Mon 31 Aug 2009
Gulf War Syndrome: WHO Allows 22+ Mio. Seasonal and Innumerable Swine Flu Vaccinations with 1 Mio. Times More Squalene
Swine flu vaccine updates here.
Abstract The article proves a fact which everyone should now: There is 1 million times more squalene in the GlaxoSmithKline vaccine for the EU, Pandemrix, than there was in the anthrax vaccine which undoubtedly contributed to making 25% of 697.000 soldiers participating in the Gulf War 1990–1991 sick, deployed abroad as well as not deployed (Gulf War Syndrome – GWS). The role of squalene in causing the Gulf War syndrome has been hushed up. See what the risk may be on this Discovery video. Anthrax vaccination with squalene is shown. Radiation apparently had an effect. However, this does not explain why the non-deployed, vaccinated personnel at home fell equally ill with autoimmune diseases as those deployed in the Gulf region. Nor why “voluntary” Israeli soldiers vaccinated with US and Israeli anthrax vaccine had GWS - nor why 2 US volunteers vaccinated with squalene had GWS. I have previously written on swine flu vaccine here, and here and here - and on the Global Research. Now it turns out that the WHO has allowed equally high squalene concentration in 22+ mio. seasonal flu vaccinations! At the same time The European Congress of Endocrinology 2008 reported a disturbing increase in the rate of autoimmune diseases. Due to Squalene?
The choice of vaccines posing the squalene Gulf War syndrome risk – as well as the thimerosal risk of developing autism (Robert F. Kennedy Jr.) and of developing nervous cell damages – as well as the danger of the Guillan-Barré syndrome, video 1 and video 2, is incomprehensible, since there is the alternative of nasal vaccination with AstraZeneca´s MedImmune. Which I advise you to demand if forced to take a vaccination.
Now I want to draw your attention to the further development around the squalene containing anthrax vaccine
Gulf War Vets Home Page 16 Oct. 2006: “The Pentagon’s mandatory anthrax vaccine program was halted in October 2004 when Washington, D.C. federal Judge Emmet Sullivan cited the FDA for failing to follow FDA licensing regulations. He issued a permanent injunction directing DOD to stop giving the experimental anthrax vaccine to military personnel without their voluntary, informed consent. In December 2005, the FDA issued a new Final Order declaring the vaccine safe and effective, but failed to provide evidence the vaccine was effective against inhalation (weaponized) anthrax, and failed to address published research studies and 5,000 adverse events reports received by FDA demonstrating that anthrax vaccine is causing serious health problems.”
On 29 June 2007a Government Accountability Office Report says that the Vaccine Health Centers are working with the Military Vaccine Agency (MILVAX) to research adverse reactions–but no studies have been reported in the medical literature. I (Meryl Nass) have heard from ill soldiers that several percent of their units were medevaced home prior to seeing any combat–due to heart attacks, gastrointestinal illnesses, and sudden development of autoimmune disorders.
Now it turned out in 2007 that “voluntary” Israeli soldier “guinea pigs” were also disabled by US and Israeli anthrax vaccine – without apparently having been exposed to radiation. “The vaccinated (apparently not unvaccinated) soldiers suffer from breathing and skin problems and from having various degrees of difficulty with everyday functions. Until 2005 about half of the U.S.'s soldiers refused to be vaccinated with this substance due to the fear of after-effects.” The Daily Mail on Aug. 27, 2009 reports of another 4 British soldiers having the Gulf war syndrome after a series of vaccinations.
Dr. Meryl Nass´testimony to the House Veterans Affairs Health Subcommittee. 26 July 2007
“I practice internal medicine in Maine, have a background in anthrax and biological warfare, and conduct a specialty clinic for patients with multisymptom illnesses such as Gulf War Syndrome, anthrax vaccine-induced illnesses, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.
The stories of those with Gulf War or anthrax vaccine-associated illnesses are usually heartrending. Most became disabled in their 20s to 40s with a combination of physicial impairments, cognitive problems and often psychiatric disorders. They receive 10 to 15 diagnoses each, on average.
