Mon 6 Dec 2010
ADDENDUM: The Independent 8 Dec. 2010: Informal discussions have already taken place between US and Swedish officials over the possibility of the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange being delivered into American custody, according to diplomatic sources. The US Justice Department is considering charging Mr Assange with espionage offences. Several right-wing American politicians are pressing for his prosecution and even execution. Assange´s attorney, Mark Stephens, believes Assange will soon be released against bail - since District Judge, Howard Riddle, will investigate the material from Sweden and release Assange if he is still not convinced that the charges against him will lead to conviction.
First, his lawyers will return to court next week to try to secure his release on conditional bail. Eventually there will be an extradition hearing at which the Swedish prosecution authorities will present prima facie evidence to show there is case for Mr Assange to answer.
Mr Assange’s legal team are already preparing to challenge the extradition in the High Court in London. If they lose the case there, they can take it all the way to the Supreme Court, a process which could last many months.
Bloomberg 7 Dec. 2010: Assange was arrested “by appointment” today at 9:30 a.m. - likely influenced by the U.S. - and could find himself facing a U.S. extradition request after he’s returned to Sweden on the current allegations. “There is very little room for maneuver within the European arrest warrant process. “The European arrest warrant is already under way, and will trump a US extradition request.” So, a direct extradition from the UK to the Us would be a big political problem.
A rape sentence in Sweden normally leads to between two and six years in prison. Sweden accepts extradition requests from non-EU countries if the allegations involved are also illegal in Sweden, acc. to Mikael Baaz, an associate law professor at the University of Gothenburg. However, that does not seem to be the case for assange.
The Raw Story 6. Dec.: The 2 accusing Swedish women bragged on their cellphones of having had sex with Assange. One - a feminist lawyer with connections to the CIA - threw away a party for him after the “crime”, which seems to consist in his not having used condomes!
Reuters 7 Dec. The British judge said: “There are substantial grounds to believe Assange could abscond if granted bail.” He said the allegations were serious. Swedish prosecutors opened, then dropped, then re-opened an investigation into the allegations.
Spiegel 7 Dec. 2010: Republican Congressman, Peter King, wants the State Department to examine whether WikiLeaks can be classified as a terrorist organization, which would make it easier for US authorities to hunt down Assange and his supporters
Summary: Australian Julian Assange is “wanted” by Interpol. due to 2 very questionable rape charges in Sweden. Presumably he is “wanted” because of his publications of US State secrets via Wikileaks, an organization that seems closely related to George Soros and Rothhschild, whose publication, The Economist, has given Assange a prize - as has Amnesty International, too, which is affiliated to Rothschild´s IMF and World Bank. Several observers make Assange a CIA agent - and both he and the CIA denied that they had any disagreements with each other - despite WikiLeaks’ disclosure that the CIA made the list of UN staff, incl. Secretary-General, to be spied on at Hillary Clinton’s wish.
Despite the fact that the British police know his whereabouts, they have not arrested him. One Bradley Manning was arrested for having pinched secret information from the U.S. State Department for WikiLeaks. More amazing is that the politically correct Guardian with a Rothschild director on its board, and the NWO publications, The New York Times and Der Spiegel, have been very keen on bringing the “revelations” which have, apart from names of Afghan agents, almost exclusively contained already known diplomatic gossip.
A clue to a purpose of the Wikileaks may be a message from Wayne Madsen Research that WikiLeaks received information on Julius Baer´s secret clientele. A publication would destroy confidence and allow a hostile takeover by Soros´ friends at Goldman Sachs. By extension, Assange announced to disclose banking secrets of 0ne or 2 major banks, the Bank of America probably aimed at, to create a bank run with consequent collapse of finance and banking industries in early 2111.
Disturbing is the fact that Hillary Clinton has forbidden employees of the State Department to visit the WikiLeaks site, and that Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate Domestic Security Committee, had threatened U.S. companies like Amazon to lift the WikiLeaks websites. This does not bode well for the future of the free internet. Many believe that the Wikileaks affair has precisely been designed to introduce more police state censorship of the Internet. Another purpose seems to be the buildup of an accusation of Chinese cyber attacks, which seem to emanate from WikiLeaks exile-Chinese hacking Chinese government computers - with CIA´s knowledge. The Washington Times said that Congress members complain of a lack of cooperation at the State Department as for detecting the sources of the leaks.
WikiLeaks is an enigma. Australian Julian Assange is said to be the boss behind it. But is he? Why has he not been killed like so many other troublesome agents? Why is he not being imprisoned for rape although an Interpol arrest warrant was issued a fortnight ago – and the police know where he is? Is Wikileaks a New World Order operation to bring us disinformation? How was it possible to hack so many documents?
Swedish and Interpol arrest warrants against Assange issued for 2 very dubious sexual assault cases – and “other crimes”.
