Euro-med                        

Summary:
The CFR´s “Foreign Affairs” reports that the international sanctions against Iran are biting hard: Iranian Central Bank Governor Mahmoud Bahmani described the sanctions “as worse than physical war,” proclaiming Iran “under siege.” Iran’s oil and gas exports in 2012–13 would reach $104 billion, $23 billion more than in 2010–11. In March, The Wall Street Journal cited estimates that sanctions could cut Iranian oil income in half — painful but still equal to the $54 billion Iran earned in 2005-06. This made a positve mood at the P5+1 meeting with Iran in April. So, it is expected that Iran will stop the enrichment of uranium to 20%  as well as the work on a subterranean enrichment plant near Qom. And Iran eksports stocks of enriched uranium in order to have enriched for medical purposes.” The next meeting will take place on 23 May 2012.

Now, before the May 23 meeting, satellite photos show “washing” of a suspect nuclear explosion Chamber at Parchin, Iran,  an Iranian opposition group reports of 60 known scientists working on a nuclear bomb, and a drawing of the Parchin nuclear explosion chamber by an “insider” matches photos seen by the IAEA. The IAEA strongly suspects nuclear weapon activities at Parchin - also because a small prototype neutron device used to spark a nuclear explosion- only being used for a nuclear bomb. However, all of this information seems to be derived from primarily Israel-affiliated sources - probably meant to increase pressure on Iran and the US and  may be indicating Israeli desperation rather than facts?.

A former? CIA official in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards tells of a book, “The last six months,” which was distributed to hundreds of thousands in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. The book warns the guards to prepare for the end time, before the re-appearance of the Islamic messiah, the Mahdi, who will hoist the Islamic flag in the entire world after a nuclear war in which 2/3 of the world’s population will die. But this coming will take place only after an attack on Syria and then Iran as well as the destruction of Israel. In addition, the book describes the 11 September attacks and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as a sign that the time is near. The head of the Iranian Shiites, Ali Khamenei, is seen as the Ayatollah, who is to hand over the flag of Islam to the Mahdi.

Thousands of terrorist cells, consisting of the most faithful, were placed all over the world, and they believe that Iran is a major player in creating the conditions for the “coming”.
*
The Islamic regime expects to be attacked in its entirety, says the source. Its leaders believe that this would happen, as predicted in centuries old Hadiths and in the book, “The last six months”. Response plans call for simultaneous attacks on Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, as well as not only attacks on U.S. bases in the region, but on the U.S. homeland, too.

The source claims that Iran has two nuclear bombs - bought from a former Soviet state - and worse, Iran has already got neutron bombs that - exploding at high altitude - trigger electromagnetic shock waves that will destroy our infrastructure and lead to mass death by all kinds of radiation.

This is dangerous - if correct. But it must also be seen in the light of the great bluffs taking place during the latest 4 years in and around Iran. Who is Reza Kahlili really? The name is a pseudonym. He is a former? CIA agent. Could he and the CIA have an interest in promoting Netanyahu’s desire for a war with Iran - or could the Iranian Ayatollah leadership have an  interest in the promotion of the imminent coming of their Mahdi? Some forces are concerned that Pres. Obama is giving in to Iran in the ongoing negotiations between Iran and the P5 +1 group, to be continued  on 23 May in Baghdad. Therefore, Israel is said to be  willing to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities in the event that the nuclear talks in Baghdad on 23 fail, the Daily Milliyet newspaper reported today (The Daily News 24 April 2012).

Debkafile reported that Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Lieutenant General Martin Dempsey, have presented three conclusions to the White House: 1. Iran’s response to a military strike would be “moderate” - to limit the damage in order to protect the regime and its military resources against a possible subsequent attack, 2. After a short time, the Iranians will return to building a nuclear weapon; 3. The destruction of the core elements of its nuclear program will be likely alter Iran’s posture in the negotiations, so that Iran is less cocky and  will be submissive to international standards.

Is the “last 6 months” just another fairy tale? My guess is that the U.S. will do everything possible to avoid a confrontation - while Israel could produce a false flag operation such as 11 September. Is this the reason why Israel has suddenly formed a national unity government?

*

Documentation of Summary

For now 4 years, the West and Israel have been escalating their war threats against Iran over its nuclear program – an uncertain matter. However, the more time elapses and the Iranians are bringing their military nuclear facilities underground the more the whole theatre looks like empty threats by impotent NWO hirelings who dare not face the consequences of a military attack on a country protected by Russia and China.

In April, the P 5+1 states (USA, China, Russia, Great Britain, France + Germany) met with Iran in a positive mood. Jyllands-Posten 22 April 2012: “The pattern is clear.  Iran will stop the enrichment of uranium to 20%  as well as the work on a subterranean enrichment plant near Qom. And Iran eksports stocks of enriched uranium in order to have enriched for medical purposes.” The next meeting will take place on 23 May 2012.

The question is: Will Iran finally submit to the New World Order?

Is Iran developing nuclear bombs?

I: The Jerusalem Post 9 May 2012: The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a Washington-based think-tank specializing on nuclear proliferation, said it had acquired commercial satellite imagery from April 9 which back up the IAEA’s concern.that the Islamic state may be “washing” a building the United Nations’ nuclear agency wants to inspect. The Jerusalem Post 9 may 2012: In a meeting wirh EU High Commissioner Ashton, Netanyahu requested that Ashton ask the Iranians to halt all uranium enrichment, remove all the enriched uranium currently in their territory and cease activity at the underground nuclear facility at Fordow near the city of Qom.

Wall Street Journal 9 May 2012: The online posting of the images by the Institute for Science and International Security could have a significant impact on a crucial month of diplomacy aimed at containing Tehran’s nuclear program.The IAEA has sought over the past year to visit the military site south of Tehran, called Parchin.

II: DEBKAfile 13 May 2012: Tehran is not willing either to stop 20 percent uranium enrichment or shut down the Fordow plant. Just the opposite. Iran has 60 nuclear specialists named  by the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK/PMOI) working on a nuclear bomb. Jerusalem calls this “bad for israel”. However, US Observer, David Albright, is very skeptical to the biased Mujahedin-e-Khalq information (Haaretz 13 May 2012).

The 3-point plan put forward by the US administration  for the May 23 conference does not exist. The main Iranian opposition group,  Mujahedin-e Khalq demonstrates that Iran is way past the decision and flying ahead at top speed on its manufacture. Our intelligence sources note that all of this Iranian group’s previous disclosures in the past nine years have proved accurate.

III: AP article in The Star 14 May 2012 This drawing based on information from inside an Iranian military site shows an explosives containment chamber of the type needed for nuclear arms-related tests that UN inspectors suspect Tehran has conducted there. The computer-generated drawing was provided to The Associated Press by an official of a country tracking Iran’s nuclear program who said it proves the structure exists.
The official said the image is based on information from a person who had seen the chamber at the Parchin military site. The official comes from an International Atomic Energy Agency member country that is severely critical of Iran’s assertions that its nuclear activities are peaceful.

Olli Heinonen, until last year the UN nuclear agency’s deputy director general in charge of the Iran file, said it was “very similar” to a photo he recently saw that he believes to be the pressure chamber the IAEA suspects is at Parchin.

IV: IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said in March that his agency has “credible information that indicates that Iran engaged in activities relevant to the development of nuclear explosive devices” at the site
Diplomats subsequently told the AP that the experiments also appear to have involved a small prototype neutron device used to spark a nuclear explosion — equipment that would be tested only if a country was trying to develop atomic weapons.

V: The technology used for the suspected multi-point explosives trigger experiments is similar to that employed in manufacturing tiny industrialized diamonds, and the IAEA believes former Soviet scientist Vyacheslav Danilenko — an expert in such diamond-making — helped Iran with designing the chamber.
His son-in-law told the IAEA that the container was built under Danilenko’s direct supervision.

