Abstract: “Socialist” Danish Prime Minister, former rotating EU president, Bilderberger and co-founder of George Soros’ European Council on Foreign Relations, has a husband, Stephen Kinnock, son of former EU Commissioner and Chairman of the Labour Party, Neil Kinnock, and MEP and European Affairs Glenys Kinnock. Stephen lived in Switzerland and worked for the NWO capitalist / corporate WEF (Davos), but stays a long in Denmark and works from here. Under the existing rules, he was taxable in Denmark - but paid no taxes there. Great scandal in the newspapers! But TAX Copenhagen made the case legal: secretly changed - probably after political pressure - the previous 18-year-old rule in the middle of the proceedings, which had made Kinnock taxable in Denmark – whereupon he was not taxable. Then, ´the boss of TAX Copenhagen and his assistant, were profitably promoted, according to former Minister Karen Jespersen.

That the EU is suffering badly from corruption is well known.

Danish MEP Morten Messerschmidt does not have much good to report on the EU system: wasting money on the altar of vanity, reflected by the fact that both the EU Parliament and the EU Commission maintain separate information centers in the member states and the United States (apart from the fact that the EU are building an embassy system in addition to the national embassies throughout the world). Sometimes Parliament and Commission offices  exist under the same roof.

The EU has at least 52 agencies, departments, directorates and think tanks - let’s call them growths - which currently cost about 20 billion Danish Kroner a year. The vast majority are unnecessary, and were they closed  only employees would notice that they were gone.

Take for example the EIGE, the European Institute for Gender Equality. EIGE costs taxpayers almost 58 million this year. But the EU is paying in advance to other instances with the same task: The EU Commission’s Advisory Board on Gender Equality, which comprises 68 members.The EU parliament has its Equality FEMM, which comprises 74 MEPs. The EU pays in advance for the European Women’s Lobby, which is a platform of countless women’s and gender associations. And additionally, all nationally funded organizations.

But what is being given to taxpayers for the 58 million DKr a year for the Foundation of EIGE? Numerous reports like “Gender, Equality and Climate Change” in the EU. Some excerpts from the “Gender Dimension of Climate Changes “:
“The gender dimension of climate change  has not yet occupied much space in the debate in the EU and other industrialized countries, but it is an important issue that should be examined, as the socially constructed roles and identities as well as the underlying distribution of power affects the way women and men contribute to, experience and respond to climate change.”
“One of the differences is that more women than men are affected by extreme weather events.” “The level of care and care work could increase as a result of climate change health effects or due to natural disasters, and thus put additional pressure on those with primary responsibility for this work.”. ” The few quantitative data available suggest that women emit fewer greenhouse gases than men.”. “There is a tendency for women to travel in a more sustainable way than men. “.” Women are more dependent on public transport, because fewer of them have cars”.
“Women usually spend more time indoors … and are more dependent on heating.” “Women are better advocates than men for political intervention to reduce private car driving.”

The report strongly suggests that women are aware of climate change, men almost indifferent to it, and therefore, more women are to have political influence before we perish. But if you take a look at the answers to questions by the two sexes, the differences are minimal! However, the EIGE  succeeds to extend all this hogwash to 28 pages.
The report strongly suggests that women are aware of climate change, men almost indifferent, therefore, more women have political influence before we perish. Assuming, however, in and sees the two sexes answers to questions, the differences are minimal! But all this hogwash succeed EIGE to stretch out to 28 pages. In addition funds are given for criticism of discrimination due to unilateral roles given to aging actresses and a report on no Muslim problems in the magnificent Tower of Babel, Malmö, where 130 languages are spoken ??and 40% have an immigrant background. The Rosengaard riots and violence are due simply to young people being  bored! (Why do you think they are not engaged and working like us?)

All parts of the EU see these outgrowths, overlapping, useless. But they are never cropped, quite the contrary. The 52 EU outgrowths currently cost around 20 billion dollars a year. This is an increase of 33 percent since 2010! Useless and unread reports will continue to flow in a current, while taxpayers have to tighten their belts.

