The Express 4 March 2010: José Barroso: “The economic crisis is worse than anyone imagined and …. makes the case for stronger economic governance in the EU. Now we have the Lisbon Treaty, which provides for (economic) policy. The Commission intends to use these powers to the full.” 

Summary: In preparation for a major UN meeting in Rio in 2012 - the 20. anniversary of the religious UNCTAD summit at the same place in 1992 when environmental ideology was born - the UNEP, ie. the UN Environment Programme, on 24th-26th February held a meeting in Bali for the environmental ministers of its 58 supervising countries. Despite the CRU and IPCC scandals having revealed global warming as a scam,  the UN is going on using its tool, the global warming lie,  to create its green world government with only the color unlike old, traditional communism. The leaked working paper and leaked information to the Fox News show that at the Rio meeting, a green world government system is to be adopted, whereby CO2/environment becomes the basis for all-encompassing policy. Furthermore, 45 trillion U.S. dollars will be transferred to developing countries - while the West's industries and consumers become stifled through more and more CO2 taxes - and the bankers behind this hoax are making unbelievable gains. According to analyses, they will issue energy allocation accounts, regulate CO2 allowances for each individual and closely monitor the individual's energy consumption and every movement in a consumption-poor world. Exceeding ones allowance will be punished in a police state. All preparations for this post-Kyoto world is in place. The next option will be chip-implantation in all to register individual CO2 consumption balance, which is also cash balance because everything you buy, represents energy. 23% of Germans are willing to accept such a chip, which can also be used to influence individual behavior. Biofuel production has switched away from all reason: It releases more CO2 than fossil fuels - and creates higher food prices and famine. A Global Research article thinks that for people to accept such a state, an overwhelming shock through a global catastrophe is presupposed to put them in a state of total helplessness first. 

UNEP

In my previous post I outlined the World Federalist Manifesto by the Club of Rome, the founder of the UN Environmental Programme -The UNEP. This article will enter upon some shocking details in and consequences of the  meeting in Bali on 24–26 Febr. 2010 of the 58 countries constituting the UNEP´s “Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environmental Forum.”
With religious zeal brainwashed people of the world are now to approve of this, hundreds of millions switching off the light for an hour on March 27 all over the world (WWF).

Infowars 26 Febr. 2010: The  UNEP´s paper outlines the globalist’s mission to enact a “radical transformation of the world economic and social order” by putting “a new treaty in place as the capstone of the Green World Order”.
The result of the Bali meeting is to be implemented in Rio in 2012. The policy proposes that the old economic model be discarded.

As we have previously highlighted, the promise of the creation of “green jobs” will offset the inevitable damage to the economy, a 50 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions causing a complete fallacy. The implementation of so-called “green jobs” in other countries has devastated economies and cost millions of jobs. As the Seattle Times reported back in June, Spain’s staggering unemployment rate of over 18 per cent was partly due to massive job losses as a result of attempts to replace existing industry with wind farms and other forms of alternative energy. In a so-called “green economy,” “Each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries, states the report.
As we have documented, a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions of 50-80 per cent would inflict a new great depression in the United States - comparable with the economic meltdown of 1929 and 1930.

The very foundation of the global warming argument has been completely eviscerated by the Climategate scandal, and here, which proved that United Nations IPCC scientists forged and exaggerated data to “hide the declinein global temperatures. Despite this, control freaks intent on taxing the life-giving gas carbon dioxide have signaled that they no longer care about the truth behind man-made climate change and have resolved to slam through their totalitarian agenda anyway.

Bronze-dragon-1UNEP´s paper from Bali  24–26 Febr. 2010
legal and political framework for the transition to green energy will be created.
Fox News 25 Febr. 2010:The United Nations is pressing full speed ahead with a plan for a greatly expanded system of global environmental governance. The new Rio summit will end, according to U.N. documents obtained by Fox News, with a "focused political document" presumably laying out the framework and international commitments to a new Green World Order.

