets of abuse simply because of their (perceived and real) origins, beliefs, life choices or physical appearance. It is the duty of EU Member States to protect the fundamental rights of these persons. The EU and its Member States can combat hate crime and address the related fundamental rights violations by making them both more visible and holding perpetrators accountable. This entails encouraging victims and witnesses to report crimes and incidents, while increasing their confidence in the ability of the criminal justice system to deal with this type of criminality decisively and effectively.
The Agency wants to see unilateral racist / xenophobia-related motives in almost all conflicts between natives and immigrants. It wants a lot of money available so that the “victims” can make a lot more lawsuits against us. This is particularly “necessary” if the Muslim dominated UN Human Rights Council should succeed in enforcing any criticism of Islam as a human rights violation. The Agency aims to increase the penalties for racism - and is thus dissatisfied that the European Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia with 3 years imprisonment will only be used if the local “criminal” is at the same time calling for violence.Is it not racist in itself, thus indirectly expressing that homosexuals belong to another race? The Agency is also dissatisfied with the EU member states being too negligent to find and report much more “Hate crimes” – for they must be there!! That the reports could false, based on the Taquia is ignored by the Agency.
However, the Agency praises the governments, because many of them now extend the racist provisions on e.g. discrimination against homosexuals.

This madness is ethnic cleansing by immigration and the abolition of Europeans´ perception of good and evil in favor of an anti-Christian, Satanic code of morality – quite in accordance with [1] Adam Weishaupt´ Illuminati 6–point program.

This generates more hatred not only of unintegratable, ideological immigrants who want to conquer Europe for Allah, according to the plan of the Shariah of the Muslim Brotherhood and the commands of the Qur’an (Sura 2:218, 3:122, 3:195, 4: 100, 9:20, 33:27) - and the indigenous peoples, because we turn our backs on them to protect ourselves, whereby they feel that they are unwanted.
This also increases the gap between the people and “their” corrupt minion “politicians” and the media who have robbed us of freedom and oppress us.

*

Crosses and halos on a Slovak commemorative coin are contrary to the principle of religious neutrality and must therefore be removed said the EU Commission, who must approve the Slovak coin, with reference to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which guarantees religious diversity and neutrality in the EU. And of course they were removed! ([2] Kristeligt Dagblad 29 Nov. 2012).

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness!” Isaiah 5:20

*

I have often mentioned the [3] reasons and [4] here and [5] here for a predominantly [6] Muslim mass [7] immigration into the EU – accelerated by the [8] US/NATO inspired Arab Spring” and the [9] Euromediterranean Process: The NWO wants to crush Christianity and nation states acc. to [1] Illuminatus Adam Weishaupt´s commandments. This mass immigration could not have taken place without authorities intimidating and [10] brainwashing their peoples into inactivity or even accept with incredibly brazen hypocricy and mendacity. The consequence is rapidly increasing violence and lawlessness in Western societies. The worst EU country as for unlimited NWO immgration is Sweden, which is now reaping the reward for its multiculturality: Acc. to [11] “Sydsvenskan” 29 Nov. 2012, Sweden is one of the 10 most dangerous countries in Europe. But Denmark is eagerly imitating.

[12] Balder Blog 26 Nov. 2011: “The Danish Instititute for Human Rights is now training police in “hate crimes”. One might rejoice at it, considering all the hate crimes native Danes are exposed to on a daily basis by immigrants, whose culture teaches them that we are apes and pigs (Koran sure 2:25, 5:60).
Comment:
Indeed, it is Allah’s good pleasure to cheat and kill us infidels (Koran Sure 9:1-5 among many others).

[13] Danmarks-demografiAfter 2050 native Danes will become a minority group in Denmark for demographic reasons. However, then the Fundamental Human Rights (see below) will only apply to majority groups. For we are doomed by the NWO.