Furthermore, Messerschmidt writes: 5.4 million Danish Kroner from the EU’s structural funds were spent on an Elton John concert. On 29 Sept.  Messerschmidt wrote on Catherine Ashton, that the EU’s inept High Representative / Foreign Secretary is hopelessly confused, incompetent, generally despised and infinitely expensive: Ashton gets 2,912,000 Danish Kroner  a year including supplements. When one day she leaves the EU, after 5 years as Foreign Minister and 1 year as Trade Minister, she will receive 585,000 Danish Kroner a year in retirement. And the day she packs, she will get 4,144,000 Danish Kroner at once for moving expenses and a golden handshake. She is the world’s highest paid female bureaucrat.

Still, no one ever, anywhere, elected Catherine Ashton for anything. She was treasurer of the Anti-Nuclear Movement, which had the Soviet Union’s attention, may also economically. Suddenly in 1999 she was lifted from anonymity by Tony Blair and made Baroness. Etc.

*

Documentation of Abstract

That the EU system is widely corrrupt has been repeatedly described and here and here and here and here and here and here on this blog.

Thorning-kinnock

At present, more and more questions arise about Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt’s husband´s , Stephen Kinnock’s, taxation, which a future prime minister could be expected to have known about.  Wikipedia: Stephen Kinnock is the son of the previous EU commissioner  and chairman of the Labour Party, Neil Kinnock, and the previous MEP and Europe Minister, Glenys Kinnock. The question has been raised whether Kinnock’s life interest is in Switzerland, where he lives, or in Denmark, where he is staying for long periods. But the latest is: Changes were suddenly made of the tax rules in his case. The BT 21. Okt. 2012 writes: Acc. to the previous rules adopted by both the National Tax Tribunal and the Tax Council,  Kinnock had to pay tax in Denmark, which has not happened. It would have been shown in the Tax Administration´s decision, had not the 18 year old judicial practice been undermined in the middle of the proceedings by a group of officials who suddenly called many years of practice ‘a mistake’. Was Tax under political pressure during the proceedings?

Ex-minister Karen Jespersen and ex-prime minister spindoctor, Ralf Pittelkow: The new interpretation  did not only apply to Kinnock but to any one in a corresponding situation, including people declared taxable acc. to the old rule. Their cases should perhaps be re-tried.
But they were not informed. Nothing was published about the revised interpretation. There was nothing in the new guide about a change. The taxation chief of Copenhagen did not even orient the Department Chief of the Ministry. He has now been promoted to a key post in the new taxation structure and so was his right hand helper. This tax boss is the regional leader who achieves the greatest promotion.

Helle Thorning-Schmidt was rotating EU president in the first half of 2012, a Bilderberger and here - thus being in the unelected cabal that controls the western governments (to manage a multinational organization you hire the best? people). Besides, she is a co-founder with the Rothschild-agent, George Soros of the  ‘European Council on Foreign Relations, an offshoot of the corresponding “invisible government” of the United States. In addition, she is a former MEP.

As of 19 October 2012, the Danish member of the European Parliament, Morten Messerschmidt, has  written 46 articles over as many days in Jyllands-Posten on the corruption of the EU-system. Below is a small selection:

Euposter-hammer-seglMEP Morten Messerschmidt, Jyllands-Posten 19 Okt. 2012: The EU has at least 52 agencies, Institutes, directorates and think tanks - let’s call them outgrowths - which currently cost about 20 billion Danish Kroner (DKr) a year. The vast majority are unnecessary, and were they were closed, only employees would  notice that they were gone.

Take, for example, the EIGE, the European Institute for Gender Equality. The EIGE costs taxpayers almost 58 million DKr this year. But I must point out that the EU already has and pays for other services with the same task: The EU Commission’s Advisory Board on Gender Equality, which comprises 68 members. The EU parliament has its Equality FEMM, which comprises 74 MEPs. The EU already is paying for the European Women’s Lobby, which is a platform of countless women’s and gender associations. And additionally, all the nationally funded organizations.