The GC/GMEF, as it is known, is made up of environmental ministers and top-level bureaucrats from a roster of supervising nations — the U.S. is one of them. The major topics are a global system of governance and what amounts to the next stage of a radical transformation of the world economic and social order, in the name of saving the planet.  The paper paints the coming green order in nebulous and utopian terms. It "implies the decoupling of resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth." It involves "substantially increased investment in green sectors, supported by enabling policy reforms." The investments will "provide the mechanism for the reconfiguration of businesses, infrastructure and institutions, and for adoption of sustainable consumption and production processes." It will lead to "more green and decent jobs, reduced energy and material intensities in production processes, less waste and pollution, and significantly reduced greenhouse-gas emissions." "Moving towards a green economy would also provide an opportunity to re-examine national and global governance structures and consider whether such structures allow the international community to respond to current and future environmental and development challenges and to capitalize on emerging opportunities."

The discussion paper assumes that the goal of the green economic transformation is the same as that of the ill-fated Copenhagen conference: a 50 percent reduction in global carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. That, the paper says, will require a staggering $45 trillion dollar to accomplish — much of it in transfers from rich nations to poorer ones.

But that is only the beginning of the transformation. Consumption patterns must change, so that fewer wasteful products are consumed, and more ecologically proper ones are produced. The UNEP authors, citing other analytical papers produced by UNEP, claim that "the global market for environmental products and services is projected to double from the present $1.37 trillion per year to $2.74 trillion by 2020." The report notes, for example, that the U.S. recycling industry as of 2002 is  employing 1 million people. The paper claims that "10 million new green jobs could be created by investing in sustainable forest management."

The report argues that …the green investment it envisages amounts to a trillion-a-year.  The paper says that "regulated market mechanisms" are needed to "to promote new and innovative investments in green technology." But above all, the paper asserts, the focus on ecological transformation must become all-encompassing if it is to succeed. Quoting from UNEP's formal medium-term strategy for 2010 to 2013, it says that "linkages between environmental sustainability and the economy will emerge as a key focus for public policymaking and a determinant of future market opportunities." In other words, the green economy requires a green-oriented political revolution. The authors of the UNEP "discussion" papers see that the UNEP — the U.N.'s principal environmental watchdog — and especially its "Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environmental Forum," as the central nexus of that new eco-centric regime.

"In all of this, it appears, the 2012 Rio Conference welds together the UNEP framework of environmentalism with the U.N.'s traditional anti-poverty agenda — which also involves huge investment transfers to poor countries from rich ones.

Atom-angreb-_58144tRichard K. Moore 27 Febr. 2010 Global Research: “The term 'new world order' is too weak a term to characterize the radical nature of the social transformation here described.
A more apt characterization would be a 'quantum leap in the domestication of the human species'. Needless to say, regular use of psychotropic drugs would be mandated, so that people could cope emotionally with such a sterile, inhuman environment.
For such a profound transformation to be possible, it is easy to see that a very great shock is required, on the scale of collapse and social chaos, and possibly on the scale of a nuclear exchange. There needs to be an implicit mandate to 'do whatever is necessary to get society running again'. The shock needs to leave people in a condition of total helplessness comparable to the survivors in the bombed-out rubble of Germany and Japan after World War 2. Nothing less will do.

Each part of the prognosis has been based on precedents that have been set, modus operandi that has been observed, trends that have been initiated, sentiments that have been expressed, signals that have been given, and actions that have been taken whose consequences can be confidently predicted. In addition, in looking at all of these indicators together, one sees a certain mindset, an absolutist determination to implement the 'ideal solution' (Agenda 21), without compromise, using extreme means, and with unbridled audacity.
World wars have been rehearsals for this historic moment. The police state infrastructure is in place and has been tested. The economy is in the process of collapse. Our elite planners are backed up by competent think tanks. They've had quite a bit of experience with social engineering, nurturing the rise of fascism, and then engineering the postwar regimes. They understand the importance of mythology.

One way or another, the bankers of the greedy elite, the masters of the universe, here and here, intend to preside over a micromanaged global system. The collapse project is now well underway.  There will be some trigger point, some stage in the economic collapse scenario, when geopolitical confrontation is judged to be most advantageous. We seem to be nearing the endgame. It will be a new era. 

In our post-Kyoto-2012 world, we have for the first time one centralized global government, and one ruling elite clique,
Rothschild-portrætRockefeller logoa kind of extended royal family, i.e. the lords of finance and here. As we can see with the IMF, WHO, and the WTO, and the other pieces of the embryonic world government, the institutions of governance will make no pretensions about popular representation or democratic responsiveness. Rule will be by means of autocratic global bureaucracies, who take their marching orders from the royal family. Presumably nations will continue to exist, as official units of governance. The main role of so-called 'government' will be to allocate and administer the carbon-credit budget that it receives from the IPCC. However security and policing will be largely centralized and privatized. 