Here is a selection of blatant hate crimes on Balder’s blog – but they are never punished, because native Danes are now outlawed in the New World order by its Fundamental Human Rights, the advocate of which, the EU´s Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA),  only see minority groups as humans:

* 70 furious immigrants breaking into a hospital, and embarking on a manhunt. * Foreign university students fleeing the Vollsmose ghetto because of sex harassment, burglaries and threats. * Muslim associations are trying to keep Christmas trees away from ‘their’ territory. * White Danes who can afford it move their children to private schools (even the ministers!) because they no longer want to see their children being harassed by immigrant boys, restive hours and a declining educational level. * The head of Lykkeskolen, Birgitte Sonsby, happens to set her finger on the sore spot, and finds who is causing constant trouble at her school, ‘I’m so fucking tired of you Muslims destroying education’, she said.  Parents and teachers at the same school now propose ethnically segregated classes.* Danes in virtually all immigrant-ridden areas are routinely subjected to racist and sexist insults: Danish whore, potato Dane, fucking Dane, Dane pigs. Especially women and even the very youngest girls  are exposed to perverse heckling. * The police are also frequently being verbally bythrown mud at by immigrant youths.
TV stations´ cars are smashed, and the Danes in the process of collecting signatures are subjected to taunts and threats. Quite a few cases have even been captured on video. * That in almost 100% of cases it is Muslim thugs who harass homosexuals is also well-known.”

Whom can this wonder: In the NWO/EU, “Fundamental Human Rights” have substituted good and evil, terms which have thereby lost any meaning. [14] The Independent 28 Nov. 2012: In a last ditch attempt to have his whole life tariff declared “inhuman and degrading”, Jeremy Bamber’s case came before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights – the continent’s highest court – along with those of two other murderers. Bamber, 51, one of the UK’s most notorious killers since he murdered his parents, sister and her two little boys back in 1985, is arguing that it breaches his human rights not to have any hope of release.

[15] FRA[16] EUbusiness 27 Nov. 2012Half of EU countries are failing to tackle hate crime, thereby violating European conventions, by not keeping track of offences linked to race, religion or gender, a report said on Tuesday. Thirteen out of the bloc’s 27 member states could provide only “limited data” on hate crimes, said a study by EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA). These countries included Spain, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Hungary and Bulgaria, among others. In Romania, evidence of data collection on hate crimes was missing altogether, the report said.
Only four countries — Britain, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands — had comprehensive data, consistently recording attacks on individuals due to their gender, sexual orientation, disability, religion or race, and published this information.

“If the criminal justice system overlooks the bias motivation behind a crime, then this amounts to a violation… of the European Convention of Human Rights,” it went on, noting that hate crime was “a daily reality throughout the European Union.”

[17] FRA Discrimination and intolerance persist in the European Union despite the best efforts of Member States to root them out, research by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shows. Verbal abuse, physical attacks and murders motivated by prejudice target EU society in all its diversity, from visible minorities to those with disabilities. This FRA report is designed to help the EU and its Member States to tackle these fundamental rights violations both by making them more visible and bringing perpetrators to account.

[18] FRA-victimisation

[19] FRA MIDIS Focus 06 (right)

The survey asked respondents a series of questions about their experiences of criminal victimisation in relation to the following five crime types: * theft of or from a vehicle;  *  burglary or attempted burglary;  * theft of personal property not involving force or threat;   * assault or threat;  *  serious harassment.

Comment: What about investigating the frequency of these crimes being committed by this sea of foreign immigrants against their hosts?  Another question: How honest are the answers from such immigrants who have grown up with the Taqija – Islam´s “legal” lie? The following Table shows who the stated criminals are:

[20] FRA-perpetrators

[21] FRA Report: Making Hate Crimes Visisble in the EU 2012

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Article 14: “The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.”

‘Under well-established ECtHR case law, Article 14 of the ECHR is to be read as obliging EU Member States to render visible – or as the ECtHR says to ‘unmask’ – bias motives leading to criminal offences by highlighting and punishing hate crimes more severely than others, as the following analysis shows.
What is referred to as hate crime is intimately linked to Article 14 of the ECHR and to the corresponding concept of human dignity. [22] FRA-Table_1

As for table 1 (right): Due to victims not reporting, official data collection mechanisms often tend to under-record the incidence of hate crime, which can translate into low numbers of prosecutions, thereby limiting opportunities for victims of hate crime to seek redress and to experience that justice is done.

