Thu 13 Jan 2011
Experiments show that 65% of us are willing to murder in an authoritarian context. Rather than expose ourselves to the discomfort of refusing to comply with an order / request or violating team rules and expectations, we accept to commit atrocities, sacrificing others in order not to vex ourselves - even though we see no danger in saying no! Indeed, many simply can not say no to an ever so foolish order, as when bosses of fast food outlets undressed their staff and ordered them to jog naked in front of astonished customers - just because an unknown person had telephoned, introduced himself as a police officer and ordered this approach to detect shoplifting! Experiment participants who risked nothing by saying no said: “It was as if someone forced me!” and “I did not care, what happened,” as he thought to kill a volunteer with 450V power. Haven´t we heard this before?
Immediately now, FBI director, Robert Mueller, demands the free Internet to be controlled, as he believes Loughner to have been brainwashed, come under mind control via the internet so that Mueller is playing into John Rockefeller IV’s and Obama’s mediezar´s hands. This has caused more people to suppose something like a political false flag action. Both beaten environmentalists and the British government are now attempting through mind control to lead mankind on their tortuous roads. And worse:
Mind control is the tool the New World Order uses to make us accept their dictatorial one-world government, the outrageous fees and chemtrail-poisoning arising from the CO2-climate lie, the war against terror, based on a lie, the Euromediterranean mass immigration, etc. without a fuss or knowledge. And does it work!
The Daily Mail 11 Jan. 2010: As he walked into a Phoenix court, Loughner looked straight at the crowd. Loughner had refused to give any reason for Saturday’s killings. Authorities are considering the possibility that Loughner was behind the explosive packages sent to various places in Washington and Maryland last week.
One couple described how he showed up at their home last summer and stared creepily inside. An acquaintance of his used to live there. ‘It was the look of pure evil,‘ Susan Ward told the New York Daily News. ‘Every hair on my body went up. He just kept staring at me and smiling.He was fearless.”
Was Jared commanded by inner schizophrenic or outer voices to do his planned attack? Had the Devil obsessed him? Why did Gabriella Giffords take an interest in him? Was he brainwashed? This is important because of the supposed far reaching consequences of this crime.
Derek Ralston is an active member of the International Association for the Study of Dreams. He has written a Lucid Dreamimg Starter Handbook. Lucid dreams are frequently described as vivid, beautiful and stimulating. The morning after awaking from a lucid dream (i.e. a dream, one knows to be a dream while dreaming), people often describe a carryover of positive emotions into their waking world, sometimes lasting several days. And with the help of lucid dreaming, many people have ostensibly figured out how to improve their waking life for the long-term.
Derek Ralston is the founder of Life Evolver. Com, a popular personal development blog. Here is his advise to change your life:
Your genes instruct you on what feels good and bad. To take control of your consciousness, you must be fully aware of social and genetic programming, and make yourself independent.
Pop music is one NWO method to brainwash us: Lady Gaga (left) and Madonna ( right), our politicians, actors, even the Tuborg Corporation etc. show their Luciferian symbols in public to make missionary work for their god and his ideology – and we love them, buy their albums, vote for them – and many imitate their signs.
Do you have a free will – or do societal rules determine your life?
The Independent 6 Jan. 2011: Stanley Milgram, the son of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, struggled to understand how it was that courteous and decent Germans in the Second World War were persuaded to take part in barbaric acts without any limitations of conscience.”
I. Nearly 50 years after Milgram´s original experiment, I finally met one of the few remaining survivors, Bill Menold. In 1961 he went along to a building where he met an earnest young man in a white lab coat – The Experimenter - and a middle-aged volunteer.
The Experimenter told Bill that he would be the Teacher and the other volunteer would be the Learner. The Teacher’s task was to give the Learner a simple set of memory tasks, which he would then be tested on. If the Learner got an answer wrong, the Teacher had to give him an electric shock. If he continued to give wrong answers, the shocks would steadily increase. Bill was left in a room with a microphone and a set of electrical controls. The Learner was put in another room, where Bill could hear but not see him. Then the experiment began. The Learner was a slow learner.
“Wrong – 150 volts.” Despite the screams coming from the next room, Bill continued to ask questions and administer electric shocks when the Learner failed to answer correctly. “I don’t care what happens. Once you make the decision, you’ve made your decision.” Menold was told that 450 volts were lethal. ”Wrong – 450 volts.” When I asked him if he thought he had killed the Learner, Bill replied, “Yeah. When he stopped responding.”
What Bill and the other volunteers who took part weren’t told was that the electric shocks were fake – and that both the Experimenter and the Learner were actors. The real purpose of the experiment was to see how far the volunteers would go. Bill, like 65 per cent of the volunteers, gave an apparently lethal electric shock when told to do so.
“Most of us would behave the same way when faced by the same set of circumstances. Often human behaviour is dominated by the roles that we are asked to play.”
II: In 1966, a psychiatrist called Charles Hofling arranged for 22 nurses working in a large hospital to be rung, separately, by a man simply calling himself, “Dr Smith”. Dr Smith told each of the nurses that he wanted them to give 20mg of a drug called Astroten to a patient, who he named. Dr Smith also told the nurses that he was on his way to the hospital and would sign the necessary paperwork when he arrived. The drug, an invention of the experimenters, had been placed in the drug cabinet several days before the telephone call with a prominent warning on its side that 10mg was the maximum safe dose. Despite this, and despite the fact that hospital protocol specifically stated that no drug should ever be administered based solely on a phone call, 21 out of the 22 nurses were preparing to give the 20mg dose when they were stopped. The nurses had bowed to the imagined authority of the “doctor”.
