Summary:  Integration is often mentioned as the very aim of immigration. Oddly, there does not seem to be a definition of that word. Assimilation, i.e.expecting  immigrants to accept e.g. English culture, is seen as an offence against human rights. The EU Commission´s Handbook on Integration for Policy-makers and Practitioners, First Ed., has the following very disquieting opinions: "Integration is a two-way process": meaning an elimination of the native citizenship/birth right. "Society as a whole may also be an appropriate policy target": If natives do not comply with EU´s immigration policy´s  aim of substituting immigrants for Europeans genetically and culturally such persons are a "problem" to be treated by all means. This is a dictatorship, where the most intransigent ethnicity will be victorious. "Politics are then a response  to the disintegrating effect of the rapid social, economic change that most European countries are going through and target various groups among the population, whether or not they have immigration background." This means  political abolishment of European culture. "Governments are influencing each other".  This means that national souvereignty has been abandoned for the infamous New World Order "consensus" - i.e. voluntary enforcement of decisions.   …and are empowered as agents of change for integrating societies". This is what I described previously, admitted by Danish and British politicians: The purpose of Muslim immigration is to change our societes radically. Former member of Sarkozy´s pro-Muslim government , Martin Hirsch: "True integration will be when Catholics name their child Mohammed."  Immigrants are Germany's future, according to the German government's commissioner for integration. "Immigrants are the skilled labor force of tomorrow" she says -  wanting to push a bill for better recognition of foreign degrees and professional accreditation.The UK know the meaning of this: Locum doctors from 3. countries are the only solution to a lack of british doctors due to governmental limitation of the number of British doctors in training, the EU´s 48 hour working  rule for doctors - and a consequence of free abortion applied on Europeans only. 3.000 British lives are lost on an annual basis due to unqualified foreign doctors, who are often blatantly lying about their qualifications - and being paid 70 pounds an hour. In many places more than half of the jobs are occupied with mainly East European workers - at the expense of unemployed British workers. This was Labour policy! Meanwhile, in spite of political assurances of the opposite, Muslims are pouring in from the Euromediterranean area - although the EU knows the fate of the Kosovo Serbs, whom the EU helped expel, and now of Christians being expelled at hours´notice from EU´s pet "partner", Morocco, which has received a status promised EU´s 4 freedoms - including free immigration to the EU! The EU is doing its worst to "disintegrate" Europeans and create chaos.
  £6.4million for "financial co-operation" among Mediterranean countries was paid to an unnamed body in Switzerland.

The Sun 10 July 2010: "Confidential" EU Funds: £6.4million for "financial co-operation" among Mediterranean countries was paid by the EU to an unnamed body in Switzerland. Bribery?

When it comes to integration of immigrants there is great confusion. While most natives have seen integration as assimilation (i.e. the immigrants become e.g. Danes in the traditional sense) such thoughts today are seen as infringement on Human Rights and the EU´s Charter of Fundamental Rights, which are to be respected in any case (3) and by all means.

Eu-integrationSo how does the EU define integration? I turned to the Handbook on Integration for Policy-makers and Practitioners, written on behalf of the EU Commission 2004, First Ed. This is blindfolded leadership. As you know "if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch" (Matth. 15:14). My comments after the accentuated text: "Integration is a two-way process": This puts immigrant and native culture and individuals on an equal footing - giving both groups the same obligations and rights. This is already an elimination of the native citizenship/birth right. This was done sneakingly by stealth through  EU treaties without informing us about their implications.  "Society as a whole may also be an appropriate policy target": If natives do not comply with EU´s immigration policy and superior aim of replacing Europeans genetically and ciulturally with immigrants, such persons are being considered a "problem" to be treated by all means. This is no less than dictatorship, where the most intransigent ethnicity will be victorious. "Politics are then a response  to the disintegrating effect of the rapid socil, economic change that most European countries are going through and target various groups among the population, whether or not they have immigration background." Now who brought about these disintegrating effects? Was that not the forces behind the EU and our political parties? Adam Adam Weishaupt´s New World Order as they used to call globalization until 1989 - the word now being used again on EU level. "Governments are influencing each other" This means that national souvereignty has been abandoned for the infamous New World Order "consensus" - i.e. voluntary enforcement of decisions. And then finally the confirmation of the purpose of the whole project  The 3. Edition 2010 P.8: "…and are empowered as agents of change for integrating societies". This is what I described previously, admitted in public by Danish and British politicians: The purpose of Muslim immigration is to change our societes radically.
Since they cannot define integration- and assimilation is out of the question - they propose on P.67 a set of integration indicators to be developed - and their suitability to be regularly evaluated.
 
