Tue 24 Jun 2008
UN Chief of the IAEA , El-Baradei ””…if a military attack is launched against Iran, it will make the Middle Eastern area a ball of fire. What I experience with Iran today is a current, serious and urgent danger,” he says.
American politicians say they cannot preclude an attack on Iran, unless the Mullah regime stop critical parts of its nuclear programme.” The Danish State Radio June 20. Times Online June 21 and CNN June 22, 2008.
What makes such a prominent personality issue such an alarming statement right now?
At the beginning of the month of June, 2008, the Israeli Airforce held a maneouvre with over 100 aircraft in the Eastern Mediterrean and Greece, drilling an attack on a target as far away as the Iranian Natanz nuclear plant . US government spokesmen said this was a clear signal to Iran.
The Hamburger Abendblatt will know that the attacks on various nuclear plants will take place by means of small nuclear bombs - and very soon, since the Iranian nuclear plants are being equipped with Russian high-tech anti-aircraft missiles.
As previously stated on this blog, former German Foreign Minister, Joschka Fisher, Distinguihed Diplomat to the Rockefeller-US Council on Foreign relations as well as George Soros´ cofounder of the European Council on Foreign Relations, has foretold an Israeli attack on Iran in the near future.
Under the headline: "Merkel wants war" the "Neue Rheinische Zeitung" quotes bilderberger (2005), Chancellor Angela Merkel as saying: "Iran has transgressed the red line".
Statements from Israeli Vice-prime Minister Mofaz , and also Foreign Minister Liwni and Prime Minister Olmert more than indicate that there will be an Israeli attack on Iran before the end of President Bush jr.´s presidency.
And Pres. Bush seems willing to accept a military strike on Iran. And no wonder, for “President George W. Bush has sparked much alarm by openly declaring himself to be a dictator in the event of a national emergency under new provisions that will effectively nullify the U.S. constitution, but such an infrastructure has been in place for over 70 years and this merely represents a re-authorization of the infrastructure of martial law”
Here is what der Spiegel Online wrote on June 16, 2008
“In truth, however, there is now a consensus within the Israeli government that an air strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities has become unavoidable.
"Most members of the Israeli cabinet no longer believe that sanctions will convince President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to change course," says Minister of Immigrant Absorption Yaakov Edri.
Former israeli top general Dani Yatom: "A military operation is needed if the world wants to stop Iran."
The one question over which Israel's various political groups disagree is the timing of an attack. The doves argue that diplomatic efforts by the United Nations should be allowed to continue until Iran is on the verge of completing the bomb.
The hawks, on the other hand, believe time is running out. They stress that there is now a "favorable window of opportunity" that will close with the US presidential election in November, and that Israel can only depend on American support for as long as current US President George W. Bush is still in charge in Washington
Pres. Bush jr.:” There's a lot of urgencies when it comes to dealing with Iran, and the Israeli political folks … if you go to Israel and listen carefully, you'll hear that urgency in their voice”.
Many think the real purpose of Pres. Bush´s visit to Israel in June, 2008, was Iran - and not just a farewell visit.
All experts agree that the Iranian bomb doesn't yet exist.
Even the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed ElBaradei, voiced in a recent SPIEGEL interview his concern that Iran is sending out the message that it could "build the bomb in a relatively short period. And no one knows better than the Israeli leadership just how much power lies in the mere belief that a country has nuclear weapons.
In a recent letter to Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak wrote that Tehran is not far from the "point of no return" at which the Israelis believe Iran could no longer be prevented from developing a bomb. Israeli intelligence officials believe that Iranian weapons engineers could have enough enriched uranium to build a nuclear warhead by 2009.
Another indication of upcoming hard times is the fact that Iran has witdrawn its money, about 75 million dollars, home from European Banks
How can Iran retaliate an Israeli attack?
Of course it can block the Hormuz Strait thus creating a heretofore unseen oil crisis.
It can attack US war ships in the Gulf
Years ago there were rumours that Iran had nuclear warheads – bought from Khazakstan after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. However, I guess the Mossad would have known - and that in that case Iran would already have staged a surprise attack on Israel.
I think it is more likely that the Iranians will attack the "Big Satan", the USA, in Iraq.
Besides, President Putin has warned against any attacks against his ally, Iran.
Now, why is this of concern to us Europeans?