Deutsche Welle 1 Dec. 2010: Interpol, the international police agency, said that it had issued its call on Nov. 20. WikiLeaks has dismissed it as “dirty tricks”. In a message posted on Twitter, WikiLeaks said its servers at Amazon had been “ousted.” Senator Joseph I. Lieberman said Amazon had stopped hosting the WikiLeaks site on Wednesday after being contacted by the staff of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The Telegraph 22 Aug. 2010 Less than 24 hours after the rape allegation emerged, Swedish prosecutors withdrew the warrant, citing a lack of evidence, while maintaining that Assange remained accused of sexual molestation after separate complaints from two women.
The US State Department is “obstructionist” to Wikileaks probe
The Washington Times 2 Dec. 2010: The State Department and other U.S. agencies are not fully cooperating with lawmakers’ efforts to probe the WikiLeaks security breach . “They’ve been obstructionist up to this point,” Repr. Mike Rogers told. For the 500,000-plus cleared users of SIPRNet, there are few barriers to access once they are logged on.
Wikileak being hunted
The Guardian 3 Dec. 2010: Late yesterday evening Tableau Software, a company which published data visualisations, pulled one of its images picturing the WikiLeaks diplomatic cables. The company’s blog said: “Our decision to remove the data from our servers came in response to a public request by Senator Joe Lieberman, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security Committee.” Assange declared this will not stop Wikileaks.
The Guardian´s Wikileaks site is still functioning. List of cables here. Here is an interim Swiss site of Wikileaks - still routed by the US everydns. Moreover, a German Wikileaks website has popped up. Comment: The Guardian 29 May 2009: The former BBC vice-chairman Anthony Salz has been appointed to the Scott Trust, owner of Guardian Media Group. Anthony Salz, is currently executive vice-chairman of the investment bank Rothschild. Previously held directorships include N.M. Rothschild & Sons Limited.
“Wikileak´s Julian Assange should be killed or treated like a traitor”
Zero Hedge 1 Dec. 2010: Tom Flanagan, a senior advisor and strategist to the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, called for the assassination of Wikileaks director Julian Assange. Youtube - The Christian Science Monitor 30 Nov. 2010: Sarah Palin says WikiLeaks committed a “treasonous act” with its document dump of US diplomatic secrets. Furthermore, on her Twitter feed Tuesday she said Congress should prod the Obama administration to use “all necessary means to respond to and defeat WikiLeaks.” The White House, of course, condemns Wikileaks.
The British police know about Assange´s whereabouts in the UK – but do not detain him
The Independent 2 Dec. 2010: Despite accusations that Julian Assange is on the run, The Independent has learnt that Scotland Yard has been in contact with his legal team for more than a month but is waiting for further instruction before arresting him. Police sources confirmed that they have a telephone number for Mr Assange and are fully aware of where he is staying. Video.
CIA behind Assange?
The Independent 18 July 2010: Spending time with Assange, it’s hard not to start believing that dark forces are at work. He never stays in one place more than two nights. Is that because the CIA wants to kill him? “Is it in the CIA’s interest to assassinate me?”, asks Assange.
If the CIA spooks wanted him that badly, couldn’t they have turned up, as a hundred adoring student journalists did, to hear him talk at the Centre for Investigative Journalism 10 days ago? Indeed, the CIA might be displeased, since Wikileaks has revealed the CIA drew up the spying wishlist for UN diplomats, incl. the secretary general. AOL News 7 April 2010 The CIA called allegations that it was following Assange “absurd.”
The Digital Journal 19 Aug. 2010: Well-known American conspiracy theorist Wayne Madsen is quoted as saying in March that the CIA, the Rothschild Bank, Goldman-Sachs, the Mossad and wealthy businessman George Soros were all implicated in a vast campaign of manipulation destined to fool Assange into thinking he was onto something big.
The Manipulation is said to be that the documents originally given to him were leaked deliberately by the CIA in an effort to give him and other critics of US policy in Afghanistan and elsewhere the impression that they had a ‘scoop.’ But the theory goes that the documents contained nothing that was not already known – so that Assange will lose interest. Webster Tarpley (interesting video: Webster Tarpley: Wikileaks Conspiracy (1): 10.59 min.), even accuses Assange of being a paid CIA agent in bed with George Soros.
Wayne Madsen reports CIA dissatisfaction with Assange, because he also sent leaks to the Mossad. Wikipedia, Victor Ostrovsky: The previous Mossad motto: For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war: and in multitude of counsellors [there is] safety.” Proverbs 24:6, “delusion” now replacing wise counsel. “kee betachbulot ta’ase lecha milchama“. Translation:”We will wage war with illegal terrorism.”
The link to George Soros, the Rothschild agent.
Wikileak´s founder Julian Assange has won an award from the “Economist” magazine, a financial publication controlled by the Rothschild banking family, and known as CIA front. Here Assange is being interviewed by the Economist. Assange has not only won awards from the Rothschild banking family’s financial publications; he also won an award from Amnesty International, which works closely with the UN, itself associated with the IMF, the World Bank.
The Huffington Post 2 Dec. 2010 Glenn Beck tied WikiLeaks, and its leader, Julian Assange, to George Soros.”I know Assange is being represented by the attorney who does the pro bono work for George Soros’ Open Society Insitute,” Beck said.