Left: This EU poster shows Adam Weishaupt´s and the Club of Rome´s - whose honorary member Mikhail Gorbachev is - and Council on Foreign Relations’ multicultural NWO. Note the hammer and sickle at the top of this photo - the symbol of one of the cruelest dictatorships the world has witnessed, the Soviet Union. Rightly, the Soviet dissident Wladimir Bokowsky called the EU the EUSSR.

But what is being given to taxpayers for the 58 million EU DKr a year for the Foundation of EIGE? Reports. Numerous reports like “Gender, Equality and Climate Change“. The report deals with women and climate change here in the EU. Some excerpts from the “Gender Dimension of Climate Changes “:
“The gender dimension of climate change  has not yet occupied much space in the debate in the EU and other industrialized countries, but it is an important issue that should be examined, as the socially constructed roles and identities as well as the underlying distribution of power affects the way women and men contribute to, experience and respond to climate change.”
“One of the differences is that more women than men are affected by extreme weather events.” “The level of care and care work could increase as a result of climate change health effects or due to natural disasters, and thus put additional pressure on those with primary responsibility for this work.”. ” The few quantitative data available suggest that women emit fewer greenhouse gases than men.”. “There is a tendency for women to travel in a more sustainable way than men. “.” Women are more dependent on public transport, because fewer of them have cars”.
“Women usually spend more time indoors … and are more dependent on heating.” “Women are better advocates than men for political intervention to reduce private car driving.”

The report strongly suggests that women are aware of climate change, men almost indifferent to it, and therefore, more women are to have political influence before we perish. But if you take a look at the answers to questions by the two sexes, the differences are minimal! However, the EIGE  succeeds to extend all this hogwash to 28 pages.

A 64-page report, which resulted in the following appeared on Discrimination against older actresses and the stereotypical roles they are placed in. Here the EU spent 1.1 million DKr, donated to the International Actors Association (FIA), which held five seminars and a conference:
“It was decided to look at the discrimination issue from the older female characters’ perspective, their career opportunities being limited by their gender and age. Acc. to the EU Commission, this can mean giving rise to discrimination and should be addressed at European level. The actors’ unions have a key role in combating gender stereotypes through close cooperation with all the media and entertainment industries. It should result in a realistic portrayal of women’s abilities and potentials in a modern society and avoid further presentations of women in a demeaning and insulting manner.”

In all parts of the EU, these outgrowths are seen, overlapping each other, and being of no benefit. But they are never cropped, quite the contrary. The 52 EU outgrowths currently cost around 20 billion dollars a year. This is an increase of 33 percent since 2010! EU elitists will go on lifting the most banal subjects up to pan-European dimensions. And those who get their livelihood, their travels, subsistences, conferences, hotel stays, times off and overtimes paid via the outgrowths will continue to look for new areas they can spread over so the show can continue. Useless and unread reports will continue to flow in a current, while taxpayers have to tighten their belts.

MEP Morten Messerschmidt, Jyllands-Posten 16th October, 2012: The EUROFOUND stands for the “European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions”. The Eurofound areas are overlapped by 3-4 other EU outgrowths, and uses its 152 million DKr a year to poke its nose into everything. So the EUROFOUND has spent an unknown number of millions on having a number of reports  written  on the integration of immigrants in European capitals and major cities.
One of the reports is called “Intercultural policies and intergroup relations” and is a so-called case study of the integration of immigrants in Malmö.

European Union Tower of BabelThe authors describe enthusiastically how Malmö today is a true Tower of Babel with 174 nationalities and 130 languages, and that almost 40 percent of the city’s nearly 300,000 residents have an immigrant background. The Swedish version of information freedom does not allow to enumerate ethnic and religious affiliations, but the most common boy’s name in Malmö since 2004 is “Muhammed”. And rumor has it that precisely at Rosengaarden in Malmö, which is the goal of the scientific report, quite a few New-Swedes with Islamic fundamental attitude are living. In any case, 85 percent here have an immigrant background.
It was also at Rosengaarden that there were several days of rioting and street fighting with burning cars and institutions like in the French suburbs, when a mosque was closed. The report calls it “social unrest”.