First, anthrax vaccine (with squalene) can cause a wide range of disorders, but most commonly causes a syndrome clinically indistinguishable from Gulf War Syndrome. Many studies have shown that it was a contributor, but certainly not the only contributor, to Gulf War illnesses.
Data from the military’s Defense Medical Surveillance System have shown that vaccinated service members have significantly elevated rates of heart attacks, several cancers, asthma, diabetes, Crohns Disease, psychoses, depression and blood clots, compared to prevaccination rates.
A GAO report last month cited CDC and military Vaccine Healthcare Center officials, who said that 1 to 2% of anthrax vaccine recipients may experience potentially disabling side effects or death. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs concurred with the report. See the entire GAO Communication here, especially pp. 1-4
The Centers for Disease Control has been conducting a trial of anthrax vaccine in 1500 civilians since 2002. Over 100 adverse event reports have been filed with FDA on trial subjects, but no preliminary data have been released to the public, and the investigators have decided to focus on short-term adverse events. Congress could investigate this study and insist that adequate long-term safety data are collected.
In the case of Gulf War and anthrax vaccine studies, a number of issues can be identified that led to unusable results:• The wrong questions were asked • Data were withheld • Dubious methods were chosen • Sample sizes were inadequate to answer the questions asked • Control groups contained exposed subjects, and exposed groups contained unexposed subjects
Finally, former government officials who supported and expanded anthrax vaccinations while in office are now on the payroll of the vaccine manufacturer, or companies with government contracts related to anthrax vaccine. This includes two former Health and Human Services secretaries.”
The role of squalene
25% of 697.000 US personnel deployed abroad and at at home fell ill with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS). You can find this table of FDA analyses from the 1. Gulf War lots on the The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website. a. AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion), b. AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene, c. AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene, d. AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene, e. AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene. On an average 34.2 ppb of squalene were given. This website also notes: “Squalene has also been found in the vaccine administered in Great Britain, although the Ministry also denied its presence”. Interestingly, a reference to the “Ministry of Defense - UK - ANTHRAX VACCINE CONTAINS SQUALENE” has a link that leads to an emptied document!
As seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document, the Pandemrix vaccine contains 10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.000 mikrogrammes pr. billion mikrogrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per dose than in the Gulf War vaccine. There is any reason to believe that this will make people sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me. More on Global Research.
I demanded the Danish Medicinal Agency to discard this vaccine. No reaction.
So far, the use of squalene has been banned by the FDA in the US according to Der Spiegel. However, this may not last long: FDA: “Currently, no U.S. licensed vaccine contains the adjuvants MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene). It is expected that a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine manufactured using the same process as U.S. licensed seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine but administered with MF-59 or ASO3 will be authorized for emergency use only.”
Now for the immunological side effects of squalene to occur takes months to years – and cannot be evaluated after up to 6 weeks of observation. Der Spiegel calls the mass vaccinations on Europeans a gigantic costfree experiment to provide the FDA with mass vaccination experience to clear the vaccine producers´ track for sale in the US.
EMEA admits that side effects can only be found through extensive vaccination campaigns!
Here is what EMEA has to say about risks of GSK Pandemrix
EMEAs Pandemrix is commonly or very commonly associated with a range of local and systemic adverse reactions but these are not often of severe intensity and the safety profile would not preclude the use of the vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-60 years or > 60 years.
However, there are some adverse reactions known to be very rarely associated with influenza vaccines and it is currently not possible to predict if higher rates might be observed with Pandemrix compared with, for example, seasonal influenza vaccines.
As for side effects: Squalene “contributed to the cascade of reactions called “ Gulf War syndrome”. Now the Swedish Medical Agency tells that as many as 900 Swedes could be befallen by Guillan-Barré paralyses (link now deleted!) due to vaccinations against this harmless swine flu. And the British government has sent a secret letter to senior neurologists to register every expected Guillan-Barré case in and after the vaccination campaign. Probably, the EU will search a common approach on swine flu vaccination, maybe forced vaccinations. On Aug. 23, 2009 the first mainstream media, The Daily Express mentioned squalene as a danger.