1. The NATO will most likely be involved in this confrontation
2. Since 1995 the Euromediterranean Project is developing more and more into the “Union for the Mediterranean” to be launched in Paris on July 13-14, 2008.
This blog has extensively described the wherabouts of this secret project. Israel is a member of the upcoming Union. This means the EU is becoming part of the permanent Middle East crisis – and directly involved in its probably nuclear war conclusion.
3. Jerusalem Post on June 16, 2008:
Despite intense lobbying by Egypt and the Palestinian Authority, the European Union on Monday - in a sign of vastly improved European-Israeli relations over the last few years - agreed to a significant upgrade of relations.
Israeli-EU relations will be upgraded in three areas:
A.increased diplomatic cooperation: there will be increased meetings between government ministers, senior officials and parliamentarians from both sides.
B. Israel's participation in European plans and agencies;
C. examination of possible Israeli integration into the European single market. .
These negotiations seem to have taken place at EU-Commission level - without the knowledge og the EU Parliament!
The EU is consequently deeply involved in the upcoming Middle East disaster. Why?
The EU has declared itself to be illuminist (explanatory statement) with cosmopolitan interests in extending its sway beyond the borders of Europe. It probably cannot do so openly due to popular European opposition.
Illuminism is a Luciferian, Antichristian movement, the goal of which is the corporate multicultural world state.
What is the Talmud
It is the Pharisaism combated by Christ - quite simply!!!
This direction must not be confused with the non-elitist Thorah-followers, the Christian or secular Jews. For they are - like Christ - the greatest and foremost victims of the talmud-elite.
In fact, the Supreme Court building in Jerusalem is a Rothschild Temple (right above) !!! Notice the pyramid with the all-seeing eye of Lucifer in the roof to the
left. The inside is full of illuminist, Rothschild symbols.
Left above: The back-side of the great Seal of the USA. A gift from Mayer Amschel Rothschild. Known from the 1 dollar bills.
No wonder, since the House of Rothschild founded the first settlements in Palestine for returning Jews from the Russian pogromes about 1880 – and bribed President Truman to recognize Israel in 1948. Price: 2 million dollars!
This Zionist movement had no great love for Jews, its founder Theodor Herzl stating in 1897:” It is essential that the sufferings of Jews….become worse….this will assist in the realization of our plans. The antisemites shall become our best friends”.
I guess that is the reason why Rockefeller´s I.G. Farben produced the Zyklon B gas for Auschwitz – and why Rockefeller´s Standard Oil made money on fuel for Hitler´s war machine through licence to the Wehrmacht´s production of petrol from coal by means of Jewish slave labour at Auschwitz, even paying SS guards there.
Of course, Muscle flexing and psychological warfare is part of the game. But if you start the game there is no way back - unless the enemy gives in. In
NATOs Grand Strategy is stated on pp.104-105: "These steps must be accompanied by well coordinated and proactive media efforts, which could help achieve the objectives without recourse to intervention.
The instruments of this phase range from all forms of coercive
diplomacy… UN legalisation may not be necessary under Article 51 of the UN Charter (self-defence) and it may be possible to renounce it under the
Genocide Convention." !!!
Iran cannot be scared. Ahmedinejad is paving the way for the second coming of the 12. imam, the Shiite Messiah - to return after an Armageddon of war. Illuminist Skull and Bonesman President Bush probably believes in the illuminist High Priest Albert Pike "prophecy" of 3 world wars - the last about Israel - to establish the world state announced by his father in his illuminist-religious 1991- State of the Union speech as "the illumination of a thousand points of light."
Both seem to have a common god, in fact. I cannot but pity all of us, Europeans, Americans, Jews, Iranians who have such mean leaders.
it does look as if the New World Order intends to kindle a ball of fire that really will make the 1000 hidden illuminist points of light sparkle.
The cleverest thing about this is that of course Iranian priesthood is the enemy of us all: It was Khumeinys revolution which called for Muslim invasion and conquest of Europe by means of the baby-bomb.
There is a logical Hegelian/New World Order sequence: Financing the Russian communist revolution (thesis) - financing Hitler (antithesis) - World War II + its necessary conequence: Israel (synthesis) = new thesis - wars with Islam/Iran (antithesis) - synthesis? to lead to the world state.
19 Responses to “ Gunboat Diplomacy Against Iran: “A Ball of Fire in “our” Union for the Mediterranean”? ”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.