With Israel saying it is determined to stop Iran before it develops the capacity to build nuclear weapons, failure at the Iraq talks could turn Israel´s threats into reality.
Comment: All of this information seems biased and originating from Israel-affiliated sources - probably to increase pressure on Iran and the US rather than describing facts.

Status of Western-Iranian relations
CFR´s Foreign Affairs 8 may 2012: “To begin with, Tehran’s decision to reenter discussions about the future of its nuclear program represents a dramatic about-face. In new talks in Istanbul this past March, Iran agreed to discuss its nuclear efforts and dropped its precondition.

The Islamic Republic did not do this out of goodwill but because of tougher sanctions by a broad coalition.  Iranian Central Bank Governor Mahmoud Bahmani described the sanctions “as worse than physical war,” proclaiming Iran “under siege.” And Iranian business leaders worry that more sanctions are on the way.

The sanctions have also helped Washington slow Tehran’s nuclear progress. Alongside sabotage, defections, cyber attacks, and assassinations, sanctions have hampered Iran’s technological advancement. For example, the Islamic Republic, despite its best efforts, continues to use a poor, outdated design for its centrifuges, which frequently break down.

Yet the sanctions do have limits. The EU oil embargo and U.S. and EU financial restrictions have largely failed to decrease Iran’s oil revenue. Oil prices are now so high that Iran can compensate for Western pressure.  In March, The Wall Street Journal cited estimates that sanctions could cut Iranian oil income in half — painful but still equal to the $54 billion Iran earned from oil sales in 2005–6.

What is going on in the heads of the Iranian leadership?
However, few know the motives and strategy of the Iranian leadership. I have previously written about messianic Jewish Anti-Amalekites in the Israeli government – strongly influenced by Doomsday sects like the Chabadists and Chassids to an extent that the previous Bet Shin spymaster (Reuters 28 April 2012 )  now warns against Netanyahu and Ehud Barak´s messianic world view and its consequences for Israel and the world. In the same article, I wrote about the Iranian messianic Haqqanites – led by Ahmedinejad and Khamenei. But how does the Iranian leadership think now? Do they believe the declaration, that the war against Iran has been called off for at least a year as stated by Haaretz 29. März 2012? Do they think it was bluff? Do they want to have the war called off?

WND 25 April 2012: The following is a description by Reza Kahlili, who is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and the author of the award-winning book, A Time to Betray. He is a senior Fellow with EMPact America, a member of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and teaches at the U.S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy (JCITA).

Despite the recent declaration by Iran that it does not want a nuclear bomb and statements by regime officials that they are willing to negotiate over the nuclear issue, indications from within Iran signal massive preparation for an all-out war as part of its destiny. Nine years ago a Revolutionary Guards arm, the Holy Defense, published a book, “The Last Six Months,” in which it describes the conditions needed in the last six months prior to the reappearance of the last Islamic messiah. The book was distributed in the hundreds of thousands to all Guards, Basij and army bases throughout the country.

Islam’s Shiites believe their 12th Imam, Mahdi, will reappear at the end of times and kill all the infidels, raising the flag of Islam in all four corners of the world.
The book admonishes the military forces that they must be prepared to do their duties during those six months and that there will be many signs to help the faithful to understand the transition, which will center on Iran.

The book, which relies on Islamic hadiths by the Prophet Mohammad and his descendants from centuries ago, describes the 9/11 attacks and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as signs that the time is near. But it also prophesies much more significant signs that would launch the six-month time frame for the reappearance of Mahdi: an attack on Syria and then an attack on Iran. Both those events are looking increasingly likely as Syria’s Bashar al-Assad continues to murder his own people and Iran continues its quest for nuclear weapons.

Mahdi will only reappear, Shiites believe, when Israel is destroyed and the U.S. is brought to its knees; two-thirds of the world’s population will die in a nuclear exchange, and with this chaos and havoc engulfing the earth, the “coming” will unfold.

As revealed in the Iranian secret documentary “The Coming Is Upon Us,” it is believed within the Islamic regime that the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is the historical figure as claimed in a hadith who will rise up against the infidels and pass the flag of Islam to Imam Mahdi, the last Islamic messiah.
Billions of dollars have been spent on the military forces to emphasize this very ideology of the coming as well as preparation for an all-out war.

Thousands of terrorist cells consisting of the most loyal are placed throughout the world, and they believe Iran will be a key player in creating the circumstances for the coming.

The Islamic regime fully expects to be attacked,  Response contingencies call for simultaneous attacks on Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and attacks not only on U.S. bases in the region but the U.S. homeland.

An internal IAEA document from 2009 shows that Khamenei, as early as 1984, was pushing for nuclear bombs to prepare Iran for the emergence of Imam Mahdi.”

Of utmost concern is that Iran likely has nuclear weapons already even as it works to create more. As reported in October, Iranian agents scoured the former Soviet republics after the fall of the Soviet Union in search of buying existing nuclear bombs, offering hundreds of millions of dollars. As verified with sources at the State Department, a former U.S. intelligence officer and a Russian general, the Iranians have at least two workable nuclear warheads. But what he verified next was further terrifying: Iran has neutron bombs, thanks to its North Korea ally.

A neutron bomb is a tactical nuclear weapon invented during the Cold War to kill people with neutron radiation, while minimizing damage to buildings.

“However, a neutron warhead is more accurately described as, and is officially called, an Enhanced Radiation Warhead because it produces large quantities of all kinds of radiation – including gamma rays – that generate the electromagnetic pulse (EMP-left) effect at high altitude,” according to Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, which advises Congress.

The powerful EMP destroys electronics and collapses the critical infrastructures that support the lives of millions of people over vast geographic areas,” Pry said.

As verified by the IAEA, the Guards have launched ballistic missiles from ships and detonated warheads over the earth’s surface. Those tests have only one purpose: create an EMP attack, whether by nuclear or neutron bomb. As revealed last year, the Guards have now armed their naval vessels with ballistic missiles and plan on deploying warships in the Atlantic Ocean.

The Congressional EMP Commission estimated that, given current U.S. unpreparedness, one year after an EMP attack, about two-thirds of the U.S. population, 200 million people, would have perished from starvation, disease or societal collapse.

The Telegraph 14 May 2012: UK Defence Seretary  Phillip Hammond and the chief executive officer of EIS and a White House adviser on the issue: There is an increasing possibility that a rogue state could use an “E-bomb” from a “rogue state”that would release a devastating electromagnetic pulse (EMP) to destroy our infrastructure

Comment
This is ominous – if correct. Manmade attempts to create the prophetic Judgment Day will necessarily become a self-fulfilling disaster. But one must also see it in the light of the big bluff going on about Iran for the latest 4 years. Who is Reza Kahlili really? It is a pseudonym. He is a former? CIA operative. Could he and the CIA have an interest in promoting Netanyahu´s desire for a war with Iran – or the Iranian ayatollah-leaderships interest in the promotion of the coming of their Mahdi? Israel says it is ready to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities in the event that May 23 nuclear talks in Baghdad fail to bear results, The Daily Milliyet reported today (The Daily News 24 April 2012). Is this the reason for the surprising cancellation of autumn elections in Israel and the formation of of a national unity government led by 3 former chiefs of staff. Many media think so: The Guardian 8 May and, Reuters 8 May 2012, and ANSAmed 8 may 2012 and Haaretz 8 May 2012.
Moreover,  a former Israeli spymaster, Disken, has branded the country’s leaders unfit to tackle the Iranian nuclear program because of what he called the “messianic feelings” behind their threats to launch a pre-emptive war on Iran

DEBKAfile 28 April 2012 reports that the theatre about Iran goes on. US Navy, Air Force, ground, intelligence and special forces units based at home, in Europe and the Middle East, took part this week in a special exercise ordered by President Barack Obama to simulate reactions to a potential US-Israel strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Besides, an unprecedented military western build-up is taking place in the Gulf region - to put pressure on Iran before the coming negotiations.

