gSummary: Although America’s “invisible government”, the Council on Foreign Relations in 2009 declared Al Qaida almost a ghost, who after 9/11 (inside jobb) 2001 has not organized a single act of terror throughout the world the U.S. continues to pump up the ghost - and to the extent that it is now seen more dangerous than when bin Laden lived. Indeed, so great the danger from Al Qaida, which the CIA created and finances through the Pakistani Intelligence Service and their Taliban friends, said to be that U.S. Congress will now transfer its right to declare war to the president. Thus, Congress will give him absolute power to declare war against people or countries he dislikes or which support “terrorists”, particularly “rogue states” that will not submit to U.S. corporate New World Order’s one-world government. Indeed, time is overdue for that – for in the Libyan war, Pres. Obama had already unconstitutionally taken this liberty!

This is part of an ongoing WWIII which is in the process of installing NWO-puppets everywhere, Russia and China being the ultimate aim of the “Grand Chessboard” plan of Obama´s mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Congress initiative removes any obstacle to a future insane president and calls for a new Hitler. This legislation takes place in deep secret, because the elite controls the mass media. Now, to ensure that the alternative media should not inform too much about it and the consequences thereof, Congress is about to legislate about banning and blocking critical Web sites via the pretext of copyright infringement via e.g. Google censorship, a phenomenon which this blog had a foretaste of in March 2011 after a harmless hacking.

However,  the situation is becoming urgent: At the behest of the U.S. 9/11 Commission, a court filing has beeen submitted against Iran for having planned  9/11and trained Al Qaeda for it! Attacks on Iran and its allies seem to be in the making.

Now the Fox News, reveals that the Al Qaida leader, Al-Awlaki, the mastermind behind the Fort Hood-shooting and the Christmas bomber in 2009 - and with close ties to 3 of the alleged 9/11 hijackers dined at the Pentagon with the FBI on 5 Febr. 2002. So, cliquishness between Al Qaida and the Pentagon/FBI does exist - even though the FBI claimed years later to have read in the Washington Post that Awlaki is a bad boy and perhaps a good liar!! But fortunately, the CIA is cleverer and can produce a long row of Al-Qaida terror tales being foiled by intelligent detectives - who must keep their jobs, of course!!

*

Obama-war-is-peace“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Mark 8:36).

*

Things are getting very serious now:  The Sydney Morning Herald 21 May 2011:  2 defectors from Iran´s Intelligence service have testified, that Iran knew about and Iranian officials and ministries were involved in 9/11 acc. to a US court filing - maintaining that Iran and Hezbollah helped al-Qaeda with planning the attacks and with the hijackers’ training and travel. The question of an Iranian connection to the attacks was raised by the national September 11 commission.

My previous post was about the Bin Laden killing myth/lie. Already the US has begun tightenening the screws of domestic control – declaring that Al Qaeda is now more dangerous than ever before. Nevertheless, Al Qaeda is the child of the CIA and its tool, also the CIA´s partner in the Libyan revolution. The “invisible government of the US”, the Council on Foreign Relations has declared Al Qaeda to consist of about 200 confused warriors hiding in Pakistan. Its Magazine “Foreign Affairs” 15 Apr. 2009 goes on: “No convincing evidence has been offered publicly to show that al Qaeda Central has put together a single full operation anywhere in the world since 9/11 (an inside job). After years of well funded sleuthing, the FBI and other investigative agencies have been unable to Al-qaeda-cia-creationuncover a single true al Qaeda sleeper cell or operative within the country. (FBI Chief) Robert Mueller’s rallying cry has now been reduced to a comparatively bland formulation: “We believe al Qaeda is still seeking to infiltrate operatives into the U.S. from overseas.” Only 2 persons have been convicted of 9/11 – on dubious evidence – 1 in Germany and one in the USA. A BBC video concludes, that Al Qaeda never existed!