Milgram went with his students on to the New York subway. Their task was to approach passengers on the train and say, pleasantly: “I’d like your seat, please”. The answer was that in just over half of all cases people gave up their seats when asked.
Recently I decided to repeat this experiment in a busy London shopping centre, with similar results. I was surprised by how many people complied with my completely unreasonable request, but even more surprised by how uncomfortable I found asking them to do it.
III: There was a recent example of the continuing tendency towards blind obedience in the USA when a con man, dubbed “the modern Milgram”, made the staff of dozens of fast-food restaurants behave in an appalling fashion simply by ringing up and pretending to be a policeman. He persuaded managers to strip-search their staff in search of stolen goods, to make them jog naked, even to strip off and appear naked in front of startled customers. One manager, who strip-searched an employee and was subsequently jailed, said, “I didn’t want to do it, but it was like he was making me”.
Milgram once wrote that we are “puppets controlled by the strings of society”. Yet what is also true is that not all puppets jump when their strings are pulled. Many of the fast-food managers who were rung up the “policeman” refused to follow his orders. In Milgram’s own experiment, although 65 per cent of the volunteers were prepared to give apparently lethal electric shocks, that still left 35 per cent who would not.
The Daily Mail 23 Nov. 2010: In a medical breakthrough, researchers have discovered that proteins can be removed from the brain’s fear centre by drugs to wipe out traumatic memories for ever.
How the UK government manipulates your daily behaviour
The Independent 3 Jan. 2011: Shame, vanity, laziness and the desire to fit in are all to be used as tools of Government policy by ministers acting on the advice of a new psychology unit in Whitehall. The public will have “social norms” heavily emphasised to them.
Spiegel 3 jan. 2011: Environmentalists are trying to come up with new ways to make global warming sexy and search for a new Messiah (after Al Gore´s lies were revealed), and i.a. “mind bombs” - highly emotional images like a video showing a teacher blowing up two students who were skeptical about cutting their carbon emissions. But there are simpler and older means to make us obey the will of the New World Order: Hitler Knew! Here are 10 simple rules to avoid the development of individualism.
Some commentators blame Sarah Palin and the Tea Party for the Arizona murders – for creating hatred against the Democrats and their liberal immigration rules. What Ralston recommends is inconvenient and damaging to the simple old way of governing the masses: It is much easier to command a standardized population which sticks within the narrow frames assigned to it by the elite. People feel it so unpleasant to transgress such limits, fearing isolation and punishment, that they rather commit atrocities than not obeying murderous orders. This is not just true of the Germans – but 2/3 of us, as experiments show. Such a population can be restrained by means of simple words for what is good: Fatherland in one era, globalism in our era. Christianity in one era, Islam and atheism in another era, the 10 Commandments in one era, now their complete contrasts – and evil: racism, used about patriots defending their own culture against politically willed Muslim mass immigration, the 10 Commandments in one era, now their absolute contrast - and evil: racism, used about patriots defending their ancient culture; antisemitism, as soon as you utter a single word about Jewish crimes and initiatives to govern
the world; conspiracy theory about criticism of the de facto self-declared dictatorial and treacherous initiatives; climate hooligans about honest scientists. And have these words been efficient - until recently. Islamic invasion, antisemitism as soon as you utter a single word about Jewish crimes and initiatives to rule the world, conspiracy theory about criticism of the de facto self–declared dictatorial and treacherous initiatives of the globalists;climate hooligans about honest scientists. And have these words been efficient – until recently.
However, the Hegelian dialectics is their tool. I have not found Derek Ralston nor Jared Lee Loughner to work for any one but themselves. But certainly, his method of changing people´s lives into total selfishness is one certain way to make any society crumble and descend into anarchy in the absence of the 10 Commandments. This was exactly what Adam Weishaupt aimed at with his and Rothschild´s New World Order – so that the Illuminati could practice their motto: “Order out of Chaos”. That means dictatorship. Fox News 9 Jan. 2011: FBI Director Robert Mueller said in a Sunday press conference that the “ubiquitous nature of the Internet” has made hateful information “much more readily available to individuals than it was eight or 10 or 15 years ago and that absolutely presents a challenge to us particularly as it relates to lone wolfs.” What we do know is that the Rockefellers have supported mindcontrol for nearly 100 years, developing into diabolically sophisticated mental hygiene. Furthermore, that John D. Rockefeller IV is the leader of an attack on the free internet – just as Obama´s Media Czar, Julius Genachowski. So, be assured that the Arizona murders will be used for an attack on the free internet and here and here. Were these murders a false flag attack – or a schizophrenic act now to be used politically?
Is this brainwashed Obama Youth Brigade able to act similarly as Loughton at command? The SS was! US soldiers were at My Lai, and Abu Ghraib etc. Or what about 9/11–2001? Whether schizophrenic or acting on impulse from outside: Loughton had all characteristics of a person under the mind control of evil – which 2/3 of us are.
2 Responses to “ Mind Control: “The Look of Pure Evil”. The Tool of the New World Order ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.