Sat 28 Nov 2009
Deceitful CRU Works For Corporate World Revolution - Supported by the UK´s and New Zealand´s Governments
Summary: To the fraud revelations about the the CRU, the IPCC-supplier of forged predictions of climatic doomsday, now comes a similar scandal from New Zealand - started by a former employee at the CRU. NIWA, owned by NZ´s government, has also forged a non-existent warming over NZ. But worse still: East Anglia University´s CRU is supported by UK government departments, the DEFRA, which has issued a guidance on how to include i.a. applied psychology to manipulate people to not only accept what politicians / "scientists" know is a climate lie, but also to change people's lives accordingly. For that purpose, DEFRA published "The Rules of the Game" alongside with Futerra, which has as its declared goal world revolution on behalf of the multinational corporations. These rules are outlined. I.a. they want to thaw people frozen in their old positions, change them during their sensitive periods, and then refreeze them, when they have been converted to the desired attitudes. They are discussing whether shock technique or softer forms of manipulation work better. They let "credible" people and media disseminate the climate lie, for those people are most believed by the public! An email from from a CRU staff member goes: "Futerra's 'rules of the game' is a good intro to what climate change communicators should be working towards in terms of best practice." This member deals with "Societal attitudinal and behavioural engagement with climate change" - a peculiar job in a "scientific" group. This is ideology - not science. We are dealing here with conspiracy practice between the British government and the IPCC climate suppliers of forged material for the New World Order global policy, the biggest lie in science, perhaps in world history, the pretext for the UN's parody: The Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen, which has world government as its real theme. The Government of New Zealand has an ETS interest in "global warming." A press release from "Earth Government" was found
First a good laugh: Hockeystick Michael Mann´s last Climategate hit: "Hide the decline." Now many scientists demand Mann and Phil Jones to be fired and barred from the IPCC - even demanding the IPCC to be disbanded.
The climate deception is now an exposed global conspiracy
The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition: We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.
The New Zealand National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) is responsible for New Zealand's National Climate Database. From NIWA’s web site — Figure 7 above: Mean annual temperature over New Zealand, from 1853 to 2008 inclusive, based on between 2 (from 1853) and 7 (from 1908) long-term station records. The blue and red bars show annual differences from the
1971 – 2000 average, the solid black line is a smoothed time series, and the dotted [straight] line is the linear trend over 1909 to 2008 (0.92°C/100 years). Dr Jim Salinger (who no longer works for NIWA) started this graph in the 1980s when he was at CRU (Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK) It’s published on NIWA’s website at:
The Climate Science Coalition used NIWA´s raw temperatures - and found:
Right below: Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850. The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming as documented below. NIWA´s shareholding Ministers are the Minister of Finance (50%), and the Minister of Research, Science & Technology (50%).
The mendacious basis of the climate movement as been further plentifully exposed:1 James Hansen and GISS manipulating surface temperature. The following is a recipe for revolution – not Bolshevik style – but the revolution of manipulation to accept the new World Order climate agenda as a proxy for the deeper goal: World government. 2. Keith Briffa´s and Michael Mann´s manipulating figures as for tree rings as proxies for global temperature – on the basis of material of uncertain origin. 3. the hacking of CRU´e-mails and documents lately.
Here are 5 alleged e-mails from the Futerra-CRU-traffic. A Futerra document is said to have been found among the CRU documents hacked recently. InformationLiberation: "The document included within the climategate treasure-chest is called 'Rules of the Game' and shows deliberate deception on the part of this agency to ensure that the debate would indeed be perceived as being settled. When facts do not convince, they reasoned, let us appeal to emotions in order to get the job done." Be this document among the hacked files or not: Documents do confirm, the CRU is closely interwoven with the UK government, as seen from this list of supporters: History of the CRU (link now altered - see here): Supporters: i.a. Department of Energy, Department of the Environment (DETR, now DEFRA), Department of Health, Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Environment Agency, Forestry Commission, Greenpeace International, International Institute of Environmental Development (IIED), World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), Shell, British Petroleum, Stockholm Environment Agency, Sultanate of Oman, Tate and Lyle, UK Met. Office, United Nations Environment Plan (UNEP), United States Department of Energy.