The economics of non-growth are radically different than capitalist economics.
The unit of exchange is likely to be a carbon credit, entitling you to consume the equivalent of one kilogram of fuel. Everything will have a carbon value, allegedly based on how much energy it took to produce it and transport it to market. 'Green consciousness' will be a primary ethic, conditioned early into children. Getting by with less is a virtue; using energy is anti-social; austerity is a responsible and necessary condition.
TechnatecardAs with every currency, the bankers will want to manage the scarcity of carbon credits, and that's where global warming alarmism becomes important. Regardless of the availability of resources, carbon credits can be kept arbitrarily scarce simply by setting carbon budgets and here , based on directives from the IPCC, another of our emerging units of global bureaucratic governance. Those budgets set the scale of economic activity. Already in Britain there is talk of carbon quotas, like gasoline rationing in wartime. It's not just that you'll pay taxes on energy, but the amount of energy you can consume will be determined by government directive. Carbon credits will be issued to you, which you can use for driving, for heating, or on rare occasions for air travel. Also in Britain, the highways are being wired so that they can track how many miles you drive, tax you accordingly, and penalize you if you travel over your limit. We can expect these kinds of things to spread throughout the West, as it's the same international bankers who are in charge everywhere. Left: Howard Scott´s Energy Distribution Certificate. Comment: The EU will now charge a tax of 10 Euros a tonne of CO2 for a start.

Scanner-420x0On a daily basis, you will need to go through checkpoints of various kinds, with varying levels of security requirements. This is where biometrics becomes important. If people can be implanted with chips and here, then much of the security can be automated, and everyone can be tracked at at all times, and their past activity retrieved. The chip links into your credit balance, so you've got all your currency always with you, along with your medical records and lots else that you don't know about. Today 23% of Germans are ready to accept a chip unter their skin!

In a non-growth economy there'll be semi-state, semi-private bureaucracies, concerned about budgets and quotas rather than growth, somewhat along the lines of the Soviet model: the Wall Street bailouts, the forced restructuring of General Motors, the call for centralized micromanagement of banking and industry, and the mandating of health insurance coverage. In an era of non-growth, the focus of the game will be on the consumption side of the economy. The bankers will be controlling the necessities of life: access to food and energy. Taxes will be mostly based on consumption, particularly of energy. That's what the global warming scare is all about, with its carbon taxes and carbon credits. The whole environmental movement has been captured by it. In Copenhagen, demonstrators confronted the police, carrying signs in support of carbon taxes and carbon credits. But in fact the carbon regime has nothing to do with climate or with sustainability. It is all about micromanaging every aspect of our lives, as well as every aspect of the economy. Comment: In fact, biofuel – palm oil – emits 35% more CO2 than fossil fuel – but the EU insists on going on producing biofuel – stealing arable land from starving 3. world people!!!

Indeed, the real purpose behind biofuels is genocide. With food prices linked to energy prices, and agriculture land being converted from food production to fuel production, the result can only be a massive increase in 3. world starvation. Depopulation has long been a stated goal in elite circles, and the Rockefeller dynasty has frequently been involved in eugenics projects of various kinds.

With such a focus on social micromanagement, I do not expect the family unit to survive in the new era (Adam Weishaupts 6 point programme), and I expect child-abuse alarmism will be the lever used to destabilize the family. Whenever I turn on the TV, I see at least one public-service ad, with shocking images, AGENDA-21-2about children who are physically or sexually abused, or criminally neglected, in their homes, and there's a hotline phone number that children can call.

The so-called War on Terrorism has two parts.
The first part is a pretext for arbitrary abuse of citizen's rights, whenever Homeland Security claims the action is necessary for security reasons. The second part is a pretext for arbitrary US military aggression anywhere in the world, whenever the White House claims that Al Qaeda is active there. When powers are arbitrary, then we are no longer living under the rule of law. We are living under the rule of men, as you would expect in a dictatorship. My own view is that most of the dramatic 'terrorist' events in the US, UK, and Europe have been covert false-flag operations.”

No Comment. I am dumbfounded!