Summary: Psychiatrists now say global warmists have a tendency for obsessive compulsions probably an observation to be taken with a grain of salt. After Copenhagen a dramatic shift has taken place away from people´s belief in the global warming danger - much to the despair of  the New World Order, which according to Danish Climate Minister, Lykke Friis, was behind the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference. So, one champion of the global warming hoax now disregards all facts and is instead ridiculing and killing the characters of the front figures in the revelation of the Jamal-ring, the Climategate and the IPCC scandals, i.e. Lord Christopher Monckton, James Delingpole, Christopher Booker etc. At the same time a cross examination of the "climate science" by Prof. Jason Scott Johnston, of the University of Pennsylvania concluded that every claim by the warmist science failed to stand to scrutiny. The warmist science has not followed the scientific method - but marshalled evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference - and concealed disagreements.Dr. Roy Spencer of the NASA Satellite Program was a co-inventor of the precise method for satellite measurement of global temperatures. In his book, he demonstrates that the global warming scam is based on a he very elementary error. Now James Hansen´s GISS-NASA is being sued according to the FOIA for not handing out NASA e-mails suspicious of being just as scandalous as those of  the Climategate. The prestigious Nature Magazine is about to publish an article showing that CO2 - the basis for looting of mankind through taxes and fees - is only responsible for 5-10% of global warming (which does not exist beyond natural variations). Many hundred famous scientists are now protesting against the global warming fraud. EU countries are rejecting the EU Commission´plans for unilaterally reducing the CO2-emisssion by 30% instead of  20%, which would make our industry incompetitive and force it to leave Europe. For every new green job, 2,2 traditional jobs are lost. Spain knows - and therefore has an unemployment rate of 20%. Nevertheless, officials are making progress behind the stage on their CO2-taxes and redistribution of our wealth to China, India - and countries that will never produce any CO2. For as  a famous British Lord says: "Politicians are ahead of the public anyway". In the US the Chicago Climate Exchange behind all global climate exchanges is awaiting the endorsement of the cap-and-trade law in the US. It was founded by money from the Joyce Foundation with the vote of board member Barack Obama, whose pals like Al Gore, Maurice Strong and IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri are on the CCX board today. But a US Senator has now switched side - making that law uncertain. In the meantime unstoppable BP oil is flowing into the already weakening Gulf Stream. This might mean rapid global cooling - all the while Bill Gates is granting money for "cloud-whitening" with sea water to cool the global climate. Are we about to have a new man-made ice age? Green might not be so bad - if it were not in the wrong hands.

 

Those who still believe in global warming are widely obsessive/compulsive
Voxy.co.nz.: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' Congress at SkyCity Convention Centre in Auckland: “Climate change related obsessions and/or compulsions were identified in 28% of patients presenting with obsessive compulsive disorder. "Media coverage about the possible catastrophic consequences to our planet concerning global warming is extensive and potentially anxiety provoking. We found that many obsessive compulsive disorder patients were concerned about reducing their global footprint"

The Copenhagen Conference was said to be a flop. It was not: As stated by Lord Monckton that was all about a world government´s redistribution of our wealth. In this sense the Copenhagen Conference was a success, agreeing upon “mitigating recompense for (non-existent man-made) CO2–global warming” to needing LDCs like China and India as well as to countries who never did nor ever will produce any CO2. This amounts to 30bn dollars by 2013 – and from 2020 to 100 bn dollars a year from Western countries who are being driven into recession. As Danish Climate Minister, Trilateral Commissioner, Lykke Friis, stated: This conference was the New World Order visiting Denmark.

Since that conference there has been a dramatic shift in people´s attitudes towards the global warming hoax, due to the Jamal tree ring scandal, the Climategate scandal, the IPCC scandal, and so forth: The New York Times 24 May 2010: “Nowhere has this shift in public opinion been more striking than in Britain. Now, the country has evolved into a home base for a thriving group of climate skeptics who have dominated news reports in recent months, apparently convincing many that the threat of warming is vastly exaggerated.” Funnily, according to The Telegraph on 12 June, 2010, the initiator of the global warming scam, Margaret Thatcher, in 2003 had converted and now warned against the flaws of the global warming scam that most can see today.
 
