Link to poster.

North-south5


Cancún-fans

At the Mexican resort of Cancun local temperatures also fell to their lowest, for the date, since records began 100 years ago. Nevertheless, Greenpeace activists (Spiegel 12. dec. 2010) are jubilating at New World Order Climate lie. The Cancún Agreement is explicitly referring to the calculations of the fraudulent and admittedly unscientific and corporation affiliated IPCC, the chairman of which is  on the Rockefeller Foundation Board. It is still unclear how the gap could be bridged.
The Council on Foreign Relations 11 Dec. 2010: The agreement moves forward in a fairly balanced way on each pillar of the Copenhagen accord. It  includes strong governance and a central role for the World Bank – a Rockefeller puppet (and Rothschild´s GEF, ed.); The Kyoto Protcol can probably not be extended. If the Kyoto Protocol is extended at the Durban conference next year, China will continue to be spared from having to make binding commitments to cut its CO2 emissions. The same applies to the US, the only industrial country never to have ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The Cancun deal also includes a commitment to llimit warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times  – a long-term goal that scientists have insisted is essential to avert the worst effects of climate change. But that goal isn’t legally binding because nations only agreed to “take note” of it. The agreement contains no concrete targets for cuts in CO2 emissions by 2050. BUND head Hubert Weiger said: “The Cancun deal won’t keep global warming below two degrees. Speaking of the deal in the round, Mr Chris Huhne, British Environment Minister and UN special adviser: “I think this shows that there is still a real consensus internationally – a growing consensus in places such as China and India. The forest agreement, which is known as REDD+ foresees the eventual “monetisation” of the great rainforests of countries such as Brazil, Congo and Indonesia, with the host nations receiving funding for not cutting them down and so releasing CO2 perhaps eventually in the form of carbon “credits” that can be traded in emissions trading schemes (and paid for by Western tax payers – ed.) – The IPCC´s and WWF´s Amazongate Scandal.

Here is a collection of the agreements at Cancún – all well agreed before the conference.  One of them is UNFCCC´s call for Rothschild´s Global Environment Facility – so interwoven with the world´s governments – to take care of the funding of the The UNFCCC World Government Project called climate mitigation and adaptation – the NWO international communist project implemented by fascists in Mussolini´s sense of the word – corporative government.

Lord Monckton of Brenchley 11 Dec- 2010
was present at the Cancún “Climate” Conference and reports from  what he heard and from the the 33-page Note (FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/CRP.2) by the Chairman of the “Ad-Hoc Working Group” (extract):
The central intent of The Process no longer has anything to do with the climate, if it ever had. The objective is greatly to empower and still more greatly to enrich the international classe politique at the expense of the peoples of the West, using the climate as a pretext, so as to copy the EU by installing in perpetuity what some delegates here are calling “transnational perma-Socialism” beyond the reach or recall of any electorate.  The intention with the  UNFCCC documents at the Cancun conference is that the documents should not be understood, but that later we shall be told they were in the public domain all the time, so what are we complaining about?  The draft suggests that the intention is still to carry out the explicit provision in the defunct Osiris - Horus  Eye PyramidCopenhagen Treaty draft of 15 September 2009 to this effect.

The Copenhagen Treaty draft of September 15, 2009, para. 38.
In short, there was to be a New World Order, with a new UN ”government” having at its command a “financial mechanism” in the form of unlimited rights to tax the world’s citizen’s directly, and a “facilitative mechanism” that would bring the rules of all formerly free markets under the direct control of the new UN “government”, aided by an already-expanding series of bureaucracies.
At no point anywhere in the 186 pages of the Treaty draft do the words “democracy”, “election”, “ballot”, or “vote” appear. As the EU has already demonstrated, the transfer of powers from sovereign democracies to supranational entities brings those democracies to an end. At the supranational level, in the UN, in the EU and in the proposed world government, decisions are not made by anyone whom we, the voters, have elected to make such decisions.
The exposure of the draft treaty in major international news media panicked the UN into abandoning the draft before the Copenhagen conference even began. Instead, the UN is now legislating crabwise, as the European Union does, with a series of successive annual agreements, the last of which was the Copenhagen Accord, each transferring more power and wealth from individual nations to its supranational bureaucracy. The latest of these agreements is being finalized here in Cancun.
The European Union has been advising the Secretariat on how to do the same on a global scale.

The following is in the Cancún Chairman´s draft
Bellpyramid172
The world-government Secretariat: In all but name, the UN Convention’s Secretariat will become a world government directly controlling hundreds of global, supranational, regional, national and sub-national bureaucracies. It will receive the vast sum of taxpayers’ money ostensibly paid by the West to the Third World for adaptation to the supposed adverse consequences of imagined (and imaginary) “global warming”.

The world government’s powers: The Secretariat will have the power not merely to invite nation states to perform their obligations under the climate-change Convention, but to compel them to do so. Nation states are to be ordered to collect, compile and submit vast quantities of information, in a manner and form to be specified by the secretariat and its growing army of subsidiary bodies. Between them, they will be given new powers to verify the information, to review it and, on the basis of that review, to tell nation states what they can and cannot do.