Here is one mail from Saffron O´Neill 2 Oct. 2006: "Futerra's 'rules of the game' is a good intro to what climate change communicators should be working towards in terms of best practice." Dr.Saffron O´Neill is on the CRU staff on "Societal attitudinal and behavioural engagement with climate change" - a peculiar job in a "scientific" group.
Futerra Revolution:Sustainability, green, climate change, fair trade, ethical, CSR, eco-chic. CSR: Corporative Social responsibility. As an example of CSR we have just seen how the vaccine producers forced governments to buy their swine flu vaccine – but refused to take responsibility for the injuries and damages ensuing therefrom. Here its corporate clients can be seen.
Whether it's the biggest challenge of our lives, climate change, or the massive opportunities presented by the new 'ethical consumer', what Futerra's been doing for over eight years is hot.
We work across Europe and the USA, have clients in China and Australia, and completed projects in Russia, Brazil and Africa last year. Everywhere we work, people are thinking differently, and beginning to act differently.
Be part of the revolution.
But the real difference is that since our foundation in 2001, we’ve only ever worked on corporate responsibility and sustainability. And we have a Bible, too.
Futerra and The UK Department for Environment published the Rules of the Game on 7 March 2005.
Here is an extract of the “Rules of the Game”
Why were the principles created? The game is communicating climate change; the rules will help us win it. These principles were created as part of the UK Climate Change Communications Strategy, an evidence-based strategy aiming to change public attitudes towards climate change in the UK. This is a ‘short version’ of a far longer document of evidence.
One ‘überprinciple’ emerged: “Changing attitudes towards climate change is not like selling a particular brand of soap – it’s like convincing someone to use soap in the first place.” These principles are a first step to using sophisticated behaviour change modelling and comprehensive evidence from around the world to change attitudes towards climate change. We need to think radically, and the Rules of the Game are a sign that future campaigns will not be ‘business as usual’. This is a truly exciting moment.
2. Forget the climate change detractors. Those who deny climate change science are irritating, but unimportant. The argument is not about if we should deal with climate change, but how we should deal with climate change.
Comment: I wonder if these criminals are just as arrogant to the climate change deniers now after the hacking of their mails and documents
4. Once we’ve eliminated the myths, there is room for some new ideas. These principles relate to some of the key ideas emerging from behaviour change modelling for sustainable development.
Comment: In simmary: Abolish the Old World Order, so that we can substitute it for The communist, sustainable New World Order in which we are to be remodelled.
6. Use both peripheral and central processing Attracting direct attention to an issue can change attitudes, but peripheral messages can be just as effective.
8. Use transmitters and social learning People – learn through social interaction, and some people are better teachers and trendsetters than others. Targeting these people will ensure that messages seem more trustworthy and are transmitted more effectively.
12. Create ‘agency’ for combating climate change. Agency is created when people know what to do, decide for themselves to do it, have access to the infrastructure in which to act, and understand that their contribution is important.
16. Create a trusted, credible, recognised voice on climate change We need trusted organisations and individuals that the media can call upon to explain the implications of climate change to the UK public.
19. The communications must be sustained over time. All the most successful public awareness campaigns have been sustained consistently over many years.
20. Partnered delivery is often a key component for projects However, the Futerra is a partner of the UK Government´s DEFRA. And Futerra´s “Rules of the Game” are largely identical with those of the Annexe E of Defras recommendations to brainwash the public: Checklist of best practice principles to encourage pro-environmental behaviour
Here is more, ia. New Game’ guide. The original Rules were developed as a guide for communication which could change attitudes towards climate change. They formed the evidence
base that underpins the ongoing UK Government campaign.
Once you’ve woken or ‘unfrozen’ people from their sleepwalking behaviour, you can convince them to change. But once they’ve adopted the new behaviours, you need to find a way of ‘refreezing’ them, so the positive behaviour becomes an unconscious habit again. Make your messages as personalised as possible. Create climate messages about ”my region, my town, my street, my house, me”. People really want to be good, important and useful. Strange but true. Much climate change communications makes people feel bad, irrelevant and useless. Help people to understand (and trust) that they are making a difference. Climate change isn’t yet in most people’s ‘locus of control’; it feels like a big nasty threat they have no influence over. Until people feel on the inside that changing their behaviour will make a difference, no amount of information, price cuts or haranguing will bring about the change needed.