The New World Order People are growing desperate – due to loss of people´s faith in their global warming liesGeorge_Monbiot
MoncktonJournalist George Monbiot in the Guardian 8 June, 2010 (left) states to be fighting with climate deniers, whom he calls stupid. Not caring about overwhelming facts, he makes blatantly arrogant remarks about Lord Christopher Monckton (right) of Brenchley for having seen the fallacies of Monbiot´s champions et al. Now Monbiot has started he  arrogantly takes on his colleagues, Christoper Booker and James Delingpole at the forefront of the revelations of the climate scam and Climategate/IPCCgate. I do not know Lord Monckton´s character, which Monbiot is  killing, but Monckton is certainly right as for world government being the purpose of the notoriuos global warming scam in Copenhagen. Monbiot disregards the fact that the very leader of the East Anglia CRU, Phil Jones in the Daily Mail on 24 febr. 2010 stated that there has been no global warming since 1995!!! But of course not even such a statement will influence a true climate believer. For he knows “the science to be overwhelming and true” – except outside his own imagination.

Monbiot writes in The Guardian that “Monckton repeatedly exposes the shallow fallacy of climate denial, dragging down those stupid enough to believe him. Those of us who do battle with climate change deniers can't inflict one tenth as much damage to their cause that Monckton wreaks every time he opens his mouth…. From now on, like the defrocked Vicar of Stiffkey, he'll be a circus act, a figure of fun whose only followers are as crazed as he is.” (In fact, Lord Monckton also works as an entertainer).
Delightfully, he has just been given a whole new ring in which to perform. In the craziest political decision since Gordon Brown put Digby Jones in his cabinet, the UK Independence party has just made Monckton its deputy leader.
” And this latter job seems to be meant as the worst part of Monbiot´s killing of Lord Monckton´s  “distorted” character!

But here is a more serious view , supporting Lord Monckton and throwing Monbiot´s disdain and mockery right back into his own face
Financial Post 6 June 2010   A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny. The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.”
Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.” The 79-page document, which effectively eviscerates the case for man-made global warming is to be seen in the report here.

And all facts show that Lord Monckton was right – and George Monbiot a bought ideological minion
Roy-spencerThe Telegraph 4 May 2010: Dr Roy Spencer, formerly senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, now leads the US science team for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSRE) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He co-developed the original satellite method for precise monitoring of global temperatures from Earth-orbiting satellites. Dr Spencer thinks global warming is all nonsense, based on a very elementary error he describes in his new book The Great Global Warming  Blunder. Climate change, he shows, is an almost entirely natural process on which human influence is negligible.
Canada Free Press:  Here is a report on the NASA being sued for using a forged formula  to calculate the correlation between global warming and CO2. Besides NASA has broken the law by not complying with the FOIA legislation.

Canada Free Press 30 April 2010: Nature Magazine, the academic journal that introduced the world to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently the human genome, is set to publish a paper in June that shows atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is responsible for only 5-10% of observed warming on Earth, as explained by the paper’s author Professor Jyrki Kauppinen. Since 2009 more than 238 physicists including Nobel Prize winner Ivar Giaever and professors from Harvard, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and dozens of other top universities and research institutions have signed an open letter addressed to the Council of the American Physical Society saying the scientific data did not support the conclusion that increased CO2 concentrations are responsible for global warming. In 2009 over 700 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC members, joined with Senator Inhofe in a Senate Minority Report to express their doubts (protests) over man-made global warming claims. The so-called global warming “scientific consensus” is a complete fabrication and does not exist.

Watts up with that? 29 May 2010:  In 2008, less than half of the ice (47%) was greater than two metres thick. Now, more than 75% of the ice is greater than two metres thick.
New Scandal – NASA-Climategate just around the corner? 
Washington Times 26 May 2010:  Nearly three years after his first Freedom of Information Act request, Christopher C. Horner, senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said he will file a lawsuit to force NASA to turn over documents the agency has promised but has never delivered. Mr. Horner said he expects the documents, primarily e-mails from scientists involved James-hansenwith NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), will be yet another blow to the science behind global warming. That was a manufactured record of aberrant warming."

James Hansen is the NASA Goddard-leader – and a prototype of a corrupt scientist, paid by Al Gore, George Soros and others. He has been caught redhanded twice tampering with global temperatures which he sent to the IPCC. 

Barroso-foran-parlamentBut the elite will not drop a good idea for taxation and power grabbing – just because it is based on lies
Commodities Now 6 May 2010: The European Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries vigorously opposes any further unilateral increase of the EU climate change objectives beyond -20% by 2020.  EUObserver 26 May 2010: France and Germany yesterday joined the growing ranks of European countries opposed to making further unilateral moves on climate change, as the European Commission today plans to make the case for raising the EU’s greenhouse gas reduction goal from -20% to -30% by 2020. The common declaration by France and Germany signals a hardening of Europe’s policy on climate change.  Estrosi said industries would move their factories and jobs abroad if Europe made the move unilaterally.