Debkafile reports that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey, submitted to the White House three conclusions:
1. Iran’s response to a military strike will be “measured,” both to limit the damage to the regime and to conserve military resources for a possible follow-up attack; 2. The Iranians will go back to work on building a nuclear weapon within a short time; 3. The destruction of core elements of its nuclear program is expected to change Iran’s attitude in negotiations, making it less cocky and more submissive to international demands.

Iran has long ago smelled the hollowness of such threats. But could the Ayatollahs want to end  Iran´s “last 6 months” now – by mining the strait of Hormuz, e.g.? It seems to be in their prophecy, that an attack on Iran has to be preceded by an attack on Syria and that Israel has to be destroyed before the coming of the Mahdi. The French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé has pronounced that an attack on Syria  will be necessary after 5 May if Assad does not comply with the Kofi Annan-plan. However, this will need a UN Security Council Resolution – which Russia will probably veto again. Or is the “last 6 months“ just another cock-and-bull tale? My guess is that the US will do anything to avoid a confrontation – while Israel might produce a false flag operation aka 9/11.

Deutsche Welle 11 May 2012: Der UN-Sondergesandte für Libyen rief die Interims-Regierung auf, Vorwürfe der Folter in miliz-gesteuerten  Gefängnissen  anzugehen. Menschenrechts-Gruppen haben inzwischen zwei Neue Gesetze dafür kritisiert, Gaddafi-Ära Praktiken zu ähneln.
Die Vereinten Nationen berichteten am Donnerstag, dass Tausende von Häftlingen in Nachkriegszeit-Libyen noch immer in den miliz-kontrollierten Gefängnissen inhaftiert seien, oft im Geheimen, und sie werden mitunter gefoltert.

Das “befreite” Libyen als Modell für Syrien nach dem Assad-Regime?

Die libysche Justiz Kontrolliert DERZEIT 31 Haftanstalten mit rund 3,000 Häftlingen über die weite Nord-afrikanische Nation verteilt,  laut dem UN-Sondergesandten für Libyen, Ian Martin. Weitere 4,000 Inhaftierte bleiben in Miliz-gesteuerten Anlagen.

Der UN-Sondergesandte-sagte, obwohl die Übergangsregierung offizielle Autorität über Dutzende von Gefängnissen habe, teile sie in der Praxis häufig die Kontrolle über diese Einrichtungen mit den revolutionären Milizen Libyens.

Menschenrechts Gruppen wie die Human Rights Watch und Amnesty International haben libysche Milizen vorgeworfen, die Gefangenen zu misshandeln. Die Miliz in der Küstenstadt Misrata, die einer brutalen Belagerung durch Pro-Gaddafi Kräfte ausgesetzt war, sind mit Untersuchung insbesondere wegen der Durchführung von Racheakten gegen die Ehemaligen Anhänger des Gaddafi konfrontiert.

Amnesty International hat unterdessen ein Gesetz, das die Verherrlichung von Gaddafi verbietet,  hervorgehoben. Gesetz Nr. 37, das am Mittwoch in Kraft trat, kriminalisiert ebenfalls die Verbreitung von falschen Gerüchten, Informationen oder Propaganda, die der Landesverteidigung schaden, Terror verbreiten oder die Moral schwächen.

Schädigung der “17. Februar Revolution”, Beleidigung des Islam oder des Staates sind auch kriminelle Taten.

Die Interims-Regierung, die im  November 2011 aufgestellt wurde, hat hat versprochen, die ersten freien Wahlen im Juni auf eine Versammlung von 200 Mitgliedern einzurichten. Diese Versammlung soll eine nationale Verfassung machen.

Frühere libysche Rebellen danken für die NATO-Befreiung von Gaddafi: Wahhabi-Pöbel schändet die Gräber von Montgomery´s Wüstenratten in Benghazi.

Was nun in Libyen passiert, wo Al Qaida´s Fahne offen auf dem Gerichtsgebäude in Benghazi weht (rechts), sieht man jetzt auch in Syrien (Video unten), wo schreiende Frauen offen Al Qaida´s Banner in Aleppo zeigen. The US und NATO unterstützen Al Qaedas Arm, die Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, in Libyen  – sowie die Al Qaeda-Rebellen in Syrien – wo die Libyan Islamic Fighting Group auch tätig ist, indem sie die “Freie Syrische Armee” trainiert und sich ihr anschliesst.

Haaretz 12 May 2012:  Eine militante Gruppe mit Links zu  al-Qaida nahm am Samstag die Verantwortung für 2 Bombenanschläge, die an 10 Mai mindestens 55 Menschen töteten und 372 iin der syrischen Hauptstadt, Damaskus, töteten.

Kommentar
Dies zeigt die Verlogenheit des “Krieges gegen den Terror” und des “Rechts/der Verantwortung zum Schützen“. In Wirklichkeit geht es darum, totales Chaos und Diktatur statt Demokratie, die für Moslems eine Beleidigung gegen Allah ist, der bereits alle notwendigen Gesetze gegeben habe, weltweit zu schaffen. Dieses Chaos erleichtert es den korporativen Bankstern die Bodenschätze gescheiterter  Länder zu stehlen. Die USA nutzen Al-Qaida als Vorwand für den 3. Weltkrieg - und kooperieren mit und finanzieren - Al-Qaida.

Die USA stifteten und finanzierten “Al Qaeda”

Foreign Policy 23 Oct. 2012: Der libysche Interims-Führer, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, den man für moderat hielt, erklärte in seiner “Befreiungs”-Ansprache, dass Libyen ein islamischer Staat werden und dass die Scharia  eine grundlegende Quelle der Gesetzgebung sein werde - die Polygamie nicht verbiete. Gulf News´ Redakteur, Abdul Hamid Ahmad, sagte: “Mustafa Abdul Jalil hat gerade aller Welt einen Beweis geliefert, dass der arabische Aufstand letztendlich zu islamischen Staaten führen wird.” Was ein wenig beunruhigend ist, ist die Art,auf die Abdel Jalil einfach diese Dinge von dem Podium verordnet.

Deutsche Welle 11 May 2012:  The UN special envoy for Libya has called on the interim government to address allegations of torture in militia-run prisons. Rights groups, meanwhile, have criticized two new laws for resembling Gadhafi-era practices.

“Liberated” Libya the model of Syria after the Assad Regime?

The United Nations reported on Thursday that thousands of prisoners in post-war Libya are still being detained in militia-controlled prisons, often in secret, and at times facing torture.

The Libyan Justice Ministry currently controls 31 detention centers housing around 3,000 detainees across the vast north African nation, according to UN special envoy for Libya Ian Martin. Another 4,000 detainees remain in militia-controlled facilities, Martin told the UN Security Council on Thursday.

The UN’s special envoy said that although the interim government has official authority over dozens of prisons, in practice it often shares control over those facilities with Libya’s revolutionary militias.

Rights groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have accused Libyan militias of abusing detainees. The militia in the coastal city of Misrata, which faced a brutal siege at the hands of pro-Gadhafi forces, has faced scrutiny in particular for carrying out revenge attacks against former Gadhafi supporters.

Amnesty International, meanwhile, has singled out a law that prohibits the glorification of Gadhafi. Law 37, which took effect on Wednesday, also criminalizes spreading false rumors, information or propaganda that harm national defense, spread terror or weaken morale.

Harming the “February 17th Revolution,” insulting Islam or offending the state are also criminal offices.

The interim government, set up in November 2011, has pledged to hold the country’s first free elections this June for a 200-member constituent assembly. The body is to be tasked with drafting a national constitution.