Termination: Contracts have termination clauses to say what happens when the agreement ends. Nothing better illustrates the intent to create a permanent world-government structure than the absence of any termination provisions whatsoever in the Cancun outcome. The Process, like diamonds, is forever.

Bureaucracy: Hundreds of new interlocking bureaucracies answerable to the world-government Secretariat will vastly extend its power and reach. In an explicit mirroring of the European Union’s method of enforcing the will of its unelected Kommissars on the groaning peoples of that benighted continent, the civil servants of nation states will come to see themselves as servants of the greater empire of the Secretariat, carrying out its ukases and diktats whatever the will of the nation states’ governments. Who pays? You do, gentle taxpayer.

PachauriContinuous expansion: The verb “enhance”, in its various forms, occurs at least 28 times in the Chairman’s note, Similar verbs, such as “strengthen” and “extend”, and adjectives such as “scaled-up”, “new” and “additional”, are also frequently deployed, particularly in relation to funding at the expense of Western taxpayers. If all of the “enhancements” proposed in the note were carried out, the cost would comfortably exceed the annual $100 billion (or, for that matter, the 1.5% of GDP) that the note mentions as the cost to the West over the coming decade.

The science is not addressed. Instead, there is merely a pietistic affirmation of superstitious faith in the IPCC, where the conference will “recognize that deep cuts in global [greenhouse-gas] emissions are required according to science, and as documented in the [IPCC's] Fourth Assessment Report.” (full of blatant fraud and errors, editor) There is no assessment of the extent to which any of the proposed actions to mitigate “global warming” by cutting emissions of carbon dioxide or to adapt the world to its consequences will be cost-effective.

Democracy: Forget government of the people, by the people, for the people. Forget the principle of “no taxation without representation” that led to the very foundation of the United States. The provisions for the democratic election of the new, all-powerful, legislating, tax-raising world-government Secretariat by the peoples of the world: None.

Maurice-strongHow did this monstrous transfer of power from once-proud, once-sovereign, once-democratic nations to the corrupt, unelected Secretariat come about? The story begins with Sir Maurice Strong, who, a quarter of a century ago, established the IPCC as an intergovernmental, political body rather than as a scientific body precisely so that it could be maneuvered into assisting in the UN’s long-term aim, reiterated at a summit of senior UN officials this May by Ban Ki-Moon himself, of extinguishing national sovereignty and establishing a world government. The Process began in earnest in 1988, when the IPCC was established.

New World Order legislation procedure
After the spectacular bloody nose the Secretariat got in Copenhagen, it was most anxious not to endure a second failure in Cancun. To this end, it obtained the agreement of the German government to host a monthly series of conferences in Bonn in the early part of 2010, some of which were open to outside observers and some were behind closed doors, where the new way of legislating for the world ­ in secret ­ first came into use.
The Chinese regime, agreed to host an additional session in Tientsin a few weeks ago. The purpose of this near-perpetual international junketing was to make sure that nearly all of the elements in the Cancun agreement were firmly in draft and agreed well before Cancun“. It can still be imposed upon us by the heavily Left-leaning Supreme Court, which no longer makes any pretense at judicial impartiality and may well decide, even if Congress does not, that the Cancun agreement shall stand part of US law on the ground that it is “customary international law”.

The media
However, following the Copenhagen disaster, our grim future New Masters are taking no chances. They persuaded their friends in the mainstream news media, who cannot now easily back out of their original declarations of blind faith in the Church of “Global Warming” and are as anxious not to lose face as the Secretariat is, to put it about that at Cancun this year and even at Durban next year very little of substance will occur.

Finance: Western countries will jointly provide $100 billion a year by 2020 to an unnamed new UN Fund. To keep this sum up with GDP growth, the West may commit itself to pay 1.5% of GDP to the UN each year. That is more than twice the 0.7% of GDP that the UN has recommended the West to pay in foreign aid for the past half century. Several hundred of the provisions in the Chairman’s note will impose huge financial costs on the nations of the West.

Propaganda: The Chairman’s note contains several mentions of the notion that the peoples of the world need to be told more about climate change. Here, too, there is a parallel with the EU. The Secretariat already has the advantage of an uncritical, acquiescent, scientifically illiterate, economically innumerate and just plain dumb news media: now it will have a propaganda fund to play with as well.

Damage caused by The Process: At the insistence of sensible nation states such as the United States, the Czech Republic, Japan, Canada, and Italy, the Cancun outcome acknowledges that The Process is causing, and will cause, considerable economic damage, delicately described in the Chairman’s note as “unintended side-effects of implementing climate-change response measures”. The solution? Consideration of the catastrophic economic consequences of the Secretariat’s heroically lunatic decisions will fall under the control of ­the Secretariat.

Cop16_650_23

The Canute provision: The conference will reaffirm the decision of its predecessor in Copenhagen this time last year “to hold the increase in global average temperature below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels”, just like that. In fact, temperature in central England, and by implication globally, rose 2.2 Celsius in the 40 years 1695-1735, as the Sun began to recover from its 11,400-year activity minimum, and rose again by 0.74 C in the 20th century. There has been no warming in the 21st century, but we are already well over 2 Celsius degrees above pre-industrial levels.