Sarkozy-hirschHow does the EU implement its thus declared goal of substituting immigrants for native Europeans?
GalliaWatch 6 July 2010: Martin Hirsch, a Jewish member of Sarkozy´s government as High Commissioner on "active solidarity against poverty" until 2010: "True integration will be when Catholics name their child Mohammed."
When Nicolas Sarkozy put together his first cabinet 2007 he chose with infallible precision politicians who would be loyal servants to the causes of métissage, multi-culturalism and socialism. Eric Besson, now Minister of Immigration, called France a "conglomerate" of peoples who want to live together! Christine Lagarde, Minister of Finance, has adapted economic rules and regulations to accommodate sharia law. Both Prime Minister François Fillon and Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux have inaugurated mosques amidst great fanfare. Most of Sarkozy's ministers have plunged hungrily into the Ramadan break-fasts as if they were being treated to a full-course feast at Maxim's.

Now, Mr Hirsch is in agreeement wtih Turkey´s Prime Minister, Tayyip Erdogan
World Bulletin 25 March – Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan demanded Germany allow Turkish schools in the country as Turkey did. Why shouldn't there be a Turkish university in Germany as well? " Erdogan also criticized the fact that Germany does not allow dual citizenship unless the additional country is a member of the EU. On the second day of her visit to Turkey, Merkel will visit the Hagia Sophia and the Blue Mosque
Comment: the Hagia Sophia is a good example of integration as it is seen today: Originally a Christian cathedral, it was made a Muslim mosque after the Muslim conquest of Constantinopel in 1453. And if we do not see it that way? Here is Tayyip Erdogan´s way to integration: “Demand double citizenship, become Turkey´s diplomats in Europe – but do not assimilate, that is an offence against human rights!!” Further:    Our minarets are our spearheads, our mosques our barracks, their domes our helmets and the faithful our soldiers . Well, then some naïve and ideologically minded morons and politicians may still hope for "Moderate Islam":"These descriptions are offensive and violate our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam. And that´s it!" (Tayyip Erdogan 21 August 2007). 

Maria-boehmerOne such naïve /idological politician is Maria Boehmer of the German CDU:
Deutsche Welle 7 July 2010: With one in three young children born in Germany coming from an imimigrant background, Germany is quickly becoming even more diverse.  Immigrants are Germany's future, according to Maria Boehmer, the government's commissioner for integration. "We must make integration more compulsory during this session of parliament," Boehmer urged. "Immigrants are the skilled labor force of tomorrow." Dr. Gunilla Fincke of the Expert Council of German Foundations on Immigration and Migration called Boehmer's statement "very optimistic." Of immigrant youth, 43 percent only get as far as Germany's basic school leaving certificate, compared with 31 percent of ethnic Germans. Thirteen percent of non-Germans aged 15-19 drop out of school altogether - double the percentage of the native population. These people [without a qualification] will not be able to take part in the labor market,becoming candidates for government aid.”

Of the 82.1 million people living in Germany, in 2008, 15.6 million had foreign backgrounds – only 8.3 million of whom have German passports. Foreigners are eligible for German citizenship after living in Germany for eight years, but non-EU citizens must renounce their first citizenship in order to gain a German passport.
Another major impediment to integration, according to migration expert Klaus Bade, is the difficulty of German national identity. Boehmer's report comes out during the soccer World Cup, when German national pride is high and the national team is being touted as a symbol of Germany's immigration success??. Eleven of 23 Integration-lægeGerman team members were either born outside Germany themselves or have immigrant parents (Former purely German teams performed better).

The integration commissioner is also pushing a bill for better recognition of foreign degrees and professional accreditation.

And this is how this better recognition of foreign degrees works under immigration necessitated by cutting the number of British doctors in training, EU´s working hour rules for doctors – and New World Order free abortion for Europeans only  
The Daily Mail 30 June 2010:  A doctor has lifted the lid on how NHS hospitals are forced to rely on temporary doctors from abroad who often lie about their experience.  Professor Chris Isles warned that locum staff with little experience are offered to NHS without it being mentioned that they have been dismissed from other hospitals for poor levels of care. Hospitals are so desperate for staff that locums are able to sell their services to the highest bidder  -  a 'cattle market' which leads to some earning rates of more than £70 an hour. Earlier this month a report by researchers at Imperial College London found that more than 3,000 lives a year were being lost every year because patients were placed in the hands of inexperienced junior doctors at weekends . He added: 'We have hordes of people coming across from places like Eastern Europe and Africa and . . . they can't do very much. He said the problems were occurring because of the European Working Time Directive, which forces doctors to limit their hours to 48 a week, and reforms that have cut the number of British doctors being trained.
integration 2Comment: There never were enough doctors to secure decent working hours for doctors – who were mostly overworked and often living under stress in my days as a registrar. But so far doctors had both conscience and pride in doing their job according to the state of the art. Lying about one´s qualifications was tremendously rare – in fact impossible. Immigrant doctors do not seem to share these qualities. But this is part of EU´s endeavours to ”disintegrate the European societies” for ideological New World Order reasons.