Former Libyan rebels thank for NATO liberation from Gaddafi: Wahhabi mob desecrating the graves of Montgomery´s desert rats in Benghazi

What happens in Libya, where Al Qaeda´s flag flies openly on the Court building in Benghazi, is now also seen in Syria (video below), where women openly show Al Qaida´s banner in Aleppo. The US and NATO support the Al Qaeda arm, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, in Libya  – and the Al Qaeda rebels in Syria – where the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group is also active, training and joining the “Free Syrian Army”.

Haaretz 12 May 2012:  A militant group with suspected links to al-Qaida on Saturday claimed responsibility for twin suicide bombings that killed at least 55 people, and wounded 372 in the Syrian capital, Damascus.

Comment
This shows the hypocrisy of the “War on Terror” and the “Responsibility to Protect”. In reality it is about creating total chaos and dictatorship worldwide instead of democracy, which to Moslims is an insult to Allah, who has already given all necessary laws. This chaos makes it easier for the Corporate NWO banksters to rob the mineral treasures of  defaulting countries. The US uses Al Qaeda as a pretext for WWIII – and cooperates with and funds  – Al Qaeda.

The US founded and funds Al Qaeda

Foreign Policy 23 Oct. 2012:  Interim leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil, thought to be a moderate, declared in his “liberation” address that Libya would be an Islamic state and that sharia law would be a fundamental source of legislation - not forbidding polygamy. Gulf News editor Abdul Hamid Ahmad said “Mustafa Abdul Jalil has just given an evidence to all [the] world that [the] Arab uprising will end up to be Islamic states.” What is somewhat alarming is the way Abdel Jalil simply decreed these things from the podium.

Zusammenfassung: Im nächsten Monat wird in Rio de Janeiro eine Konferenz mit wahrscheinlich weitreichenden Folgen für die Menschhheit stattfinden. Es geht dabei um die Einführung der kommunistischen grünen Weltregierung unter dem Namen Agenda 21 - von der ich mehrmals geschrieben habe. Der Kern der dahinter steckenden Ideologie ist die Nachhaltigkeit, im UN -Brundtland-Bericht 1987 folgendermassen definiert: “Entwicklung, die die Bedürfnisse der Gegenwart befriedigt, ohne zu riskieren, dass künftige Generationen ihre eigenen Bedürfnisse nicht befriedigen können”. Dahinter stehen 36 globale Organisationen. Das hört sich ja gut an - wollen wir aber den Preis für diese Sowjet-Utopie bezahlen?

Diese Weltregierung ist nun seit der Rio I -Konferenz 1992 in der Mache und soll in Rio vervollständigt werden. Zentral ist Rothschilds Global Environmental Facility (GEF), die zur Aufgabe hat, unser Geld in die Taschen der Grossbanken und der Politiker weltweit sowie einen kleinen Teil an die nie-entwickelten Armen der Entwicklungsländer zu kanalisieren, und zwar als Entschädigung für eine behauptete, nicht-existente menschenverursachte Erderwärmung.

Mit Genehmigung von nunmehr 182 Staaten der Welt kann Rothschild einen zunehmenden Teil der Erde mit ihren Bodenschätzen als verfallene Sicherheiten von verschuldeten Ländern einziehen. Die GEF Partnerschaft umfasst 10 Agenturen: das UN-Entwicklungsprogramm, das Umweltprogramm der Vereinten Nationen, die Weltbank, die UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), die UN-Organisation für industrielle Entwicklung, die Afrikanische Entwicklungsbank, die Asiatische Entwicklungsbank, die Europäische Bank für Wiederaufbau und Entwicklung, die Inter-American Development Bank, und den Internationalen Fonds für landwirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Das Wissenschaftliche und Technik-Beratungs-Panel sorgt für technische und wissenschaftliche Beratung in GEF-Politiken und -Projekten.

Die globale Umwandlungs-Tagesordnung wurde in einem kürzlich veröffentlichten Bericht mit dem Titel “Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective” entworfen. Der Hauptgrund ist eine kommunistische Umverteilung des Wohlstandes der Welt - angeblich 2.1 Billionen Dollar im Jahr - von der produktiven in die unproduktive Welt - wohl besonders an die islamischen Staaten - und zwar unter dem Namen Globalisierung.

Die populärste Definition dessen, was ein Globalist ist, und wer die Globalisten sind, ist so weit: “Ein Bündnis auf der Grundlage von Eigeninteressen der privaten internationalen Finanziers und der königlichen, dynastischen und Erbland-Eigentümerfamilien von Großbritannien, Europa und Amerika, die über die Jahre Mischehen eingegangen sind, um eine selbst-regenerierende Kraft-Struktur zu bilden. Sie versuchen,  durch Lügen und Täuschung, alles und jeden zu kontrollieren. Die Globalisten erstreben, alle Länder zu beseitigen, damit sie alle Volkswirtschaften, die Produktion und die Verarbeitung von natürlichen Ressourcen zentralisieren, reduzieren und standardisieren können, damit sie die Entscheidungen, die wir treffen, direkt kontrollieren, manipulieren und beeinflussen können, um ihre Macht, Kontrolle, Reichtum und historischen Einfluss zu behalten”.

Die Nachhaltigkeits-Weltregierung will die Menschheit von der Natur abschneiden und in Megastädten in Hochhäuser einsperren, kontrollieren und einer ständigen Gehirnwäsche unterziehen. Diese Nachhaltigkeit bedeutet einen grundlegenden Wandel in der Art, wie wir denken und handeln” und erfordert “ein ernsthaftes Überdenken der Lebensstile in den entwickelten Ländern.” Unter anderen Ländern lobt der Bericht besonders  China als “ein gutes Beispiel”.

Die Kräfte hinter dieser Weltregierung beabsichtigen, den Dollar durch eine Weltregierung zu verdrängen. Des Weiteren muss die Zukunft der Menschheit - die Jugend -  über die angeblichen Gefahren der theoretischen von Menschen verursachten Erderwärmung belehrt werden.  Kinder müssen auch lernen, dass die UNO benötigt werde, um das angebliche Problem zu lösen. Das Bekenntnis zur “nachhaltigen Entwicklungs”-Bildung muss in die Lehrpläne auf allen Ebenen integriert werden.

Die grüne Nachhaligkeit bedeutet nach spanischen Erfahrungen mit 25% Arbeitslosen, dass für jeden neuen grünen Job 2.2 traditionelle Jobs verloren gehen. Daher will man Wohlfahrtsprogramme entwickeln, um die stark zunehmende Menge von armen Arbeitslosen munter zu erhalten. Nicht so munter wird es für die wenigen, die arbeiten und zahlen müssen. Danach können die grünen Globalisten behaupten, das Leben habe sich mit Hilfe anderer Maßnahmen verbessert - Glück, vielleicht, oder Nachhaltigkeit.

Die Globalisten sind auf dem Holzweg der Ideologie.
Windmühlen und Sonnenenergie können nur einem kleinen Bruchteil des Energieverbrauchs der Menschheit entsprechen. Reduzierung des Energieverbrauchs bedeutet Armut, strenge Sparmassnahmen und Revolutionen. Wachsende Pflanzenölanteile für Energie reduzieren die Nahrungsmittelproduktion in einer Welt mit 1 Mrd.  hungernden Menschen. Vor diesem Hintergrund finde ich es unverantwortlich, nicht auf die Wasserstoff–Brennzellen-Technik zurückzugreifen - z.B. von Air Liquide entwickelt: Energieproduktion aus Wasser, die Wasser als einziges Nebenprodukt hat. Allerdings schätze ich, die elitären Öl-Konzerne sind aus pekuniären Gründen dagegen.

Dass dies im Geheimen geschieht ist selbstverständlich. Denn dieselben Kräfte haben schon längst “unsere” Politiker und Medien in ihrer Gewalt.