The Pakistan Daily 28 July 2010 reports details from the Wayne Madsen Report (WMR): There is a strong belief in some Asian countries, particularly China and Thailand, that the website Wikileaks is linked to U.S. cyber-warfare and computer espionage operations, as well as to Mossad’s own cyber-warfare activities. WMR’s sources believe that it is Wikileaks that is part and parcel of a cyber-COINTELPRO campaign, such as that proposed by President Obama’s “information czar,” Dr. Cass Sunstein (cognitive infiltration of “extremist” groups- who doubt governmental 9/11 explanation).
This is the procedure
In January 2007, John Young, who runs cryptome.org, a site that publishes a wealth of sensitive and classified information, left Wikileaks, claiming the operation was a CIA front. Wayne Madsen Report has confirmed Young’s contention that Wikileaks is a CIA front operation. Wikileaks is intimately involved in a $20 million CIA operation, U.S.-based Chinese dissidents hacking into computers in China. Some of the Chinese
hackers route special hacking programs through Chinese computers that then target U.S. government and military computer systems. After this hacking is accomplished, the U.S. government announces through friendly media outlets that U.S. computers have been subjected to a Chinese cyber-attack.
It is also pointed out that on Wikileaks advisory board is Ben Laurie, a one-time programmer and Internet security expert for Google, which recently signed a cooperative agreement with the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). another on this board is Xiao Qiang, commentator on the George Soros-affiliated Radio Free Asia;
It is also believed by informed sources that Soros is behind the operation to move Wikileaks to Iceland. There are strong suspicions that Wikileaks is yet another Soros-funded “false flag” operation on the left side of the political spectrum. WMR has learned that ….. Soros put the Wikileaks operation into high gear. Soros is currently talking down the euro, planning its fall and shorting it, just like he did versus the pound in London in the 1980s. After the UK’s and Europe’s currencies are devalued, Soros will buy every euro note in sight, thus making trillions. Soros and his Wikileaks friends have in Iceland a practically unregulated banking system desperate for an influx of capital . With Wikileaks firmly ensconced in Iceland, the “brave” and much-heralded information leakers will run an international blackmail operation against Soros’s foes. A destructive e-mail correspondence is shown.
Bank secrecies to be revealed (AFP)
Politi FI 1 Dec. 2010: One of the major Financial firms in the United States, reputed to be Bank of America, will have its Private and confidential documents laid bare by a new Wikileaks release, and here: The Street 30 Nov. 2010:
The Bird Flu Case 1 dec. 2010: Assange predicted a bank run could be triggered by bank data leaks. His task is to destroy the financial system before the eurozone fragments, allowing countries potentially to restore their own currencies and regain their souvereignty. Ordinary citizens will lose their money.
The Los Angeles Times 2 Dec.: Wikileaks´archive in a mountain in Sweden. This demands large scale funding – and protection by the Swedish authorities.
If Assange were a real activist, he would not be getting any coverage from the mainstream media, let alone so headlines every day in every well known corporate media outlet. In fact, all the media outlets that normally are silent on such sensitive matters have been extremely active to report on Wikileaks.
Since these media are controlled by Rothschild/Rockefeller and here this must be part of a planned strategy. The Guardian has been keen on publishing Wikileaks – has a senior Rothschild official on its board.
Assange has had inside help – like acc. to The Washington Times 2 Dec. 2010 one Mr. Manning. Global Res. 1 Dec. 2010: “There is little doubt that Wikileaks is a “sideshow’ run by an intelligence agency with dozens of agents inside the Department of Defense. Only Israel has this capability, having penetrated Defense to such a degree they run it as their own. What is the agenda of Wikileaks? Is it revealing the truth? If so, why is the truth censored and watered down to such a degree as to be “non-news” as the earlier leak had been.
In fact, most stories about leaks are simply speculation and most “leaks” are little than “chickenfeed.” Why does Wikileaks spend more time hiding things than revealing them?” It is also peculiar that the UK police knowing Mr. Assange´s whereabouts and having an Interpol arrest warrant at hand has not arrested Assange a long time ago.
A clue to a purpose of the Wikileaks may be a message from Wayne Madsen Research that WikiLeaks received information on Julius Baer´s secret clientele. A publication would destroy confidence and allow a hostile takeover by Soros´ friends at Goldman Sachs.
So, what is the purpose of Wikileaks? I don´t know. But let´s try the usual Hegelian dialectics of the illuminists: 1. Thesis: Discrediting US diplomats, State Department, Dept. of Defence, the dollar and the euro 2. Antithesis: to bring confidence in them down and isolatethem as the same circuits endeavour to do through the financial crisis 3. Synthesis: They have removed obstacles, i.a. critical internet, to Soros´/Rothschild´s ultimative looting of Europeans and Americans, paving the way for their world currency and here and world state – also via a bank run, a la the 1929 crash?
4 Responses to “ Wikileaks and Julian Assange - Another False Flag Operation? Who Are behind Them? ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.