The Telegraph 11 June 2010: While the sceptics continue to pick over the bones of Copenhagen, the officials behind the scenes have been getting on with the process and it looks like eventually they are making progress. Yvo de Boer, parting UN negotiation leader, hoped that a global agreement could be signed off at the end of 2011. CopenhagenSummit_1546591cMain progress has been made:  On whether mitigation money is to be paid via the World Bank or the UN. A mechanism to stop deforestation called Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation or REDD is making progress. Nations (and WWF and investing Rothschild firms) should be paid not to chop down trees (so remote that they would not be felled anyway). The EU could move to 30 per cent emissions cuts by 2020.

PrisonPlanet 22. June 2010: The plan to impose a carbon tax on American citizens may be dead at least for the time being after Republican Senator Lindsey Graham shockingly reversed his views on climate change, telling a press conference that the science behind man-made global warming is in question and those pushing it are alarmists who have oversold the problem.
However, the elite are still desperate to impose a consumption tax on Americans as part of the kind of nightmare “green economy” that has left Spain with a 20 per cent unemployment rate. In a so-called green economy, over 2.2 jobs are lost for every “green job” created.

What the citizens, those stupid animals, think does not matter except before elections – for  politicians “are ahead of the public anyway”.
 A survey in February by the BBC: found that only 26 percent of Britons believed that “climate change is happening and is now established as largely manmade,” down from 41 percent in November 2009. A poll conducted for the German magazine Der Spiegel found that 42 percent of Germans feared global warming, down from 62 percent four years earlier.
Lord-stern48 percent of Americans believed that the seriousness of global warming was “generally exaggerated,” up from 41 percent a year ago.
ObamaGore
Lord Nicholas Stern (left): In Britain, at least, politicians “are ahead of the public anyway.

Pres Obama back in about 2000 was a director on the board of the Joyce Foundation. He voted for a vital donation of 1.1 bn dollars for the foundation of the Chicago Climate Exchange, which is now behind all Climate exchanges worldwide. Joyce´s then president, today is CCX´executive vice president. Its founder was Richard Sandor, whose 8 bn shares now have a value of more than 260 million. Rothschild puppet and UNEP-founder Maurice Strong is also on the board – and Al Gore has great influence om the CCX. Through the cap-and-trade bill, the gains at the CCX would increase tremendously, the CO2 trade is to take place there. This would probably not be harmful to Mr. President Obama. Also, IPCC-chairman, Rajendra Pachauri from the board of the Rockefeller Foundation, is on the CCX-board

So, what to do?
Times Colonist 12 May 2010Bill Gates is now donating money for “Cloud-whitening”: Spraying sea water into the clouds to make a perfectly normal climateBp-olie1 cooler.  eXtraWagandt 11. Juni 2010:"The Gulf Stream works as a gigantic “heat pump” which has a fundamental influence on the world´s climate. Scientists are taking it for granted that should the flow of the Gulf Stream collapse seriously, this would lead to a worldwide climate change and massive cooling of the world´s climate".  The Raw Story on 2 June 2010: "Goldman Sachs sold 44 % of its BP share holdings – just before the spill. Goldman's sales were the largest of any firm during that time."
Great_conveyor_belt

The BP oil stream has now reached the Loop Current which flows into the Gulf Stream. Here is a survey of the apocalyptical consequences of this oil spill. 

Spiegel 30 Nov. 2010: "The circulation of the Gulf Stream has being slowing  by about 30 percent in the period 1957-2004. But when a certain threshold is reached, the circulation could abruptly switch to a new state in which there is little or no heat flow to the north any more." This would have "devastating impact on the socio-economic conditions" of the whole of Northern Europe. The temperature in the north would then fall by 4 degrees Celsius. "Does the sluggish oil now bring about a further slowing of the Gulf stream? Does the exclusion of water from direct sun exposure by the oil layer lead to a cooling of the water there? Then that would be within the intention of the NWO-climate alarmists. Is the NWO in fact interested in stopping the oil? Would HAARP  be something appropriate here as a remedy? It looks like the damage is found 1000 ft. below the sea floor – and that not only does oil seep up from the bore hole – but also from other leaks in the sea floor.
The Climate battle is Don Quixote´s battle against weather mills – and it is unpayable