*

Die Agenda 21 Konferenz im kommenden Monat in Rio de Janeiro (Agenda 21 + 20) ist geplant, die endgültige  UN-Übernahme der kommunistischen grünen Weltregierung zu werden, eine diktatorische Herrschaft über eine Menschheit, die in Hochhäuser in Megastädten umgesiedelt werden soll - von der Natur verbannt. Ich hoffe, dieser Staatsstreich wird scheitern - aber im Falle des Erfolgs ist es eine noch nie da gewesene Versklavung der Menschheit. Also werde ich Artikel darüber in der kommenden Zeit veröffentlichen, obwohl ich schon mehrere Artikel über die Agenda 21 und hier und hier und hier und hier veröffentlicht habe .  Dieser Artikel wird sich mit dem Konzept der Nachhaltigkeit, der Grundlage der Agenda 21, befassen. Der Brundtland-Bericht 1987 definierte den Begriff: “Nachhaltige Entwicklung ist Entwicklung, die die Bedürfnisse der Gegenwart befriedigt, ohne zu riskieren, dass künftige Generationen ihre eigenen Bedürfnisse nicht befriedigen können“.

Als selbst-ernannte Führerin der Neuen Weltordnung investiert die EU viel Prestige in ihr Hauptprogramm, eine Weltregierung. Die EU und ihre Partner in der UNO werden in Rio de Janeiro am 20. bis zum 22. Juni 2012 tagen, um das zu beenden, was Maurice Strong (links) / Edmund de Rothschild (rechts) in Rio 1992 begannen: Eine grüne Weltregierung mit Vertretern aus 182 Regierungen weltweit im Vorstand - um unser Geld in die Taschen der Rothschild Banken, insbesondere durch Rothschilds Global Environmental-Facility zu kanalisieren. Im Zuge der Umstrukturierung wurde der GEF anvertraut, der finanzielle Mechanismus sowohl für die UN-Konvention über die biologische Vielfalt als auch das UN-Rahmenübereinkommen über Klimaänderungen zu werden. Die Aufgabe der GEF ist es, säumigen Staaten, die nicht in der Lage sind, das Geld zurückzuzahlen (von den Steuerzahlern der Welt und Rothschilds Zentralbanken - aus dünner Luft gedruckt)  Geld zu leihen. Danach kann die GEF die “Wildnisse“ bankrotter Länder als verfallene Sicherheiten - mit ihren Bodenschätzen - übernehmen. Es geht um 30% der Erde. Das Areal nimmt aber zu, wie die Agenda 21 landwirtschaftliche Gebiete entvölkert, um die Weltbevölkerung zu verstädtern (=  Nachhaltigkeit)  - durch Steven Rockefellers, Michail Gorbatschows, Maurice Strongs “Erd Charta” weiter ausgefeilt.

Wikipedia: Die GEF Partnerschaft umfasst 10 Agenturen: das UN-Entwicklungsprogramm, das Umweltprogramm der Vereinten Nationen, die Weltbank, die UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), die UN-Organisation für industrielle Entwicklung, die Afrikanische Entwicklungsbank, die Asiatische Entwicklungsbank, die Europäische Bank für Wiederaufbau und Entwicklung, die Inter-American Development Bank, und den Internationalen Fonds für landwirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Das Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel bietet technische und wissenschaftliche Beratung in der GEF-Politiken und -Projekte.

Das Video oben (von der 28:45 Min. Markierung) zeigt, wie Edmund de Rothschild das Konzept der vom Menschen verursachten globalen Erwärmung den größten Business-Betrug in der Geschichte machte.

Obwohl 49 ehemalige NASA Astronauten, Ingenieure und Wissenschaftler protestieren – und zwar gegen die falsche Behauptung einer vom Menschen verursachten CO2-Erderwärmung –  hat es keinen Einfluss auf NASAs von Al Gore und George Soros bestochenem James Hansens verlogene Märchen und hier von der CO2–Lüge, die von der NASA ausging.  James Hansen wurde als der Vater des Märchens der von Menschen verursachten Erderwärmung benannt – brachte diese verrückte Idee 1988  heraus  und erpresste US-Politiker dazu, den Betrug zu glauben. Allerdings - Edmund de Rothschild startete  bereits 1987 diese lukrative CO2-Erderwärmungs-Idee auf der 4. World Wilderness Congress und hier - und liess James Hansen durch seinen Agenten, George Soros, sponsern, um das zu verbreiten, was heute in seriösen wissenschaftlichen Kreisen als eine offensichtliche Lüge gesehen wird.

The Globalist Report: Globalisten sind selbst die größte Bedrohung für die menschliche Zivilisation. Jeden Tag werden immer mehr Menschen in irgendeiner Weise wegen der Globalisten und der Agenda der Globalisten betroffen.

Die populärste Definition dessen, was ein Globalist ist, und wer die Globalisten sind, ist so weit: “die Globalisierungsbewegung ist ein Bündnis auf der Grundlage von Eigeninteressen der privaten internationalen Finanziers und der königlichen, dynastischen und Erbland-Eigentümerfamilien von Großbritannien, Europa und Amerika, die über die Jahre Mischehen eingegangen sind, um eine selbst-regenerierende Kraft-Struktur zu bilden, die durch Lügen und Täuschung versucht, alles und jeden zu kontrollieren. Die Globalisten erstreben, alle Länder zu beseitigen, damit sie alle Volkswirtschaften, die Produktion und die Verarbeitung von natürlichen Ressourcen zentralisieren, reduzieren und standardisieren können, damit sie die Entscheidungen, die wir treffen, direkt kontrollieren, manipulieren und beeinflussen können, um ihre Macht, Kontrolle, Reichtum und historischen Einfluss zu behalten.

The Globalist Report: Die Globalisten haben offiziell die australische Regierung infiltriert und sie haben jetzt eingeräumt, dass sie wünschen, Australien solle die Welt führen, um globale Regierung und die neue Weltordnung einzuführen. Der australische Globalist, der grüne Parteichef und inoffizielle Führer der Australian Labor Party, Senator Bob Brown, wurde mit den Worten zitiert, dass die “Welt von einem neuen globalen Parlament unter der Schirmherrschaft der Vereinten Nationen regiert werden sollte. Browns Aussage machte einen solchen Aufschrei, dass er den Rücktritt bevorzugt!

Globalisten und Klima
MSNBC 23 April 2012: James Lovelock: “Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht” . James Lovelock, der Außenseiter-Wissenschaftler, der mit seiner Gaia” Theorie, die Erde sei ein einziger, atmender Organismus, der Guru der Umweltbewegung wurde, hat eingeräumt, in Bezug auf den Klimawandel ”Panikmacher” gewesen zu sein und sagt, andere Umwelt-Kommentatoren, wie Al Gore, seien es auch gewesen. “Das Problem ist, wir wissen nicht, was das Klima tut. Wir dachten, wir wüssten es vor 20 Jahren”. Klima-Erschütterer: Im Jahr 2007 prognostizierte Lovelock den Erderwärmungs-Weltuntergang: “Milliarden von uns werden sterben, die wenigen menschlichen Brutpaare, die überleben, werden in der Arktis sein”. “Das Klima tut seine üblichen Tricks. Es ist wirklich noch nicht viel passiert. Wir vermuteten, auf halbem Weg in Richtung einer bratenden Welt jetzt zu sein”, sagte er. “Die Welt hat sich seit der Jahrtausendwende nicht sehr viel erwärmt. Zwölf Jahre sind eine angemessene Zeit … sie (die Temperatur) ist nahezu konstant geblieben, während sie hätte zunehmen sollen - Kohlendioxid steigt, das ist keine Frage”.

Die Gaia-Religion hat alle Welt-Institutionen mehr oder weniger infiltriert - auch einige Kirchen. Die Arche der Hoffnung (rechts) ist ein luziferischer Gegenstück zu der  Bundeslade.