Taking the jobs from native Europeans – giving them to immigrants 
The Daily Mail 30 June 2010A map today reveals parts of Britain where more than half of jobs are held by workers who were born overseas (mostly East Europeans).The workforce in large parts of London is dominated by people born abroad – despite Labour’s repeated promises to deliver ‘British jobs for British workers’. But foreign-born employees also have a strong foothold in other British towns and cities.
And last night, immigration minister Damian Green said: ‘This shows why we need a limit on work visas as well as a better trained British workforce.  Experts say this makes it more important for the Government to impose a strict cap on non-EU migrants in an attempt to bring the total number of foreign workers under controlIn October 1997, British-born workers made up 92.5 per cent of the workforce. By 2009, this had fallen to 87.1 per cent.

Integration2Eurostat EU Press Release 4 May 2010: In 2009, there were nearly 261 000 asylum applicants  registered in the EU27. The main countries of citizenship of these applicants were Afghanistan (20 400 or 8% of the total number of applicants), Russia (20 100 or 8%), Somalia (19 100 or 7%), Iraq (18 700 or 7%) and Kosovo under UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (14 200 or 5%). Highest number of applicants recorded in France, Germany and UK. 

In 2009 in the EU27, 229 500 first instance decisions were made on asylum applications. There were 166 900 rejections (73% of decisions), 27 600 applicants (12%) were granted refugee status, 26 200 (11%) subsidiary protection and 8 900 (4%) were granted authorisation to stay for humanitarian reasons. The proportion of positive decisions varies considerably among Member States.

Comment
Integration-skoleAsylum seekers are apparently a minor part of the EU immigration: Illegal immigration and legal immigration represent much larger figures. EU Commission: (ec.europa.eu/publications/booklets/move/81/en.doc) As of 2007, there were 18.5 million immigrants from outside the EU (so-called ‘third country nationals’) legally established in the 27 EU countries, representing about 4 % of the total population. Irregular immigrants form only a small minority by comparison. Although by definition there can be no formal figures, estimates from the European Commission suggest there are at least 4.5 million people residing illegally in EU Member states. Asylum-seekers are even fewer. Their numbers are at their lowest level for more than a decade, averaging just over 200 000 a year.
Dansk-Kultur-Folder-Barcelona-Euro-MediterraneanI think these figures are underestimated. Thus, in Denmark there are now apparently about 700.000 immigrants (12,65%  western + non-western and 10,01%  non-western, personal communication) of the population instead of just 4%)– including 2. and 3 generations, who are often even less integrated than the first generation. Why should the EU return asylum seekers, when it has opened recruiting offices in e.g. Mali to recruit 56 mio Africans + their families by 2050 to replace the “diintegrating” Europeans? And when the EU has promised its 4 freedoms incl. free immigration to its Muslims Euromediterranean partners – now bestowed on Morocco? The rejected asylum seekers can, of course appeal, and I guess the EU in the end keeps many of them.

What the EU is doing is no less than the biggest ethnic cleansing, genetically and culturally that the world ever saw. Its model seems to be Kosovo which the EU countries helped cleansing of Serbs in a bloody war – and later the EU took over the ancient Serbian province – to stop a Muslim ethnic cleansing of Serbs: “Now how in the world can the EU imagine that Muslims will be more lenient to other Europeans, once they have reached demographic and parliamentary majority? “We will bear you to pieces” – as a Muslim woman said, thus echoing Ayatollah Khomeiny. Exactly that happend in Kosovo.  And they know that our future can be seen in their favourite “partner country, Morocco.

Human Rights Watch: "Banning minarets or the burqa only leads to further radicalization.” Ole Schröder, German parliamentary state secretary: “In the end, Germany's Muslims should of course cooperate with the authorities to help us deal with this new form of terrorism. The German government is working on is getting imams trained in Germany to ensure that there won't be "imams who preach hatred instead of peace."
After 40 wasted years in which extremism and Jihad have only increased, and although exactly this dialogue method has proven totally inefficient, such statements can no longer be considered naïve or stupid: They are hardcore ideology meant to promote the EU´s ethnic cleansing.