Malmö is also known for the city’s approximately 1500 Jews having experienced very difficult times over the past decade. They are being harassed on the street, spat upon, and there have been a few petrol bomb attacks on their synagogue. About this, the report writes: “It is believed that the unrest in Gaza in 2008 led to inter-religious conflict in the streets and in the classrooms.”. “There is anecdotal evidence - though not confirmed - of tensions between Jews and Muslims, and there are concerns about the potential growth of a right-wing anti-immigration movement.”  Spokespersons from the Islamic Society in Malmö say in the report that no religious people were involved, but that socio-economic conditions were to blame. The Integration Centre of Malmö believes that the “incidents were caused by young people who are bored” and not due to Muslim hatred of Jews.
However, Malmö’s Social Democratic mayor, Reepallus, has said that Sweden’s Jews “… could even be said to be the reason for the attacks themselves because they do not clearly distance themselves from Israel,” and believes that Malmö’s Jews “… are under the leadership of the party called the “Sweden Democrats” (who protest against the mass immigration) – but you can not read that in the the report.Louise Weiss Building

In return, Malmö´s Muslims even have hurt feelings, which the report (or I) do not hesitate to pass on: Muslims are “exposed to inappropriate language and cultural carelessness from individual police officers. It occurred especially during the riots at Rosengaarden in December of 2008. This behavior was associated with police officers from other cities (a parallel to our infamous Jutlandish truncheon swimgers?), but also members of the Malmö police behaved inappropriately. After Swedish TV revealed inappropriate police behavior, tensions increased.”

Acc. to the report, Malmö is thought to have no particular problems with  Islamic extremists nor with honor killings, and blood feuds are dismissed as a Muslim phenomenon, although the report refers to more Muslim than non-Muslim women falling from their balconies in public housing.

Comment: Jyllands-Posten 15 Okt. 2012: During the first nine months of this year, 29,713 persons applied for asylum in Sweden, and this is an increase of 48 % as compared to the same period last year. At the same time, the flow of refugees shows no evidence to subside, so the Swedish immigration authorities notify. In Denmark, most asylum seekers currently come from Somalia, Syria and Afghanistan. Up to August of this year, 3,731 people had applied for asylum in Denmark. (However, those who have been granted asylum in Sweden can smoothly settle in Denmark due to the Schengen Agreement).

Ex-minister Karen Jespersen and former prime minister spindoktor Ralf Pittelkow on 19 Okt. 2012: The Police Intelligence is transferring an annual 10 billion DKr from Denmark to non-Western countries. In four years, DKr 1.4 billion were transferred to Somalia alone.
A few days ago, it was revealed that a large group of Danish-Somalis had for years cheated massively with taxes. Of a sample of 269, an astounding 248 had deductions of 12.5 million dollars, to which they were not entitled.
In fact, the authorities do not know much about where the money goes. Terrorist financing is one of the most difficult transactions to prove, says terrorism researcher Søren Hove.
NATO / EU-backed rebellion in Syria, Afghanistan and Libya chases refugees to the EU’s best welfare systems - which is carefully planned and here and here.

Morten Messerschmidt, Jyllands-Posten 14 Oct. 2012The EU has pumped more than 15 billion DKr into the robber State of Kosovo since 1999. Last year alone 50 million - despite the fact that the EU has lost hundreds of millions of dollars through fraud and theft to predatory clans who sit on the power. Most of the money has vanished without a trace, including the UN mazes, and the EU’s auditors have gradually given up.