Fox news 20 April 2012: Die bevorstehende UN-Umwelt-Konferenz über nachhaltige Entwicklung wird eine atemberaubende Palette von Kohlenstoff Steuern, der Überweisung von Billionen von Dollar von  reichen an arme Länder, und neuen Ausgabenprogrammen prüfen, um zu gewährleisten, dass Bevölkerungen weltweit vor den Auswirkungen der Programme, die die Weltorganisation umsetzen will, geschützt werden, laut erstaunlichen UN-Dokumenten, die Fox News untersucht hat.

Das Hauptziel der verschriene Rio + 20 Konferenz für nachhaltige Entwicklung der Vereinten Nationen soll in Brasilien vom 20. bis bis zum 23. Juni stattfinden, von der Obama-Regierung unterstützt, und soll dramatische und enorm teure Änderungen vornehmen, “einen grundlegenden Wandel in der Art, wie wir denken und handeln.”

Rio + 20 bedeutet:

Mehr als 2,1 Billionen Dollar werden pro Jahr in Vermögenstransfers aus reichen Ländern an ärmere Staaten, im Namen der Förderung der “grünen Infrastruktur”, “Anpassung an den Klimawandel” und anderer “grüner Wirtschafts”-Maßnahmen (verschwinden).

- Die großen weltweiten Sozialausgaben-Programme, einschließlich einer “sozialen Grundsicherung” und “Netze der sozialen Sicherheit” für die weltweit am meisten gefährdeten gesellschaftlichen Gruppen aus Gründen der “Billigkeit“.

- Noch mehr Sozialleistungen für diejenigen, die durch die grüne Wirtschafts-Revolution, einschließlich derjenigen, die aus der Arbeit in unerwünschte fossile Industrien verdrängt werden. Die Vorteile, die “Investitionen” benannt werden, würden auch “Zugang zu nährstoffreicher Nahrung, Gesundheitsversorgung, Bildung, Weiterbildung, der Umschulung und dem Arbeitslosengeld umfassen.”

- Eine Garantie, dass mehr gewährt werden würde, wenn diese Vorteile noch nicht genug sind.
Die satten grünen “Investitionen”-Liste kratzt kaum die Oberfläche der Mammut-Übung des globalen sozialen Engineerings, das in den UN-Dokumenten vorgesehen und von der in Genf ansässigen United Nations Environmental Management Group (UNEMG), einem Konsortium von 36 UN-Organisationen, Entwicklungs-Banken und Umwelt-Bürokratien, im Vorfeld der Rio-Sitzung vorbereitet ist.

Die internationale soziale Reorganisation wird von Regulierungsbehörden und Regierungen genau überwacht werden, um die “Nachhaltigkeit” der Umwelt und  “menschliche Gerechtigkeit” zu pflegen. Es erfordert auch “ein ernsthaftes Überdenken der Lebensstile in den entwickelten Ländern.” Unter den anderen Ländern, lobt der Bericht besonders  China als “ein gutes Beispiel” für die Kombination von Investitionen und Anreizen der öffentlichen Ordnung.

Nach diesen Richtlinien heißt es, die nationalen Regierungen müssen sich neu organisieren, um “gemeinsame Fiskal-und Steuerpolitik sowie Strategien, wie man die neu generierten Einnahmen verwenden kann”, zu gestalten. Dort “können UN-Organisationen Regierungen und anderen verhelfen, die geeignetsten Möglichkeiten des Ausstiegs aus schädlichen Subventionen zu finden.”

Rechts: Bemerken Sie die NWO Pyramide in diesem Nachhaltigkeits-Logo – und die Ähnlichkeit mit dem Logo von David Rockefellers/Brzezinskis Trilateraler Kommission, deren Mission die Eine-Weltregierung und hier ist.

Die globale Umwandlungs-Tagesordnung wurde in einem kürzlich veröffentlichten Bericht mit dem Titel Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective” entworfen. Das Dokument - von einer Gruppe von mehr als 35 UN-Organisationen und verschiedenen internationalen Institutionen unter dem Banner der “Environmental Management Group” (UNEMG) der UNO vorbereitet – erläutert die Ziele des kommenden “Nachhaltigkeits”-Gipfels der globalen Organisation. Die Konferenz markiert den 20. Jahrestag des UN-Erdgipfels 1992, der die höchst umstrittene “Agenda 21″ verabschiedete.

Hier folgen einige Schlagwörter.

Notwendige Investitionen in  Infrastruktur in Entwicklungsländern werden auf USD 1,0-1,5 Billionen  pro Jahr veranschlagt.

Einhaltung der Anforderungen einer globalen urbanisierten Bevölkerung nach höheren Lebensstandards. Gute (UN) Regierung. Verhaltensänderungen in der Produktion sowie des Verbrauchs und der Lebensstile …  Neuorientierung  des Konsums, der Investitionen und anderer wirtschaftlicher Tätigkeiten …  Aufhör der Subventionen, beispielsweise für fossile Brennstoffe, Fischerei, Forstwirtschaft, Wassernutzung, Landnutzung und Landwirtschaft.

Interministerielle Zusammenarbeit anstacheln. Wie man die neu generierten Einnahmen verwendet. Multilaterale Umweltabkommen (MEA), mit globalen Verpflichtungen koordinierter Aktivitäten ….Einverständnis-Mechanismen, einschließlich der Justiz. … mit gestärkem integriertem institutionellem Rahmen und Regierung …. mit Vermeidung der Verbreitung von nationalen Vorschriften und Normen … internationale Standards …… mit sozialer Erneuerung.

UN-Organisationen müssen die Unterstützung für die Bildung und Ausbildung anstacheln. Das UN-System der Umweltwirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnungen (SEEA) wird im Jahr 2012 ein international vereinbarter statistischer Rahmen . … Das UN-Sekretariat bietet Plattform für regionale Dialoge und Konsensbildung.

Kohlenstoff-Steuern oder ein Cap-and-trade-System, bis zu 0,6% des BIP pro Jahr, einzukassieren.  Nutzung von (IWF) Sonderziehungsrechten (SZR).

Kommentar
Der Wegfall der Subventionen bedeutet teurere Nahrungsmittel - und Hunger.
Nach Angaben der UNO sind Armut und “nachhaltige Entwicklung” verknüpft. Daher muss die Organisation dafür sorgen, dass globale Wohlfahrt-Programme integrale Bestandteile der so genannten “grünen” Wirtschaft ausmachen. Anstelle der traditionellen Indikatoren des menschlichen Fortschritts und des Wohlergehens, kann der enorme Verlust, der  an materiellem Wohlstand weltweit erlitten wird, getarnt werden, indem sie behaupten, das Leben habe sich mit Hilfe anderer Maßnahmen verbessert - Glück, vielleicht, oder Nachhaltigkeit

“Unter anderen Ländern, lobt der Bericht besonders China als “ein gutes Beispiel für die Kombination von Investitionen und Anreizen der öffentlichen Ordnung.” Dies ist ein Beispiel dafür, wie tief Rothschilds Agent, der korrupte Maurice Strong (wurde mit 1 Mio. Dollar als hoher UN-Vertreter bestochen und musste nach China fliehen, wo er Berater der chinesischen Regierung ist) die UNO mit seinem Meisterwerk, der Agenda 21, beeinflusst hat. Die UNO ist so kommunistisch wie der Begründer des Schwindels mit der grünen Gesellschaft, der Club of Rome und hier.
Die UNO ist krank vor Sehnsucht danach, die Welt zu regieren - mit der verlogenen grünen Agenda als religiösem Vorwand.