Nevertheless, the Al Qaeda myth has very serious implications, as US Congress is preparing to transfer the right to declare war from Congress to the president – a practice which was established in the war on Libya – a so far illegal, unconstitutional act perpetrated by Pres. Obama.
Foreign Affairs (CFR) 20 March 2011: Resolution 1973 authorized UN member states to “take all necessary measures   to protect civilians and civilian populated areas” in Libya by establishing a no-fly zone and enforcing an arms embargo. The resolution gave teeth to the much-heralded “responsibility to protect” (RtoP)– which, according to the 2005 UN World Summit Outcome, is the responsibility of the international community to “help protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.” Western nations secured the Resolution 1973  with ten votes in favor, no vetoes, and five abstentions from Brazil, China, Germany, India, and Russia.Www3

The following will show how the Al Qaeda concoction is being used in combination with the UN Resolution 1973 by a dictatorial NWO to expand the war on terror to WWIII – a war which Tony Cartalucci thinks has already begun with NATO subduing one non-complying rascal state after another. The implications of an upcoming US legislation is that  at any time, the US president can can crack down upon persons or countries he does not like.   As will be seen the official US/NATO motivation for the “war on terror” WWIII is the Al Qaeda fabrication, which the US has created and funded via the Pakistani Intelligence Service, the ISI.

H.R. 1540—FY12 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION (US) BILL. CHAIRMAN’S MARK
Title 1034 Section 1034—This section would affirm that the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). This section would also affirm that the President’s authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force includes the authority to detain certain belligerents until the termination of hostilities.
The committee notes that as the United States nears the tenth anniversary of the attacks on September 11, 2001, the terrorist threat has evolved as a result of intense military and diplomatic pressure from the United States and its coalition partners. However, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces still pose a grave threat to U.S. national security. The Authorization for Use of Military Force necessarily includes the authority to address the continuing and evolving threat posed by these groups.
The committee supports the Executive Branch’s interpretation of the Authorization for Use of Military Force…..

Obama-warlordAlexander Higgins Blog, and The Hill 11 May 2011 and ACLU: Here is what Congress is supposed to pass The title 1034 and:   …..(3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization, and persons who— (A) are part of, or are substantially supporting, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or Obama-brzezinski(B) have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported hostilities in aid of a nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph (A); ……

This monumental legislation–with a large-scale and practically irrevocable delegation of war power from Congress to the President– could commit the United States to a worldwide war without clear enemies, without any geographical boundaries (the use of military force within the United States could be permitted), and without any boundary relating to time or specific objective to be achieved. Unlike the AUMF that authorized the Afghanistan War and the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, the proposed new Declaration of War does not cite any specific harm, such as the 9/11 attacks, or specific threat of harm to the United States. It appears to be stating that the United States is at war wherever terrorism suspects reside, regardless of whether there is any danger to the United States. Under the guise of a “reaffirmation” of authority, Section 1034 of the Chairman’s mark for the NDAA would give the President unchecked authority….to use military force worldwide against or within any country in which terrorism suspects reside.

House Dems protest GOP’s plans for permanent war against terror
Nearly three dozen House Democrats are calling on Republicans to withdraw a section of the 2012 defense authorization bill that they say would effectively declare a state of permanent war against unnamed Taliban and al Qaeda operatives. A Tuesday letter from House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and 32 other Democrats argues that affirming continued war against terrorist forces goes too far, giving too much authority to the president without debate in Congress.Grand-chessboard However, the republicans seem unwilling.
False_flag_conspiracycards

MEMORANDUM to all Members of the House Committee on Armed Services from a number of worried organizations: Although the proposed new Declaration of War lists “al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces” as the “threat,” there is no definition for any of these entities, which historically have been amorphous, with shifting names, memberships, and organizational relationships.Whether Congress realizes it or not, the proposed new Declaration of War would authorize the President to use the United States military against countries such as Somalia, Iran, or Yemen, or send the American military into any of the scores of countries where suspected terrorists reside, which include not only nearly all Middle East, African, and Asian countries, but also European countries and Canada–and of course, the United States itself. Targets could include suspects having no connection to the 9/11 attacks or to any other specific harm or threat to the United States. The President would have the power to go to war almost anywhere, at any time, and based on the presence of suspects who do not have to pose any threat to the national security of the United States.