“When investigating violent incidents […] State authorities have the additional duty to take all reasonable steps to unmask any racist motive and to establish whether or not ethnic hatred or prejudice may have played a role in the events. A failure to make a distinction in the way in which situations that are essentially different are handled may constitute unjustified treatment irreconcilable with Article 14 of the Convention.”17

Despite the best efforts and commitments of Member States of the European Union (EU) to counter discrimination and intolerance, including manifestations of hate crime, in the last few years, we have witnessed continued and renewed violations of the fundamental rights of people living within the EU – not least of all their right to human dignity – through verbal abuse, physical attacks or murders motivated by prejudice.
While (violent) expressions of prejudice are often thought to emanate from people with extremist sympathies, there is ample evidence to suggest that those who commit such offences are drawn from across society.

[23] FRA-Tabel2People throughout the EU are indeed the targets of abuse simply because of their (perceived and real) origins, beliefs, life choices or physical appearance. It is the duty of EU Member States to protect the fundamental rights of these persons. The EU and its Member States can combat hate crime and address the related fundamental rights violations by making them both more visible and holding perpetrators accountable. This entails encouraging victims and witnesses to report crimes and incidents, while increasing their confidence in the ability of the criminal justice system to deal with this type of criminality decisively and effectively.

As the right to non-discrimination under Article 14 of the ECHR ties in with the right to an effective remedy under Article 13 of the ECHR, victims of hate crime should have remedies available to them to enable them to assert their rights under Article 14 of the ECHR. This would apply in any case where victims believe that the public prosecutor or the criminal court did not sufficiently address the violation of this right. Legislators should look into models where enhanced penalties for hate crimes are introduced to stress the added severity of these offencesCourts rendering judgments should address bias motivations publicly, making it clear that these lead to harsher sentences. The discussion will draw on case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Why do bias motives matter particularly? The answer to these questions lies in the fact that C’s behaviour expresses disdain not for D alone but also for all other persons C would label as ‘gay’.

The [24] Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia, in Article 1 (a), requires EU Member States to take measures to punish public incitement to violence or hatred directed against
a person or persons belonging to a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin and the commission of such acts by public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material. It also requires EU Member States to take measures to punish any conduct publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, when the conduct is carried out in a manner likely to incite to violence or hatred against a person or persons belonging to one of the groups listed in Article 1 (a).

While this Framework Decision is restricted to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin, many EU Member States have opted to include other
grounds such as antisemitism, sexual orientation or disability in criminal definitions protecting against discrimination. The readiness of legislators in EU Member States to extend definitions of hate crimes to a wide range of categories is a clear trend observable in Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania and Spain. Other EU Member States, like Denmark, Hungary, Sweden and the United Kingdom have included at least sexual orientation as an additional category of discrimination.
Comment: This is the ultimate break-down of inherited concepts of right and wrong in a given society and excludes, of course, the teachings of Christ and any form of freedom. This is dictatorship of opinion, it is dictatorial standardisation. Defamation has always been a matter for national justice and should remain so regardless of NWO minions´ paragraph 14 with political intentions. Therefore, the crosses and the glorioles on the Slovakian coin are unwanted by the Luciferian NWO-EU.

if the bias motivation of a crime means the victim was insulted and his or her dignity violated then it is not sufficient to punish the offender more harshly
after the fact. A state must instead provide for criminal law provisions that deter hate crimes and protect an individual’s human dignity.

Article 1 (2) of the Framework Decision allows EU Member States to limit legal protection to conduct (that is, behaviour) “carried out in a manner likely to disturb public order”. From a fundamental rights perspective, it is debatable whether the legal protection of a person targeted in [25] FRA-Tabel4public by
incitement to violence should depend on whether or not this conduct disturbs public order(Austria and Germany).  States must be concerned with any obstacles impeding the practical implementation of victims’ rights.

Immigrants – who represented 15 % of the respondents to the survey – were found to be the most likely to have been the victims of hate crime, with a 10 % victimisation rate against 2 % among non-immigrants.
No differences were found between the victimisation rate of respondents who claimed to practice a religion and that of those who claimed not to.
Immigrants in Belgium, Greece, Spain and Denmark perceive to be victimised by hate crimes most often. The two most commonly cited reasons for not reporting crimes were a lack of confidence in the police being able to do anything about them and the perception that incidents were too trivial to be worth reporting.