Links: Die beiden Hauptbetrüger der menschenverursachten Erderwärmung, Rothschild-Agent Maurice Strong und Al Gore

Die Nachhaltigkeits-Regierung wird die Zukunft der Weltbevölkerung arm machen und Sozialprogramme als Ersatz für ihre verlorenen Arbeitsplätze geben. Aus Spanien wissen wir, dass für jeden neuen grünen Job 2.2 traditionelle Jobs verloren gehen - und u.a. somit hat Spanien ca. 25% arbeitslose. Anstelle von materiellem Wohlstand, wird die Menschheit lernen müssen, andere Werte, und zwar die Nachhaltigkeits-Religion auf verlogenen Prämissen zu schätzen. Denn der Kern der zukünftigen Existenz ist Angst - Angst davor,  durch nicht vorhandene globale Erwärmung zu braten - damit die Menschen vor diesem inexistenten Übel von der Elite gerettet und ausgeraubt werden kann. Kinder sollen einer Gehirnwäsche unterzogen werden, um diese Lüge zu glauben. Jetzt kann sogar noch der Guru des globalen Erwärmungs-Betrugs - der Gaia-religiöse James Lovelock - die globale Erwärmung als eine große Lüge sehen. Auch der Vorsitzende des UN IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, hat “Klimaforschung” für politische Auftragsarbeit erklärt - und er ist nicht in der Lage, den Climategate-Skandal und hier abzustreiten.

Dies ist nicht nur lächerlich. Es ist erschreckend und offenbart die wahre Natur der Neuen Weltordnung.

Windmühlen und Sonnenenergie können nur einem kleinen Bruchteil des Energieverbrauchs der Menschheit entsprechen. Reduzierung des Energieverbrauchs bedeutet Armut, strenge Sparmassnahmen und Revolutionen. Wachsende Pflanzenölanteile im Verbrauch der Welt reduzieren die Nahrungsmittelproduktion in einer Welt mit 1 Mrd.  hungernden Menschen. Vor diesem Hintergrund finde ich es unverantwortlich, nicht auf die Wasserstoff–Brennzellen-Technik zurückzugreifen - z.B. von Air Liquide entwickelt: Energieproduktion aus Wasser, die Wasser als einziges Nebenprodukt hat. Allerdings schätze ich, die elitären Öl-Konzerne sind aus pekuniären Gründen dagegen.

Summary: Next month, a conference with probably far-reaching consequences for mankind will be held in Rio de Janeiro. It involves the introduction of the green one world communist government under the name of Agenda 21 - which I’ve written about several times. The core of the ideology behind it is sustainability, defined in the Brundtland Report in 1987 as follows: “Development that meets present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. Behind it are 36 global organizations. That sounds good - but do we want to pay the price for this Soviet-utopia?

This world government is now in the making  since the Rio Conference in 1992 I and is to be completed in Rio. Central to it is Rothschild’s Global Environmental Facility (GEF), which has the task of channeling our money into the pockets of the big banks and the politicians around the world – and a small part for the poor of the never-developed countries, as a compensation for an alleged non-existing manmade global warming.

With the approval of 182 countries, Rothschild can now collect an increasing part of the earth with its natural resources as forfeited collaterals  from endebted countries. The GEF partnership includes 10 agencies: the UN Development Programme; the UN Environment Programme; the World Bank; the UN Food and Agriculture Organization; the UN Industrial Development Organization; the African Development Bank; the Asian Development Bank; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; the Inter-American Development Bank; and the International Fund for Agricultural Development. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel provides technical and scientific advice on the GEF’s policies and projects.

In a recently published report, entitled “Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective,” the global transformation agenda was designed. The main motive is a communist redistribution of the prosperity of the world – 2.1 Billionen Dollars a year - from the productive to the unproductive world - presumably to the Muslimcountries in particular - under the name of globalisation.

The most popular definition of what is a Globalist and who are the Globalists so far is: “the Globalist movement is an alliance based on self-interests of the private international financiers and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of Britain, Europe and America which over the years have intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that through lies and deception seeks to control everything and everyone. The Globalists seek to eliminate all countries so that they can centralize, reduce and standardize all economies, production and the processing of natural resources so that they can directly control, manipulate and influence the decisions we make to ensure they maintain their power, control, wealth and historical influence.”
The sustainability-world government will cut off mankind from nature and lock us up in mega-cities of skyscrapers, monitor and constantly brainwash people. This sustainability is a fundamental change in the way we think and act” and “requires a serious rethinking of the lifestyles in developed countries.”  The report praises especially “China as a good example.

The forces behind this world government intend to supplant the dollar with a world government. Furthermore, the future of humanity - the youth - must be taught about the alleged dangers of the theoretical man-made global warming. Children must also learn that the United Nations is needed to solve the alleged problem. The commitment to “sustainable development” must be integrated into educational curricula at all levels. “

According to Spanish experience with 25% unemployment, every new green job means the loss of 2.2 traditional jobs. Therefore the green globalists want to develop welfare programs to keep the rapidly increasing number of poor unemployed people in spirits. Not so funny would it be for the few who work and have to pay. After that, the green globalists can claim that life has improved as for other measures - happiness, perhaps, or sustainability.

The globalists are on the wrong way. Windmills and solar energy can only be a small fraction of the energy consumption needed by mankind. Reduction of energy use means poverty, strict austerity measures and revolutions. Growing vegetabile oil share for energy production reduces food production in a world with 1 billion hungry people. Against this backdrop, I think it’s irresponsible not to resort to the hydrogen fuel cell technology - for example developed by Air Liquide: Energy production from water, water being the only byproduct. But I guess the elitists´ oil companies are against it for pecuniary reasons.

This is done in secret, of course. Because the same forces have long had “our” politicians and media in their firm grip.

*

The Agenda 21 meeting next month in Rio de Janeiro (Agenda 21 + 20) is planned to be the UN´s final take over of the Communist green one world government, a dictatorial rule of mankind, which is to be moved into skyscrapers in megacities – banned from nature. I hope this coup d´état will fail – but in case of success it is a heretofore unseen enslavement of mankind. So, I shall publish articles on it in the near future, although I have already published several articles on the  Agenda 21 and here and  here and here and here. This article will be on the concept of sustainability, the basis of the Agenda 21. The Brundtland Report 1987 defined the concept: “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.

As a self-appointed leader of the New World Order, the EU is investing much prestige in its main program, the one world government. The EU and its globalist partners in the UN are to meet in Rio de Janeiro on June 20–22, 2012, to finish what Maurice Strong (left) /Edmund de Rothschild (right) started in Rio in 1992: A Green one world government to bring our money into the pockets of Rothschilds banks, in particular through  Rothschild´s Global environmental Facility – with representatives of 182 of world´s governments on its board. As part of the restructuring, the GEF was entrusted to become the financial mechanism for both the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.  The task of the GEF is to lend money to defaulting states which are unable to repay the money (from the world´s taxpayers and Rothschild´s central banks – printed out of thin air). So the GEF can then take the “wildernesses” of such countries as forfeited collaterals – with their mineral resources – 30% of the Earth, but increasing as the Agenda 21 depopulates farming areas to urbanize the world´s populations (= sustainability – further elaborated in Steven Rockefeller´s, Mikhail Gorbachev´s, Maurice Strong´s “Earth Charter”).

Wikipedia: The GEF partnership includes 10 agencies: the UN Development Programme; the UN Environment Programme; the World Bank; the UN Food and Agriculture Organization; the UN Industrial Development Organization; the African Development Bank; the Asian Development Bank; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; the Inter-American Development Bank; and the International Fund for Agricultural Development. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel provides technical and scientific advice on the GEF’s policies and projects.

The video above (from the 28:45 min. mark) shows Edmund de Rothschild making the concept of manmade global warming the biggest business fraud in history. 

Although 49 NASA former NASA astronauts, engineers and scientists protest against the hoax of manmade CO2 global warming it has no influence on Al Gore- and George Soros-paid James Hansen´s mendacious fairytales and here of manmade global warming emanating from NASA. James Hansen was called  the father of the fairy tale of manmade global warming launching this mad idea in 1988.– gangpressing US politicians into believing the scam.  However – Edmund de Rothschild launched this lucrative CO2–global warming idea already in 1987 at the 4. World Wilderness Congress and here – and let James Hansen be sponsored by his agent, George Soros, to spread what is today in serious scientific circles an obvious lie.