To be clear, President Obama has not sought enactment of the proposed new Declaration of War. To the contrary, his Administration has made clear its position that it believes it already has all of the authority that it needs to fight terrorism. But if the proposed new Declaration of War becomes law, President Obama and all of his successors, until and unless a future Congress and future President repeal it, will have the sweeping new power to make war almost anywhere and everywhere. Indeed, the moment we all feared has come before us as the Congress meddles giving the President absolute power over the military, including the authority to launch military strikes within the United States against U.S. Citizens.

ALL WITHOUT HEARINGS. Instead,  the reported success of the (Bin Laden) raid is being used as a Julebombecrutch to push through new legislation in the defense bills up for vote before congress which literally authorize World War 3, which will be declared as an endless war with no defined enemies and no borders. Short of committing genocide the termination of the hostilities will never come and as such the war will never come to end.

Right: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was an unlucky young “Al Qaeda” terrorist in what is considered to be a CIA staged attempt to detonate a bomb on a airplane at Christmas time 2009.


Where are the Al Qaeda terrorists?
As mentioned above, the CFR states that the FBI has not been able to find one single Al Qaeda cell in the US since 9/11 – which was an inside job! What about the EU?  EUOBSERVER 19 Apr. 2011: The annual survey, the EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report, covering events in 2010, noted that the vast majority of terrorist incidents in the EU last year came from separatist groups such as Eta in Spain or the Turkish group, the PKK/Kongra-Gel. Foiled or successful separatist attacks accounted for 160 out of the total 249 cases in 2010, compared to 45 far-left incidents and just 3 Islamist cases??? EU countries saw a 50 percent jump in the number of arrests linked to Islamist terrorism and a 12 percent jump in cases linked to far-left and anarchist groups.

Remarking on the ideology of Islamist groups such as Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), Europol said incitements to violence concentrated on: the Mohammed cartoons in Denmark; banning the veil in France; the Swiss anti-minaret vote; the war in Afghanistan; and Spain’s ‘occupation’ of Ceuta and Melilla in Morocco. But where is the Al Qaeda violence? Much indicates that the Madrid Bombs 2004 and the London Bombs on 7/7 were inside jobs – and even the Council on Foreign Relations do not cite them as Al Qaeda deeds.

Comment
I have described the New World Order and its aims extensively on this blog - here is a survey – incl. the Albert Pike letter to Mazzini. The Albert Pike vision of the one world government through 3 world wars dates back to before WWI. Nevertheless, the paper describes WWI and WWII in amazing detail. So why should WWIII not follow the described Albert Pike pattern?
It is amazing that such a simple fabrication as Al Qaeda can be foisted upon and accepted by the populations of the world as an excuse for the conquest of the world in the name of “the International Community/The corporate New World order – for the purpose of enslaving and looting us – then to kill large numbers of us (see the survey).

Most amazingly, however, the US Government has the nerve to authorize their president, one man, sick or Albert-pikehealthy, to wage war on any person, groups of persons and countries (called rascal states – unless they are too big and strong) which he does not like. This invites a new Hitler. This act of dictatorship is made without a hearing – without the MSM telling about it, because the elite has bought the media (George Soros-Rothschild agent)  and the Council on Foreign Relations. What is very disturbing, however, is that this US elite is now after the alternative media, which they do not own. They are planning to block unwanted Jay-rockefeller-divine-king-1websites, referring to offence against the copy right legislation – and here and here and here.

Left: John D. Rockefeller IV is the moving spirit behind the efforts to make alternative media silent. Thousands of Youtube protest videos are being deleted due to governmental demands!! Rockefeller´s  family has been funding mind control over the past 100 years. Right: Albert Pike, Fremason guru, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction. Mark this:  Souvereignty and jurisdiction are state prerogatives. However, when government and freemasonry are fused no distinction is made.

I recently met the expression: Totalitarian democracy. This seems more dangerous to me than regular dictatorship – where you know the rules to stick to, if you want to be safe. Totalitarian democracy builds on a web of lies, ends in regular dictatorship by stealth. That is what the Bin Laden/ Al Qaeda concoction is being used for – the 3. world war has started by stealth as the “War on Terror”, the Al Qaeda terrorists being ghosts – we, however, who will not submit to their NWO are the “terrorists” they want to make silent. And the countries which will not submit are “rascal states” – and some of them really are. This is really Luciferian.