Until 2008, the  EU funds for Kosovo were administered by the UN mission in the country, the UNMIK, which would control the construction of the public sector through the “Kosovo Trust Agency”. It was a bad idea, the local Albanian UN staff stole like magpies, one as much as 32 million dollars.
In 2002, EU auditors warned against massive fraud among UN staff and Kosovo’s new Albanian rulers, as well as among the KPMG consultants in 2005. In 2006, the Albanian authorities´ own audit could not account for all the money. Since the employed “consultants” were employed by the United Nations they could not be prosecuted in the European Union - although it was EU money they had stolen.
A UN study in which the EU anti-fraud corps, OLAF, participated, examined 50 cases and found thefts in 12. Of those, 11 were left to the UN in Kosovo to take care of – and one case to the OLAF.
Members of the EU Parliament have tried to stick to the case. But the UN has refused to cooperate. To be fair - in the UN, they have a more relaxed attitude toward “other people’s money” than the EU.

Eu-commission-office-scotlandEu-parliament-office-in-scotlandMEP Morten Messerschmidt, Jyllands-Posten 12 Oct. 2012: The European Commission has information offices in all 27 Member States. But - so has the EU Parliament, too. EU Parliament expenses for its 34 independent centers in the EU amount to approximately 350 million (a year).

Left: The EU Parliament´s office in Scotland. Right: The EU Commission´s office in Scotland.

The dual EU representation is not about workload or efficiency but about vanity and self-esteem - and you pay. In the EU parliament,  the political blocs working for the United States of Europe dominate (from socialists to liberals and so-called conservatives). EU citizens’ indifference and contempt rankle the minds of parliamentarians on a daily basis (except me). They feel themselves to be underestimated and are always jealous of the much more powerful and self-assured officials of the European Commission. Therefore, the EU Parliament has its very own information centres with its own staff, although in some places, like in London and Copenhagen, they are living under the same roof as the European Commission’s representation.

Indeed, in some EU countries - Spain, Germany, France, Italy and the UK - the EU Parliament runs two information offices. The most expensive of them is in the UK (41 million DKr) and France (25 million DKr).

Although the European Parliament has its official seat at Strasbourg (This unnecessary traveling circus costs EU citizens at least 1.5 billion dollars a year), the EU Parliament has, in fact, also got an information center  in Strasbourg, costing 10.5 million DKr a year - in addition to the information office in Brussels, where most activities take place (9 million DKr a year).

And the United States should not forget that in Europe, there is a very, very important parliament – so the EU Parliament also has its own representation there. Not because it makes sense, but because it gives a sense of importance. But this is a feeling you pay for.

Catherine-ashtonMorten Messerschmidt 19. okt. 2012:  5.4 million DKr from the EU’s structural fund were spent on an Elton John concert. On 29 Sept.,  Messerschmidt  wrote about Catherine Ashton (right posing as a saint - as so many other EU bosses), the EU’s inept High Representative / foreign minister, who is muddled, incompetent and generally despised and infinitely expensive: Ashton receives 2,912,000 DKr a year including bonus. When one day she leaves the EU, after 5 years as a foreign minister and 1 year as a Trade Minister, she will receive 585,000 dollars a year in retirement. And the day she packs, she will get 4,144,000 kroner for moving expenses and a golden handshake. She is the world’s highest paid female bureaucrat.

Still, no one ever, anywhere, elected Catherine Ashton for anything. She was treasurer of the Anti-Nuclear Movement, which had the Soviet Union’s attention, may also economically. Suddenly, in 1999 she was lifted from anonymity by Tony Blair and made Baroness. Etc.

Comment
World communism with its bureaucracy is being promoted at our expense by the New World Order´s EU. But what does it all mean? Northern Europeans still have  a high standard of living - and nothing else matters to them. In southern Europe, things are quite different - and Northern Europeans can not understand that  some day such times will reach them, too, because they have to participate in “solidarity compensations” to simply pay the southern European countries’ debt interest to Rothschild’s central banks and big banks which created the banking crises and the common currency. Whether you call the system democratic or dictatorial, and the nation state and our Christian culture survive or not: it is insignificant - we have sold these values long ago for the welfare state. But how about the situation when it is gone, too?