The Globalist Report:  Globalists themselves are the greatest threat to human civilization.  Every day, more and more people are affected in some way because of the Globalists and the Globalist agenda.

The most popular definition of what is a Globalist and who are the Globalists so far is “the Globalist movement is an alliance based on self-interests of the private international financiers and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of Britain, Europe and America which over the years have intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that through lies and deception seeks to control everything and everyone. The Globalists seek to eliminate all countries so that they can centralize, reduce and standardize all economies, production and the processing of natural resources so that they can directly control, manipulate and influence the decisions we make to ensure they maintain their power, control, wealth and historical influence.

The Globalist Report: The Globalists have officially infiltrated the Australian Government and have now admitted on record that they want Australia to lead the world to introduce global government and the new world order. Australian Globalist, Greens Party leader and unofficial leader of the Australian Labor Party, Senator Bob Brown, has been quoted as saying that the “world should be ruled by a new global parliament under the auspices of the United Nations”. Brown´s statement made such an outcry that he preferred to resign!

Globalists and Climate

MSNBC 23 April 2012: James Lovelock: ‘I made a mistake’. James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement with his “Gaia” theory of the Earth as a single, breathing organism, has admitted to being “alarmist” about climate change and says other environmental commentators, such as Al Gore, were too. “I was ‘alarmist’ about climate change & so was Gore! ‘The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago’ . Climate Shocker: In 2007, Lovelock Predicted Global Warming Doom: ‘Billions of us will die; few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in Arctic”.  “The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said. “The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time… it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising — carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that.”

The Gaia religion has infiltrated all World institutions more or less – even some churches. The Ark of Hope (right) is a Luciferian counterpiece to the Ark of the Covenant.

Fox news 20 April 2012:  The upcoming United Nations environmental conference on sustainable development will consider  a breathtaking array of carbon taxes, transfers of trillions of dollars from wealthy countries to poor ones, and new spending programs to guarantee that populations around the world are protected from the effects of the very programs the world organization wants to implement, according to stunning U.N. documents examined  by Fox News.

The main goal of the much-touted, Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, scheduled to be held in Brazil from June 20-23, and which Obama Administration officials have supported, is to make dramatic and enormously expensive changes, “a fundamental shift in the way we think and act.”

Agenda 21 + 20 means:

–More than $2.1 trillion a year in wealth transfers from rich countries to poorer ones, in the name of fostering “green infrastructure,”  “climate adaptation” and other “green economy” measures.

- Major global social spending programs, including a “social protection floor” and “social safety nets” for the world’s most vulnerable social groups  for reasons of “equity.”

–Even more social benefits for those displaced by the green economy revolution—including those put out of work in undesirable fossil fuel industries. The benefits, called “investments,”  would include “access to nutritious food, health services, education, training and retraining, and unemployment benefits.”

–A guarantee that if those sweeping benefits weren’t enough, more would be granted.
The whopping green “investment” list  barely scratches the surface of the mammoth exercise in global social engineering that is envisaged in the U.N. documents, prepared by the Geneva-based United Nations Environmental Management Group (UNEMG), a consortium of 36 U.N. agencies, development banks  and environmental bureaucracies, in advance of the Rio session.

The international social reorganization will be closely monitored by regulators and governments to maintain environmental “sustainability” and “human equity.” It will also require “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries.”  Among other countries, the report particularly lauds China as “a good example of combining investments and public policy incentives.

Along those lines, it says, national governments need to reorganize themselves to “collectively design fiscal and tax policies as well as policies on how to use the newly generated revenue”  from their levies. There,  “U.N. entities can help governments and others to find the most appropriate ways of phasing out harmful subsidies while combining that with the introduction of new incentive schemes to encourage positive steps forward.”

Right: Not the NWO pyramid in this sustainability logo – and the similarity with the logo of David Rockefeller´s and Brzezinski´s Trilateral Commission – the mission of which is world governance and here.

The global transformation agenda was laid out in a recently published report entitled “Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective.” The document — prepared by a group of more than 35 UN agencies and assorted international institutions under the banner of the UN “Environmental Management Group” (UNEMG) — explains the goals of the global body’s upcoming “sustainability” summit. The conference marks the 20th anniversary of the 1992 UN Earth Summit that adopted the highly controversial “Agenda 21.”
The following shows central words from the report

Necessary Investing in greening infrastructurein developing countries is estimated at USD1.0-1.5 trillion per year.

Satisfying demands of an urbanising global population for higher living standards. Good (UN) governance.The UN system and the multilateral development banks have an important role ..behavioural changes in production, consumption, and lifestyles…reorient consumption, investments, and other economic activities … phasing out of harmful subsidies, such as those on fossil fuels, fisheries, forestry, water use, land use, and agriculture.

Governments need to stimulate inter-ministerial collaboration … how to use the newly generated revenue. Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs), can foster global commitments and promote coordinated activities …..compliance mechanisms, including justice systems.

… strengthened integrated institutional framework and governance…. avoid the proliferation of national regulations and standards…international standards ……social innovation.

UN entities need to scale up support for education and training. UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) will become an internationally agreed statistical framework in 2012. Regional and sub-regional cooperation … UN Secretariat through the Regional Commissions provides a unique platform for regional dialogues and consensus building.

Carbon taxes or a cap-and-trade system on industrialized countries raising as much as 0.6% of their GDP…  innovative use of (IMF) Special Drawing Rights (SDR).  

Comment
According to the UN, poverty and “sustainable development” are linked. Therefore, the global body must ensure that welfare programs represent an integral part of the so-called “green” economy. Instead of traditional indicators of human progress and well-being the tremendous loss to be suffered around the world in material well-being can be camouflaged by claiming that life has improved using other measures – happiness, perhaps, or sustainability.
“Among other countries, the report particularly lauds China as “a good example of combining investments and public policy incentives.” This is an illustration of how deeply Rothschild´s agent,  corrupt  Maurice Strong (was bribed with 1 mio. dollars as a high UN official and had to flee to China, where is an adviser to the Chinese government) has influenced the UN with his masterpiece, the Agenda 21. The UN is as Communist as the originator of the green society hoax, the Club of Rome and here.
The UN is sick with yearning to govern the world – using the mendacious green agenda as a religious pretext.

Left: The two primary manmade global warming fraudsters, Rothschild Agent Maurice Strong and Al Gore

The sustainability government will make the future global population poor and give welfare programs as substitute for their lost jobs. From Spain, we know that for every new green job, 2.2 traditional jobs are lost – and i.a. therefore,  Spain has about 25% unemployed. Instead of material wellbeing, mankind will learn other values, viz. sustainability religion based on mendacious premises. For the core of future existence is fear – fear of being fried by nonexistent global warming – so that people will gladly be robbed by the elite who saves them from this non-existing evil. And children are to be brainwashed to believe this lie. Now even the guru of global warming scam – Gaia-religious James Lovelock, can see the global warming as a big lie. Even the Chairman of the UN IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, has declared “climate science” to just politically commissioned work – being unable to contradict the Climategate Scandal and here.

This is not only ridiculous. It is horrifying and reveals the true nature of the New World Order.

Sustainability is a camouflage for world government – and has no real meaning as of now. Wind mills , earth and sun energy can only cover a small fracture of mankind´s enrgy need. Reduction of energy consumption will mean poverty, austerity and revolutions. Growing vegetabile oil reduces food production in a world with 1 bn. hungry people. Against this backdrop, I find it irresponsible not to develop the hydrogen fuel technique – developed by Air Liquide. Energy taken from water having water as its only byproduct. However, I guess the elitist´s oil corporations are against it for the sake of gains.