[26] Specifically, the EU-MIDIS Data in Focus 6 report on ‘Minorities as victims of crime’ shows that: “On average, 18 % of all Roma and 18 % of all Sub-Saharan African respondents […] indicated that they had experienced at least one ‘in-person crime’ in the last 12 months (that is – assault or threat, or serious harassment) that they considered as being ‘racially motivated’ in some way.” The groups with the highest perceived rates of racially motivated in-person criminal victimisation were the Roma in the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia; Somalis in Finland and Denmark; and Africans in Ireland, Italy and Malta. The overall non-reporting rates for assault or threat ranged from 57 % for ex-Yugoslav respondents to 74 % for Turkish ones, while those for serious harassment ranged from 75 % for ex-Yugoslav respondents to 90 % for Turkish ones (Table 7). FRA-Tabel7

Comment
The morals of the NWO is to punish native European peoples by means  of the [24] European Framwork Decision on Racism and Xenophobia – by up to 3 years in prison – for being discontent with what the NWO minions find is right: Ethnic cleansing through immigration, abolishment of Europeans countries, religion and perception of good and evil in favour of an Antichristian, Satanic codex of anti-morals. This will only beget hatred against not only unintegrable, ideologic immigrants who want to conquer Europe for Allah  acc. to the [27] plan of the Muslim Brotherhood and[28] here and the commands of the Koran (Sure 2:218, 3:122, 3:195, 4:100, 9:20, 33:27).
No, it will also deepen dthe gap between the peoples and “their” corrupt acolyte “politicians” and media. Of course, this creates parallel societies and more hatred on the side of the immigrants seeing that they are not needed or wanted.  This is calculated diabolical NWO policy: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Latin America for Latin Ameicans – intrusion is evil. But Europe for all except Europeans – to protest that is evil. And we do not protest. We have sold our souls to the  [29] Luciferians of the NWO because they bribed us with a welfare state.  However, the reaction of peoples to the unilateral everyday violence on our streets and the destruction of our public schools is white isolation – turning our backs on immigrants towards what we always backed ourselves on: our culture, religion, morals and national identity.

[22]


Article printed from Euro-med: http://euro-med.dk

URL to article: http://euro-med.dk/?p=28832

URLs in this post:
[1] Adam Weishaupt´ Illuminati 6–point program: http://euro-med.dk/?p=13834
[2] Kristeligt Dagblad 29 Nov. 2012: http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/artikel/488642:Kirke---tro--EU-fjerner-kors-fra-slovakisk-moent
[3] reasons: http://euro-med.dk/?p=11359
[4] here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395
[5] here: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-417_en.htm?locale=en
[6] Muslim: http://euro-med.dk/?p=22190
[7] immigration: http://euro-med.dk/?p=28657
[8] US/NATO inspired Arab Spring”: http://euro-med.dk/?p=26382
[9] Euromediterranean Process: http://euro-med.dk/?p=9049
[10] brainwashing: http://euro-med.dk/?p=27003
[11] “Sydsvenskan” 29 Nov. 2012: http://www.sydsvenskan.se/sverige/sapochefen-hotbilden-ar-forhojd/
[12] Balder Blog 26 Nov. 2011: http://blog.balder.org/?p=1494
[13] Image: http://danmark.wordpress.com/fremskrivning-af-antallet-af-fremmede-i-danmark-i-aar-2020/
[14] The Independent 28 Nov. 2012: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/britains-policy-of-locking-up-violent-criminals-indefinit
ely-crushes-human-dignity-say-lawyers-for-jeremy-bamber-8364434.html

[15] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra.png
[16] EUbusiness 27 Nov. 2012: http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/crime-hate.l11/
[17] FRA: http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/crime/hate-crime-12
[18] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-victimisation.png
[19] FRA MIDIS Focus 06: http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2012-eu-midis-dif6_0.pdf
[20] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-perpetrators.png
[21] FRA Report: Making Hate Crimes Visisble in the EU 2012: http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2012_hate-crime.pdf
[22] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-table-1.png
[23] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-tabel2.png
[24] Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia: http://euro-med.dk/EU-Documents/Framework-Decision-On-Racism-And-Xenophobia-93739.pdf
[25] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-tabel4.png
[26] Image: http://euro-med.dk/bil/fra-tabel7.png
[27] plan of the Muslim Brotherhood: http://euro-med.dk/?p=26709
[28] here : http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=4475
[29] Luciferians of the NWO: http://euro-med.dk/?p=24581