Losing £5 feels more important then gaining £5. It’s a small but powerful insight. Of course you can communicate the benefits of new actions, but lead in with the real losses people are suffering as a result of their current unsustainable behaviour.
Empathy is a powerful motivator for change, but most people don’t empathise with landscapes. If places are threatened by climate change, then show the people and animals who are in danger. We need to make solutions sound more heroic, use grander terms, and make the scale of the solution sound equal to the scale of the problem.
There is a massive range of communications channels that can be used for climate change, from advertising to education, TV to literature, newspapers to door-stepping.
If you’re trying to change habits, it’s no good convincing someone just once. You need to remind them exactly when they’re taking the action you want to change.
Get someone to do something small and then introduce another larger action once the small one is completed. The move upwards won’t just happen on its own: communications are needed to link each rung of the ladder.
Climate change communications need an ongoing series of peaks. Small behaviours don’t automatically lead to bigger ones, but big and socially visible ones can lead to smaller ones.
There are times of big changes in our lives: getting married, moving house, starting a new job, having a baby or retiring. People are far more open to change in these ‘transition zones’, because their habits are all in flux. Less significant times of personal change work as well. Try communicating on payday, in spring and autumn, during our summer holidays. Change people when they’re already changing.
Futerra founder, Ed Gillespie, The Guardian 20 Nov. 2009 Do shock tactics actually work to shift the public's attitudes and behaviours? Conventional psychological theory suggests that shock ads used to work because their message wormed its way so deeply into our consciousness that we're eventually compelled to act on it. However I'm still not sure it will change behaviour, the danger is that by pumping up the high octane drama of an ad, you increase the risk of viewers feeling manipulated and dismissing it as pure propaganda.
Gillespie is dangerous, for he is clever. He is practising applied psychology for propaganda at its worst: brainwashing - like the “Rules of the Game”, the author of which he may be.
We can now conclude that the climate revolution at East Anglia University´s CRU has wide ramifications: Not just to the U.S. climate mafia - but also to the British Government's DEFRA and its partner, the Futerra, who declares to stand for a revolution for the world domination by international corporations. And several British ministries support the climate work / scam of the CRU. Now it appears that the New Zealand Government´s NIWA has also rigged temperatures in order to obtain a non-existent warming. The fraud was commenced by one Dr Salinger during his engagement at the CRU.
What we see here is a widespread revolutionary movement with the purpose of radically changing the world and us. You may also say this is oldfashioned missionary activity. It is led by rhe British government who has expressed its will to change the British Society radically by multiculturalism – according to Tony Blair´s speechwriter. But to make sure that all sails are set the British government makes a programme which stakes on revolution through the enviromentalist movement as well. Its own Defra states to be indoctrinating and brainwashing the Brits – even in cooperation with the Futerra which states its aim to be revolution. What is particularly nasty is that they are recruiting “credible” persons and organisations to spread their mendacious campaign. The British government is heavily supporting the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, the purveyor of the Nobel Laureate, the IPCC´s, climate projections, the mendacious basis of the Climate Change Conference of Copenhagen 7–13 Dec. Even Obamas "science-tsar, John Holdren is represented, supporting fraudulent Michael Mann and despising a climate sceptic Dr. Baliuna.
The CRU has just been exposed as as a gang of fraudsters hiding the real status quo in global temperature for, possibly for ideological reasons: Jonathan Brown, Independent Journalist: One of the leaked climate (CRU) emails was a press release from “Earth Government” Newsletter dated 27 Mar 2003. The document calls for a ‘democratic’ world government that would amalgamate and reform the prevailing global institutions including the United Nations, IMF, World Bank WTO, NAFTA, FTAA and others “for the good of all.” It is identical with the World Federalist Manifesto by US Director of the climate alarmist Club of Rome, Francesco Stipo - and in full agreement with Futerra´s CSR.
4 Responses to “ Deceitful CRU Works For Corporate World Revolution - Supported by the UK´s and New Zealand´s Governments ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.