Now what does the WHO have to say to this?
WHO updated on 21 July, 2006 (Document posted below on this blog, as I am pretty sure that the WHO will soon remove it!): •A few people have tried to link the health problems of Gulf War veterans to the possible presence of squalene in the vaccines these soldiers received. • One published report suggested that some veterans who received anthrax vaccines developed anti-squalene antibodies and these antibodies caused disabilities.
•It is now known that squalene was not added to the vaccines administered to these veterans, and technical deficiencies in the report suggesting an association have been published. (I have not been able to find a report on deficiencies in Prof. Garry´s studies. See Dr. Nass´ remarks above as for theincompetent research on the GWS. Der Spiegel:The EMEA guideline merely calls for safety studies in which side effects can be detected that occur in more than 1 percent of cases).
This statement, that the Gulf soldiers got no squalene, is a blatant lie, since we know the FDA demonstrated squalene in 5 of the lots used – The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website.
Then the WHO confesses: "As this vaccine and new squalene-containing vaccines are introduced in other age groups, post-marketing follow-up to detect any vaccine-related adverse events will need to be performed." The EU leaves it to the producers to make this follow-up!! I.e. so far blood-tests after 21 and 45 days! This is a confession of a gigantic experiment with our health!!
In a doctor´ thesis from Australia, 2003, I found on p. 84 the proof of the danger of squalene: “Two control subjects who volunteered to participate in a vaccine trial at the United States National Institutes of Health developed a multisystem disorder similar to that of Gulf War Syndrome. The trial involved the use of a squalene-containing adjuvant. One person . . . received a single injection and became ill within 3 weeks, with signs and symptoms including arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, photosensitive rashes, fatigue, headaches and fasciculations. The study therefore suggests “evidence of an immune factor based upon the adjuvancy of squalene” (p 62) in the aetiology in these cases of multisystemic illness, and this would indicate that great care needs to be taken with the use of even apparently “natural” adjuvants.”
The WHO tells us that 22 million shots against seasonal flu have been safely administered since 1997 (till 2006 and probably still today) with about 10 mg squalene per dose - mostly for elderly, less reactive people. How does the WHO know that this has been done safely? The WHO writes: "The absence of significant vaccine-related adverse events following this number of doses suggests that squalene in vaccines has no significant risk." Nothing about their follow ups, registrations, observation periods. They probably care just as little about that as about the extent of their pandemic. In July, the WHO ordered governments to stop registrating swine flu cases.
For, in fact, the incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing – due to squalene? The European Congress of Endocrinology 2008: “Western countries are being confronted with a disturbing increase in the incidence of most immune disorders, including autoimmune and allergic diseases."
So, no wonder that a poll on Fox News on 28 Aug. at 16 o`clock showed 50% of alert Americans think it is more dangerous to take the flu vaccine than having swine flu. Only 32% thought vice versa.
What is even more extraordinary: In Russia Today journalist Wayne Madsen says he knows that scientists developing the swine flu vaccines dissuade their families and friends to take it – and that all over the US an anti-vaccine movement is arising. The WHO´s move: You can expect a much worse swine flu this fall!!
Big money is certainly involved. And big lies and tremendous ruthlessness and recklessness.
And as we know, “our” politicians are easy to buy by means of promotion and money. The WHO is closely cooperating with the Rockefeller Foundation. So endeavours towards world governance and world government, “a global problem demanding a global solution”, are also connected with the entire swine flu vaccination campaign – e.g. making the WHO the Health Department of the UN – as demanded by the latest Rockefeller-Bilderberg meeting.
Why do the Europeans have to take a mortally dangerous vaccine which is forbidden in the USA, considering the harmless swine flu should not be vaccinated for at all, only having an effect in 25% and reducing the absence from the job by 1 1/2 hours per flu season per employee? – especially considering the danger of mass vaccinations by themselves developing a lethal pandemic?